Subjugation
109. I make clear that I will NOT be in subjugation to any sovereign, Monarch, Pope, Prime Minister, President or any Assembly of Traitors to themselves and those around them, that are now falsely describing themselves as the Representation of the abstract legal fiction of the People within the legal fiction of Corporate Government, or representative of such, so attempting to subvert the authority, the inalienable Rights of the individual defended through the reality of an entrusted, committed burden, duty and obligation of twenty three peer committee of plea system (assembly and deliberation in the constituting of fairness through tort remedy) in the right of only natural Law, and further I will not subjugate anyone in support of any Sovereign, Monarch, Pope, Prime Minister, President, or their Assembly of Traitors to themselves and those around them, this if becoming apparent, would be against both myself and all others who value the inalienable natural law established through the Court of Record in Equity; I will NOT compel any other free Liberated living man/woman in their proper tangible form to be subject to my beliefs against their own, whether my wife, child, relatives or any others, as I equally will NOT be compelled into any subjugation myself by another.
110. I make clear my inalienable Right as a autonomous individual, as such the subjugation of any and all living sovereigns in existence who impose subjugation upon others within this physical reality will not be supported, accepted or followed, further those who masquerade as sovereigns will be viewed with utter contempt and derision.
111. I make clear I will NOT recognise any authority or prerogative of any priesthood, clergy, Imam, Mufti, Mullah, Monk, Pope, Vicar, Bishop, Ayatollah, Rabbi, Pastor, Minister, Reverend, Muezzin, Guru, Sheik, Fakir, Sanyasi, Druid, Bonze, Santon, Abdal, Lama, Talapoin, Caloyeror, Judge, Magistrate, Justice of the Peace, Prime Minister, President, Politician, Senator, Congressmen, Mayor, Police Officer, Police Commissioner, Member of Parliament, or any other Religious Cleric of any denomination or Religion.
112. I make clear this Pure Contract Beyond the power of any legislation or fictions of law, now declared irrevocable, so will only be terminated upon my death, however nothing is so consonant with natural equity as that each thing should be dissolved by the same means as it was bound, and any wishing to dissolve this contract themselves are always free to do so through a lawful method. If I am accused of breaking the bond of this contract by encroaching upon any unfettered liberated living man/woman in their proper tangible form, the aggrieved party must seek reparation based upon Torts of remedy decided through peers (Peers as defined within this document, free of summary judgement, sovereign judgements, administrative judgements); if without dispute, as the thing speaks for itself, being an event that has occurred which, if the subject of litigation, would not require an onus of proof by the plaintiff (the complaining party) because of the obvious negligence of the accused, then remedy must be established equitably between the parties. If disputed, settlement established through a Court of Record in Equity in natural Law, without prejudice. Once a case has been finally decided upon by a natural law Court of Record in Equity the same parties cannot attempt to raise the issue by or during further proceedings, unless clear proof of conflicting evidence arises against the previously established facts. Peer verdicts can be based upon outlawry including forfeit of life in the event of murder at the discretion of the family wronged, (the murder has stolen the life of the victim, under the law the thief must return what was stolen in kind, as the law is substantive, so the life of the murderer, is in the hands of the friends and relatives of the victim, they can extinguish the life, they can maintain the life in captivity at their own exclusive cost, but they cannot release the life, as if another is murdered that victims kith and kin would have a lawful claim against the family who released the murderer; as any man/woman who spares the guilty punishes the innocent. Additionally the murderer’s holdings in full would be forfeit to the family of the victim/s in substantive settlement; if the resources required and demanded in remedy were beyond the resources of the convicted, then they would be secured through the contracted surety bonds, if a bond was held by the murderer. Holding captive a man/woman who represents a physical danger to another or the community within lawful confinement, this established not for the sake of punishment, but for their detention under guard, until remedy is established.
113. In the more atrocious crimes, the intent (or attempt) must be remedied even if the effect does not follow.
Murder
114. I make clear I will NOT kill another living man/woman in their proper tangible form or a ‘human being’, being the legal definition of a slave, or any creature in being that can reason, unless in self defence or in the establishment of remedy in the execution of a natural law committee plea jury convicted murderer.
115. Under natural law the wearing of a uniform, and acting under orders from another, does not remove culpability of the actions committed, murder is murder for both the issuers murderous commands and the performer of their execution, even if a man/woman kills one when they meant to kill another, they are held guilty of felony (any crime punishable by death or mutilation and forfeiture of lands and goods). Murder is the wilful killing of any creature in being that can reason, Murdrum is the killing in a secret manner, for the heinous act of Murder the law demands full reparation in remedy 'to put Right' in defence of the weak and in the immutable, inalienable right of natural Law. For every tangible man/woman it is lawful to repel force by force; but let it always be done with blameless defence, not to take revenge, but to repel injury.
116. If a tangible man or woman is placed outside of the law and the community, this is known as Outlawry. An outlaw is, as it were, put out of the protection of the law, for a felony amounting to conviction and attainder; meaning the consequence of judged remedy of the community is death or in the event of the physical absence of the guilty, outlawry for that felony, involving the loss of all civilised rights, and so the protection of the law.
Relationships
117. I make clear I will NOT abandon or kill my children out of fear of poverty, or from the shame of their actions, I will not hold them as chattel nor treat them with contempt.
118. I make clear I shall honour my parents for as long as they live, one of them or both of them, I shall not speak harshly to them nor mistreat them. If this is made impossible I will tolerate them at a distance in peace, remaining cordial.
119. It is the role of parents to support their children even when illegitimate until adulthood; a child who is born outside of lawful matrimony follows the condition of the mother. To fail in this duty would be an encroachment upon the child and so the peace maker (Rex) would stand champion for the child, and would demand remedy.
120. The union of man and woman derives from the law of nature. Consent in contract, and not coition (or sharing a bed), constitutes nuptials or marriage, and no one can consent before marriageable age. To have sexual relations with a child is an encroachment upon them, and would be remedied by the Court of Record in Equity in natural law, fulfilled through the peace makers championing the cause of the weak, and demanding remedy.
121. The father has the guardianship of his son/daughter in natural law, and this is inseparable and cannot be waived, a father's right to the custody of his own children being founded on his right of guardianship, meaning the care, protection and defence of that child, this honour being taken away if the opposite deed is demonstrated, when they may be severed from him, and put, by the authority of a lawful court in full community, in the custody of another, who could under the protection of the law provide true guardianship for them. If a child is wrongfully taken from a fit parent and given to some other adult, it is a form of human trafficking, and an abomination in the eyes of the law, only a natural law court, consisting of a full community of peers, being twenty three tangible men/women in jury, can determine the guardianship of a child, based upon clear torts and violations of the terms of guardianship, but without imposing undue restriction upon parental liberty and family autonomy.
122. It is not lawful to have two or more wives/husbands at one time, you break the contract of marriage established with the original wife/husbands, and the injured party/s can seek remedy from the Court of Record in Equity. Unless the ability to marry more spouses is explicitly asserted within the original contract of marriage, with any parameters included, if the agreement is in place it must apply to both parties, as all are equal, and all rights of contract must apply equally to all parties, so both the husband and the wife would have equal right to take a second spouse, with full disclosure to all concerned, meaning that any further spouse/s were fully aware of the original contract.
123. A child in the womb is considered born, whenever there is a question of a benefit to the child, so the law protects the child from formed fetus, and treats the life as full and mature, to terminate a life within the womb encroaches upon the child, additionally to intentionally poison, or damage the environment of the fetus encroaches on the child.
