new illuminati

Wednesday, 24 March 2010

The Earth Is Growing & Expanding Rapidly

by EXTERNAL ACCRETION:

(METEORITES, DUST AND SOLAR ENERGY)

and

INTERNAL CORE EXPANSION

(BY GRAVITATIONALLY INDUCED HEATING)

(The mechanisms and a new cosmology)

by Lawrence S. Myers

The map shown here is PROOF of Earth's growth and expansion in just the last 200 million years -- proving there were NO oceans (now covering over 70% of the planet) when it was 40% smaller than it is today.

The evidence is obvious, unmistakable and irrefutable!

This map of the Earth and World Ocean Floor was created in 1977 by Bruce M. Heezen and Marie Tharp to illustrate their recently-discovered ~65,000 kilometers (~40,000 miles) of midocean ridges (MOR) that almost completely encircle the planet. A white line has been added off the Asian trench system from Kamchatka down to the Mariana Trench, where the oldest known seafloor sediments on Earth, ~195-197 Ma (million years old), were discovered in 1992 by Nakanishi, et al. This gives an approximate age of 200 Ma for today's oceans. This trench system is very significant—it fits the western coast of North America, just as the eastern coast once conjoined Europe and Africa.

However, far more significant is the trench system encompassing the right-angled Vityaz-Tonga-Kermadec Trench, New Zealand, and Macquarie Ridge that ends in a distinct eastward curvature (white rectangle). This figure-7 or fishhook-shaped configuration clearly matches the western coast of South America from the notch at 20° South Latitude to the tip at 60° South Latitude, where it curves perfectly around Cape Horn. (This Australian trench is even more remarkable because it replicates the shape of the eastern coast of South America that once conjoined Africa as part of Wegener’s Pangaea [1912]. Two nearly identical major fractures in Earth's crust is a phenomenon worth further investigation.)

With this evidence in mind, look at the same map with the Asian/Australian trenches moved back to where they were~150 to ~200 million years ago—when all of today's oceans were in their infancy:

(The map above has been modified to show the Asian and Australian trenches near their original positions conjoining North and South America and Europe and Africa moved closer to their original positions conjoined with the Americas (with as much ocean area removed as possible using a flat mercator projection. L.S. Myers, January 2002)

This modified map shows clear empirical evidence that Asia and Australia were originally conjoined with North and South America approximately 200-250 Ma, prior to creation of the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Oceans.

This earlier connection of Asia and Australia with the Americas is also confirmed geologically by the deep ocean trenches that delineate the Andesite Line containing andesite, the primary mineral of the Andes Cordilleran Mountains running the length of South America. [Carey, 1976, p.256]

The evidence is empirical and the conclusions are obvious —the Earth 200-250 million years ago was a single planetary landmass 40% smaller than it is today, and at that moment in geologic time there were NO OCEANS!

Every island and seamount, and most of the water In today’s ocean basins that now cover over 70% of the planet, has evolved in the very short period of 200 million years! The Earth has been, and still is, steadily growing in size and expanding in diameter at an accelerating rate—contrary to what scientists believe because they are currently unable to detect and measure this relatively slow rate of growth.

THIS RAPID GROWTH AND EXPANSION HAS GRAVE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE OF MANKIND!

FURTHER PROOF OF EARTH'S GROWTH AND EXPANSION

The Kant-Laplace nebular hypothesis of the Solar System and Earth's rapid creation as molten bodies ~4.5 billion years ago cannot be true, and the evidence confirms the Earth is gradually increasing in size--one layer at a time--by constant accretion of mass from outer space--a process I call ACCREATION (creation by accretion).

The fallacy of the nebular hypothesis is shown very clearly in the physiographic cross-section of the Grand Canyon cliffs in Northern Arizona and the photo shown below. These layers were laid down (accreted) as solid matter, and none show signs of having been melted at any time. These layers are positive evidence the Earth has grown steadily over time.

The significance of these layers is that each one increased the radius of the planet by a small amount and provide additional proof the Earth (and all planetary bodies) originate as meteoroids (cometary fragments) that grow larger by gravitational accretion of dust and small particles, or by chance amalgamation with other (smaller or larger) meteoroids in their orbits around the Sun.
The bottom layers of the Grand Canyon, ~1.6 kilometers (one mile) down, go back in time almost a billion years to the Precambrian, leaving another ~6365 kilometers to Earth's center. This suggests the Earth could be much older than the 4.5 billion years now accepted as its age from radio-carbon dating of meteorites.

