What does the Religion of Peace Teach About Violence and
Women?
Direct Quotes from Unholy Books
Before
we proceed, please note that in response to the following objections:
Q: Why do you pick on Islam?
A: We don’t. We actively disrespect all Abrahamic cults that brainwash the innocent and preach elitism, hatred and violence equally. You’ll find articles denouncing them all on this site. In a more enlightened time religion [a region with a li(e) in it] will be treated like pornography – something to be kept away from the open minds of innocent, gullible children who trust their elders not to lie to them.
Q: Why are you attacking Islam when the US and its allies are attacking
Islamic countries?
A: The
US and its allies have been attacking Islamic countries for most of the
millennium. How long do you expect us to wait before exposing these truths?Question:
Does the Quran really
contain dozens of verses promoting violence?
|
Summary Answer: Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text. They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subjective as anything else in the Quran. The context of violent passages is more ambiguous than might be expected of a perfect book from a loving God, however this can work both ways. Most of today's Muslims exercise a personal choice to interpret their holy book's call to arms according to their own moral preconceptions about justifiable violence. Apologists cater to their preferences with tenuous arguments that gloss over historical fact and generally do not stand up to scrutiny. Still, it is important to note that the problem is not bad people, but bad ideology.
Unfortunately, there
are very few verses of tolerance and peace to abrogate or even balance out
the many that call for nonbelievers to be fought and subdued until they either
accept humiliation, convert to Islam, or are killed. Muhammad's own
martial legacy - and that of his companions - along with the remarkable
stress on violence found in the Quran have produced a trail of blood and
tears across world history.
|
The Quran:
Quran (2:191-193) - "And
kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have
turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief] is worse than killing...
but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and
merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and
worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no
transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and
wrong-doers, etc.)" (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The historical context of
this passage is not defensive warfare, since Muhammad and his Muslims
had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan
adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that
Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). The use
of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is thus
disingenuous (the actual Muslim words for persecution - "idtihad" -
and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the
verse). The actual Arabic comes from "fitna" which can mean
disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. Taken
as a whole, the context makes clear that violence is being authorized until "religion is
for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.
Quran (2:244) - "Then
fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all
things."
Quran (2:216) - "Fighting
is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye
dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad
for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does
this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts
the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience
was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know
that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to
motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans
for loot.
Quran (3:56) - "As
to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this
world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."
Quran (3:151) - "Soon
shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined
companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority". This
speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they
believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining
companions to Allah').
Quran (4:74) - "Let
those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the
other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious,
on him We shall bestow a vast reward." The martyrs of Islam
are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter.
These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and
destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for
today's suicide bombers.
Quran (4:76) - "Those
who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"
Quran (4:89) - "They
but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same
footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in
the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize
them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends
or helpers from their ranks."
Quran (4:95) - "Not
equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those
who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their
persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with
their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith)
Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He
distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,-"
This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in
the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's
eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't
mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only
is the Arabic word used in this passage, but it is clearly not
referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given
exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in
response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad and
this is reflected in other translations of the verse).
Quran (4:104) - "And
be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely
they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..." Is pursuing an
injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?
Quran (5:33) - "The
punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive
to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or
crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides
or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this
world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"
Quran (8:12) - "I
will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike
off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" No
reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.
Quran (8:15) - "O
ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your
backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless
maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred
wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's
end."
Quran (8:39) - "And
fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and
religion should be only for Allah" Some translations interpret
"fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional
understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See
notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad
access to their city during Haj. Other Muslims were allowed to travel
there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca
prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their
religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and
establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part
of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah",
meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the
opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad
further explains that "Allah must have no rivals."
Quran (8:57) - "If
thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those
who are behind them, that haply they may remember."
Quran (8:67) - "It
is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a
great slaughter in the land..."
Quran (8:59-60) - "And
let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's
Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of
(armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of
Allah and your enemy."
Quran (8:65) - "O
Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."
