"All the World's a Stage We Pass Through" R. Ayana

Showing posts with label bill mollison. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bill mollison. Show all posts

Sunday, 4 September 2011

Trees – Guardians of the Earth: Seeing the Forest for the Trees

Trees – Guardians of the Earth
Seeing the Forest for the Trees 

https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4097/4736324766_ce893d53f5_b.jpg



By Bill Mollison
 
   
What I hope to show is the immense value of trees to the biosphere. We must deplore the rapacity of those who, for an ephemeral profit in dollars, would cut trees for newsprint, packaging and other temporary uses. When we cut forests, we must pay for the end cost in drought, water loss, nutrient loss and salted soils. Such costs are not charged by uncaring or corrupted governments and deforestation has therefore impoverished whole nations.
 

             The process continues with acid rain as a more modern problem, charged against the cost of electricity or motor vehicles, with the inevitable account building up so that no nation can pay, in the end, for rehabilitation. The capitalist, communist and developing worlds will all be equally brought down by forest loss.
 

             Those barren political or religious ideologies which fail to care for forests carry their own destruction as lethal seeds within their fabric. 

             We should not be deceived by the propaganda that promises for every tree cut down, a tree planted. The exchange of a fifty gram seedling for a forest giant of fifty to twelve hundred tonnes is like the offer of a mouse for an elephant. A young forest or tree doesn’t behave like the same entity in age; it may be more or less frost hardy, wind fast, salt tolerant, drought resistant or shade tolerant at different ages and seasons.
 

             I can never see the forest as an assemblage of plant and animal species, but rather as a single body with differing cells, organs and functions. A forest is not just a number of trees. A forest and its animals is a complex and interdependent organism.
 

             At the crown of the forest and within its canopy, the cast energies of sunlight, wind and precipitation are being modified for life and growth. Trees not only build but conserve the soils, shielding them from the impact of raindrops and the wind and sun.
 

             At the crown, forceful raindrops are broken up and scattered, often to mist, or coalesced into small bark-issued streams and so descend to earth robbed of the kinetic energy that destroys the soil mantle outside forests. Further impedance takes place on the forest’s floor, where roots, litter, logs and leaves redirect, slow down and pool the water.
 

             Like all living things, a tree has shed its weight many times over to earth and air, and has built much of the soil it stands in. Not only the crown, but also the roots die and shed their wastes to earth. The living tree stands in a zone of decomposition, much of it transferred, reborn, transported, or reincarnated into grasses, bacteria, fungus, insect life, birds and mammals.
 

             The root fungi intercedes with water, soil and atmosphere to manufacture cell nutrients for the tree, while myriad insects carry out summer pruning, decompose the surplus leaves and activate essential soil bacteria for the tree to use for nutrient flow. The rain of insect faeces may be crucial to forest and prairie health. It is a clever person indeed who can separate the total body of the tree into mineral, plant, animal detritus and life. This separation is for simple minds as its total entity, like ours, reaches out into all things.  


   How a Tree Interacts With Rain   
 
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4017/5157362967_e96179c740_b.jpg When rain falls on a forest, a complex process begins. First the tree canopy shelters and nullifies the impact of raindrops, reducing the rain to a thin mist below the canopy even in torrential showers.
 

             However, if more rain falls, water commences to drift as mists or droplets to earth. This water is called ‘throughfall’.
 

             As an average figure, the throughfall is 85% of rain in humid climates. At this point, throughfall contains many plant cells and nutrients and is a much richer brew than rainfall. Dissolved salts, organic content, dust and plant exudates are included in the throughfall.
 

              The random fall of rain is converted into well-directed flow patterns that serve the needs of growth in the forest. In the stem bases of palms, plantains and many epiphytes or the flanged roots of figs, water is held as aerial ponds, often rich in algae and mosquitoes. Stem mosses and epiphytes absorb many times their bulk of water, and the tree itself directs water via in-sloping branches and fissured bark to its tap roots, with spiders catching their share on webs and fungi soaking up what they need. Some trees trail weeping branches to direct throughfall to their fibrous peripheral roots.                        