Shown are the geological strata (layers) accreted (laid down) just in the Palaeozoic Era from the beginning of the Cambrian (~570 Ma) through the Permian (~240 Ma), a total of ~330 million years. The indicated depth shown is ~3300 feet (about 1 kilometer), representing a slow accretion rate of about 10 feet (~3 meters) per million years, which means it took about 100,000 years to accumulate each foot of new surface soil at the rate of about one inch in 10,000 years.

But, more importantly, think of the BOTTOM layer. When that bottom layer accreted onto Earth’s surface it was the TOP layer of the Earth and exposed to the sun. All layers above it were laid down, one by one, in subsequent years. Where could this enormous volume of material have come from except outer space?

A visualization of these layers is provided in the photo of the Grand Canyon shown below. The thick layers in the foreground and on the far side of the canyon show different colors and depths that are clear evidence meteor streams millions of years ago consisted of different chemical compositions in different geological epochs and each meteor stream deposited its unique material for prolonged periods of time before another took its place and deposited a layer with a different chemical composition.

[Courtesy of IBM]

This whole area, like other areas of the United States, was once covered by water, forming a shallow epicontinental sea, so one can assume the cataclysm that caused the breakup of Pangaea and formation of the Pacific Ocean basin ~200 Ma offered a lower elevation into which this shallow sea could run off—thus eroding and creating the Grand Canyon.

ACCRETION OF MATTER FROM OUTER SPACE

The planet is accreting new mass consisting of TWO types of matter from outer space— meteorites and meteor dust, plus solar energy captured by photo- synthesis in living organisms—which could happen only after water appeared on the planet’s surface to support organic growth.

Meteorites falling to Earth, large and small, have been known for centuries, but more recent scientific measurements show that an even greater volume of dust and meteorites (hundreds, possibly thousands, of tons) accretes onto Earth's surface every day!
The estimates vary widely (wildly?)—from ~274 to ~55,000 tons per day [Newkirk in Meteor Orbits and Dust, NASA, 1967], but one can imagine the potential volume of accreting extraterrestrial material from the very large number of meteor streams (10 major and 374 minor, of which 154 are the most authentic) reported by Terentjeva [ibid.] She reported “Generally, the existence is accepted of several hundred minor meteor showers with a duration of not less than 3 to 7 days and an average rate not exceeding 2 meteors per hour.”
Although today the daily volume of extraterrestrial matter from space may be minuscule relative to Earth’s total mass, even one kilogram of new matter is unquestionably an addition of mass and gravitational power. This influx is well known but has been grossly underestimated and dismissed as insignificant—despite massive amounts of meteoric, geologic and organic evidence found in immense coal, oil, and limestone deposits, plus deep overburdens, on every continent and in all ocean sediments.

Some scientists may dispute the notion that additional solid matter is created from solar energy by photosynthesis in plants and other living organisms, but they should consider coal beds that were formed from trees in the Carboniferous (~360 to ~290 Ma) but are now buried under deep overburden that accreted later.

The huge fossilized tree trunks found in the Petrified National Forest near Holbrook in eastern Arizona are additional evidence of mass from solar energy. Also consider the massive deposits of limestone created by marine fauna (fish, coral, bivalves, microfossils, etc.) in earlier epochs and this growth continues today. Today, piles of leaves, wood chips and fallen trees are rapidly converted to soil by nematodes. The whole question of added mass needs further research to more accurately determine the volume and sources.

IMPLICATIONS OF GLOBAL GROWTH AND EXPANSION

This overwhelming evidence of Earth’s growth and rapidly accelerating expansion over the past ~200 Ma not only contradicts the current philosophy of Earth's creation, but is revolutionary and self-explanatory—the facts are there for everyone to see.

However, there is no explanation for what may have caused this small early planet with only a single landmass, no oceans, and scattered epicontinental seas to suddenly break apart and form several separate continents, commence formation of the Pacific, Atlantic, Indian and Arctic Oceans, and split off Antarctica to become a separate, nearly-circular continent.