124. It is not just and proper that one who speaks ill, but truthfully of the torts (wrongful acts) of a man/woman should be condemned on that account; for it is fitting and expedient that the wrongdoings of bad men/women be known, however, any baseless claims against another are an encroachment upon them and remedy could be sort, as back biting and gossip based on fantasy is a serious encroachment upon the victim.
Theft
125. Theft is the handling of another’s property, with an intention of stealing, against the will of the proprietor, whose property it had been. The remedy is firstly, the item must be returned without damage, if damaged must be recompensed, if lost must be paid as a minimum of its value, and further to compensate the victim in time and trouble suffered from their actions, if they have no resource to do so they must labour until the debt is paid, secondly they can hold no position of authority or guardianship within the community, and cannot stand attestant, nor verify any contract for another, as they have proved themselves dishonest, this prohibition would remain until the consensus of the local community granted forgiveness through a prolonged change in conduct. Finally the friends and family of the thief must systematically confront the thief throughout a day, with every good thing they have ever done, relating how proud they have been of them in their good conduct within the community, however small that maybe, and demonstrate to the thief how valued and essentially good they truly are, so shaming them through the positive not the negative, showing them how they have let themselves down, this final method of reform can be applied to any wrong that would have reasonable benefits.
126. Surety of the peace, as remedy, preserves justice and consists in obligating those men/women whom there is probable ground to suspect of future misbehaviour, to stipulate with, and to give full assurance to, the community that such an offence as is apprehended shall not take place, by finding pledges or securities for keeping the peace, or for their good lawful behaviour.
127. Justice that truly prevents a crime is better than any which severely punishes it, in natural law, punishment is not recognised in and of itself, only remedy for the victim and protection for the community.
128. Whatever a man/woman will do under the fear of losing their life or limb will not be held binding upon them in law.
Impediments
129. I make clear that I DO NOT recognise any Right in law, created through the legal fictions of national borders, State regional jurisdiction, Sovereign ownership of land, corporate ownership of land or restrictions of movement through passport, visa or immigration placed upon any man/woman in their proper tangible form represented on their own behalf, or any human being held as a slave through the fictitious systems and confidence tricks placed upon them, as without doubt the entire Earth and all that's upon and within it, are Allodial by their very nature.
Allodial right of use
130. I make clear without reservation that all property without exception is utterly and completely owned by the Creator alone, no claim of ownership (control) through being a representative of a God, or being a God on earth is valid or recognised, absolutely; No fiction of legislation or any living man/woman in their proper tangible form has any Right to establish, or inherit any:
131. Trust - All Trusts are an unlawful contract, based upon a trinity of parties, from the original holder of estate or property, the title is conveyed to the legal instrument (the incorporeal entity or holy ghost), this is serviced by the administrator known as the trustee (Son) who cannot be the beneficiary of the trust, who is controlled by the grantor (Executor or Father) of the trust, those to benefit from the trust can be the grantor or a beneficiary, as any party acting as grantor (executor) can confer to a beneficiary. This is a way to allow a third party, the trustee, to act as administrator on behalf of the grantor, with the trustee having full powers to administrate the directions of the grantor (executor) but having no power to receive benefits themselves, in effect a trust is a contract based upon no trust between the parties contracting, so the estate or property is held within a legal fiction to prevent the trustee claiming it themselves.
132. Estate - is all interests in land held by a deceased person at death, or a body of men/women united or combined into one incorporeal body, to make a legal corps (dead body), known as corporation whose holdings are known as mortmain, 'the dead man’s hand'. All estate is ownership (control) of property by a corps (dead body). Under the natural law a dead man/woman cannot possess immovable property, in truth they can possess nothing, their dead, it immediately falls to their tangible living inheritor/s.
133. Property Title – the outward evidence of a right in the colour of law of tenancy.
134. Property Deed - a Deed in legislative policy is nothing more than the vestment (or clothing) of a gift, the bestower of a gift has the legal (not lawful) right to regulate its disposal) as tenant.
135. All in representation of tenancy, all created by legal deception, none of the representations of claim are of any value or worth, holding only the colour of law.
136. Ownership is an encroachment and a deception, and a right of action cannot arise out of deception, the buying and selling of land or the extant natural resources of the earth are never sanctioned, further selling the Right of use (i.e. renting) is against the right of only natural Law, you can only own what you, yourself create, so you can not own the land, or the resources of the land, you can only hold a right of use, and a right of use cannot demand the fruits of the labour of another for using what you did, or for what you are not using yourself.
137. No unfettered liberated tangible living man/woman has a right to own property beyond that property they themselves create, but has a inalienable right of use, based upon Stronger Right through use than any other tangible living man/woman, we have a right to custodianship only, as we arrive in this world with nothing, and we depart this world with nothing of material value except ourselves, this natural reality establishes allodial right of use as an immutable constant, we are the custodians of the fruits of the labours of the past and the furnishes of the labours of the present, holding a right to full possession of the fruits of our own labour.
138. For example: If I plant a field of watermelons, the watermelons are the bounty of the Creator, grown from the earth and out of the seed, and from the design of the Creator, but the physical labour you invested in the planting of the seed, the preparing of the land, the harvesting and marketing of the watermelons, is what you have honestly earned and deserve in reward of your labour, so when you sell the watermelon, the watermelon itself is free, as it is the bounty of the Creator, but the labour it took to reach its end user and consumer must be paid by the end user and consumer.
Animals have right
139. The above logic applies to all life. Therefore, animals need only one right: the right not to be property, animals are unable to enter into a social contract or make moral choices, and for that reason cannot be regarded as possessors of rights that can be defended or established by them independently.
140. Like the watermelon the animal is not owned, only the labour invested in the animal has value the animal is the property of the Creator, the right of the animal not to suffer from the hand of man is inalienable to all life, we have a duty of care.
141. To fail in that duty of care demands remedy, anyone can claim defence of the weak and hold accountable any who with malicious intention abuse life. This need not be defined as it is claimed by the plaintiff (complainer), and they must convince the Jury of twenty three peers of the truth of their claim against the abuser of life.
142. Allodial right of use is a situation where real property (land, buildings and fixtures) is held free and clear of any encumbrances, including liens, mortgages and tax obligations. Allodium title is inalienable, in that it cannot be taken by any operation of law for any reason whatsoever, (beyond the single intentional actions of manifesting long term damage to surrounding property.)
143. All land is Allodial, so the absolute property of their custodian and not subject to any service or acknowledgement to a superior, this concept denies the legal power of municipal (Municipal corporation is a foreign town corporation to which the freedom of the city of Rome was granted, and whose inhabitants had the privilege (right to steal) of enjoying offices and honours there grant by Rome. Municipal law is the law of the City of Rome.) and State governments to tax property, (if they were in existence) on the basis that allodium claim cannot be alienated by failure to pay those taxes, abide by their invented regulations or paying their imposed fees.
144. Allodium claim cannot be alienated by seizure by a creditor, as the claim of the foreclosure by the mortgagee is unlawful. However, by its nature, allodium claim cannot be mortgaged in the first place, and an attempt to create allodium claim on land that is subject to encumbrance by debt is impossible.
