Corporations Masquerading as Government in Australia and
World Wide
The
Great Seal of the United Kingdom, atop the Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act 1900 - and
The Great Seal of Australia, a trademark registered with United States Patent and Trademark Office.
The Great Seal of Australia, a trademark registered with United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Which represents real (de jure) government in Australia?
Which is seen on “government” literature ?
Would
you be surprised to find a company with the same name as your country
registered with the Security
and Exchange Commission (SEC) in Washington DC? Well, guess what?!
Among those listed as corporate entities by the United States SEC are Israel, Turkey,
Italy,
Hungary,
Sweden,
Finland,
Argentina,
Colombia,
Brazil,
The
Philippines, South
Korea, Japan,
Jamaica,
South
Africa, Canada,
Australia…
and my personal favourite (and I quote) “Her
Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Alberta as represented by Alberta
Investment Management Corp.”
Interesting!
So what could all this mean? For the purpose of this article we will follow the
example of Australia.
Australia…. the lucky country?
- SEC Entity Name: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
- SEC Central Index Key (CIK): 0000805157
- SEC Standard Industrial Code (SIC): 8880 (UNKNOWN)
- SEC Business Address: 1601 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW WASHINGTON DC 20036
- Fiscal Year End: 0630
Well,
that certainly raises some questions!
By
definition, aren’t corporate and government entities mutually exclusive? And
doesn’t government regulate companies?
Why
would Australia be registered with the SEC in the United States? And why would
it provide a ‘Prospectus’ and annual ‘Economic and Fiscal Outlook’ documents to
the SEC? And be subject to SEC regulation?
Why
is the Great
Seal of Australia a trademark registered with United States Patent and Trademark Office?
Could
the ‘Australian Government’ be a corporate entity masquerading as real government,
for profit, and not for the purpose of governance? Does the ‘Australian
Government’ truly represent “the people” and not shareholders in another
country?
Why
do today’s government departments have corporate mission statements like “we
provide services on
BEHALF of government” and “our CLIENTS include
government…”?
What
happened to “we ARE
government”?? Does this suggest they are NOT true government, but a company
masquerading as government?
If
a company registered in Washington DC is falsely claiming government status in
Australia, what happened to the real (de jure) government with a similar name?
And when?
And
are the laws in Australia therefore just rules for employees and contractors of
the corporation?
Interesting. Let’s look a little closer…
Perhaps
it is a requirement that the Commonwealth of Australia registers as a company
entity in order to trade with the United States of America. Are all the other
countries who trade with the United States also registered on the American SEC?
Is ‘the United States of America’ also registered with ASIC, the Australian
Securities & Investments Commission? And is Australia similarly registered
with the corresponding trade regulators in other countries?
The
answer appears to be NO.
International
trade implies mutual agreement; reciprocity; a common method of exchange. But
the reality is that the ‘COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA’ is registered as a
corporate entity with the United States SEC, but not the other way around.
There appear to be no comparable corporate entities registered in other
countries with which Australia trades. And nations ranking among the United
States’ biggest trading partners do NOT have corporate avatars registered with
the American SEC. Perhaps registration in Washington DC is for the purpose of
trading Government Bonds. Interesting…
…
But this strange corporate entity is only half the story. Before government
bonds can even exist, surely there must first be a legitimate government.
Government and the role of Governor-General
in Australia
In
Australia, the Governor-Generalis the representative of the Monarch (currently Queen
Elizabeth II) and the Administrator of Government. Given that the
Governor-General administers government in Australia, government can only exist
in Australia with a valid Governor-General. The Governor-General is reliant
upon the existence of the ‘Office of Governor-General’, which was originally
constituted by the late Queen Victoria in Letters Patent dated 29th October
1900, passed under the Monarch’s seal – the Great Seal Of The United Kingdom (view
Letters Patent 1900).
The
power and authority to revoke, alter or amend those Letters Patent was reserved
by the late Queen Victoria to her heirs and successors. Given those Letters
Patent were issued under the ‘Great Seal
of the United Kingdom’, surely any revocation, alteration or amendment must
be issued by an heir and successor under the same Seal.
So what’s the problem?