The mechanism or cataclysmic event that initiated this global breakup is unknown. Also still unclear is whether Asia and Australia broke away from North and South America before the breakup of Wegener’s Pangaea that created the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, or whether the events were parts of a single, simultaneous global event. These are details that require further investigation.

Could this event have been triggered by a major cataclysmic event such as an asteroid impact somewhere on the planet? Yes, but there could be other explanations as well, and caution is mandatory. There is good evidence to support the notion an asteroid impact suddenly formed the Arctic Ocean basin, an idea based on the nearly-circular character of the Arctic Ocean within the Arctic Circle, bounded by the Brooks Mountain Range in Alaska, and the Siberian coast (see the polar projection map below).

If research could confirm this suggestion and provide an appropriate time frame, it would support the possibility the impact not only formed the Arctic basin but fractured the planet longitudinally from north to south on each side of North and South America, thereby initiating the Pacific and Atlantic ocean basins and simultaneously creating (punching out) Antarctica at the planet’s antipode.

Whatever the actual cause of the event, this was a truly major planet-wide event that coincided with the transition from the Triassic (~240-205 Ma) to the Jurassic (~205-138 Ma), periods remarkable for producing the immense sauropods and other fauna and flora of exceptionally large size. Stephen Hurrell in “Dinosaurs and the Expanding Earth,” [1994, One-off Publishing, Great Britain] makes a strong case that the immense size of the animal, insect and plant species during those periods was due to the lesser gravity of a much smaller Earth, which is supported by the evidence of growth and expansion of the planet presented here.

However, much of Earth’s earlier history is hidden from view or disguised by subsequent accretion, volcanic, seismic and climatic events. Many details are still unknown because geologists for two centuries have been trying to interpret the geological evidence using the faulty fundamental philosophy of the nebular hypothesis that produced faulty interpretations.

IS ANY FURTHER PROOF OF EXPANSION NEEDED?

Not really, but early resolution of this fundamental controversy is extremely important for the future of both science and Mankind because it is now clear the planet IS GROWING AND EXPANDING at a velocity that appears to be accelerating exponentially.

It is now up to the appropriate governmental authorities (NASA and NOAA) to measure and recalculate Earth’s diameter to establish the TRUE rates of accretion and expansion in order to establish benchmarks for estimates of future growth and expansion. This will require extensive international geodesic effort by NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey (NGS), as well as international cooperation to recalibrate the global grid system that is now seriously out of date.

Earth's diameter can not be changed by the beliefs of scientists but the beliefs of scientists can be changed by re-measuring Earth's diameter!

CONCLUSIONS

+ Approximately 200 million years ago ALL of today’s continents were joined together as a single planetary landmass on a much smaller planet (slightly larger than Mars is today) when NONE OF TODAY’S OCEANS EXISTED!

+ This unequivocal evidence suggests Earth’s diameter has increased at an accelerating velocity. Today’s oceans cover ~71% of Earth’s surface, which equates to a ~40% increase in Earth’s diameter in just ~200 Ma, an incredibly short period in geologic time. Earth’s diameter then, without oceans, would have been only ~7640 km (~4747 mi) or about ~60% of its current average diameter of 12,734.889 km (7913.46 mi). [North American Datum of 1983, NOAA, 1989]

+ The Earth ~200 Ma was different from Wegener’s 1912 concept of a single continental landmass (Pangaea) that covered one hemisphere, surrounded by a single hemispheric ocean (Panthalassa) on a planet of today’s diameter because WEGENER’S PANTHALASSA NEVER EXISTED!

+ This evidence also nullifies the Kant-Laplace (1796) nebular hypothesis of creation of the Earth ~4.5 billion years ago, which requires replacement by an entirely new cosmological theory for creation of the Earth and other bodies in our Solar System.
+ This evidence also verifies Carey’s Earth Expansion hypothesis [1956, 1976] that was rejected by the world’s scientific community three decades ago after the subduction concept was introduced by Oliver and Isacks [1967].