Quran (9:5) - "So
when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you
find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in
every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate,
leave their way free to them." According to this verse, the
best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer
(salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five
Pillars). This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence
within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as
well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under
attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period
(earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even
during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after
the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the
Muslims had the power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not
convert.
Quran (9:14) - "Fight
against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them
and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing
people." Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the
blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his
punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims.
Quran (9:20) - "Those
who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and
their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These
are they who are triumphant." The Arabic word interpreted as
"striving" in this verse is the same root as
"Jihad". The context is obviously holy war.
Quran (9:29) - "Fight
those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden
which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the
religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they
pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued." "People of the Book" refers to Christians
and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated,
with the sole justification being their religious status. This was one
of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the
tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to
conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam
is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.
Quran (9:30) - "And
the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah
is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the
saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are
turned away!"
Quran (9:38-39) - "O
ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go
forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the
life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life,
as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a
grievous penalty, and put others in your place." This is a
warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.
Quran (9:41) - "Go
forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your
lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew." See
also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there
had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all)
without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on
them" This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only
in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long
distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case,
according to the historians).
Quran (9:73) - "O
Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be
unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the
destination." Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by
reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it
easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today's devout
Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.
Quran (9:88) - "But
the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their
wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who
will prosper."
Quran (9:111) - "Allah
hath purchased of the believers
their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of
Paradise): they fight
in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on
Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more
faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye
have concluded: that is the achievement supreme." How does the
Quran define a true believer?
Quran (9:123) - "O
you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let
them find in you hardness."
Quran (17:16) - "And
when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it
who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true
against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction." Note
that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter
destruction." (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden
first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).
Quran (18:65-81) - This
parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family
member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through
apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story (which is not found
in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with
"special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense
on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation.
One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74).
However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would
"grieve" his parents by "disobedience and
ingratitude." He was killed so that Allah could provide them a
'better' son. (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned
by Sharia. Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that
punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills
their offspring (o.1.1-2).)
Quran (21:44) - "We
gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the
period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in
their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?"
Quran (25:52) - "Therefore
listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost
strenuousness..." "Strive against" is Jihad -
obviously not in the personal context. It's also significant to point
out that this is a Meccan verse.
Quran (33:60-62) - "If
the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in
the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they
will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be
seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter."
This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and
"horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups:
Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't
act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include
Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and
"alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak
out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers. It is worth
noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what
today's terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the
city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word
to Muslim generations.
Quran (47:3-4) - "Those
who reject Allah follow vanities, while those who believe follow the truth
from their lord. Thus does Allah set forth form men their lessons by
similitude. Therefore when you meet in battle those who disbelieve,
then smite the necks until when you have overcome them, then make (them)
prisoners," Those who reject Allah are to be subdued in
battle. The verse goes on to say the only reason Allah doesn't do the
dirty work himself is in order to to test the faithfulness of Muslims.
Those who kill pass the test. "But if it had been Allah's Will, He
could certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets
you fight) in order to test you, some with others. But those who are slain in
the Way of Allah,- He will never let their deeds be lost."
Quran (47:35) - "Be
not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir:
"have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"
Quran (48:17) - "There
is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there
blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah
and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers
flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful
doom." Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad
means 'spiritual struggle.' Is so, then why are the blind, lame and
sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will
suffer torment in hell.
Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad
is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the
disbelievers and merciful among themselves" Islam is not
about treating everyone equally. There are two very distinct standards
that are applied based on religious status. Also the word used for
'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word
translated as 'painful' or severe' in verse 16.
Quran (61:4) - "Surely
Allah loves those who fight in His way" Religion of Peace,
indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning
that it is speaking of physical conflict. This is followed by (61:9): "He it is
who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth
(Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels
may resist." (See next verse, below). Infidels who
resist Islamic rule are to be fought.
Quran (61:10-12) - "O
You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a
painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger
(Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah
with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but
know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into
Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens
of 'Adn - Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the
great success." This verse refers to physical battle in order
to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above). It uses the
Arabic word, Jihad.
