"All the World's a Stage We Pass Through" R. Ayana

Showing posts with label solar electricity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label solar electricity. Show all posts

Saturday, 20 February 2016

Battery Powered Homes: Consumers are producers in new distributed network

Battery Powered Homes
Consumers are producers in bold new distributed network


http://cdn2.yourstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/yourstory_solar_haryana.jpg


There's a power revolution heading for our homes – a device that allows you to take power into your own hands. It's batteries, home batteries, and they've been called the holy grail of renewables – the key to the transition away from fossil fuels. Australia is at the vanguard of this revolution - we will be one of the first countries in the world to experience the transition to the battery powered home. Find out how you can be part of it.

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT




NARRATION
There's a power revolution heading for our homes, a device that allows you to take power into your own hands, and is predicted to change our world. It's batteries, home batteries, and within five years, over a million Australian homes are expected to have one.

Dr Jonica Newby
This is what a lithium-ion home battery looks like. It may be an unfamiliar sight now, but not for long, as retailers start jostling to sign you up to their deal.

Dr Jonica Newby
Home batteries are really the holy grail of renewables and the transition away from fossil fuels.

Kobad Bhavnagri
If energy companies ignore them, they will watch their businesses crumbling in front of them.

Ivor Frischknechti
Australia's at the global vanguard here. We're going first.

NARRATION
So what do you need to know about this disruptive technology, a technology that offers every home the potential for 24-hour renewable power? And let's start by finding out why you might want one. This is Josh Byrne, already known to many ABC viewers as a presenter on Gardening Australia. And this is Josh's house.

Dr Jonica Newby
This is absolutely gorgeous.

Josh Byrne
Thank you.

NARRATION
As a keen environmental scientist, Josh built this place back in 2013 to be both affordable and super efficient.

Josh Byrne
So, we've got state-of-the-art water systems, with solar hot water, then three kilowatts of solar panels on the roof.

NARRATION
But there was a problem. Even though his house was already producing twice as much energy as it used, Josh wasn't getting the benefit.

Dr Jonica Newby
So you're pumping all this energy into the grid and you're being paid how much for it?

Josh Byrne
About seven cents a kilowatt hour.

Dr Jonica Newby
Right. And at night, how much to you pay?

Josh Byrne
We're buying it back at four times that price.

Dr Jonica Newby
Four times. That doesn't seem fair, Josh.

Josh Byrne
Not really, no.

NARRATION
With the state-of-the-art monitoring equipment Josh installed, sustainability expert Jemma Green has followed the situation carefully.

Jemma Green
I'll show you where the problem is. Basically, 60% of Josh's household electricity is at night-time. So even though the solar panels are generating 76% more power than he needs, he's still very reliant on the grids and also getting quite a big bill as a result.

Josh Byrne
So, bring on the battery.

Dr Jonica Newby
(Laughs) I bet you were hanging out for that to arrive.

NARRATION
About six months ago, Josh took delivery of the battery he'd been waiting for.

Josh Byrne
Hey-hey!

NARRATION
And now, we finally get to see it.

Josh Byrne
These are the batteries in here.

Dr Jonica Newby
Yep.

Josh Byrne
This has eight kilowatt hours of usable stored power.

Dr Jonica Newby
It's not just a battery.

Josh Byrne
No, the system is always more than just the battery. There's also an inverter, which helps makes the power into a usable form for the house, but then there's also, very importantly, an energy management system, which is the controls of the system. And all of that can be displayed on a little display like this.

NARRATION
The management software tells your entire system when to flow electricity where. For example, on a sunny day, when generation exceeds use, the power will go first to recharge the battery, and then any excess can be delivered to the grid. At night, when Josh's family is on maximum power use, the power flow goes back to the house.

Dr Jonica Newby
OK, so you've had the battery for a month. How's it gone?

Jemma Green
Well, it's quite amazing what the battery's done. Basically, 53% of the household's electricity needs are now coming from the battery. 44% is still coming from their solar panel during the day, and only 3% from the grid. So it's a really dramatic shift.

Dr Jonica Newby
So that's virtually 24-hour renewable power.

Josh Byrne
Yeah, right there.

Dr Jonica Newby
You've done it!

Josh Byrne
Thank you. Well done, Jemma, too.

NARRATION
So why a home battery revolution now? Well, to understand that, let's rewind the battery clock back a bit. Remember these? The first mobile phones, unaffectionately known as The Brick, used nickel-cadmium batteries, which were really bulky. But lithium-ion batteries were about to set the phone free. So what's so special about lithium? Well, at an atomic level, lithium is the lightest metal. So, if it can be made into a battery, it will be light and hold a lot of charge for its size. And crucially for battery chemistry, lithium easily loses an electron to become a positively charged ion.

Dr Jonica Newby
So this is the basic principle of the rechargeable lithium-ion battery. On the negative side you have a carbon electrode, plus lithium. On the positive side you have a metal oxide. Now, when the battery is being used, an electron is pulled out from here. To balance the charge out, the lithium ion now travels across to here. And when all the lithium ions have moved across, your battery is out of charge. So, to recharge the battery, simply reverse the process, the lithium ions swing back.

NARRATION
Lithium batteries were first invented in the 1980s, but early versions had an unfortunate tendency to self-combust. So scientists fiddled with the chemistry, adding carbon for improved safety and trying different kinds of metal oxide.

Dr Jonica Newby
And the formulation that made our world take off was lithium cobalt oxide.

NARRATION
Our phones, our computers, modern life runs on lithium batteries. But there was one more step to making a battery for your home that was safe and affordable. It was this - the leap into electric cars. When they were first being designed, there were further fears that in that super-heated environment, lithium batteries were still a fire risk. So companies went back to the chemistry board to find other metal oxides, and batteries got even safer. All of a sudden, huge factories sprung up to churn out batteries for electric cars. And once they were being mass-produced, thoughts turned to another market - homes - and those are the batteries that are coming on stream now, with many companies deciding to launch first in Australia.