145. Although allodium claim cannot be lost, that also means that it cannot be transferred or encumbered without losing its allodial status. As such, when a property custodian, the Allodarii ,dies and leaves custodianship to more than one heir, the conceptual allodium claim status of the Allodarii is lost, this situation must be resolved as quickly as possible, so re-establishing the correct Allodium claim status, the property must be either divided, sold or agreement of the parties to settle and establish a single custodian. This process failing to be accomplished the claim reverts back to the community it exists within.
146. Allodium claim cannot be mortgaged (as is common in a usury system). Moreover, as liens cannot attach to allodium claim, if considered from the perspective of a usury system it is propagated that it would be difficult to finance improvements to any property held in allodium claim as, once linked to the single custodian, the improvements become part of the allodium claim and become exempt from lien or seizure of the property to pay a contractor's bill. The burden of responsibility to honour these debts, if established, is solely upon the custodian personally, the fruits generated from the property, personally by the custodian could be seized, as they represent the wealth, the labour invested within the produced goods from the property. However in the lawful system the surety bond services the confidence in the bond of the debtor.
147. Allodium claim cannot, in theory, lawfully be taken away against the will of the custodian. However, an allodarii custodian can contractually give up allodial custodianship and that allodial custodianship can be restored or sold (added value only) or passed on to a single heir. Allodium claim cannot be exchanged by deception, only by lawful contract. (For example you could not use your allodial property as a stake for a wager, just as much as the collateral for a loan.)
148. Allodial property cannot be owned by a corporation, being a group recognised as an individual by legislation, being a group colony of individuals, working in unity against the community for their own benefit. Only tangible men/women can hold allodial rights of use and custodianship under natural law.
149. All property is Allodial, property without a custodian is held in common use by the local community, and allotted to individuals when the men and women of the local community are asked to consent to new claims around them. Otherwise it remains open to all to enjoy, and for local community projects.
150. Land alone can have no saleable value, it can be given freely or exchanged for equal land in another location, but not sold, as it is in custody only, however the fixed labour invested in the land, labour integral that forms added worth, such as making the land arable, buildings, crops; seasonal or annual, like trees planted; all have value and can be sold with the transferred obligations of the custodianship of the land which attaches no cost.
151. If you irreparably damage the land, as its custodian, through contaminating it with poisons, damage its nature with cross species genetically modified crops, making it radioactive, any long term effects that detrimentally effect not just your allodial land, but the surrounding lands through intentional assault, breaks the covenant and so void the custodianship, and holds those responsible accountable for the cost and effort of rectifying the surrounding contamination. If the custodian damages their Allodium claim without affecting any surrounding land it is a crime between the custodian and the Creator, and all are always open to another championing the cause of the weak, if they damage life with malice and intention anyone can complain and seek remedy before the Court of Record in Equity. But any abuses would have a bearing on the local community allocating new allodial custodianship in any future applications, as it is those around a claim that sanction a claim.
152. Rights of dominion are transferred without title or delivery, registration or tenancy, simply recorded in affidavit contract with all parties holding local claim neighbouring the new area of the adjuration of use, a claim can only be held once claimed by positive prescription to wit, long and quiet possession and use; initially sanctioned by the local consent of men/women physically surrounding the claim, then held through use.
153. This allodium claim is achieved in the establishing of a lawful affidavit (after locating where you’d wish to exercise a right of use), consisting of the collection of signatures and thumb prints of twenty three independent tangible men and women who physically neighbour the claim, each witnessed, stating that, ‘they have no objection to your claim, and know of no tangible man or woman who holds a stronger prior claim of use’, the affidavit should be notarised by a natural law notary public (notary seal), those 23 then forming the second seal of a full community, and the third seal of signatures and thumb prints, this is then sent to any concerned parties as a affidavit, to the allow rebuttal of that claim. If within the UK to:
154. Public Trustee Malcolm Dawson,
Chief Land Registrar
Land Registry Croydon Office
Trafalgar House
1 Bedford Park
Croydon
CR0 2AQ
155. Public Trustee Kenneth Clarke, MP
Ministry of Justice
102 Petty France
Westminster
London
SW1H 9AJ
156. Public Trustee Vince Cable MP
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
1 Victoria Street
London SW1H 0ET
157. In Scotland:
The Keeper of the Registers of Scotland
Public Trustee Sheenagh Adams
Erskine House
68 Queen Street
Edinburgh
EH2 4NF
158. I make clear all physical land and Right to use property holdings I possess are liberated of the legal fiction of ownership(meaning control – a duplicate account), defined as being title separated and duplicated so held by different parties; which means, when you buy immovable property it is under the concept of 'Sharing gains' that are expected to be generated from that property, further the legal fiction of title of estate, a document that lays claim over the land in colour of title, is proper, only when no real title or claim of a tangible living man/woman to the land exists, therefore no claim of estate by any intangible form will be recognised as lawful.( The colour of law denotes the "mere semblance of legal right", the "pretence or appearance of" right); this removes all controlling claims of landlords, corporations and States to dominate land or resources, fully denying any consent to eminent domain. I hold all land and Right to use property as allodaril holder, as the Allodarii – the possessor of allodial land: allodial, meaning free from the control of any superior, held with no obligation to another, an unconditional right of use. Through Allodium claim, in contract, meaning, land held absolutely in one’s own right, not subject to any duties or burdens.
159. The Allodium claim establishing lawful custody, unfettered of any fiction of legislation or registration, as I hold land and Right to use property by the use of allodium claim in written contract verified in inauguration with a minimum of 23 neighbours around the local claim, as signed peers within the local community, defined as all who surround and are around the claimed property; as these men/women are the only lawful parties concerned, as No one should intermeddle with a thing that in no respect concerns them. So claims are granted by local consensus or under the right of which occupancy is done, or abandoned, claimed if there is no stronger claim. Likewise any alteration, improvements, or structures upon the land that encroach upon those around the claimed right of use, such as structures that dominate the views of neighbours, or activities that cause strong foul odours, like pig farming, or excessive noises, beyond what is reasonable, would require the consent of those around them (without prior consent would represent an encroachment upon another). Further to damage surrounding claims with complaint of environmental poisoning of groundwater or air, or any other form of encroachment from claimed use that are not speedily rectified, could forfeit all rights of claim to the land, established through arbitration of an entrusted, committed burden, duty and obligation of twenty three peer committee of plea system (assembly and deliberation in the constituting of fairness through tort remedy) in the right of only natural Law without prejudice. As No man/woman ought to lose their property without their own act or default, and no creditor can have any claim at all upon the immovable property of any debtor, and further cannot seize the movable property of a debtor that would in doing so preventing them earning a living, or having full provisions for their home, as only the surplus fruits of the labours of the debtor can be demanded, nothing more, the lawful creditor can claim payment through agreement of the debtors surety bondsmen, and the debtor can work to repay the surety.
160. In the sky above any claim all would have a right of way as long as they did not encroach upon those claims they passed over, through noise pollution, air pollution, falling objects or chemicals, etc., all these would represent encroachments. Noise for example would be reasonable acceptable levels; otherwise the noise of birds would prevent their free access, which would be unreasonable.
161. Rivers and ports are public, therefore the right of fishing there is common to all; roads are public, therefore the right to travel upon them is common to all, no tolls, licenses, taxes, or permissions are required; the use of riverbanks is by the law public (allodial right of use), like that of the stream itself. Water as air, are movable things and must of necessity continue common by the law of nature.