+ Subduction is not only illogical, it is not supported by geological or physical evidence, and violates fundamental laws of physics. Had the scientific community been less hasty in adopting subduction they might have realized subduction’s fatal flaw that shows WHY subduction is totally false. [See P. 2 – Subduction Sophistry]

+ This evidence also eliminates subduction from current plate tectonics dogma because it was adopted on the basis of a constant-diameter Earth and EARTH’S DIAMETER HAS NEVER BEEN CONSTANT.

+ The supreme irony of subduction and the conclusive argument that subduction is false can be summarized quite simply by the following illustration.

IF EARTH'S DIAMETER IS FIXED AND UNCHANGING, the Atlantic Ocean basin MUST continue to EXPAND, pushing North and South America westward until they collide with Asia and Australia AFTER ELIMINATING THE PACIFIC OCEAN.

This means North and South America would have been pushed from the west side of Pangaea to the east side of Pangaea—half way around the planet and eliminating the entire Pacific Ocean basin in the process. This would happen despite the massive growth of new seafloor along the East Pacific Rise, which today is actually expanding the Pacific Ocean basin—not decreasing it!

WHAT’S CAUSING RAPID GROWTH AND EXPANSION?

ANSWER: TWO concurrent basic mechanisms reinforcing each other:

1. ACCRETION OF MATTER FROM SPACE GRADUALLY INCREASING EARTH’S MASS, GRAVITY, SURFACE AREA AND DIAMETER
2. INTERNAL CORE EXPANSION BY TECTONIC FORCE OF EXPANDING MAGMA MELTED BY GRAVITY-GENERATED COMPRESSIVE HEAT

Whether cosmic rays, neutrinos, or other known particles with mass, contribute to Earth’s total mass is beyond the scope of my knowledge, but it is seriously doubted such particles would contribute any appreciable volume of mass equal to that of the known meteor dust and meteorites. Furthermore, an acceptable mechanism for their capture must be demonstrated, particularly in the proto- planetary stages of meteoroids before they reach spherical shape and core melting commences.

Also problematic are suggestions that appreciable amounts of gases are lost into space. This idea is also subject to proof by someone else.

INTERNAL CORE EXPANSION

The dominant factor in global expansion today is the expanding molten core-–melting its way upward towards the crust and creating new ocean floor when extruded from the ~65,000 km (~40,000 miles) of midocean ridges. In the last ~200 Ma these ridges have added more than 71% of new ocean surface area to the planet, increasing Earth’s diameter by 40%.

Midocean ridges are the enabling mechanism of GLOBAL EXPANSION, acting like cranial sutures that allow the human skull to grow to maturity.

The heat source melting and expanding the core is compressive heating generated by the planet’s total atomic weight omnidirectionally focused by gravity on its exact center. Some investigators may invoke radioactive decay of fissionable material as an additional heat source, but I seriously doubt this and will leave it to further debate and proof by discovery of a molten core in an irregularly-shaped asteroid.

Diagram of Omnidirectional Gravitational Pressure on exact center of any spherical body.

SUMMATION

Empirical evidence that as recently as ~200 Ma the Earth was only ~60% of its present diameter, and that today’s oceans, and the waters in them, did not exist on the planet may come as a shock to most scientists, especially those in earth sciences who have been taught differently with fundamental philosophies that have not changed in the past 200 years.
Many fundamental reference tables and fact sheets now need revision, and most textbooks are certainly out of date. Earth’s gravitational constant must be updated and recalibrated to reflect constantly-increasing mass. Maps need to be redrawn and positions of key cities and landmarks re-determined because ALL distances between meridians of longitude and parallels of latitude have increased because of expansion, but scientists do not yet realize it. The grid system itself needs to be recalibrated periodically after expansion is confirmed—another challenge facing geophysicists and geodesists!

Similar reference data applicable to all other bodies in the Solar System will require revision, because they, too, come under the same universal rule of constant growth and development by accretion and should be considered patterns for other solar systems and galaxies in the Universe. In effect, global growth and expansion can be considered a Universal Recycling System.
These conclusions are inescapable, and this evidence of an incredibly rapid increase in Earth’s diameter and surface area is a new development the scientific community must confront, confirm, and calibrate before contemplating measures to cope with the inevitable consequences of global expansion such as earthquakes and the global warming that has now become apparent.