        With the aerial reservoirs filled, the throughfall now enters the humus layer of the forest, which can itself (like a great blotter) absorb one centimeter of rain for every centimeter of depth. In undisturbed rainforest, deep mosses may carpet the forest floor. For 40-60 centimetres in depth, the throughfall is absorbed by the decomposers and living systems of the humus layer. Again, the composition of the water changes, picking up humic exudates, and water from the deep forests and bogs may take on a clear golden colour, rather like tea.


             Below the humus lie the tree roots, each enclosed in fungal hyphae and gels secreted by bacterial colonies. Thirty to forty percent of the tree itself lies in the soil; most of this extends over many acres, with thousands of kilometres of root hairs lying mat-like in the upper sixty centimetres of soil (only 10% to 12% of the root mass lies below this depth but the remaining roots penetrate as much as forty metres into the rocks below). The root mat actively absorbs the solution that water has become, transporting it up the tree again to transpire to air.
 

             If we imagine the visible (above-ground) forest as water (and all but five to ten percent of this mass is water), and then imagine the water contained in soil humus and root material, the forests represent great lakes of actively managed and actively recycled water.
 

             Thus the soil becomes an impediment to water movement and the free (interstitial) water can take as long as one to forty years to percolate through to streams. It almost seems as if the purpose of the forests is to give the soil time and the means to hold fresh water on land.
 

             On bare soils and thinly spaced or cultivated crops, the impact of droplets carries away soil and many rains typically remove thirty tons per acre, or up to five hundred tons in extreme downpours. When we bare the soil we lose the earth.   


 Wind Effects    
 
Vogel (1981) notes that as wind speed increases, the tree’s leaves and branches deform so that the tree steadily reduces its exposed leaf area. Vogel notes that very heavy and rigid trees spread wide root mats, and may rely totally on their weight, withstanding considerable wind force with no more attachment than that necessary to prevent slide, while other trees insert gnarled roots deep in rock crevices and are literally anchored into the ground.
 

             The forest bends and sways, each species with its own amplitude.
 

             Apart from the moisture, the wind may carry heavy loads of ice, dust or sand. Stand trees (palms, pines and casuarinas) have tough stems or thick bark to withstand wind particle blast. Even tussock grasses slow the wind and cause dust loads to settle out. In the edges of forests and behind beaches, tree lines may accumulate a mound of driven particles just within their canopy. The forest removes very fine dusts and industrial aerosols from the airstream within a few hundred metres.
 

             Forests provide a nutrient net of material blown by wind, or gathered by birds that forage within its edges. Migrating salmon in rivers die in the headwaters after spawning and thousands of tonnes of fish remains are deposited by birds and other predators in the forests surrounding these rivers. In addition to these nutrient sources, trees actively mine the base rock and soil for minerals.      


Trees and Precipitation
 


https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4123/4736326732_8d09f25f2a_b.jpg  Trees have helped to create both our soils and our atmosphere. The first by mechanical (root pressure) and chemical (humic acid) breakdown of rock, adding life processes as humus and myriad decomposers.

             The second by gaseous exchange, establishing and maintaining an oxygenated atmosphere and an active water vapour cycle essential to life.
 

             The composition of the atmosphere is the result of reactive processes, and forests may be doing about eighty percent of the work, with the rest due mainly to oceanic or aquatic exchange. Many cities, and most deforested areas such as Greece, no longer produce the oxygen they use.

              The basic effects of trees on water vapour and windstreams are;  * Compression of streamlines, and induced turbulence in airflows.  * Condensation phenomena, especially at night.
 

             Moisture will not condense unless it finds a surface to condense on. Leaves provide this surface, as well as contact cooling. Leaf surfaces are likely to be cooler than other objects at evening due to the evaporation from leaf stomata by day. As air is also rising over trees, some vertical lift cooling occurs, the two combining to condense moisture on the forest.
 

             A single tree such as a giant Til (Ootea foetens) may present forty acres of laminate leaf surface to the sea air, and there can be forty or so such trees per surface acre; trees enormously magnify the available condensation surface.
 

             Who has not stood under a great tree which rains softly and continuously at night on a clear and cloudless evening? Some gardens, created in these conditions, quietly catch their own water while neighbours suffer drought.
 