In
1984, Letters Patent supposedly revoked the original Letters Patent of 1900 and provided new
provisions for the Office of Governor-General (view
Letters Patent 1984). This happened under the ‘Great Seal of Australia’,
which we already know is a corporate trademark registered with the United
States Patent & Trademark Office in the U.S. (view registration)
Surely
such an attempt at revocation cannot therefore be lawful? And if not, what
Office is the Governor-General in Australia presently occupying? Is the person
we call “Governor-General” truly a representative of an “heir and successor”
to the late Queen Victoria?
The
answer appears to be NO.
Given
that the Governor-General appoints Ministers, Judges, Commissioners and
Justices of the Peace, and ascribes Royal Assent as the Monarch’s
representative in Australia – using the Monarch’s Seal – in the absence of a valid
Governor-General, are
there any legitimate government offices in Australia?
Again…
the answer appears to be NO.
So
let’s test the theory…
A case study
Wake
Up World friend and colleague Scott Bartle documented
his recent dealings with ‘Australian Customs & Border Protection
Service’ in his self-funded documentary “What The FUQ? – Frequently Unanswered
Questions of the Australian Government”.
This
simple, concise and sometimes hilarious case-study follows Scott’s ongoing
interactions with a supposed “government” entity that simply does not behave
as a genuine government agency should.
And
all he did was ask them to demonstrate their validity!
Documentary
Trailer – What The FUQ Trailer (2:47 mins)
See this documentary in full:. I highly recommended it -
So… IS the “Australian Government” the same
government the original Office of Governor-General was intended to Administer?
It’s
a question that officials at all levels of “Australian Government” have seem
unwilling or unable to answer. Some readers may think I’m a crack-pot for even asking
the question. “Break out the tin-foil hats!” they’ll cry! But please… Before
you form an opinion or post a comment on this article, ask the Australian
Government the same question yourself:
It
is your right, after all. And there are certainly some details that don’t add
up. But it gets better….
That’s odd, they certainly don’t ACT like a
true government.
At
first “Government” may just ignore you. But since anyone claiming government
status has a responsibility to prove it, their silence is very indicative,
don’t you think? So push your Government a little further, and see what happens
when you really start to question who’s who. Taxes & fines are suddenly
waived, and miraculously, licenses & permits are no longer required! And it
doesn’t stop there.
Does
this sound like the behaviour of legitimate government? NO, it does not. If
challenged, does a legitimate government not simply demonstrate its validity
and continue to act within its lawful authority? Or does legitimate government
exempt that person’s responsibilities and wave them through the gates, quickly,
quietly and with a minimum of fuss? “Nothing to see here!”
Is this situation unique to Australia?
Let’s
find out!
To
our friends and readers from the Commonwealth of Australia, we recommend you
contact your local Members
and Senators
and ask them one simple question:
Can you please demonstrate that today’s Office of
Governor-General is the same Office that was constituted by the late Queen
Victoria in Letters Patent of 1900?
To
our friends and readers outside Australia, we recommend you identify the
documents that established the original offices of government in your country,
then ask one simple
question of your government representatives:
Can you please demonstrate that today’s government is the
same one as established at the inception of this country?
Demonstrating
its own legitimacy is a very simple thing that every government agency should
be able to do. And in a true democracy, silence is an unacceptable response of
government to questions of its very legitimacy. But today the “Australian
Government” appears unwilling or unable to prove its legitimacy.
Is yours?
It
only takes a few minutes to write to your local member’s office. Please come
back to Wake Up World and tell our readers how your enquiry was met. Silence?
Jargon? Or a simple demonstration of your government’s legitimacy?
We’d
love to hear your stories, so please leave a comment or send
us an email
So what the FUQ do we do next?
Surely
‘Her Majesty’ must know the answer; why a corporation in the United States
bears the name ‘COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA’; why in 1984 her authority to amend
the provisions for the Office of Governor-General was granted on a company
letterhead; why those claiming to represent true government in Australia have
been unable to prove that status; and why some, when challenged, may suddenly
overlook one’s obligations and run silently in the other direction.
…and
ask ‘Her Majesty’ for the truth.
SHARE
THIS ARTICLE
…we
all have a right to know.
HOLD
YOUR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE
…it
is just one
simple question.