Dr Jonica Newby
Here, in Australia, we have a unique confluence. We are a place with a lot of sunshine, we are a tech-savvy community, we have high electricity costs, we have a population really wanting this change, and the world is watching.

NARRATION
So what do these new batteries mean for us? Are we all going to end up going off-grid? Well, no. Most experts see three main scenarios, and we've asked some early adopters to show us what they're doing. Option one is going off-grid altogether. This will appeal to many of us. To remote property owners where, even with lead-acid batteries, it's already cheaper, often than grid connection.

Mr Sharp
This is where our 12-volt battery system lives, and this is also where our blue-tongued lizard lives.

NARRATION
But it will also appeal to those who are just annoyed with energy companies and want to be done with them.

Michael Mobbs
Look at this. It's off my house. It used to connect to the grid. It's my trophy. (Chuckles)

NARRATION
The disadvantage, though, is to go off-grid completely, you need to buy a big enough battery for a cloudy week without sunshine. Option two is virtually off-grid, where you generate most of your own power, but keep the wire for backup.

Josh Byrne
We decided to stay grid-connected for two main reasons. Firstly, we wanted the backup of the grid, should we need it. But also, on most days we're generating surplus solar power and we don't want to waste it. So we want to push it out to the grid so others can use it.

NARRATION
Option three, well, this is where the experts see most of us going in the near future. It's installing a smaller battery to use your solar at night and avoid peak pricing.

Mrs McConnell
This is our battery. It's a 6.4 kilowatt LG. The sun is going down and you can see we're starting to draw from the battery, and we're also drawing a little bit from the grid.

NARRATION
The average family uses 20 to 40 kilowatts of energy a day, and for most, the peak time is early evening. If you switch to what's called a 'time of use tariff', which many energy retailers now offer, then you can use your battery during the peak hours when electricity is expensive.

Mrs McConnell
We've noticed that the peak comes on at 2pm and finishes at 8pm. So if it's sunny, the battery will get us through to the end of peak.

Jemma Green
So you're likely to see households put small batteries systems in at first, just to deal with the peak pricing period. And then as battery prices come down, perhaps upsize their battery systems when the payback period is more attractive. It's very much a modular system, so you can start with three kilowatt hours and move up six kilowatt hours. You can have a massive power station at the end if you want.

NARRATION
So, bottom line, how much will it cost?

Dr Jonica Newby
Well, up until early 2015, you couldn't get a seven kilowatt battery plus inverter, plus installation, for under about $15,000. But in the last six months, prices have suddenly dropped by a third or even more.

NARRATION
Energy company AGL is now offering a battery and inverter package for under $10,000.

Marc England
To be honest, that's subsidised. We've done that because we want to get batteries out into the market.

NARRATION
Other companies, including the much-hyped Tesla, are jostling around that price, while Ergon is trialling a leasing program.

Ian McLeod
So, Ergon is paying for the up-front cost of the solar PV and the batteries. It's a power-purchasing agreement.

NARRATION
And the cost will drop further with time.

Kobad Bhavnagri
We think the uptake of batteries will be slow to start, and mainly concentrated to technology enthusiasts. But by 2020, prices will have come down and grid-supplied energy charges will have gone up to the point where batteries really start to become mainstream.

NARRATION
Well, maybe, but this thing could take off faster, especially if you live in South Australia. In June 2015, the Adelaide Council announced up to a $5,000 rebate for homes and offices with batteries. So far, we've only talked about what a battery can do for your home. But there is a bigger picture here, a much bigger picture.

Dr Jonica Newby
You can become a part of the master controlling system that is our national grid, and earn a few extra quid on the side.

NARRATION
Meet the Manning family. They are the first family in the country to go live with an exciting new system being developed by Australian start-up software company Reposit Power. And they have a particularly Australian reason for wanting a battery.

Geoff Manning
Bushfire is a problem, so, yes, if we have a bushfire, we lose our power. And with no power, no pumps, no water, we can't fight a fire. So the battery was absolutely a critical addition to the house.

NARRATION
But this battery, with its souped-up software, is going to do a great deal more than fight the fire for them. It's designed to make money for them.

Luke Osborne
What we've done is equip Geoff's storage system with a smart brain, and what it does is it acts in Geoff's best financial interests.

NARRATION
Like other systems, it shows you clearly what's being generated, consumed and stored. Though this smart software actually helps run all that cost-effectively for you.

Luke Osborne
So we can see how much they've spent today, just 47 cents.

NARRATION
But it's also equipped with an extra-special superpower. It's hooked in to the wholesale price of the national electricity market, and every now and again, you will see this happen.

Dr Jonica Newby
Five cents!

Geoff Manning
Wow.

Dr Jonica Newby
You've earned five cents, Geoff! (Laughs)

NARRATION
Geoff's battery has been called upon to help save the grid.

Luke Osborne
On Geoff's grid dial, we can see that it's exporting hard out onto the grid. We can see that he's earning money here.

NARRATION
To understand what's happening, you need to know a little more about the extraordinary superstructure that is our grid. Australia has three major electricity grids - one in WA, one in the Northern Territory, and then the big daddy, our eastern seaboard grid, the largest interconnected power system in the world. And it's a hell of a complex job to manage it.

Dr Jonica Newby
When I first started thinking about the grid, I assumed that all the power that got generated by, say, coal or gas got stored somewhere and then we just used it as we needed it. But that's not how our grid works at all. In fact, there's very little electricity storage. Demand is met by literally turning up or down our power stations as we turn on or off our lights, and we have to get it exactly right on a minute-by-minute basis. Not enough power, blackout. Too much power and our power poles would blow up. Well, of course, actually, the safety mechanisms kick in, so blackout.

NARRATION
And how does this vast network keep exact pace with our lives? Well, it's a complex interaction between power generators and grid operators, like this one. And it all works via the National Electricity Market, or NEM.

Dr Darren Spoor
The more electricity people use, the more expensive it can get.