             The effects of condensation by trees can be quickly destroyed. Felling of the forests causes rivers to dry out and drought to grip the land. All this can occur within the lifetime of a person.
 

             Windstreams flow across a forest. The streamlines are partially deflected over the forest (almost sixty percent of the air) and partly absorbed into the trees (about forty percent of the air). Within a thousand metres the air entering the forest, with its tonnages of water and dust, is brought to a standstill. The forest has swallowed these great energies, and the result is an almost imperceptible warming of the air within the forest, a general increased humidity in the trees (averaging 15% to 18% higher than the ambient air) and air in which no dust is detectable.
 

             Under the forest canopy, negative ions produced by the life processes cause dust particles (++) to clump and adhere to each other and a fallout of dispersed dust results.
 

             If… hot air enters the forest, it is shaded, cooled, de-humidified and slowly released via the crowns of the trees. We may see this warm humid air as misty spirals ascending from the forest. The trees modify extremes of heat and humidity to a life-enhancing and tolerable level.
 

             The winds deflected over the forest cause compression in the streamlining of the wind, an effect extending to twenty times the tree height, so that a twelve metre (forty foot) high line of trees compresses the air to 240 metres (eight hundred feet) above, creating more water vapour per unit volume and cooling the ascending air stream. Both conditions are conducive to rain.
 

             These saturated airstreams condense in trees to create a copious soft condensation which, in such conditions, may far exceed the precipitation caused by rainfall. Condensation drip can be as high as 80%-85% of total precipitation on the upland slopes of islands or seacoasts, and eventually produces the dense rainforests of Tasmania, Chile, Hawaii, Washington-Oregon and Scandinavia. It produced the redwood forests of California and the giant laurel forests of the pre-conquest Canary Islands (now an arid area due to almost complete deforestation by the Spanish).
 


Re-Humidifying Airstreams   


 Forests are cloud makers both from water evaporated from the leaves by day and water transpired as part of life processes. A large evergreen tree such as Eucalyptus globulus [Blue Gum] may pump out eight hundred to a thousand gallons of water and returned to the air to become clouds.
 

             A forest can return (unlike the sea) 75% of its water to air, in large enough amounts to form new rain clouds (Bayard Webster, Forests Role in Weather; documented in Amazon, New York Times section 5-7-83). Forested areas return ten times as much moisture as bare ground, and twice as much as grasslands.
 

             This is a crucial finding that adds even more data to the relationship between desertification and deforestation.
 

             Of the 75% of water returned by trees to air, 25% is evaporated from leaf surfaces and 50% transpired. The remaining 25% of rainfall infiltrates the soil and eventually reaches the streams, or evaporates to air. Over the forests, twice as much rain falls than is available from the incoming air, so that the forest is continually recycling water to air and rain, producing fifty percent of its own rain (Webster, Ibid). These findings forever put an end to the fallacy that trees and weather are unrelated [More recent research shows the pivotal role of old growth trees in uplifting deeply stored deuterium-rich heavy water and concentrating it in the atmosphere, causing precipitation – Ed].
 

            Design strategies are obvious and urgent – save all forest that remains and plant trees for increased condensation on the hills that face the sea.
 

             All these factors are clear enough for any person to understand. To doubt the connexion between forests and the water cycle is to doubt that milk flows from the breast of the mother, which is the analogy given to water by tribal peoples. Trees were the hair of the earth which caught the mists and made the rivers flow. Such metaphors are clear allegorical guides to sensible conduct, and caused the Hawaiians (who had themselves brought about earlier environmental catastrophes) to Tabu forest cutting or even make tracks on high slopes, and to place mountain trees in a sacred or protected category.
 

             In summary, we do not need to accept rainfall as having everything to do with total local precipitation, especially if we live within thirty to one hundred miles of coasts (as much of the world does), and we do not need to accept that total precipitation cannot be changed. Let’s be clear about how trees affect total precipitation. The case taken is where winds blow inland from an ocean or large lake:    

1) The water in the air is evaporated from the surface of the sea or lake. It contains a few salt particles but is clean. A small proportion may fall as rain (15%-20%), but most of this water is condensed out of clear night air of fogs by the cool surfaces of leaves (80%-85%). Of this condensate, 15% evaporates by day and 50% is transpired. The rest enters the groundwater. Thus, trees are responsible for more water in streams than the rainfall alone provides.   2) Of the rain that falls, 25% is re-evaporated from crown leaves and 50% is transpired. This moisture is added to clouds, which are now at least 50% tree water. These clouds travel on inland to rain again. Trees may double or multiply rainfall itself by this process, which can be repeated many times over extensive forested plains or foothills.
 