Eventually Mankind will be forced to migrate to a new home on Mars before Earth grows to the size of Neptune. Today's global warming is an early warning to Mankind.
(Revised 29 April 2005)

(First presentation of theory Dec. 14, 1982, at the AGU Fall Meeting in San Francisco, California)

This article reflects the personal views of Lawrence S. Myers, who alone is responsible for the accuracy and reliability of all data. This concept paper introduces many new ideas that contradict the current philosophy of Earth’s creation accepted as fact by 99.99% of the world’s scientists. These ideas have been independently generated since February 1965, when the subject of an energy source necessary for the earth to expand appeared in a newspaper article discussing Professor S. Warren Carey’s then new (1956) theory of the expanding earth. The importance of these new ideas and perceptions should not be ignored; they are the forerunners of a new theory of ‘universal planetary growth’ that explains creation of the Earth and Solar System in an entirely new way. This new theory is called ACCREATION (creation by accretion) to distinguish it from the biblical story of Creation recited in Genesis, and other new creation theories that scientists have tried to introduce over the past 200 years.

(Copyright, 1999, St. Clair Enterprises, Inc.) ( Last revised 29 April 2005)
Email comments to: meteordust@expanding-earth.org

From http://www.expanding-earth.org/

Video (10:02) @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ

For further enlightenment enter a word or phrase into the search box @ New Illuminati:

http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

or http://newilluminati.blog-city.com (this one only works with Firefox)

And see

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com

New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

http://newilluminati.blog-city.com (this one only works with Firefox)

New Illuminati on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-Illuminati/320674219559

The Prince of Centraxis – http://centraxis.blogspot.com

This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright (unless an individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

Monday, 22 March 2010

Hydrogen Power At Home

New Solid Hydrogen Fuel & Cell Technology for Home Power & Transportation

http://www.sefca.com.au/images/home_img.jpg

CNN report (3:44)

From http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLVQVtuPR9c

Image - http://www.sefca.com.au/images/home_img.jpg via Forced Green - http://www.forcedgreen.com

For further enlightenment enter a word or phrase into the search box @ New Illuminati:

http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

or http://newilluminati.blog-city.com (this one only works with Firefox)

And see

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com

New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

http://newilluminati.blog-city.com (this one only works with Firefox)

New Illuminati on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-Illuminati/320674219559

The Prince of Centraxis – http://centraxis.blogspot.com

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

Sunday, 21 March 2010

THE PRIORE MACHINE: Curing Cancers

THE PRIORE MACHINE

Curing Cancers

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_ciencia/priore02.jpg

The cure for cancer mentioned above [see http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/biophotons.htm] is the Prioré device in France, which has been curing cancer and other diseases for decades, much to the frustration of many members of the French Academy of Sciences.

  Antoine Prioré is an Italian-born inventor who escaped from the Germans in World War II and fled to France. After the war Prioré purchased surplus equipment and eventually developed a strange machine that filled an entire room. A nozzle above a table in the center of the room emitted a strong ray or field, which Prioré explained consisted of an electromagnetic wave in a magnetic field. Eventually the French government spent almost three million dollars for construction of a new, improved Prioré machine, because Prioré had shown he could cure cancers in laboratory animals with the device.

   In 1964 Professor Robert Courrier, renowned biologist and secrétaire-perpétuel of the French Academy of Sciences, presented some of Prioré's results to the Academy. Forty-eight cancerous rats had been divided into two groups of twenty- four each. One group was set aside without treatment as a control, and the other group was divided into two subgroups of twelve each. One of these subgroups was treated by the Prioré machine promptly after cancer grafts, and the other was treated after a lapse of several days. Both subgroups were completely cured - the first quickly and the second after more prolonged treatment. All the control rats died in twenty-two to thirty days after grafting.

   The results created a furore and a controversy that have continued to the present day. Since the first presentation by Courrier, the machine has repeatedly cured leukemia and other forms of cancer in laboratory animals. The controversy seems to have arisen because the French Academicians could not comprehend the working of the machine, and because the inventor would not reveal how it worked but only how it was built.