Quran (66:9) - "O
Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern
with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end." The
root word of "Jihad" is used again here. The context is clearly
holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include
"hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as
such.
|
From the Hadith:
Bukhari (52:177) - Allah's
Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the
Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O
Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."
Bukhari (52:256) - The
Prophet... was asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors
at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger.
The Prophet replied, "They (i.e. women and children) are from them (i.e.
pagans)." In this command, Muhammad establishes that it is
permissible to kill non-combatants in the process of killing a perceived
enemy. This provides justification for the many Islamic terror
bombings.
Bukhari (52:65) - The
Prophet said, 'He who fights that Allah's Word, Islam, should be superior,
fights in Allah's Cause. Muhammad's words are the basis for
offensive Jihad - spreading Islam by force. This is how it was
understood by his companions, and by the terrorists of today.
Bukhari (52:220) - Allah's
Apostle said... 'I have been made victorious with terror'
Abu Dawud (14:2526) - The
Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to
refrain from (killing) a person who utters, "There is no god but
Allah" and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and
not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed
continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last
member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist)
Abu Dawud (14:2527) - The
Prophet said: Striving in the path of Allah (jihad) is incumbent on you along
with every ruler, whether he is pious or impious
Muslim (1:33) - the
Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till
they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger
of Allah
Bukhari (8:387) -
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they
say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah'. And if they say
so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then
their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with
them except legally."
Muslim (1:30) - "The
Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people so
long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah."
Bukhari (52:73) -
"Allah's Apostle said, 'Know that Paradise is under the shades of
swords'."
Bukhari (11:626) - [Muhammad
said:] "I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a
flame to burn all those, who had not left their houses for the prayer,
burning them alive inside their homes."
Muslim (1:149) - "Abu
Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is the best?
He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and Jihad in His
cause..."
Muslim (20:4645) - "...He
(the Messenger of Allah) did that and said: There is another act which
elevates the position of a man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher),
and the elevation between one grade and the other is equal to the height of
the heaven from the earth. He (Abu Sa'id) said: What is that act? He replied:
Jihad in the way of Allah! Jihad in the way of Allah!"
Muslim (20:4696) - "the
Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: 'One who died but did not
fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination)
for Jihad died the death of a hypocrite.'"
Muslim (19:4321-4323) -
Three separate hadith in which Muhammad shrugs over the news that innocent
children were killed in a raid by his men against unbelievers. His
response: "They are of them (meaning the enemy)."
Muslim (19:4294) - "When the Messenger of Allah
(may peace be upon him) appointed anyone as leader of an army or detachment
he would especially exhort him... He would say: Fight in the name of Allah
and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a
holy war... When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them
to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also
accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to
(accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from
fighting against them... If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the
Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If
they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them."
Bukhari 1:35 "The person who participates
in (Holy Battles) in Allah’s cause and nothing compels him do so except
belief in Allah and His Apostle, will be recompensed by Allah either with a
reward, or booty ( if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise ( if he is
killed)."
Tabari 7:97 The morning after the murder of
Ashraf, the Prophet declared, "Kill any Jew who falls under your
power." Ashraf was a poet, killed by Muhammad's men because he
insulted Islam. Here, Muhammad widens the scope of his orders to
kill. An innocent Jewish businessman was then slain by his Muslim
partner, merely for being non-Muslim.
Tabari 9:69 "Killing Unbelievers is a
small matter to us" The words of Muhammad, prophet of Islam.
Tabari 17:187 "'By God, our religion
(din) from which we have departed is better and more correct than that which
these people follow. Their religion does not stop them from shedding blood, terrifying
the roads, and seizing properties.' And they returned to their former
religion." The words of a group of Christians who had
converted to Islam, but realized their error after being shocked by the
violence and looting committed in the name of Allah. The price of their
decision to return to a religion of peace was that the men were beheaded and
the woman and children enslaved by the caliph Ali.
Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 484: - “Allah
said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered
enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this
world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires
killing them to manifest the religion.’”
Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 990: - Lest
anyone think that cutting off someone's head while screaming 'Allah Akbar!'
is a modern creation, here is an account of that very practice under
Muhammad, who seems to approve.
Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 992: - "Fight
everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah." Muhammad's
instructions to his men prior to a military raid.
Saifur Rahman, The Sealed Nectar p.227-228 - "Embrace
Islam... If you two accept Islam, you will remain in command of your country;
but if your refuse my Call, you’ve got to remember that all of your possessions
are perishable. My horsemen will appropriate your land, and my Prophethood
will assume preponderance over your kingship." One of several
letters from Muhammad to rulers of other countries. The significance is
that the recipients were not making war or threatening Muslims. Their
subsequent defeat and subjugation by Muhammad's armies was justified merely
on the basis of their unbelief.
|
Additional Notes:
Other than the fact that Muslims haven't killed every
non-Muslim under their domain, there is very little
else that they can point to as proof that theirs is a peaceful, tolerant
religion. Where Islam is dominant (as in the Middle East and Pakistan)
religious minorities suffer brutal persecution with little resistance.
Where Islam is in the minority (as in Thailand, the Philippines and Europe)
there is the threat of violence if Muslim demands are not met. Either
situation seems to provide a justification for religious terrorism, which is
persistent and endemic to Islamic fundamentalism.
The reasons are obvious and begin with the Quran.
Few verses of Islam's most sacred text can be construed to fit the
contemporary virtues of religious tolerance and universal brotherhood.
Those that do are earlier "Meccan" verses which are obviously
abrogated by later ones. This is why Muslim apologists speak of the
"risks" of trying to interpret the Quran without their
"assistance" - even while claiming that it is a perfect book.
Far from being mere history or theological construct,
the violent verses of the Quran have played a key role in very real massacre
and genocide. This includes the brutal slaughter of tens of millions of
Hindus for five centuries beginning around 1000 AD with Mahmud of Ghazni's
bloody conquest. Both he and the later Tamerlane (Islam's Genghis Khan)
slaughtered an untold number merely for defending their temples from
destruction. Buddhism was very nearly wiped off the Indian
subcontinent. Judaism and Christianity met the same fate (albeit more
slowly) in areas conquered by Muslim armies, including the Middle East, North
Africa and parts of Europe, including today's Turkey. Zoroastrianism,
the ancient religion of a proud Persian people is despised by Muslims and
barely survives in modern Iran.
So ingrained is violence in the religion that Islam has
never really stopped being at war, either with other religions or with
itself.
Muhammad was a military leader, laying siege to towns, massacring the men, raping their women,
enslaving their children, and taking the property of others as his own.
On several occasions he rejected offers of surrender from the besieged
inhabitants and even butchered captives. He
actually inspired his followers to battle when they did not feel it was right
to fight, promising them slaves and booty if they did and threatening them
with Hell if they did not. Muhammad allowed his men to rape traumatized
women captured in battle, usually on the very day their husbands and family
members were slaughtered.
It is important to emphasize that, for the most part,
Muslim armies waged aggressive campaigns, and the religion's most
dramatic military conquests were made by the actual companions of Muhammad in
the decades following his death. The early Islamic principle of warfare
was that the civilian population of a town was to be destroyed (ie. men
executed, women and children taken as slaves) if they defended
themselves. Although modern apologists often claim that Muslims are
only supposed to attack in self-defense, this is an oxymoron that is flatly contradicted by
the accounts of Islamic historians and others that go back to the time of
Muhammad.
Consider the example of the Qurayza Jews, who were
completely obliterated only five years after Muhammad arrived in
Medina. Their leader opted to stay neutral when their town was besieged
by a Meccan army that was sent to take revenge for Muhammad's deadly
caravan raids. The tribe killed no one from either side and even
surrendered peacefully to Muhammad after the Meccans had been turned
back. Yet the prophet of Islam had every male member of the Qurayza
beheaded, and every woman and child enslaved, even raping one of the captives
himself (what Muslim apologists might refer to as "same day
marriage").