NARRATION
The NEM is the wholesale price for electricity and it goes up or down, depending on demand. Right now, everything is in balance, but what if our energy use suddenly spikes? Well, there are only a couple of types of power plant that can respond quickly enough to prevent a blackout - the Snowy Hydro Scheme and gas-fired plants. They can turn up the tap and churn out more power instantly, and they get paid a special premium for it. And this is where the Reposit software is so clever. It means if you have a battery, you can be part of that solution and get paid for it.

Dr Jonica Newby
Imagine it's the first big heatwave of the summer. Melbourne and Sydney wake up, then Brisbane, Adelaide, everyone's switching on their air-conditioners. 'Quick, we need more power now.' The price shoots up. Cue the gas-fired power stations, cue the Snowy Hydro, cue the Manning house. You've made $1.57. Whoo-hoo, jackpot!

Geoff Manning
Didn't even do anything!

NARRATION
Of course, individuals can't bid into this wholesale market directly, but their power company, Diamond Energy, is using their battery power and has agreed to pay the Mannings accordingly. And while their Reposit software is currently out in front, other similar models will follow in time. And there's a lot more to it than fun. Battery storage can help manage one of the key ingredients of the switch to renewable power. As more renewables come into the system, that influx of intermittent power makes grid management ever more complex.

Ivor Frischknechti
South Australia has actually had days where the entire state produces more renewable energy, more wind, than people are using. And so the only alternative is to export into Victoria. But let's imagine that that were happening for the whole of Australia, or for the whole of the network, there is no place to export to, other than batteries.

NARRATION
This is one of the reasons the South Australian government is subsidising batteries. Batteries and other forms of storage are the missing link. They can smooth out the grid, store excess power and rapidly release power when needed. This is why batteries are predicted to change our world. This is part of the revolution that will see renewable power become 24-hour power.

Luke Osborne
So 1.4 million households in Australia have solar panels at the moment. If we add batteries to those households, they, together, will make up the biggest power station in our system.

Marc England
That's a fundamental game changer in our industry.

Dr Jonica Newby
We always used to be told by the people who were the experts that solar is good, wind is good, but it's not base load power. Well, we now have base load power with the battery revolution. It's as simple as that.

Dr Jonica Newby
But what if you don't live in a freestanding home? Currently, about 15% of us live in apartments or other kinds of strata housing. And that's only set to rise.

NARRATION
So can we scale this technology up to an apartment? or even a whole suburb? I'm heading west now, to Perth which, with its sun-drenched landscape, now boasts an astonishing one in five households with solar panels. And WA's government now expects the majority of Perth's daytime electricity needs to be met by solar within ten years. But at the moment, strata dwellers are largely locked out of this home renewable revolution.

Jemma Green
Investors are reluctant to put in renewable energy technology because it's the tenant that gets the benefit. So we've got 1.4 million houses in Australia with rooftop solar, but hardly any in strata.

NARRATION
But this is the development Jemma Green expects will change that for good.

Man
The apartments will be on that side in the corner, this is where the maisonettes will be going, in this area here.

NARRATION
This is White Gum Valley, what will be an attractive multi-dwelling block near the highly-desirable postcode of Fremantle. And this is the site of what they've dubbed the Gen-Y building.

Jemma Green
This is super exciting because it's Australia's first solar and battery trial on strata.

NARRATION
The building comprises three apartments, with a central battery depot. What's groundbreaking is not so much the technology, it's that Jemma has developed a governance model where, for the first time, the strata owners become the main energy supplier to the tenant.

Jemma Green
And so they've got 24-hour renewable power, low-carbon electricity and also it provides a revenue stream for investors because the tenants pay their electricity bill to the strata company instead of paying it to the utility.

Dr Jonica Newby
That's incredible. That's like a potential game changer.

Jemma Green
I hope so. Yeah, I hope we'll see many of these pop up around Australia as a result of this research project.

NARRATION
But what about scaling it up again to the development of an entire suburb?

Dr Jonica Newby
This is the Alkimos Beach development just north of Perth. It was started in 2012, and by the time it's finished in 2020, it'll have 6,000 homes, parks, schools, shops, a town centre and, as you can see, every single home has solar.

NARRATION
And with a development this size, you might go for a bigger battery, a much bigger battery. This is the mega battery now being built for Alkimos Beach.

Man
There's 1.2 megawatt hours of energy storage here. To put that into a general term, this space here is equivalent to about a thousand wild horses packed into this area.

NARRATION
And that's enough to power a hundred households for a full day. These larger scale lithium batteries are already starting to be deployed in remote off-grid communities, But Alkimos Beach represents the first time community-level lithium battery storage will be tried in an urban residential development.

Nathan Ling
So, this is where the battery device is going to go.

NARRATION
Residents take advantage of the community battery via grid credits. Any excess solar power they export to the grid during the day becomes a credit they can then use at night. So residents benefit, but so does the developer, because with local energy storage, they may not need to build such a big grid connection to the development, potentially saving hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Ivor Frischknechti
To give you a sense of these infrastructure costs, they can easily be in the order of $10,000 or $20,000 per home. That cost could be invested in a combination of solar plus battery storage. So you make your connection costs cheaper, but then also have savings in an ongoing way because your energy bill is less.

NARRATION
It shows clearly how, in the future, batteries can reduce our spend on poles and wires.

Dr Jonica Newby
But what if there's a sudden game changer, a leap in battery technology itself? Well, then this disruptive technology goes on steroids.

NARRATION
Around the world, the race has been on to develop a better battery than the current lithium configuration. And some of the top contenders are right here in Australia, such as Professor Thomas Maschmeyer. He believes he's just invented the battery that will change everything.

Professor Thomas Maschmeyer
This is our battery, it's based on zinc bromide. So, we've got the two electrodes here and what's called a coin cell, and then the key part is that we have a gel that we put on top of the electrode.