162. To build structures upon claim of land that represents a saleable value of your labour, at the point of sale must comply to the minimum safety standards of the local community, as to build an unsafe structure endangers the lives of others, even family or visitors, and through that logic would be an encroachment upon them (breaking natural law - the law of the land). No man is compelled to sell his own property, even for a just or overly generous price, only the labours invested upon the land have any saleable value, the land and its incumbent resources are always a free transfer of custodianship at the point of sale.
163. If I claim use of land and leave it deserted for a prolonged period, it may be claimed abandoned, and another makes use of it, if this new claim was later disputed, remedy could be established upon reasoned evidence of just cause to excuse it temporary desertion.
164. Under natural law each man/woman has a right of way, to pass across or over any allodium claim, both individual and communal, as long as they caused no damage or encroachment upon any other while doing so, a holder of allodium claim can establish set paths forming rights of way around crops or to allow privacy upon their land, which obliges others to remain upon the set rights of way created.
165. Once bonded, I am a bondsman, and am able to contract using my bond as guarantee, as a surety for any man/woman in their proper tangible form who contracts with me; if I hold twenty three contracts of bond, I would be fully bonded; or for example with a bond of 6, I would hold six contracts. This system demonstrates the confidence others show towards the man/woman they have contracted in bond with, as the bond is in surety, meaning each party in the contract of bond has made themselves responsible for the other, for the fulfilment of an obligation, the payment of a debt, the defence and protection of the other when in need, being a bondsman, one who stands surety by bond for the other in equal right.
166. I will avoid as far as is possible a private business contract with any tangible man/woman who has no bond of surety to support their ability to contract; as any who contract, must know, or ought to know, the quality of the man/woman with whom they contract, otherwise a plea offered in extenuation of a fault or for release from an obligation, or promise has no substance to enforce, so is not a secure contract. If it is not clear what was done (or agreed on), the consequence will be that we follow what is commonly done in place where the agreement was made.
167. The principle responsible for the debt should always be exhausted before resorting to the sureties. So if I have not the resources to meet my obligation at any point in time, my surety/s are required to fulfil these substantive demands, I must labour to reimburse all their costs, as resource and time permits, as No man ought to be burdened in consequence of another’s act. When two or more bondsmen are liable on a joint obligation, if one makes default the others must bear the whole.
168. I make clear that no man/woman in their proper tangible form represented on their own behalf once contracted independently within surety bond will be fore-judged, disinherited, disavowed or disowned from surety bond without due process in the right of only natural Law, other than in the case of signed and verified abjuration of a contract by both parties being the man/woman in their proper tangible form represented on their own behalf, themselves.
Oaths
169. I make clear I am unfettered of any promissory, assertory, corporal, supplementary, decisory, extrajudicial, purgatory, solemn or official oaths of loyalty to any Monarch, Corporation or Church authority, or any other oath that would surrenders or compromise my autonomous Rights, so preventing the discharging of this contract. If an oath has been sworn, then before commitment within this contract can be established the recording of an affidavit to any oath given to any beneficiary, would require a sworn pronouncement recanting, revoking, rescinding, and utterly denying the validity of the oath given between the oath giver and oath beneficiary under the basis of 'Not been done before'(a contract signed mistakenly as were the full facts and implications made plain within the contract, no one of sound mind would sign.), giving the beneficiary of the oath 40 days to respond, and a recorded confirmation affidavit then sent if amicable outcome has been established, through silence of reply or confirmation of acceptance.
170. If the affidavit is disputed, the beneficiary of the oath must present evidence of why, based upon reason and the constraints of natural law, they would hold the oath giver bound.
171. Every oath or affidavit ought to be founded on certain knowledge, great care must be demonstrated in their administration and execution, as a man’s/woman’s oath is their bond. An infamous (convicted perjurer or one convicted of a tort that betrays the truth/honesty) man/woman is prevented from taking an oath as a result of their actions, until the community consensus is content they have had a profound change in character, sanctioning their truthfulness. A foolish oath, though false, does not make perjury.
Trading
172. I make clear I will NOT work within any activity impacting in a negative way upon the community I exist within, or impacts negatively upon the environment that would break an allodium contract.
173. I make clear I will not be an employee or waged (Wages being the compensation agreed upon by a master to be paid to a servant) and I will not use employees within the concept of establishing a business, this being an encroachment through the inferior employee and superior employer business structure, as all men/women in sight of the law are created equal in dignity, privilege, benefit, nobility, value; and vary only in knowledge and skills. When the struggle of control between separate individuals is removed, created from the wish to live and prosper at the expense of others, so struggle is replaced by cooperation, and how that substitution results in the development of intellectual and moral faculties which secure to the species the best conditions for equity, prosperity and self development in a truly egalitarian structure.
174. I state clearly I am never performing the function of government; the rules of commerce within the Unified commercial code apply ONLY to the business of government, all statutes, act, charters and legislation governing commerce apply only to the government, any activity of business I perform has nothing to do with that body of regulation, I will not provide any government issued numbers or licenses, of national insurance or any other form, I will not function as an unpaid revenue collection agent for any corporate body or government agency.
175. This aspect of natural law prevents the form of trading known as a body of soldiers or as Company, defined as a body of (normally) Jewish servants bonded to a vassal of the Vatican under the rules of servants of the royal chamber and Usury. Also the form of trading known as Incorporated Company (permitting a group of individuals to work against the individual and community at large by using the pre-existing legal fiction of a Charter issued by a superior company to register (grant control) as a subsidiary). Further the form of trading known as a chartered company (the highest officially sanctioned paper granting exclusive rights to a body of men chained to the ring of the Papacy). All these forms of business are the granting from a superior to an inferior man, known as class society, which is by its very nature socially cannibalistic. It is organised so that some people can rob, exploit and "consume" the capacities and lives of others. Corporations, in their myriad forms, are for unlawful purposes, primarily to escape punishment for the crimes of the men/women using them, by placing the blame on a fictional organization, responsible to no one, and morally/ethically accountable to no one. Their sole purpose is to shirk responsibility. One who incorporates or even those who join a corporation are doing it for the purpose of avoiding individual responsibility for their own lives.
176. The dominant business model of corporations, now controlling the resources and people of the world through the application of the colour of law; practically it subverts the natural development of community, retards technology, and innovation of production, it restricts the sharing and dissemination of information, and stagnates the equitable evolution of the individual. The principles of honesty, fairness and sincerity are sacrificed to further the self-interests of the leadership, leading to actions based on hidden motives and deception.
177. Within the natural law cooperative business model there is no advantage in monopoly, so new ideas and improvements of existing concepts are openly shared, helping others involved in the same areas of business to improve and develop, which within the usury model would be seen as competitors and enemies, not allies and confederates as in the natural law cooperative business model; which improves the production of goods and services, with higher quality, lower costs, far superior safety for those investing their labours, and the solving of many other problems faced by those working to produce and create. The eight principles of business within the natural law:
178. 1 Shared Equity – 2 Written Contract – 3 Cooperative Assurance – 4 Repository Finance 5 – Surety Bond – 6 Education – 7 Apportioned Input, Apportioned Output 8 – Lawful Meritocracy 9 – Economy of Scale
Principle one.
Shared Equity
179. A shared equity collective/cooperative holds the value of a man/woman through gauging their skills and knowledge, not in the wealth they have amassed, as capital generates nothing; it is a device of exchange for labour. As long as we think ‘money’ is wealth, we hold wealth as an object of desire; but in reality as all things, pecuniary wealth is the stored energy of labour, we invest our labours to create wealth; ‘money’ is a device to steal that wealth.