One of Islam's most revered modern scholars, Sheikh
Yusuf al-Qaradawi, openly sanctions offensive Jihad: "In the Jihad
which you are seeking, you look for the enemy and invade him. This type of
Jihad takes place only when the Islamic state is
invading other [countries] in order to spread the word of
Islam and to remove obstacles standing in its way." Elsewhere,
he notes: "Islam has the right to take the initiative…this is God’s
religion and it is for the whole world. It has the right to destroy all
obstacles in the form of institutions and traditions … it attacks
institutions and traditions to release human beings from their poisonous
influences, which distort human nature and curtail human freedom. Those who
say that Islamic Jihad was merely for the defense of the 'homeland of Islam'
diminish the greatness of the Islamic way of life."
The widely respected Dictionary of Islam
defines Jihad as "A religious war with those who are unbelievers in
the mission of Muhammad. It is an incumbent religious duty, established in
the Qur'an and in the Traditions as a divine institution, and enjoined
specially for the purpose of advancing Islam and of repelling evil from
Muslims…[Quoting from the Hanafi school, Hedaya, 2:140, 141.], "The
destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the
first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the traditions
which are generally received to this effect."
Dr. Salah al-Sawy, the chief member of the Assembly of
Muslim Jurists in America, stated in 2009 that "the Islamic community does not
possess the strength to engage in offensive jihad at this time,"
tacitly affirming the legitimacy of violence for the cause of Islamic rule -
bound only by the capacity for success. (source)
Muhammad's failure to leave a clear line of succession
resulted in perpetual internal war following his death. Those who knew
him best first fought to keep remote tribes from leaving Islam and reverting
to their preferred religion (the Ridda or 'Apostasy wars'). Then,
within the closer community, early Meccan converts battled later ones.
Hostility developed between those immigrants who had traveled with Muhammad
to Mecca and the Ansar at Medina who had helped them settle in. Finally
there was a violent struggle within Muhammad's own family between his
favorite wife and favorite daughter - a jagged schism that has left Shias and
Sunnis at each others' throats to this day.
The strangest and most untrue thing that can be said
about Islam is that it is a Religion of Peace. If every standard by
which the West is judged and condemned (slavery, imperialism, intolerance,
misogyny, sexual repression, warfare...) were applied equally to Islam, the
verdict would be devastating. Islam never gives up what it conquers, be
it religion, culture, language or life. Neither does it make apologies
or any real effort at moral progress. It is the least open to dialogue
and the most self-absorbed. It is convinced of its own perfection, yet
brutally shuns self-examination and represses criticism.
This is what makes the Quran's verses of violence so
dangerous. They are given the weight of divine command. While
Muslim terrorists take them as literally as anything else in their holy book,
and understand that Islam is incomplete without Jihad, moderates offer little
to contradict them - outside of opinion. Indeed, what do they
have? Speaking of peace and love may win over the ignorant, but when
every twelfth verse of Islam's holiest book either speaks to Allah's hatred
for non-Muslims or calls for their death, forced conversion, or subjugation,
it's little wonder that sympathy for terrorism runs as deeply as it does in the broader community -
even if most Muslims personally prefer not to interpret their religion in
this way.
Although scholars like Ibn Khaldun, one of Islam's most
respected philosophers, understood that "the holy war is a religious
duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation
to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force", many
other Muslims are either unaware or willfully ignorant of the Quran's near
absence of verses that preach universal non-violence. Their
understanding of Islam comes from what they are taught by others. In
the West, it is typical for believers to think that their religion must be
like Christianity - preaching the New Testament virtues of peace, love, and
tolerance - because Muslims are taught that Islam is supposed to be superior in every
way. They are somewhat surprised and embarrassed to learn that the
evidence of the Quran and the bloody history of Islam are very much in
contradiction to this.
Others simply accept the violence. In 1991, a
Palestinian couple in America was convicted of stabbing their daughter to
death for being too Westernized. A family friend came to their defense,
excoriating the jury for not understanding the "culture", claiming
that the father was merely following "the religion" and saying that
the couple had to "discipline their daughter or lose respect." (source). In 2011,
unrepentant Palestinian terrorists, responsible for the brutal murders of civilians,
women and children explicitly in the name of
Allah were treated to a luxurious "holy pilgrimage" to Mecca by the
Saudi king - without a single Muslim voice raised in protest.