NARRATION
Zinc-bromine flow batteries exist already. They use a liquid to transport the changed particles, which has its advantages, but they're too big to fit in a phone or computer. Thomas' breakthrough idea was to take a zinc-bromine battery, but instead of a liquid, use a gel. So why a gel? Well, it's neither a liquid nor a solid, but you get the advantages of both. And that includes being able to move ions quickly, so you get rapid charging.

Dr Jonica Newby
So how quickly does it charge?

Professor Thomas Maschmeyer
We can get it down to just a few minutes.

Dr Jonica Newby
Really? So you're saying I could charge my phone in just a few minutes.

Professor Thomas Maschmeyer
In just a few minutes. And not just your phone, but also your car.

NARRATION
Already the batter is running at 90% efficiency, which is higher than in your mobile phone. It has a longer lifetime and zinc is cheaper than lithium.

Dr Jonica Newby
So if this becomes commercialised, it's cheaper, you can charge it faster, it lasts longer...

Professor Thomas Maschmeyer
And the gel is made out of a fire-retardant material.

Dr Jonica Newby
It's fire-retardant as well?

Professor Thomas Maschmeyer
That's correct.

Dr Jonica Newby
That's pretty impressive.

Professor Thomas Maschmeyer
Well, thank you very much.

NARRATION
But perhaps its biggest potential lies in the fact that being a gel, it's bendy. It won't crack. And that's what excites this industry. The potential is for flat pack zinc-bromine batteries to be included in the very fabric of buildings. Lendlease is just one of the big companies that's been inspired by Professor Maschmeyer's vision.

Steve McCann
It's very exciting, his work. Our vision is to create the best places. To do that, you have to continue to innovate. And we're thinking about things like working with Professor Maschmeyer to use prefabricated wall segments, for example, as, effectively, battery storage or power storage facilities. So imagine that in a large scale and the impact that will have on the emissions from the built space, which is a very significant impact on the environment.

Dr Jonica Newby
Wow. So the very walls of your future buildings would have, or could have, these kinds of batteries inside them.

Steve McCann
We don't think that's too far away, actually.

Dr Jonica Newby
Really?!

Steve McCann
We do.

NARRATION
Well, as we all know, the trip from benchtop to big business is not a smooth one, and who can predict if it's Professor Maschmeyer's battery that will make the trip.

Dr Jonica Newby
But here we have a view of the future, a view big companies like this are taking seriously. You'd have to think, out of all the research groups around the world focussing on batteries, someone somewhere will make the breakthrough within the next 10 to 20 years. Maybe sooner.

Kobad Bhavnagri
One thing that history clearly tells us is that people like me and forecasters and also people in the business community tend to get their projections of how quickly things change wrong and wrong in one direction. They underestimate the pace of change.

NARRATION
But all that is well ahead of us. This is where we are now - the first bloom of the early adopters, as they sort out the glitches and show us the way to a future you now feel you can almost touch. Batteries are the thing that will eventually help bring on the ultimate transition to 24-hour renewable power.

Dr Jonica Newby
We all know fossil fuels have got to go, and this is a way of you and your family being able to contribute to that, or your business or your local community, and it is a way of contributing to a future that everybody will look back and say, 'Yes, I was in there first!'




batteries-4_small.jpg

  • Reporter: Dr Jonica Newby
  • Producer: Dr Jonica Newby
  • Researcher: Dominique Pile
  • Camera: Kevin May
    Daniel Shaw
    David Collins
    Tim Kennedy
    Julian Robin
    Matt Robert
  • Sound: Steve Ravich
    Adam Toole
    Gavin Marsh
    Adam Kennedy
    Richard Glover
    Martin Harrington
    Shaun Kingman
  • Editor: Vaughan Smith

Story Contacts

Josh Byrne
Environmental Scientist
Research fellow, Curtin University

Professor Peter Newman
Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute

Jemma Green
Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute

Marc England
Executive General Manager,
AGL New Energy

Ian McLeod
Chief Executive
Ergon Energy

Kobad Bhavnagri
Head of Australia
Bloomberg New Energy Finance

Luke Osborne
Director, Reposit Power

Dr Darren Spoor
Control Centre Management Transgrid

Ivor Frischknecht
CEO Australian Renewable Energy Agency

Nathan Ling
Synergy

 

Related Info


Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute (CUSP)
Australia's answer to Tesla: Indigenous firm AllGrid shines in solar battery industry
Cosmos Magazine : Batteries – A guide to the future.
Energy companies embracing domestic solar and storage systems in scramble to protect profits
Australian Renewable Energy Association.
Australian Energy Market Commission
Ergon: Manage your energy storage
Red Energy/Panasonic Trial
Alternative Technology Association.
Nature Magazine : The Rechargeable Revolution.
Powerwall: Solar energy storage batteries 'set to transform Australian electricity industry'
Home battery storage to 'revolutionise' solar industry in Australia: Climate Council report
CSIRO ultrabattery development



For more information about clean electricity see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/clean%20electricity
For more information solutions see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/solutions  
- Scroll down through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section


Hope you like this not for profit site -
It takes hours of work every day by a genuinely incapacitated invalid to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this website from a tiny cabin in a remote forest
Like what we do? Please give anything you can -  
Contribute any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!
(You can use a card securely if you don’t use Paypal)
Please click below -



Spare Bitcoin change?


Xtra Images – http://cdn2.yourstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/yourstory_solar_haryana.jpg



For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @ the top left of http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com


And see


 New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati

New Illuminati Youtube Channel -  https://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/playlists

New Illuminati’s OWN Youtube Videos -  
New Illuminati on Google+ @ For New Illuminati posts - https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RamAyana0/posts

New Illuminati on Twitter @ www.twitter.com/new_illuminati


New Illuminations –Art(icles) by R. Ayana @ http://newilluminations.blogspot.com

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com



DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide a live link to your original material on your site (and links via social networking services) - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps spread your info further!

This site is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT (unless an individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged - if you give attribution to the work & author and include all links in the original (along with this or a similar notice).

Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution!