             If we can only understand what a tree does for us, how beneficial it is to life on Earth, we will (as many tribes have done) revere all trees as sisters and brothers.
 

             I hope to show that the little we do know has this ultimate meaning; without trees, we cannot inhabit the Earth. Without trees we rapidly create deserts and drought, and the evidence for this is before our eyes. Without trees, the atmosphere will alter its composition, and life support systems will fail.
    
 
- Bill Mollison, the progenitor of Permaculture, wrote this as an early version of a section of his landmark book Permaculture – A Designer’s Manual – a completely indispensable work for anyone living WITH planet Earth, in any climat or situation. A longer version of this article was first printed in Nimbin News, July 1988 and excerpted in NEXUS New Times Magazine, Vol 1, No 6


For more about Permaculture see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/permaculture




Hope you like this not for profit site -
It takes hours of work every day by a genuinely incapacitated invalid to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this website from a tiny cabin in a remote forest
Like what we do? Please give anything you can -  
Contribute any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!
(You can use a card securely if you don’t use Paypal)
Please click below -



Spare Bitcoin change?




For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @ the top left of http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com


And see


 New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati

New Illuminati Youtube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati


New Illuminati on Twitter @ www.twitter.com/new_illuminati


New Illuminations –Art(icles) by R. Ayana @ http://newilluminations.blogspot.com

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com



DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide a live link to your original material on your site (and links via social networking services) - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps spread your info further!

This site is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT (unless an individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged - if you give attribution to the work & author and include all links in the original (along with this or a similar notice).

Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution!

If you like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large) or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

Live long and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible worlds…


From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

Friday, 17 August 2007

Permaculture: Renewing the Planet Part 2

Permaculture
Renewing the Planet Part 2 

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/12/E.V.A._Lanxmeer_VegetalPath3_2009.jpg


Permaculture creates living systems using cooperation with nature. With its designs and principles we can create beautiful, practical, self-sustaining urban or natural environments. Using the diversity, stability and resilience of natural ecosystems, people can create real solutions - and put back more than they take from the Earth.

                        Bill Mollison, the pioneer of Permaculture, provides alternative perspectives and catalytic solutions to seemingly intractable problems that face all Humankind. How can you survive and thrive – even in a desert? 

R.Ayana – You’ve worked with Aboriginal communities? 

Bill Mollison – My work with Aboriginal communities was chiefly in South Australia. South Australia has a lot of Aboriginal communities, from the [Great Australian] Bight at Ceduna right up to Oodnadatta and there are four or five tribal groups. We’ve seen a lot of trees and a lot of food go into each community we’ve worked with. We set up a city farm and city training programs and at one stage we were putting twelve backyards a week into urban Aboriginal households. It made a tremendous difference both to the monetary position of Aboriginal groups and to their health. Some of them have been able to give up their diabetic pills once they got onto fresh fruit and vegetables. That’s been a good time and we’ve always enjoyed the work, although at first it was slow to take off. But after a few years everybody trusted us and we were welcome everywhere – we didn’t have to rebuild that trust in each settlement. 

R.A. – Has that been the case in other countries where you’ve been working? 

B.M. – In Native American Indian groups, yes. I started with the Paiute Nation and some Hopi came in – and I’ve worked since with the Papago or Sand People in the Sonora Desert and with the Cherokee people on their reservations. We’ve had a lot of fun.  

R.A. – Are you mainly using plants that are native to the land that you’re working with? 

B.M. – With the Papago we’re working with plants that they actually developed. They developed beans and all your chillies and peppers and a lot of desert species – cat’s claw and all sorts of special plants – so they’re a great agricultural people. They still grow their traditional crops. The Paiute still plant their rice-grass out on the dunes, that’s their main grass – and they’re experts.