For their part, Western liberals would do well not to
sacrifice critical thinking to the god of political correctness, or look for
reasons to bring other religion down to the level of Islam merely to avoid
the existential truth that this it is both different and dangerous.
There are just too many Muslims who take the Quran
literally... and too many others who couldn't care less about the violence
done in the name of Islam.
|
A Woman's Worth Relative to a Man's
|
Question:
Does Islam teach that a woman is worth less
than a man?
|
Summary Answer:
Absolutely. The only debatable point
is by what degree.
|
The Qur'an:
Qur'an (4:11) -
(Inheritance) "The male shall have the equal of the portion of two
females" (see also verse 4:176). In Islam,
sexism is mathematically established.
Qur'an (2:282) - (Court
testimony) "And call to witness, from among your men, two witnesses. And
if two men be not found then a man and two women." Muslim
apologists offer creative explanations to explain why Allah felt that a man's
testimony in court should be valued twice as highly as a woman's, but studies
consistently show that women are actually less likely to tell lies than men,
meaning that they would make more reliable witnesses.
Qur'an (2:228) -
"and the men are a degree above them [women]"
Qur'an (5:6) - "And
if ye are unclean, purify yourselves. And if ye are sick or on a journey, or
one of you cometh from the closet, or ye have had contact with women, and ye
find not water, then go to clean, high ground and rub your faces and your
hands with some of it" Men are to rub dirt on their hands if there
is no water to purify them following casual contact with a woman (such as shaking
hands).
Qur'an (24:31) - Women
are to lower their gaze around men, so they do not look them in the
eye. (To be fair, men are told to do the same thing in the prior
verse).
Qur'an (2:223) -
"Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how
ye will..." A man has dominion over his wives' bodies as he does
his land. This verse is overtly sexual. There is some dispute as
to whether it is referring to the practice of anal intercourse, which it has
been used historically to justify. If this is what Muhammad meant,
however, then it would appear to contradict what he said in Muslim (8:3365).
Qur'an (4:3) -
(Wife-to-husband ratio) "Marry women of your choice, Two or three or
four" Inequality by numbers.
Qur'an (53:27) -
"Those who believe not in the Hereafter, name the angels with female
names." Angels are sublime beings, and would therefore be male.
Qur'an (4:24) and Qur'an (33:50) - A man is
permitted to take women as sex slaves outside of marriage. Note that
the verse distinguishes wives from captives (those whom they right hand
possesses).
|
From the Hadith:
Bukhari (6:301) -
"[Muhammad] said, 'Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness
of one man?' They replied in the affirmative. He said, 'This is
the deficiency in her intelligence.'"
Bukhari (6:301) - continued
- "[Muhammad said] 'Isn't it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast
during her menses?' The women replied in the affirmative. He said, 'This is
the deficiency in her religion.'" Allah has made women deficient
in the practice of their religion as well, by giving them menstrual
cycles.
Bukhari (2:28) - Women
comprise the majority of Hell's occupants. This is important because
the only women in heaven ever mentioned by Muhammad are the virgins who serve
the sexual desires of men. (A weak Hadith, Kanz al-`ummal, 22:10, even
suggests that 99% of women go to Hell).
Bukhari (62:81) -
"The Prophet said: "'The stipulations most entitled to be abided by
are those with which you are given the right to enjoy the (women's) private
parts (i.e. the stipulations of the marriage contract).'" In other
words, the most important thing a woman brings to marriage is between her
legs.
Bukhari (62:58) - A woman
presents herself in marriage to Muhammad, but he does not find her
attractive, so he "donates" her on the spot to another man.
Muslim (4:1039) -
"A'isha said [to Muhammad]: 'You have made us equal to the dogs and the
asses'" These are the words of Muhammad's favorite wife, complaining
of the role assigned to women under Islam.
Abu Dawud (2:704) -
"...the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) said: When one of you prays
without a sutrah, a dog, an ass, a pig, a Jew, a Magian, and a woman cut off
his prayer, but it will suffice if they pass in front of him at a distance of
over a stone's throw."