If you like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large) or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

Live long and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible worlds…


From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

Saturday, 3 March 2012

Our Misunderstood Sun: The Electric Universe

Our Misunderstood Sun
The Electric Universe
]






“We stand on the verge of a vast cosmical discovery such as nothing hitherto imagined can compare with.”

—Sir John Herschel in 1850, upon the discovery of a link between magnetic storms on Earth and sunspots, to Michael Faraday, the vaunted experimentalist who was investigating the links between electricity and magnetism.


IMAGE

>> Sir John Herschel from 1846 The Year-book of Facts in Science and Art By John Timbs, London: Simpkin, Marshall, and Co.
[Click on all images to enlarge]


Incredibly, one hundred and sixty years later in the space age, Herschel’s “vast cosmical discovery such as nothing hitherto imagined can compare with,” of an Electric Universe, remains “on the verge.” Mistaken ideas have diverted scientists down the path of Ptolemy once more, adding endless epicycles to theory to save appearances. Meanwhile the object central to the problem is the same and in full view. It is our misunderstood Sun.

“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens (1980)


This year is going to be very busy publicizing the Electric Universe in England and Australia while receiving an award from a European Academy of Science for the work. So my articles will probably be sparser as I attend to other demands this year. Meanwhile, observational support for the Electric Universe arrives almost daily in the scientific press and my friends and colleagues at thunderbolts.info provide an up-to-date resource for those following this adventure.


Astronomers in the Dark

IMAGE


The Milky Way is a blazing spectacle
in the southern hemisphere sky. The stars remind me of a high school experiment in a darkened room; the radiant pinpoints of light appearing on the glass walls of an electric discharge tube as a near vacuum is reached inside the tube. It provides an exciting alternative perspective of the cosmos that is denied to almost everyone because it is ‘off the map’ of our education.

Nowhere in any astronomy textbook or magazine will you find mention of electric discharge in space. The concept of electrically powered stars is never considered. Plasma science was in its infancy and nuclear energy the new sensation when the mathematical physicist Arthur Eddington (1882-1944) wrote The Internal Constitution of the Stars (1926). His theoretical work in stellar physics seemed to solve the puzzles of powering the Sun for billions of years and how the Sun could remain so huge against the tendency to collapse due its own strong gravity.


IMAGE

“It is not enough to provide for the external radiation of the star. We must provide for the maintenance of the high internal temperature, without which the star would collapse.” —A. Eddington, The Internal Constitution of the stars.


But this constraint arises from the peculiar self-gravitating gas model Eddington chose and not the star. None of the myriad bizarre phenomena seen on and above the photosphere are explained by his purely theoretical solution to the problem. A balance between gravitational attraction and inflating thermal energy does not determine the size of the Sun. That is why star sizes vary by at least ±10 percent from the theoretical (see later). A photosphere is a brilliant electrical discharge phenomenon, which is little influenced by the physical size of the star hidden within.

“The problem of the source of a star’s energy will be considered; by a process of exhaustion we are driven to conclude that the only possible source of a star’s energy is subatomic; yet it must be confessed that the hypothesis shows little disposition to accommodate itself to the detailed requirements of observation, and a critic might count up a large number of ‘fatal’ objections.” —A. Eddington, The Internal Constitution of the Stars.

Perhaps because of Eddington’s influence, his intolerance of criticism and lack of an alternative theory, no “fatal objections” were raised. The development of Eddington’s theories was ruled more by mathematical aesthetics than empirics. Somehow an explosive nuclear energy source in the core had to be initiated and then tamed. The lethal radiation from the core needed to be contained and ‘cooled’ by collisions in a so-called radiative zone inside the Sun. After about 171,000 years, on average, the more benign energy is transferred to space by convection and subsequent radiation. There is no experimental confirmation of such a bizarre body composed principally of hydrogen, transferring energy internally by radiation, or of the hypothetical thermonuclear reactions at its core. Observations of the Sun are forced to fit the model and anomalies abound.


IMAGE

>> This simple diagram of the hypothetical standard solar model gives no inkling of the complexity of the phenomena seen in the photosphere and above. Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.


“We should expect on the basis of a straightforward calculation that the Sun would ‘end’ itself in a simple and rather prosaic way; that with increasing height above the photosphere the density of the solar material would decrease quite rapidly, until it became pretty well negligible only two or three kilometres up ... Instead, the atmosphere is a huge bloated envelope.” —F. Hoyle, Frontiers of Astronomy

“Essential to the received theory is the conviction that inside the sun is a steep temperature gradient, falling toward the photosphere, along which the internal energy flows outward. If we stack this internal temperature gradient against the observed temperature gradient in the solar atmosphere, which falls steeply inward, toward the photosphere, we find we have diagrammed a physical absurdity: The two gradients produce a trough at the photosphere, which implies that thermal energy should collect and become stuck there until it raises the temperature and eliminates the trough. That this does not occur seems to bother no one. But suppose we remove the hypothetical internal temperature gradient. What then? Why then we see that the sun’s bloated atmosphere and the “wrong-way” temperature gradient in that atmosphere point strongly to an external source of solar energy.” — Ralph E. Juergens, (1972)


IMAGE

>> This stunning image shows remarkable and mysterious details near the dark central region of a planet-sized sunspot in one of the sharpest views ever of the surface of the Sun. Along with features described as hairs and canals are dark cores visible within the bright filaments that extend into the sunspot, representing previously unknown and unexplored solar phenomena. The filaments' newly revealed dark cores are seen to be thousands of kilometers long but only about 100 kilometers wide. Image courtesy of the Swedish Solar Telescope.


"The amazing zoo of structures and dynamic phenomena on the Sun are not well understood in general, though they have been observed for a very long time." —Dan Kiselman, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences,
Institute for Solar Physics


IMAGE

>> Ralph Juergens.