180. In a collective model you invest individually into the collective and become a share holder, which is the group investment of wealth held within the collective; so as an example, on the merchant ships of old, shares were not equal, the captain of a merchant ship could hold 2 shares while an able seaman could hold 1 share, a first mate could hold 1 and three quarter share, this presents the concept. There is no contribution of labour from none shareholders under the concept of employees, or waged labour, as no man/woman can lawfully contract themselves into slavery.
181. The cooperative shares the wealth collected as a division of labour.
182. The amount of share given to an individual is not based at all on their ability to buy shares, only skill and knowledge, experience and effort input, have a bearing on share division; share consideration is established by the collective as a whole.
183. It may be argued that to be equitable all should receive the same share for the same time invested. For example, a 16 year old who has just entered the work force of the collective with no experience or skills should receive the same as a man with advanced technical skills and 20 years experience. They argue the 16 year olds enthusiasm is balanced by the complacency and jaded nature of the man with 20 years experience, a very generalised basis for establishing such inequity. The problem with flat rate payment is the 16 year old has no incentive to increase their technical abilities and responsibilities within the collective. They gain no benefit from working to increase their skills and knowledge, as they have achieved the full benefit of the collective while adding the least practical contribution. Conversely the man with advanced technical skills and knowledge and 20years experience would be justified in feeling resentment for gaining no advantage from the years of effort he has invested in gaining those skills and building his knowledge, he would feel betrayed even subconsciously by the collective for not recognising the benefits he conveys to the collective, and the greater ability to generate wealth he injects through his labours.
184. In the example below the final division of the month’s payment of the wealth to the collective is reflected by both the number of share held, and the number of hours labour, invested:
If 5 shares held in total represent the total assets of the group.
100 ounces of Silver collected in profit after costs paid for the month
Master Smith has worked 160 hours and holds 2 shares
Master Jones has worked 320 hours and holds 1.5 shares
Master Williams has worked 280 hours and holds 1 share
Apprentice Hill has worked 160 hours and holds 0.5 shares
So the division of the silver would be in hours paid:
Master Smith 160 X 2 (Shares) = 320 hours paid
Master Jones 320 X 1.5 (Shares) = 480 hours paid
Master Williams 280 X 1 (Share) = 280 hours paid
Apprentice Hill 160 X 0.5 (Shares) = 80 hours paid
Total number of parts = 1160 of hours paid
100 ounces of silver divided by 1160 = 0.086
Master Smith 320 X 0.086 = 27.6 ounces of silver
Master Jones 480 X 0.086 = 41.4 ounces of silver
Master Williams 280 X 0.086 = 24.1 ounces of silver
Apprentice Hill 80 X 0.086 = 6.9 ounces of silver
185. If you need more labour, new members must buy a share within the combined total invested by the group, so if for example 5 shares have been paid in, with a total value of 50,000 ounces of silver then a new member would need to pay 10,000 to buy a share, the collective could of course allow a new member to work off their required investment over time, interest free, taking say 10% off their earnings, until they had paid off their share. The new capital can be paid back to the original investors reducing the value of each share to 8333 ounces of silver, or it can be used to invest further into the business, retaining the original value of 10,000 oz.
186. If a member wished to leave they could sell their share to a new member, but this money would belong to the investor leaving the cooperative not to any other members, as the member leaving would be recovering their share; therefore if a member died the share would be passed on in their will to whomever they choose. The collective does not need to accept a new member if they feel they are unsuitable, they can find a suitable replacement themselves or pay the share collectively.
187. The medium of exchange can vary.
Principle two.
Written Contract
188. A man/woman who forgets the social objectives of their cooperative betrays it, whether consciously or subconsciously. In true cooperative business everyone is fully capable of carrying out their work; they can rely on their colleagues at all times and are always prepared to make efforts for the common good.
189. The basis of a collective is a written contract between the men/women within that collective, all must be a party to the contract individually, they are not contracting with a fiction of abstract invention, but to each other.
190. If a member of the collective is proved to intentionally deceive the group or any member of the group, within the spirit of the contract, the collective would have to decide on the course of action they required. If dispute to the collective ‘will’ and the accused arose, the Court of Record in Equity would arbitrate any dispute to remedy within natural law. In the case of theft, the minimum remedy would be to repay twice what was stolen, the maximum remedy to exclude the member of the collective and forfeit his share, if this was still not enough to cause remedy, the member would be required to repay the theft from their personal wealth and if this was not enough from the surety bond they hold to satisfy the remedy. For this reason it would always be better to hold your personal surety bonds with men and women that were not within the collective if possible.
191. Theft is not the only wrongful act that could cause remedy and all acts that encroach upon another man/woman or their property would be a breach of contract, under that logic; always every member of the cooperative collective would be bound individually to stay within the bounds of natural law.
192. Another way to support the expansion of a small collective is through the contracting out of component parts or services through Piece work, done without support of the contracting party to provide materials, equipment or premises, supplied by the piece and paid for at a set rate per unit, equitably agreed with full value given in exchange, through lawful contract.
Principle three.
Cooperative Assurance
193. Based upon contract, the Assurer gives insurance to the Assured, against loss or perils. This principle can be applied for the benefit of any individual or business in some form, and is based upon collective risk for an individual’s protection.
Example one. Car Insurance
194. Men/women wishing to insure the car choose to join a collective of assurance; let us say a 1000 local people join, each of them paying 20 ounces of silver, you could alter the amounts based on the value of the car or the track record of the driver, but for simplicity we'll say they pay the same, that's a total of 20,000 ounces.
195. On average there are 72 claims per 1000 per year, let say for simplicity that’s 100 claims.
196. If each claim cost on average 40 ounces of silver, in a year 4000 ounces of silver would be used on claims, leaving 16000 ounces of silver.
197. Each member would after a year retain 16 ounces of silver if administration cost 1 ounce of silver that leaves 15 ounces so the second years assurance cost for the collective would be 5 ounces of silver. If the individual terminates their contract at any point they would be repaid the unused portion of their original bond of assurance, so at the end of the contracted year they would recover 15 ounces of silver.
Example two – Medical Care:
198. This principle of assurance can be used in many applications, even to establish medical assurance.
199. Men/women wishing to assure medical care, join a collective, each pays a bond, let say 50 ounces of silver, say 1000 people are within the collective, that’s 50,000 ounces of silver.
200. The cost of constructing a building and fitting it out with equipment as a hospital may cost 100,000 ounces of silver, the excess is taken from the repository principle, as explained below.
201. The cost of running the hospital in payment for the doctor, other staff, and consumables would vary, but let’s say 12,000 ounces of silver, and the cost of infrastructure 3,000 ounces of silver, this leaves 35 ounces of silver to be carried over for each assured individual, so the second years cost would be 15 ounces of silver to remain assured.
202. The 3000 ounces of silver allocated for infrastructure and new equipment, would initially repay the principle borrowed from the repository, so in less than 17 years the loan would be repaid, if no requirements arose to divert those resources, which would slow the repayments.
203. The more men/women within the collective the greater the resources available for their medical care, and if any man/woman wished to leave the collective they would be given back their bond, in this example 35 ounces of silver, which they could use in a new location for medical care, or for the services of a competing collective of medical care, or have no assurance.
Principle four.