             Sometimes we bring in new crops, certainly. But sometimes we’re working with people who are originators of the crops. Sunflowers, Jerusalem artichokes, beans, peppers and chillies all originated in these peoples, particularly the Papago group.  

R.A. – So you’ve been learning a lot about cultivation directly from them? 

B.M. – Yes, by their traditional methods – and we’ve been looking a lot more closely at the archaeology of they who were the precursors of the Papago. I worked in Geronimo’s country with the Chiricahuas, but they’re sadly all gone and the Chiricahuas are resettled now over in Florida. Geronimo resisted occupation and moved the whole of his tribe away from the ancestral grounds. But you can still find traces of their agriculture in the Chiricahuas.

 R.A. – How do you get clear water in arid areas? 

B.M. – Well, there are various methods. There are very sophisticated runoff systems to bring the flood water from the washes out into the fields and they’re very ancient and very skilled in their construction. Then just before the fields at the bottom of the waddies, or the sandbanks – or the arroyos, as we say there – they dig wells. Above the wells are actually water-filled pans, too, at flood time.

             But in the really dry period, everyone traditionally leaves the desert and goes into the mountain foothills to the permanent springs. Then you hang out up in the foothills and collect your pine nuts and deer and all. And when the rains come back you go to your fields in the centre of the desert. That’s the Sand Indians.

             The same Pima group as the Papago live along the river and they have water all the time, so they water their beds from the river. They have pretty intricate 
systems of floodwater trapping with little fences and mounds, so the floods come up and flood the fields, leaving the silt – almost like the old Egyptian culture. They have a very ancient agriculture down there, five or six thousand years old, older than the earliest Egyptian records.

             It’s amazing how far they took agriculture. You go up steep ravines and there’ll be thousands of little stone-walled fields in which they grew agave – and a special agave only found in those fields, there are no wild ones like it. They trim it all off until it looks a bit like a short pineapple and then they pile tons of it into pits and cook it; hot stone pits.

             There were thousands and thousands of people there with a pretty sophisticated agricultural base. Since white Americans overran most of that country the Indians are now penned into much smaller and poorer reservations and they can’t leave the desert for the hill country.

            It’s interesting working with each Indian group and they’re very hospitable, put on little ceremonies for me and do sweat lodges, dust me down with Eagle feathers and have little chants. They really have a lot of good times and tell a lot of stories – and jokes. 

R.A. – Do these deserts still retain their original gene stocks because they’ve remained in the hands of native people? 

B.M. – No. The Sonora desert and all that area was a great prairie with huge herds of animals on it. In 1880 the first of the Texan [cattle] herds reached the Sonora and they wiped off the prairie. By 1890 the first gulches and arroyos had cut into the grassland and it drained the water table down so there’s no more prairie. In those days there were huge trees in the river valley, two or three feet through, but now all the cattle and horses have to eat is mesquite. They went and took cattle up onto this dried-out landscape, so now you have a sand plain with scrub mesquite.

            Originally it was a densely forested area with a lot of beaver streams and huge cottonwoods – that was only in 1880. And cattle have reduced it to a cactus desert today. The cattle alone have done that. 

R.A. – Do you think cattle have caused the same problems in Australia? 

B.M. – Since their presence here – yes, most definitely. It’s made our desert land very arid, and eventually it will become just a sand dune desert. You can see it happening with increasing rapidity. 

R.A. – How do you turn it around aside from taking cattle and hard-footed animals off the land? 

B.M. – Ah, well how are you going to take the graziers out of parliament? I mean, only four percent of our beef comes off the deserts. It’s an insignificant amount of beef, but to get that small amount we’re destroying thousands of square miles of landscape and it’s an obvious immorality that its yields before cattle were enormous – and the yields now are ridiculously small. 

R.A. – If you remove the cattle, how do you regenerate the land? 

B.M. – You make ‘sausages’ of stone all wrapped up in wire – very heavy ones – and you build them in place across the valleys, so the sand builds up behind them to the old level. You have to start putting swales across the country – contour drains about thirty feet wide; they catch runoff. And then you start replanting the swales and it’s tedious and painful work but the results are pretty spectacular.  You can bring back some of the old grasses at that point so you get a prairie and tree effect and you can start to plant cottonwoods behind the covered stone ‘sausages’. But it’s all hard work once you’ve gone downhill.