Abu Dawud (2155) - Women
are compared to slaves and camels with regard to the "evil" in
them.
Ishaq 593 - "As for Ali, he said, 'Women are
plentiful, and you can easily change one for another.'" Ali was raised
as a son by Muhammad. He was also the 4th caliph. This comment
was made in Muhammad's presence without a word of rebuke from him.
Ishaq 593 - "From the captives of Hunayn, Allah's
Messenger gave [his son-in-law] Ali a slave girl called Baytab and he gave
[future Caliph] Uthman a slave girl called Zaynab and [future Caliph] Umar
another." - Even in this world, Muhammad treated women like party
favors, handing out slave girls to his cronies for sex.
Ibn Ishaq (693) - "Then the apostle sent Sa-d b.
Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu'l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu
Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons." Muhammad
traded captured women for horses.
Al-Tirmidhi 3272 - "When Allah's Messenger was
asked which woman was best he replied, 'The one who pleases (her husband)
when he looks at her, obeys him when he gives a command, and does not go
against his wishes regarding her person or property by doing anything of
which he disapproves'."
Tabari VIII:117 - The fate of more captured farm wives,
whom the Muslims distributed amongst themselves as sex slaves: "Dihyah
had asked the Messenger for Safiyah when the Prophet chose her for himself...
the Apostle traded for Safiyah by giving Dihyah her two cousins. The women of
Khaybar were distributed among the Muslims."
Tabari IX:137 - "Allah granted Rayhana of the
Qurayza to Muhammad as booty."
Ishaq 969 - "Men were to lay injunctions on women
lightly, for they were prisoners of men and had no control over their
persons." - This same text also justifies beating women for flirting.
Tabari Vol 9, Number 1754 - "Treat women well, for
they are [like] domestic animals with you and do not possess anything for
themselves." From Muhammad's 'Farewell Sermon'.
|
Additional Notes:
The attempt to paint Islam as a pioneering force in
women's rights is a recent one, corresponding with the efforts of Muslim
apologists (not otherwise known for their feminist concerns) and some Western
academics prone to interpreting history according to pre-formed
conclusions. In truth, the Islamic religious community has never
exhibited an interest in expanding opportunities for women beyond the family
role.
The fourth Caliph, who was Muhammad's son-in-law and
cousin, said just a few years after the prophet's death that "The entire
woman is an evil. And what is worse is that it is a necessary
evil."
A traditional Islamic saying is that, "A woman's
heaven is beneath her husband's feet." One of the world's most
respected Quran commentaries explains that, "Women are like cows, horses,
and camels, for all are ridden." (Tafsir al-Qurtubi)
The revered Islamic scholar, al-Ghazali, who has been
called 'the greatest Muslim after Muhammad,' writes that the role of a Muslim
woman is to "stay at home and get on with her sewing. She should
not go out often, she must not be well-informed, nor must she be
communicative with her neighbors and only visit them when absolutely
necessary; she should take care of her husband... and seek to satisfy him in
everything... Her sole worry should be her virtue... She should be clean and
ready to satisfy her husband's sexual needs at any moment." [as quoted
from Ibn Warraq]
A Yemeni cleric recently explained in a television
broadcast what it is that makes women inferior and unable, say, to serve as
good witnesses: "Women are subject to menstruation, when their endurance
and mental capacity for concentration are diminished. When a woman witnesses
a killing or an accident, she becomes frightened, moves away, and sometimes
even faints, and she cannot even watch the incident."
During a 2012 talk show on an Egyptian television
channel, a cleric slammed Christianity - in
part for teaching gender equality: “the Christian religion does not
differentiate between women and men, but it confirms their perfect equality:
it gives them an equal share in inheritance, it bans divorce, and it bans
polygamy.”
The many opportunities denied women under Islamic law,
from giving equal testimony in court to having the right to exclude other
wives from their marital bed, is very clear proof that women are of lesser
value then men in Islam. Muslim women are not even free to marry outside
the faith without being killed by their own families.