In
a true democracy, silence is an unacceptable answer of government to questions
of its legitimacy.
Which “Government” Can We Trust?
By Scott
Bartle
It
appears that Corporations are masquerading as government
in countries around the world – for profit and not for the purpose of governance. We
know the role of true government is to act as trustees for the people… to
provide services to the community, to represent its interests. But do those claiming
government status today truly act as our trustees? Does real government still
exist? What the FUQ is
going on in government today????
Let’s
go right back to the beginning… before there was Government.
Natural Trust
When
each of us is born, our parents take on the role of Executor of a trust. They appoint
Trustees like nannies, school teachers, dentists etc. to return benefits to you
as the Beneficiary. Your parents may make the determinations about your care,
but they do so on your behalf until we reach maturity.
When
we become of age (whatever age that is) we take on the role of Executor, and
continue to appoint Trustees to return benefits to us as Beneficiaries. This is
a global human phenomenon; even the most isolated tribes in the deepest jungles
appear to behave in the same way. Let’s call this a Natural Trust.
How Does This Relate To Government?
In
the same way we appoint nannies and dentists, we also appoint Government as a Trustee.
They perform an administrative service and return benefits to us as
Beneficiaries. We enjoy the benefits of roads, schools, public health services
etc… or at least that’s how it should work. Most people, I believe, would be
comfortable appointing Government as a Trustee – provided Government functions
according to this Natural Trust, and more importantly that Government actually
serves the people.
But what if somewhere, something went
wrong..?
What
if the Government, appointed as Trustee, started serving another master? What if the
actions of Government were benefiting others
– like shareholders? Would
you trust them enough to appoint them your Trustee?
Inconsistencies in the Representation of
“Government”
Let’s
first look to the United States. The original Constitution reads “The Constitution for
the United States”. As of 1871, a Constitution was substituted and reads “The
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”.
So
which is it? Which one is legitimate? How many constitutions are there?
A
similar scenario appears to be taking place in Australia. The Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) tells us that Government is named
“Government of the Commonwealth”.… yet occupying the country’s capital is the
“Australian Government”.
Further
inconsistency manifests in the name of the Parliament holding office in
Australia. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) defines
Parliament as “The Parliament” or “The Parliament of the Commonwealth”. This is
in direct contrast to the entity called “Parliament of Australia”
which is currently occupying the country’s capital.
Surely
the Constitutions in both America and Australia aren’t so weak that legal
entity names can so easily be substituted? It doesn’t take a constitutional
lawyer to tell you there are strict
rules for altering constitutions; that’s why we have referenda. But does
anyone remember the referenda that enabled these changes to be made?
And
is it just the name that’s different..?
Frequently Unanswered Questions.
When
such questions are put to “Government”, answers are scarce – if not completely
absent. In a recent
case study involving the importation of a 1959 Chevrolet Corvette into
Australia, “Australian Customs & Border Protection Service” were challenged
to provide evidence they were in fact a legitimate Department of the de jure
Government of the Commonwealth of Australia. After twelve months of questioning
at all levels of Government, no answers have been forthcoming. “Ministers”,
“Judges”, “Commissioners”, “Departments”, “Governors”, and even the Prime
Minister – all remain silent.
So
who are they? Are they really Government? So far, no “Government” official has
been willing to attempt an explanation; to demonstrate their legitimacy as
representatives of true government.
But
is a government’s refusal to provide evidence of its legitimacy really good
enough? Is that what you expect of a Government that is supposed to act as your
trustee? What happened to accountability
in Government? Should 12 months without answers be taken AS the answer…??
Accountability in Government… in the Words of
JFK
So
what happened to accountability in government? Surely questions related to the
lawful validity of Government are not simply vexatious? Rather, isn’t a
“Government” official who declines scrutiny into the lawful validity of their
office claiming to be above the law?
In
1961 US President John F Kennedy made a speech to the American
Newspaper Publishers Association that everyone in Government – and those
who believe Government do not have to answer to the people – should listen to.
He
stated: “Government at all levels must meet its obligation to provide you with
the fullest possible information, outside the narrowest limits of national
security…. We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors, and we
expect you to point them out when we miss them” said Kennedy. Those are
powerful words.