Repository finance
204. A repository is a place where things are deposited, you cannot gain interest in increased accumulation within this structure, only a store of safety, if you wish to escape the inflation of fiat money, the interest of the usury banking system, and the fees and charges invented to cheat you of your resources, the repository model is the answer.
205. Let us say for example 1000 people place their savings in the repository, on average they save £2000 each, so a total of £2,000,000.
206. The repository buys pure silver for example with the funds from any silver mine, which at the moment is around £25 per ounce, so a total of 80,000 ounces, or 2272kg of pure silver.
207. The depositor has the option of having their silver minted into coins, a service which would fund the repository workers, say the cost of minting a coin is a 10th of an ounce of silver for quarter ounce coins for example, each investor has 80 oz of silver so it would cost around 8 oz of silver to have that minted, leaving each investor with 288 quarter ounce coins, leaving the repository workers with 8 oz of silver. If you choose a bigger denomination of coin the cost of minting would be reduced, for one ounce coins the minting cost maybe only a 20th of an ounce of silver.
208. The cost of setting up the repository and equipment to mint coins would be taken from the investors savings, say it cost 1,000 ounces of silver, the administrator running the repository would repay the loan through earnings giving a percentage of their labour back to the investors until the loan is repaid. Of course any individual can mint coins, under the prerequisites, of a community agreed, set thickness, shape and purity, this makes it simple to establish a pure coin from a impure coin, as if a coin is placed in a holder of a universal size it should weigh an exact amount in a pure metal, as contamination would change the weight.
209. Any commodity could be used of a store of labour intrinsically, copper, zinc, tin, whatever you wished to use as a store of physical labour, the coins of silver are more a method of account and external exchange than a requirement within a lawful community, as the true exchange is the only generator of wealth, being physical tangible human labour. The money has to be intrinsic; in an advance of labour the labour is still intrinsic, because the surety guarantee the store, as they will if demanded, provide the labour themselves.
210. This method establishes equity, as the repository takes in any fiat money in exchange for pure silver (or another store of labour), they would be exchanging something with perceived value for something with intrinsic value, so ridding all involved of the worthless fiat paper money deception.
211. If a fiat currency is made representative, known as gold backed, then it should be exchanged upon receipt for the metal it represents in tangible form, this prevents the perpetuation of further deceptions.
212. The repository functions as a human labour exchange, based upon surety bond, in an accounting system:
213. Every advancement of physical labour loaned is for an individual, it must be the tangible man/woman who takes responsibility for the loan directly, not an invented entity to escape liability, so the cooperative can borrow nothing, only the members of the cooperative.
214. The sanctioning of any loan must be established, not with the administrator of the repository directly, but with the (bondsmen) surety bond of the individual who requires the loan, as it is the surety bond that guarantees the payment of the advancement of labour, if for whatever reason the loan is defaulted or dishonoured. So the contract is with the surety bondsmen not a risk for the repository directly in the sanctioning of the loan. The contract of ‘an advancement of labour’ is between the community, surety bondsmen and the individual receiving the loan.
215. When the repository credits the advancement of labour, which is represented in this example by silver coins, as a credit into the account of the one seeking the loan contract, the repository needs no silver to honour the loan, as it is guaranteed in surety.
216. A minimum of twenty three men/women must be custodians of the repository to maintain oversight and establish open and balanced accounts for public scrutiny, these men/women acting in community spirit, without fee or payment.
217. Within this system the account need not have full representation of physical silver, as in general only 5% of silver coins are required of stored silver for use, 95% remains in constant storage, to run a human labour repository exchange, the silver is used only as a method of account, the labour is the true exchange, so the stored 95% of silver is used to allow the circulation of exchange, without a need for interest and only the initial cost of contract administration.
Principle five.
Surety Bond
218. A surety bond is a contract between a flesh and bone man/woman and another flesh and bone man/woman, for each to stand surety for the other, so for example if a committee plea of peers determines you encroached upon another and the remedy is to pay the man/woman more than you have, the short fall must be paid by your surety bond members.
219. Likewise within the confines of the collective business contract, each contracted member must stand surety for every other party of the contract, and collectively all parties contracted in surety to a man/woman making, substantive claim for the surety to stand the cost in remedy of any act that encroaches upon another man/woman, through any action of a business interaction or breach of their cooperative business contracts. This is a separate surety to the personal contracts of surety each bondsman holds, and differs in that the claiming bondsman need only repay the surety if the claim is a result of that man/woman’s direct negligence, deception or incompetence, otherwise the cost is a shared one by the members of the collective cooperative.
220. A plaintiff (complainer) can demand remedy from the cooperative business as a collective naming the cooperative in so doing naming all members directly, this would bring in the personal surety of each member if they failed to have sufficient means to settle any lawful claim through the resources of the collective group within the cooperative.
Principle six.
Education
221. Accurate and practical education, of applied knowledge and skills is the corner stone of any business, the monopoly and control of the free dissemination of education is its stagnation. All cooperatives should actively engage in the sharing of new ideas, technologies, and skills with others held within a contract of natural law.
222. The experts in any field of study are always those who apply knowledge practically, this is why the best method has always been the apprenticeship as a means of educating someone in all aspects of their chosen trade. If you have a short term selfish view simply to create a business vehicle for speculation which will provide a tidy sum after a few years of work, as is the perception of the usury business, then investing in education would seem a selfless act of unnecessary expenditure, but if your objective is to establish a stable business of justice for both those involved and those patronising it, and well being as a principle of conduct for all connected, which will be enhanced and strengthened as it passes to future generations, then education and the advancement of knowledge is a founding concern.
Principle seven.
Apportioned input, apportioned output
223. The collective does not need to work together directly, for example one group may cast components, another may assemble all parts, another may install finished products, and another may provide transportation, all dependent upon the business practiced. The share must always be the value invested not a fantasy of value invented to make another rich without effort.
224. So for example if you had a cooperative supermarket:
225. A supermarket as a combined undertaking; the local suppliers of the goods, supply the goods; those who provide the transportation of goods, transport the goods; and supermarket workers sell the goods.
226. Each man or woman involved supplies their labour as part of a collective effort, and this is reflected within the price of the goods.
227. So if a food producer supplies 200 watermelons, and the customer pays a 10th of an ounce of silver for one watermelon, when all the watermelons have been sold they would have collected 20 ounces of silver.
228. The food producer has provided the largest contribution, and may have invested 3 ounces of silver in materials and equipment, and 9 ounces of silver in labour, so would receive 12 ounces of silver as their share.
229. The transporter of the produce may have spent 2 ounce of silver in fuel and equipment costs, and 1 ounce in labour, so would receive 3 ounces of silver as their share.
230. The supermarket workers may have spent 2 ounces of silver in material and equipment costs, and 2 ounces in labour, so would receive 4 ounces of silver.
231. The cost of the supermarket construction and maintenance would be a shared investment; all parties would have joined together at the outset and funded the cost through a shared investment and the repository loan principle. The remaining silver in this example of 1 ounce of silver would be paid to the repository in settlement of the loan, without any interest or fees.
232. Once the loan was repaid the cost of goods could either be reduced or the community could agree to contribute that surplus above the cost of goods to the services of the community at the checkout, or gain their discount.
233. The Supermarket would be owned by both the people of the community under allodial right of use, with no right of control beyond the cooperative workers having the right only to transfer custodianship of the allodial community portion and not to sell that portion of the supermarket, because the patrons have paid over time the original loan from the slight increase in cost of goods.