Islamic law also specifies that when a woman is
murdered by a man, her family is owed only half as much "blood
money" (diya) as they would be if she had been a man. (The life of
a non-Muslim is generally assessed at one-third).
Although a man retains custody of his children in the
event of his wife's death, a non-Muslim woman will automatically lose custody
of her children in the event of her husband's death unless she converts to
Islam or marries a male relative of within his family. Even the rights
of Muslim mothers are subordinate to her husband's family.
Contemporary Muslims like to counter that Arabs treated
women as camels prior to Muhammad. This is somewhat questionable, given
that Muhammad's first wife was a wealthy woman who owned property and ran a
successful business prior to ever meeting him. She was even his boss...
(although we're sure that changed after the marriage). Still, it is
somewhat telling that Islam's treatment of women can only be defended by
contrasting it to an extremely primitive environment in which women were
supposedly non-entities.
Homa Darabi was a talented physician who took her own
life by setting herself on fire in public protest of the oppression of women
in Islamic Iran. She did this after a 16-year-old girl was shot to
death for wearing lipstick. In the book, Why We Left Islam, her sister
includes a direct quote from one of the country's leading clerics:
"The specific task of women in this society is to
marry and bear children. They will be discouraged from entering
legislative, judicial, or whatever careers which may require decision-making,
as women lack the intellectual ability and discerning judgment required for
these careers."
Modern day cleric Abu Ishaq al-Huwaini has called for a return of
the slave markets, where Muslim men can go to order concubines. In this
man of God's ideal world, "when I want a sex-slave, I got to the market
and pick whichever female I desire and buy her."
At best, Islam elevates the status of a woman to
somewhere between that of a camel and a man.
Muhammad captured women in war and treated them as a
tradable commodity. The immutable, ever-relevant Qur'an explicitly
permits women to be kept as sex slaves. These are hardly things in
which Muslims can take pride.
See also: Muhammad's Hatred of Women
© 2006-2015 TheReligionofPeace.com. All
rights reserved.
|
From The Religion of Peace @ http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm and http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/010-women-worth-less.htm
For more information about the brainwashing cults known as religions see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/religion
- Scroll down through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
Hope you like this
not for profit site -
It takes hours of work every day by
a genuinely incapacitated invalid to maintain, write, edit, research,
illustrate and publish this website from a tiny cabin in a remote forest
Like what we do? Please give anything
you can -
Contribute any amount and receive at
least one New Illuminati eBook!
(You can use a card
securely if you don’t use Paypal)
Please click below -
Images by R. Ayana – https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3697/11022308573_41f24fdc64_k.jpg
For further enlightening
information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @
the top left of http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
And see
New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati
New Illuminati Youtube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/feed
New Illuminati on Google+ @ https://plus.google.com/115562482213600937809/posts
New Illuminati on Twitter @ www.twitter.com/new_illuminati
New Illuminations –Art(icles) by
R. Ayana @ http://newilluminations.blogspot.com
The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com
The Prince of Centraxis - http://centraxis.blogspot.com (Be
Aware! This link leads to implicate & xplicit concepts & images!)
DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide a live link to your original material on your site (and
links via social networking services) - which raises your ranking on search
engines and helps spread your info further! This site is
published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an individual
article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright holder). Reproduction
for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, - if you give attribution to the work &
author. Please include a (preferably active) link to the original (along with
this or a similar notice).
Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or
mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web –
but remember attribution!
If you like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too
small or too large) or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…
Live long and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible
worlds…
From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
The irony..... I don't think the muslim started any major world war we've had throughout recent history, have they?
ReplyDeleteDepends what you mean by major or recent, if we want to ignore the fact they invaded europe and controlled large parts of it for centuries - when they had the abilty to do so. More recently the genocidal Muslim regime in Indonesia has stolen entire countries, murdered millions of 'infidel' indigenous people since the 1960s and is still doing so, and regularly disposes of pesky 'minority' groups onshore (Chinese for instance) using murder, theft and mass rapes. More currently - is I.S. major or recent enough for you? Or all the Muslim armies such as those in Southern malaysia for instance? If they could, more doubtless would.
Delete