             I very much admire the Papago Indians. They’re using all these techniques to return the land to some kind of health. 

R.A. – You seem to be continually drawn to arid lands. 

B.M. – I tend to be. I told the people at Alice Springs, “Why send for me? I’m a Tasmanian – I don’t know anything about the desert.” But by observing I started to learn how to use the desert. Over a decade ago we started to learn how to direct and absorb water and studied the work of the Israelis. We’ve become good at deserts. We like deserts. We think they’re great places to grow. 

Water Harvesting 

The way to grow in deserts is by water harvesting. Say you’re getting an average of fifteen inches of rain per year, then half of that – seven inches – falls only thirteen percent of the rain days and the whole fifteen inches over only thirty-four rain days. You only get four days of heavy rain and during those four days half the rain will fall. But if you can find a rock shelf, you can store water. Every hundred feet or so you store a shelf of water twenty feet wide with a bank about a foot high on the outside. All the hundred feet of runoff will fill that shelf – you can absorb forty-seven inches in it. And in that you can grow big orchard trees on contour strips or swales, for miles.

             You can grow trees which require forty inches of rain in a fifteen inch rainfall area – and we can do that down to four inches of rain. It’s quite productive with an average rainfall of twenty inches. 

R.A. – Do the trees help hold the moisture as well? 

B.M. – Yes. After the swales age there’s a noticeable leaf litter catch washing off the desert above into these little strips. Then slowly you’ll see deep, rich chocolate soils developing and you can sit in the swales picking up humus – soil that smells like a compost heap.

            Every bit of animal manure is washed across the desert and into the swale, every leaf, every stick. And the trees in the swale drop their leaves, so the soil becomes very rich very quickly. After a while the trees produce more rain because they transpire and by increasing the number of swales you could turn the desert back to humid forest in a relatively short time, as little as twenty years – if we can hold back the graziers who want it all to be beef and lamb. 

R.A. – Thanks, Bill.  

Bill Mollison – My pleasure. 



 P.S. - Bill had this talk with me twenty years ago. Cattle continue to be one of the greatest destructive agents of our soils and atmosphere, emitting more ‘greenhouse gases’ than all other human industries combined – because people persist in the stupid, destructive, unhealthy, unethical and unnecessary practice of eating dead animals. Cattle consume most of the grain and arable land on the planet – without them there’d be far more than enough food to feed Earth’s teeming billions for the foreseeable future.

             It’s not the footprint of Humankind that is too large for the planet to sustain – it’s the footprint of ignorance and thoughtless greed.

            Our benign universe provides more than enough – if we’re wise enough to know how to use and share it.

             What excuse does anyone have for keeping, torturing, killing and eating dead animals – if it’s unnecessary for human health? And guess what? It is unnecessary, despite what any and all unilluminated money-grubbers with vested interests (or your co-opted grandparents) may tell you. Only desert-dwellers (including those in frozen deserts) have an excuse to eat meat to survive.

             Eating animals is nothing more or less than an optional and unethical choice – unless you’re eating true pest animals you catch yourself. The biggest contribution you can make to healing the soils, forests, rivers and atmosphere is to stop contributing to the destruction and turning vegetarian – today. After a few months or a year you won’t miss it; like all addictions, it will become utterly unattractive – the smell of dead flesh will turn your stomach, as is only natural.  By the way – fish are also animals.

             You’ll then think a lot more about what you eat – it’s easy for lacto-vegetarians to get enough vitamins and minerals and stay healthy!


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/76/Bill_Mollison_01.jpg
Bill Mollison

-                R.A.


First published in NEXUS New Times Magazine, Vol 1 No 8 –
see NEXUS
See the Permaculture Institute

images -  http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/12/E.V.A._Lanxmeer_VegetalPath3_2009.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/76/Bill_Mollison_01.jpg




For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the search box @  New Illuminati or click on any label/tag at the bottom of the page @  http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

And see

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com





This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright (unless an individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com