Simple observation shows the ordered granulation of the photosphere does not behave as expected of turbulent convection in hot hydrogen. The pioneer of the discharge model of the Sun, Ralph Juergens, wrote in 1979,

“The idea of turbulent convection delivering endless loads of energy upward from the unseen depths of the Sun conflicts not only with the ordered structure of the photosphere but also with the observable integrity of individual granules. The nodules of plasma appear, endure for some minutes, then fade away... Minnaert once published an analysis of photospheric behavior in terms of the Reynolds number. He found the critical value to lie near 103. The actual Reynolds number of the photosphere, as calculated from observable characteristics of the plasma, turned out to be in excess of 1011, which is to say, at least 100 million times greater than the critical value. Clearly, then, any convective motion in the photosphere should be violently turbulent and highly disordered, as Minnaert indeed pointed out. Practically in his next breath, however, Minnaert asserted that ‘The variable forms of the granules and their short lifetimes are evidence of nonstationary convection.’ Such an abrupt about-face is startling. Apparently Minnaert, himself, was disquieted; he immediately set out to minimize his non sequitur by suggesting ways and means for disregarding the classical theory of turbulence to make things come out right for the photosphere.” —Ralph E. Juergens

Sunspots are dark instead of bright, which is prima facie evidence that heat is not trying to escape from within. And the Sun’s corona is millions of degrees hotter than the photosphere. These simple observations point to the energy source of the Sun being external. Add to this the dominant influence of magnetic fields on the Sun’s external behavior and we arrive at the necessity for an electrical energy supply. It is the “subtle radiation traversing space which the star picks up,” and which Eddington immediately dismissed because his gravitational model required energy to be generated at the core of the star to bloat it to the observed size.

“In seeking a source of energy other than contraction the first question is whether the energy to be radiated in future is now hidden in the star or whether it is being picked up continuously from outside. Suggestions have been made that the impact of meteoric matter provides the heat, or that there is some subtle radiation traversing space which the star picks up. Strong objection may be urged against these hypotheses individually; but it is unnecessary to consider them in detail because they have arisen through a misunderstanding of the nature of the problem. No source of energy is of any avail unless it liberates energy in the deep interior of the star.” —A. Eddington, The Internal Constitution of the Stars.

Eddington’s legacy to stellar physics has been a return to Ptolemaic science where endless ‘epicycles’ are added to theory in an attempt to save appearances.

It is now almost a century since the thermonuclear theory of stars was formulated. It is an urban myth. Science has many urban myths that have a life of their own. Such myths are difficult to dispel when eminent scientists promote them, educators parrot them, the media dramatizes them, and students are discouraged from dissent.

“It is a strange thought, but I believe a correct one, that twenty or thirty pages of ideas and information would be capable of turning the present-day world upside down, or even destroying it. I have often tried to conceive of what those pages might contain, but of course I am a prisoner of the present-day world, just as all of you are. We cannot think outside the particular patterns that our brains are conditioned to, or, to be more accurate, we can only think a very little way outside, and then only if we are very original.” —Fred Hoyle, Of Men and Galaxies

Our mental ‘map’ of the world is strongly influenced by the things we experience in our early years. Our formal education tends to set the patterns that we follow for the rest of our lives. But not so for everyone. There are always those adventurous few who venture off the beaten path. For them, losing sight of landmarks can be exhilarating, but the difficulty of relating discoveries upon return can be high. Not least is the problem of dismissal by the “specialized gate keepers” of knowledge. Excessive institutionalisation may have made acceptance of new paradigms more difficult now than in Galileo’s time.

“We can only discuss or make intellectual advances by passing through the existing body of learning. This is such an enormous task, made even more enormous by the multitudes of specialized gate keepers, that no one can produce integrated thought.” “...we are faced by a crisis in language and communication. This crisis is being accentuated, not eased, by the Universities.” —J R Saul, The Unconscious Civilization

Having a trailblazer’s map, like that provided by Ralph Juergens, is like having access to Google Earth while scientists puzzle over medieval maps with their rubric at the borders, “ beyond there be dragons,” and where Terra Incognita is huge and “dark.” So it is the belief that the unknown depths of space are filled with “dark matter” and “dark energy” and all-devouring dragons or black holes. Modern astronomy is completely in the dark.

The standard theory of stellar interiors is the result of bad timing. It is an historical accident that is long overdue for investigation. But the history of ideas and scientific debates are rarely put in context for students. The losers and their arguments are minimized and forgotten. However, debates are rarely won on scientific grounds. Politics and personalities, then as now, play a major role. So the contests should be revisited occasionally to check the assumptions that were made. It should be compulsory before indulging in post-modern metaphysics; the idea that knowledge is constructed, not discovered. But it is rare today to see a scientific paper cite others more than a few years old. Notably, those few scholars who trouble to delve into historical scientific debates find the ‘truths’ they have been taught not so assured after all. It is often they who question the consensus view and find publication difficult as a result. The historical perspective required for healthy skepticism is lacking in science today.

When we assign names to theories — Newton’s law of gravity, Einstein’s theories of relativity— we impede progress by attaching ideas to celebrities. To question these theories is seen as an attack on the celebrity, with all of the attendant visceral responses to such an ‘intrusion.’ But the history of science shows that it is often an intruder’s fresh ideas that eventually trigger the biggest advances. Dr. Bernard Newgrosh calls such intruders “eminent outsiders.” His favorite example is none other than the astronomer William Herschel (1738-1822), “who was born in Hanover, joined a regimental band at 14, went to England at 21 and worked as a musician and composer. He also instructed himself in mathematics and astronomy and constructing his own reflecting telescopes.” Another was Michael Faraday (1791-1867), who “was born in Surrey, apprenticed to a book-binder and was largely self-educated.”

Newgrosh notes, “how easy it used to be even for entirely self-taught outsiders and part-time amateurs to break into mainstream academia... Not only does this not happen in the modern world, where academia is distrustful of outsiders and its publications are by and large closed to non-members of the academic elite but the general perception is that if you have no academic qualification you cannot be recognized as having any expertise.” The Royal Society is a club that would reject a Herschel or Faraday today.