   The second, more powerful Prioré machine produces a magnetic field of about 1,240 gauss. According to one scientist, the machine contains a gas-filled vacuum tube, which contains a plasma of mercury and neon gas. A pulsed 9.4 gigahertz electromagnetic wave is modulated onto a 17 megahertz wave in this plasma. However, the true nature of the machine is revealed by the fact that the 9.4 gigahertz wave is joined in the "lamp" by seventeen radiations of unspecified frequency and nature.
Thus we see that Prioré is actually using second-order multiple modulations and is dealing with the direct life-mind-consciousness loop of the mammalian cell. He is directly stimulating and engineering the hyperspace nested virtual bands with his device. His twenty-six years of work have mostly been involved with ferreting out the required precise frequencies and mix of second-order modulations, as well as the correct intermodulation carrier necessary to obtain the desired effects.

In Figure 10 we show a simplified diagram of the Prioré device, from which it can immediately be seen that the device uses the same principles shown previously in Figure 9. Prioré is using nested orders of modulations to affect nested orders of virtual state, thus producing direct channels and effects in neutrinic field and in mindfield. Radiating a biological target such as a laboratory animal with such a complex field directly engineers its mind-life-consciousness loop. With the correct nested modulations on the correct carrier (in this case a strong magnetic field, which allows a stronger connection to the neutrinic field aspects), the mind-life- consciousness loops of the individual cells in the body of the irradiated animal are "scrubbed clean " of any deviation from the norm by the virtual patterns delivered to the animal, and hence to its "virtual biophoton stabilization field" reported by Popp.

In other words, the Prioré device produces a reverse sort of effect as compared with the Soviet work reported by Kaznacheyev on anomalous death and disease transmission between cell cultures by near ultraviolet biophotons emitted from the virtual Popp field of the dying cells of the stressed, attacked cultures.

The same sort of virtual engineering that can transmit death of the organism (by disrupting its mind-life-consciousness loop tuning) can also transmit life into a stressed attacked grouping of cells by a sort of "forced resonance" of their consciousness loops into normal health patterns. (Virtual state interactions control charges, which control chemistry. Thus the entire chemistry of the absorbing cells can be controlled and engineered.)

Also, the Lisitsyn paper refers to the presence of eleven independent channels in the brainwaves (namely, in the mind-life-consciousness connection to the waves of dendrite firings that constitute brainwaves*), and these were specifically referred to clipped signals, not sine waves (The clipped signals would be those possessing complex nested modulations, and thus representing the tuning effects of the life-consciousness loop).

The Prioré machine uses seventeen higher-order modulations, which are quite sufficient to cover all eleven life channels required, with an additional six being available for tuning so as to squelch or "jam" the life-consciousness loops of those cells with tuning abnormalities, that is, of diseased or cancerous cells.

The main component : the plasma tube

As we would expect, the Prioré machine has also shown its ability to cure other infectious diseases and materially benefit victims of cardiovascular diseases. Infectious diseases cured by Prioré radiation also provide an immunity to the treated host organism that has been shown to be transferable by transfusion of blood samples.

   Again I strongly emphasize that the individual biological effects of solitary magnetic fields or single frequency waves cannot be extrapolated to the multiple frequency, nested modulation case; and almost all our present knowledge of the effects of electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields on biological systems is woefully immature and incomplete.

T. Henry Moray built a somewhat similar machine - though very much smaller - which provided a direct radiation from extensive "peach blossom violet" colored spark gaps inside a quartz tube, and which greatly stimulated the health of an individual exposed to the radiation. In fact, the device would promptly cure the radiation burns Moray frequently suffered as a result of his continual experimentation with uranium compounds and other radioactive substances. He patented the device, and some of his original machines are still in existence and still being used to treat patients with a wide variety of ailments.

I have personally been exposed to one of Moray's treatment machines and can vouch for the fact that it stimulates every cell in one's body, providing in about two to three minutes a great tonic and health stimulant.