234. The cost of maintenance and all over heads accounted for within the cost of goods.
235. Alternatively the cooperative could invest the remaining part of the 1 ounce of profit in new infrastructure or research and development of new products or services. Or those holding shares in the cooperative wishing to increase the value of their shares, by investing their earnings themselves, if all were in agreement to do so, would be another option, the danger of holding too greater value in shares makes it harder for new members to join the cooperative, and this should be balanced and considered, another option is altruistic donation from the members working in the cooperative.
Principle eight.
Lawful Meritocracy
236. Within a cooperative the mandate established by the Rochdale pioneers of 1844 of democracy, is misrepresented, and not lawful, what is labelled democracy is in general representative elective control, this is not democracy, and most certainly not democratic. You cannot force the minority to suffer the will of the majority, further you cannot allow the majority to impose a dictator upon the decisions of the cooperative through representation.
237. In a system of democratic voting of a representative hierarchical structure the people most affected by any decision are predominantly excluded from voting, and the disconnection this establishes prevents voting even for those acting as representatives from having any truly informed outcome, as in general the voters are locked out of the appraisal of the full facts, making them unqualified, ignorant or ill-informed to be able to vote effectively, even in the limited capacity representative elections afford.
238. Democracy as defined in the concept of majority rule, imposing their will upon the minority, could never be achieved from election of representatives acting dictatorially, the imposition of democracy is in addition not lawful, as no other can impose their will even if a majority, that encroaches upon the rights of another individual.
239. "Reason obeys itself; Ignorance submits to what is dictated to it." - Thomas Paine
240. In a lawful system the same principle as is held in a lawful court must be applied, the members of the cooperative must form a jury and all the facts must be presented and considered, at the conclusion of the articulation of reasoning and conclusion each member must vote; it must always remain one man/woman one vote, without reference to shares held or time served. The consensus of every member of the collective must be gained, if there is dispute upon the best course the cooperative should establish, then the parties in dispute must present their evidence, and reasoned conclusions to the group for deliberation, and the group form a unanimous consensus as to which has the best reasoned argument and conclusion, to act in unity. To act in majority rule can make some resentful, and can make them work against the purpose and objectives the majority have imposed, so proving the minority view correct at the expense of the cooperative, as a self fulfilling prophecy .
241. This method of careful deliberation is time consuming and exhaustive and is only required for major decisions, while the experience and knowledge of those within their own specialty act through merit. All cooperative decisions must always remain within the confines of natural law, and up hold the duty of care incumbent upon every individual.
242. Within decision making of a cooperative business the establishment of any major determination must be established in a lawful manner, just as within a court the members of the cooperative sitting as if a jury must establish agreement, in a modern court 10 to 2 must agree for a verdict to stand, in a lawful court 22 to 1, any more dissent and it is a hung jury. The rationale for majority verdicts, as opposed to unanimous verdicts involves so-called 'rogue jurors' who unreasonably impede the unanimous agreement.
243. A hung jury or deadlocked jury is a jury that cannot, by the required voting threshold, agree upon a verdict after an extended period of deliberation and is unable to change its votes due to severe differences of opinion.
244. The jury must try to reach a unanimous verdict, the review of the information available, the evidence in support or denigration, the consideration of all members views wishing to be heard, are placed before all and using the trivium, a reasoned conclusion is established, and confirmed through the members voting until unanimous.
245. The dominant aspect is always skill and knowledge guiding the collective decisions, for example if a man has spent twenty years in logistics for transportation, he should knows all there is to know on every attribute of that job, if the collective need to decide on the best course of action within that aspect of the business, that wealth of experience would be utilised and the collective decision would reflect the guidance of that experience.
Economy of Scale
246. The common advantage seen from economy of scale is in bulk buying of materials, goods or services, so gaining a better purchase price per item and reduction in delivery costs per item or kilogram.
247. The advantage of economy of scale can be seen also in mass production, as a machine set to manufacture a single component can often supply the needs for that single component of an entire region. The disadvantage of that is in monopoly, which means if production is stopped for whatever reason the product cannot be supplied, and can also mean consumers are open to the exploitation of unduly high prices within the monopoly of a single supplier.
248. The cooperative should source its materials, goods and services from other cooperative groups, based within natural law, free of taxation, corporate policy and regulation, as much as possible, through this mutual cooperation they can easily match the economy of scale the corporation have established through their method of establishing money, resource and labour monopolies, so allowing them to dominate markets free of competition. In contrast the cooperative expands by creating competition, as in new participants in the same field of endeavour, as a nature consequence of their own success.
249. When a cooperative grows, it is always in danger from becoming too large to function efficiently, when the number of members within a cooperative reach 12 it has a natural proclivity to divide, harmony is not maintained efficiently beyond that economy of scale, this demands, just as it does in nature when a cell grows beyond its limits, that it divide into two cells, when a pack of animals grows too large to function effectively, it divides, when community of men and women grows too large it divides into two communities, this division generates diversity, innovation and allows the cooperative to remain a true community. Cooperatives begin to manifest internal stress between members as it grows over 7 members, this means a cooperative should begin to reorganise when the membership grows to between 7 and 12 members, and divide into two groups of 6 when they reach the threshold. The new groups should have self autonomy and be fully independent of the original cell, in this way the group can either expand into a new location or divide the task into specialisations.
Business
250. I make clear I will make no account of my private or business financial transaction available for the scrutiny of any other outside of a covenant of lawful contract within the confines of a cooperative between tangible men/women, whether demanded by an individual or a group of individuals dressing themselves up in the colour of law, as I am not accountable to them, being a autonomous unfettered liberated living man/woman in my proper tangible form represented on my own behalf, only constrained through the right and obligation of natural Law.
251. I make clear I will not recognise the validity of contracts, invoices, or licenses issued by any association of individuals known as Mortmain or the dead man's hand, functioning under the legal fiction known as corporation, including state corporation, but only recognise unfettered liberated living man/woman in their proper tangible form represented on their own behalf, within valid contracts and valid invoices. All legislated fictional rights of the legal fiction of corporation (Incorporated Company - Chartered Company) are a criminal encroachment upon every tangible man/woman, as such directly against Natural law and courts of Equity, which only recognises living man/woman in their proper tangible form as a party to lawful contract, and never recognising any abstract fictions of legislation as having any lawful claim, rights or contract.
252. I have an inalienable right to carry on any private business without permissions, licenses, registration, taxations of any contrivance, royalties or copyright payments, all of which are an encroachment upon me, as under the law all men/women are created equal, so no intangible superior can grant me anything as a privilege, that I do not already have a full right to.
253. I make clear I will NOT practice Usury (Riba), meaning the theft of the fruits of the labour of another; or intentionally trade with any free liberated living man/woman in their proper tangible form who is sustained through its practice, this activity being against the inalienable natural law. If services and goods are not available, yet required, then I would be forced, to grudgingly use the services of legal fictions to obtain goods, with no alternative being available in the short term, making efforts in community to remedy that situation through the establishment of cooperative alternatives, as communities develop.