The Royal Society celebrates its 350th anniversary this year. The book, Seeing Further: The Story of Science and the Royal Society, edited by Bill Bryson, is being released to honor the event. Robin McKie, science editor of the Guardian, in his review writes, “The book is low, to the point of non-appearance, in human interest and is just a little bit too smug for its own good. Then there is the creeping feeling of worthiness that slowly envelops the reader, as you encounter, again and again, noble minds revealing the wonders of nature. It is like reading a piece of upmarket vanity publishing. I wanted to like it more but couldn't.”

Human interest comes chiefly from reading about the clash of ideas and personalities in their proper historical context. This kind of adulatory book about scientists written by the usual publicity hounds is not the way to advance science. It reinforces the status quo and discourages dissent. It is boring and discourages student participation in science, as universities report with growing concern. To stop the rot requires that we challenge students with the idea that “a vast cosmical discovery” awaits the adventurous. And all of the arts and sciences will be profoundly influenced. What better motivation could educators offer students?

However, bringing about a fundamental scientific paradigm shift is arguably more difficult today than at any time in history. And nothing could be more difficult than to wring an acknowledgement that our cherished story of how the Sun and stars work is wrong, despite the disquiet expressed by experienced astrophysicists at their meetings. The following quotes are from a recent colloquium by a well-known astrophysicist and expert on stellar interiors:

“If we understand what is going on in the Sun, we can turn and look outwards to every other star and transfer that knowledge to those other stars.”
“The standard solar model predicts no motion in the photosphere. The solar surface is a mess.” “There is a gap in our understanding of stellar evolution. Some of the things we’re finding are not what we expected.” “The radii of some stars are out by ±10 percent according to our models.”


Rapid change needs a metaphorical bushfire to sweep through the ‘old growth’ on our campuses. But what ‘firestorm’ could result from misunderstandings about the Sun? The contrived crisis of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) may be a timely example. But AGW tends to be an unfalsifiable hypothesis in the short term. If you are buried in snow, the argument goes, it is AGW that is causing the “extreme weather.” We may have to wait for years before it becomes evident that the climate changes regardless of what we humans do. The cosmological fact is that the source of warmth, our Sun, is a variable star. This was termed an “unorthodox idea” as recently as last week on the Solar Dynamic Observatory (SDO) website:

For some years now, an unorthodox idea has been gaining favor among astronomers. It contradicts old teachings and unsettles thoughtful observers, especially climatologists. “The sun,” explains Lika Guhathakurta of NASA headquarters in Washington DC, “is a variable star.”

However, with the short attention span of the media, science will probably ride out the inevitable failed prediction. The jungle of institutionalized and government funded science is more fire-proof than the major US banks in the worst of the global financial crisis. And the media is sycophantic toward academics to the point of being irrelevant.

“I would assert that there are probably as many as twenty really major discoveries in physics which are waiting around for somebody to pick up and which involve no major facility. I would suspect that to have a major facility would be an active handicap, since it is usually the case that the facility dictates the scientist’s thoughts rather than the other way about.” —Fred Hoyle, Of Men and Galaxies



Cosmic Electric Lights


The electrical model of the Sun discards the problematic
birth of stars by gravitational accretion. Stars are formed following Marklund convection of charged particles in dusty plasma toward the axis of galactic Birkeland current filaments.


IMAGE

>> General form of the magnetic field line pattern in a force-free axisymmetric filamentary structure. The filament is transparent so the temperature decreases toward the axis due to a preferential cooling of the densest regions. So the ionized components of the plasma are convected inwards with a velocity V across a temperature gradient, delta T. Diagram adapted from Marklund, G. T., "Plasma convection in force-free magnetic fields as a mechanism for chemical separation in cosmical plasma", Nature, vol. 277, Feb. 1, 1979, p. 370, 371.


It is a very efficient mechanism which results in scavenging matter with a long-range 1/r force. Marklund explains, “In my paper in Nature the plasma convects radially inwards, with the normal E x B/B2 velocity, towards the center of a cylindrical flux tube. During this convection inwards, the different chemical constituents of the plasma, each having its specific ionization potential, enter into a progressively cooler region. The plasma constituents will recombine and become neutral, and thus no longer under the influence of the electromagnetic forcing. The ionization potentials will thus determine where the different species will be deposited, or stopped in their motion." Stars formed in this way have an outer envelope of helium and hydrogen. Working inwards, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen will form the atmospheric middle layers, and iron, silicon and magnesium will make up the core, which is cool. There is no thermonuclear engine in stars!


IMAGE

>> This infrared image of the Orion nebula shows the new (red) stars forming along twisting current filaments in a dusty plasma. Credit: ESO/J. Emerson/VISTA & R. Gendler. Acknowledgment: Cambridge Astronomical Survey Unit. [Click to enlarge]


Dr. Carl A. Rouse is called “a quiet maverick of an astrophysicist whose ‘nonstandard’ models of the interior of the Sun have been provoking the solar physics community for nearly 40 years.” He found from his study of pulsating variable stars that there is something wrong with the standard model of the interior of stars. Using the usual assumptions he could not match the observed mass, luminosity and radius of the Sun! He found that his model worked only by assuming the Sun has a core of heavy elements. What is more, he can reproduce the observed helioseismic oscillations. Rouse’s work deserves more attention because it fits the plasma cosmology story of star formation in a Z-pinch, with the heavy elements concentrated at the core. It also matches the Electric Universe model of electric stars, where the solar neutrino deficit is no longer “one of the greatest unsolved problems of solar physics” because sunshine is a spherical electric discharge phenomenon powered by the galaxy. It explains simply why the solar irradiance exhibits modulation identical to that of neutrinos. Nuclear reactions occur on the Sun like they do in atom smashers on Earth, by concentrating electrical energy onto a target.



IMAGE

>> This diagram is from The Sun e-book. The simplistic estimate of the size of the body of the Sun is intended to show that the atmosphere of a star can contribute a substantial amount to its apparent size, given by the thin yellow photosphere.