So
if this is the case, does real government simply shut up when its validity is
challenged? Or does it attempt to address the concerns of those it is supposed
to serve, especially as public pressure to do so continues to mount? And if
they don’t serve us…. who ARE they serving?? What would happen if the
“Government” started to act as the Executor
of a trust – dictating rules, codes and statutes to you? What happens if
“Government” started demanding that benefits be returned to them..?
How
could this happen..?
Corporate “Government” Trust
Let’s
consider for a minute the scenario of a Corporate Government Trust, in which the
“government” plays the role of Executor. Would a “government” acting as
Executor take questions from it’s Trustee? Would the “Government” create a
legal entity to which you act as Trustee? Perhaps upon the registration of your
birth? Do governments address you … or a LEGAL ENTITY? More importantly, does
the silence of government on these questions provide the “fullest possible
information” that President Kennedy spoke about??
What can we do about this..?
The
first action appears to be to determine the capacity in which “Government”
acts.
Who are they actually serving..? This question is critical. But I don’t expect
this information to be any more forthcoming of government than the answer of
their legitimacy. So in the meantime, there are other things we can do in our
interactions with Corporate Government.
- Some offer to accept the role of Trustee to their Corporate Government on the condition that they be paid an annual fee to be the Trustee… say $1,000,000 p.a.
- Others provide terms and conditions to their Corporate Government, which set out fees and charges applicable for acts of the pretence to real government.
Either
of these two approaches would collapse if those claiming government status were
able to demonstrate their legitimacy. But these actions have been shown to stop
Corporate Government agencies in their tracks. Does this sound like the actions
of a Trustee of the people? Or an Executor and Beneficiary of a corrupted
system?
More
importantly, how many challenges to the lawful validity of government have been
met with the proof demanded by its people?
So what the FUQ do we do next?
- In dealings with any government representative, ask them ONE SIMPLE QUESTION: Can you please demonstrate that today’s government (the one you represent) is the same one as established at the inception of this country? It is the onus of any person or entity claiming government status to prove they act on behalf of legitimate government. Until they can demonstrate this, don’t deal with them.
- Sign the petition to ask Her Majesty, The Queen for the truth about the “Australian Government”; something all levels of the “Australian Government” have been unwilling or unable to provide.
- Share this article. The Corporate Government phenomenon is not limited just to the United States, the UK, or Australia. Increasingly, Governments around the world are behaving as Executors and Beneficiaries, not as Trustees of their people. We all have a right to know… which “Government” can we trust?
Visit
truth-now.net for more
information.
From Wake Up World @ http://wakeup-world.com/2012/11/09/are-corporations-masquerading-as-government-in-australia-and-world-wide/
and http://wakeup-world.com/2012/12/17/corporations-masquerading-as-government-part-ii-which-government-can-we-trust/
For more information about ‘real’ law see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/common%20law
- Scroll down
through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
Hope you like this
not for profit site -
It takes hours of work every day by
a genuinely incapacitated invalid to maintain, write, edit, research,
illustrate and publish this website from a tiny cabin in a remote forest
Like what we do? Please give anything
you can -
Contribute any amount and receive at
least one New Illuminati eBook!
(You can use a card
securely if you don’t use Paypal)
Please click below -
Spare Bitcoin
change?
Videos - https://youtu.be/EeYQNq7znH4
For further enlightening
information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @
the top left of http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
And see
New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati
New Illuminati Youtube Channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/playlists
New Illuminati’s OWN Youtube Videos
-
New Illuminati on Google+ @ For
New Illuminati posts - https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RamAyana0/posts
New Illuminati on Twitter @ www.twitter.com/new_illuminati
New Illuminations –Art(icles) by
R. Ayana @ http://newilluminations.blogspot.com
The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com
DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide a live link to your original material on your site (and
links via social networking services) - which raises your ranking on search
engines and helps spread your info further!
This site is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT
(unless an individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright
holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted
& encouraged - if you give attribution to the work & author and include
all links in the original (along with this or a similar notice).
Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or
mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web –
but remember attribution!
If you like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too
small or too large) or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…
Live long and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible
worlds…
From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