254. Usury further (defined throughout the contract as: the theft of the fruits of the labour of another) holds men/women as economic slaves through the fictions of legislation, however they have within natural Law a right, not to be defrauded, exploited, deceived, or enslaved through debt; through the deception of creating fiat money from nothing, within corporate monopoly and imposing interest upon every fiat certificate of debt printed, the demand of interest creates inflation, as to service the interest on the debt certificates twice the amount of debt certificates has to borrowed into circulation every ten years, which steals the value of saved fiat money, conspire to hide the true facts, so misinformed in order to exchanged fiat paper for physical labours; so draining the resources and labour from the population for criminal advantage, and would upon a thing adjudged by peer committee plea, result as a matter of fact arise the right to compensate all, so would require the extraction of full substantive reparation from the resources of each individual employed within all criminal acts that defraud through legislation, fiat money and usury, that encroach upon others.
255. No man/woman ought to enrich themselves at the expense of (meaning to the detriment of) others.
Taxation
256. I make clear I will NOT be compelled to pay ANY form of Taxation, any payment of duty, or imposed obligation, any accountability to any legal fiction of Corporate Government, Government, Monarch, State or abstract legal fiction of nation, people or country, as all these stand against the natural Law being an encroachment upon any tangible man/woman. All governments are private for profit companies, for example: The house of Lords Company No. 05973794; The House of Commons is a commercial for-profit company (number UC2279443); The Labour Party is a commercial company which trades under the name of “Allister Darling MP” Labour Party Nominees Limited Company No. 00966540 - Labour Party Properties Limited Company No. 00964628; The House of Lords which is the highest court in the land is a private company; the United Kingdom Corporation Ltd. formerly known as the “United Kingdom plc” and which never file its financial records; the Ministry of Justice D-U-N-S Number 22-549-8526; The Bank of England Company (Royal Charter) RC000042; etc.
Copyright
257. I will not recognise the legal fiction of Copyright, being the control and monopoly of intellectual ‘property’, used to extort revenue (taxation) upon the application of the idea or design of the copyright holder, further imposing regulations upon another who uses the copyrighted goods, services or ideas, so dictating what someone can or cannot do with their own real ‘property’. These two types of "properties", tangible property and intangible property are mutually inconsistent, if you trade property in natural law you give full and complete possession over to the buyer, but in the fictional world of copyright, you sell your goods and services and wish to be paid by everyone who uses the same idea, by holding a state granted criminal monopoly privilege (privilege means- a right to steal). In reality intellectual property is something you can trade, but not something you can rent out, in the case of copyright they demand rent on something they have sold, but we can only own what we ourselves create, and therefore all forms of rental are definitely usurious, since it is equivalent to selling your property but still demanding you own it, selling anything is transferring a right of use, in doing so you concede all rights upon it.
Property
258. I make clear all my physical assets now in existence, and all new assets that may exist physically in the future are unfettered liberated of probate, upon my death all my physical assets remain within the constraints of this Pure Contract, Beyond the power of any legislation or fictions of law. Within the constraints of allodial rights of use all assets are to be distributed as stipulated through my documented living proclamation (wishes of inheritance of my right of use) unfettered and liberated of legislation.
259. I make clear every ‘will’ is consummated by death, that every living will of the man/woman written in covenant becomes testament upon death, if lawfully verified and recorded, must be honoured upon death, all lawful claims from tangible men/women upon them satisfied what remains must be free of taxation, duties or commissions, and distributed as willed by the benefactor to all beneficiaries.
Defence
260. I make clear I will NOT interfere with the beliefs of another, religious, scientific, political or philosophical that do not prevent or create problems to hinder the execution of this contract, do not create an encroachment upon me, or impose unlawful constraints, demands or control against me.
261. I make clear I will stand united with all living man/woman in their proper tangible form represented on my own behalf, to establish this community contract; an unprovoked attack on one living man/woman in their proper tangible form, is an attack on every bonded committed tangible living man/woman, and a call to stand united in defence, support and protection.
Community
262. I make clear I will help to establish and maintain a 'mutually recognised space' for the local community, and support the building of an allodial polycentric society locally, free from the deception of representation, sovereignty, or monarchy, where each free Liberated living man/woman in their proper tangible form represented on their own behalf may live within a fertile environment, freely holding allodium claim as the holding of the Earth is only through right of use, 'by mutually recognised space' within a Verified contract locally, by community consent. (A community cannot be strangers to each other; therefore as a community grows it would be beneficial to divide naturally, ideally keeping its size below 3000 members, this of course is only advice.)
263. I make clear I will actively take part in the polycentric community, making my views and opinion heard and considered if relevant or helpful within local community debate and decisions.
Assurance
264. The law assists those that are vigilant with their rights, and not those that sleep thereupon.
( Vigilantibus Et Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt)
265. May the One Creator of all realities, who neither is, nor (ever) shall be a deity or a God for worship and adoration, with Mercy, Defend the Rectus & May those who now or in the future hold any living tangible flesh and blood man or woman in an Unlawful Capacity be brought to swift and compelling account.
266. May the One Creator of all realities, who neither is, nor (ever) shall be a deity or a God for worship and adoration, with Mercy, Defend the Right & May those who now or in the future hold any man/woman in their proper tangible form represented on one's own behalf in an Unlawful Capacity be brought to swift and compelling account.
267. Your signature is the last you thing you put on a contract, when you pick up your pen from the signed contract it is consummated, you have given up your
right to change the contract.
268. I, distinguished as (No fiction of title before the wet signature in red ink, NOT in full capitals.) make this contract currency through my signature.
269. Proof of the attestation is evidence by the sealing with my thumb print and delivery of the seal of my oath
Thumb Print in red ink.
270. All honourable Signatories, signing on this date, both as a representative number of the community to vouchsafe the contractee, and as verification of truth of this contract by Deed, to the Declaration of this Principle Pure Contract, Beyond the power of any legislation or fictions of law:
First Signatory
I, distinguished as (Printed Name followed by Signature - No title/fiction before the wet signature in red ink, NOT in full capitalisation) make this contract currency through my signature.
Proof of the verification and bond of this contract is evidence by the sealing with my thumb print, which is delivery of the seal of my oath
Thumb print here
Second Signatory
I, distinguished as (Printed Name followed by Signature - No title/fiction before the wet signature in red ink, NOT in full capitalisation) make this contract currency through my signature.
Proof of the verification and bond of this contract is evidence by the sealing with my thumb print, which is delivery of the seal of my oath
Thumb print here
Third Signatory
I, distinguished as (Printed Name followed by Signature - No title/fiction before the wet signature in red ink, NOT in full capitalisation) make this contract currency through my signature.
Proof of the verification and bond of this contract is evidence by the sealing with my thumb print, which is delivery of the seal of my oath
Thumb print here
Continued to twenty three….
The whole community now in seal is greater than the sum of those seals, what are here twenty three seals combined in one voice, invokes the great seal of the community.
If anyone wishes to challenge any statement within this affidavit of contract, it is given to all parties who presume authority for their consent or rebuttal, Silence is agreement, by not replying to this notice you agree to my terms and statements of fact.
World
politics today is governed by the Vatican, but also by the Crown Empire. The modern
world of so-called Western Civilization began at the end of the 17th century
with the blossoming of the British Empire. That empire actually began several
hundred years earlier with the establishment of the City of London, which is
now an 800-year corporation that controls finance from an entity called ‘The
Crown’. This entity is the creator and controller of the Bank of England, the
US Federal Reserve, the World Bank (IMF – International Monetary Fund), The
European Union, and various cartels and corporations across the earth.
Barack Obama is the current CEO of the USA Corporation and the
gold-fringed flags in the background stand for "ruled from abroad."