In September last year the National Solar Observatory featured a news item, “Solar Polar Vortex?” “Typically, the differential [solar] rotation shows speeds of rotation of about 2000 m/s near the Equator and about 1000 m/s near latitudes of 80 degrees. The differential rotation has undergone changes over surprisingly short periods of time. In short, the central latitudes have been somewhat constant, whereas the regions near the Equator and the poles have changed substantially in a semi-periodic fashion, which appears to be correlated with the solar magnetic cycle... The increases in spin appear to be short lived but occur during times of high magnetic activity. In a few cases, dramatic increases in spin approaching 400 m/s have occurred.”

That is dramatic! So is the fact that this behavior of the Sun is not a surprise in the electrical model. Alfvén’s circuit model of the Sun shows the current flow concentrated at the poles and the equator. The changes in the solar magnetic field are caused by changes in the electric current flowing through the Sun. The rapid changes in speed of the polar vortex are simply electrical atmospheric effects like those seen on the gas giant planets. In fact, since all polar atmospheric vortexes are driven by rotating Birkeland currents, similar odd features seen at Saturn and Venus (polygon, hot spot vortex) should someday be detected on the Sun.

The renowned solar astrophysicist, Eugene N. Parker, wrote in his Special Historical Review article in Solar Physics, “..the pedestrian Sun exhibits a variety of phenomena that defy contemporary theoretical understanding. We need look no farther than the sunspot, or the intensely filamentary structure of the photospheric magnetic field, or the spicules, or the origin of the small magnetic bipoles that continually emerge in the supergranules, or the heat source that maintains the expanding gas in the coronal hole, or the effective magnetic diffusion that is so essential for understanding the solar dynamo, or the peculiar internal rotation inferred from helioseismology, or the variation of solar brightness with the level of solar activity, to name a few of the more obvious mysterious macrophysical phenomena exhibited by the Sun.”

Such frank admissions should be a warning that scientists don’t understand the Sun or stars at all. All of the problems can be put down to an invalid model. An outstanding clue is the “intensely filamentary structure of the photospheric magnetic field,” which is diagnostic of electric Birkeland currents impinging on the photosphere. Another clue is the even spacing of those magnetic filaments at the photosphere (current filaments impinging on an anode are spaced evenly apart). And the attraction between sunspots with the same magnetic polarity seals the argument (parallel electric currents attract).

A good measure of a theory is its ability to predict the outcome of new observations or explain them without introducing additional ad hoc concepts. Stellar theory fails this test miserably. For example, most stars are in binary or multiple systems (gravitational theory has problems with this too). So it is vital that stellar theory works for them. However, the theories of mass transfer between binary stars and their resulting evolution give the wrong element abundances, even after all of the adjustable parameters are pushed to their limits. Our expert again:

“Something is clearly wrong.” “Some of the things we’re finding are not what we expected. We’ve all been carefully taught in the wrong way.” “We need theories that are not so infinitely flexible.”

Just so. Complexity does, however, provide security of tenure. It allows researchers to waste their talents and our money endlessly playing with computer models to approximate surprising new observations. The work is futile because it is not designed to make predictions whose falsification could end the game. There is no thought of any alternative to the thermonuclear model of stars. It is a self-perpetuating pastime.
“Even good scientists do GIGO (garbage in – garbage out). Astrophysicists have a long history of plugging in the answer they want to see.” The “infinitely flexible” astrophysical theories are impossible to falsify. Cosmology at present is not real science.

Theoretical astrophysicists have missed something important in their education. They are taught a theoretical form of plasma physics involving frozen-in magnetic fields that was warned against by Hannes Alfvén as not applying in space plasma. They do not attend plasma science conferences comparing real plasma lab experiments with observations of cosmic plasma. They seem oblivious that there is an electrical engineering (IEEE) discipline of plasma cosmology. Like the stars, plasma cosmology has a bright future.

Countless billions of dollars have been wasted based on the thermonuclear model of stars. For example, trying to generate electricity from thermonuclear fusion, “just like the Sun.” The thought that solar scientists have it completely backwards has not troubled anyone’s imagination. The little fusion power that has been generated on Earth has required phenomenal electric power input, “just like the Sun!” The Sun and all stars consume electrical energy to produce their heat and light and cause some thermonuclear fusion in their atmospheres. The heavy elements formed there are seen in stellar spectra. It explains why the expected solar neutrino count is low and anti-correlated with sunspot numbers. It explains why many stars are considered “chemically peculiar.” Get the physics right first and the mathematics will follow.

It is no surprise that ‘journeyman science’ and its spin-off technology advances more rapidly in the age of the Internet than in the past. But it comes as a shock that fundamental science is moribund. That doesn’t stop some scientists with more hubris than commonsense to declare a ‘theory of everything’ is within reach. Typical of this misguided age is the notion that such a theory will be found in a concise statement printable in arcane mathematical runes on a T-shirt. It reveals that perhaps the greatest problem for physics is the cult of celebrity attached to mathematicians and their consequent dominance of the field. Perhaps the worrying decline in interest in physics can be put down to the overemphasis on mathematical theory. The clash of philosophical concepts is far more intriguing and ultimately useful. Mathematics should be the cart behind the horse of physics, not the reverse. Mathematics describes actions, it cannot explain them. Mathematics is not physics!

“I am acutely aware of the fact that the marriage between mathematics and physics, which was so enormously fruitful in past centuries, has recently ended in divorce.” —Freeman Dyson

As the astrophysicist said, “If we understand what is going on in the Sun, we can turn and look outwards to every other star and transfer that knowledge to those other stars.” But we have not even begun to understand the Sun or the universe we live in. We must wait to see who the real scientists are—those who respond wisely to the distress of encountering fundamental disagreement.

“Science is one thing, wisdom is another. Science is an edged tool, with which men play like children, and cut their own fingers.” —Sir Arthur Eddington

by Wal Thornhill







To read more about the electric universe see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/label/electric sun




Please Help Keep This Unique Site Online
Donate any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!






For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the search box @  New Illuminati or click on any label/tag at the bottom of the pagehttp://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com


And see

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com





This material is published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com