* It is these dendrite firings which form the collector-detector mechanisms through which the mind- world changes are joined to the human nervous system and brain. Were they not specifically useful and needed, the dendrite firings would not have been developed, and nerves would simply be long wires.

http://www.rumormillnews.com/pix5/trz10.gif

From the Tom Bearden’s Excalibur Briefing @ http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/priore_machine.htm

Xtra Images - http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_ciencia/priore02.jpg

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/scalar_tech/esp_scalartech01.htm

http://www.rumormillnews.com/pix5/trz10.gif

For further enlightenment enter a word or phrase into the search box @ New Illuminati:

http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

or http://newilluminati.blog-city.com (this one only works with Firefox)

And see

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com

New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

http://newilluminati.blog-city.com (this one only works with Firefox)

New Illuminati on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-Illuminati/320674219559

The Prince of Centraxis – http://centraxis.blogspot.com

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

Saturday, 20 March 2010

Monsanto: The evil corporation in your refrigerator

by Bob Cesca

When we consider the rogue's gallery of devilish, over-sized, greedy and disproportionately powerful corporations, we generally come up with outfits like Microsoft, Bechtel, AIG, Halliburton, Goldman-Sachs, Exxon-Mobil and the United States Senate. Yet somehow, Monsanto, arguably the most devilish, over-sized, greedy and disproportionately powerful corporation in the world has been able to more or less skulk between the raindrops -- only a household name in households where documentaries like Food Inc. are regarded as light Friday evening entertainment. My house, for example. But for the most part, if you were to ask an average American for their list of sinister corporations, Monsanto probably wouldn't make the cut.

It should.

Founded by Missouri pharmacist John Francis Queeny in 1901, Monsanto is literally everywhere. Just about every non-organic food product available to consumers has some sort of connection with Monsanto.

Anyone who can read a label knows that corn, soy and cotton can be found in just about every American food product. Upwards of 90% of all corn, soybeans and cotton are grown from genetically engineered seeds, also known as genetically modified organisms (GMOs). These genetically enhanced products appear in around 70% of all American processed food products. And Monsanto controls 90% of all genetically engineered seeds. In other words, Monsanto controls -- and owns patents on -- most of the American food supply.

When you consider, as Walletpop originally reported, that one-in-four food labels is inaccurate, that the F.D.A.'s testing is weak at best, then how can we trust one corporation to have so much control over our produce? The answer is, we can't.
Recently, a study by the International Journal of Biological Sciences revealed that Monsanto's Mon 863, Mon 810, and Roundup herbicide-absorbing NK 603 in corn caused kidney and liver damage in laboratory rats. Scientists also discovered damage to the heart, spleen, adrenal glands and even the blood of rats that consumed the mutant corn. A "state of hepatorenal toxicity" the study concluded.

This hasn't slowed down Monsanto's profit machine. In 2008, Monsanto cleared over $2 billion in net profits on $11 billion in revenues. And its 2009 is looking equally as excellent.
Author and food safety advocate Robyn O'Brien told me, "Monsanto is expecting gross margins in Q2 2010 of 62%, its corn and soy price mix to be up 8-10% and its glyphosate revenue to expand to an estimated $1 billion in gross profit by 2012, enabling Monsanto to further drive R&D into seeds and to price those seeds at a premium – further driving price increases on the farm and in the grocery stores."

This, O'Brien says, in the same year when farm income declined by around 34%.

Because Monsanto claims that its GMOs create higher yields and therefore comparatively higher revenues per acre for struggling American farmers, they're certainly a tempting option. On the surface, that is. Monsanto controls its seeds with an iron fist, so even if you happen to own a farm next to another farm upon which Monsanto seeds are used, and if those seeds migrate onto your land, Monsanto can sue you for royalties.

Additionally, if you use seeds from crops grown from Monsanto seeds, a process known as "seed cleaning," you also have to pay royalties to Monsanto or it will sue you. All told, Monsanto has recovered $15 million in royalties by suing farmers, with individual settlements ranging from five figures to millions of dollars each.

Back in 2004, farmer Kem Ralph served eight months in jail and was fined $1.3 million for lying about Monsanto cotton seeds he was hiding in his barn as a favor to a friend. They weren't even his seeds (yeah, that's what they all say!). By way of comparison, the fine in Ralph's home state of Tennessee for, say, cocaine possession, is $2,500.

In keeping with the Orwellian nature of modern marketing, one of the first phrases you see on the front page of the Monsanto website is "we help farmers." Funny. In a cruelly ironical way, that is.

In fairness, the argument in support of Monsanto is generally "it makes more food for lower prices." Of course this is a red herring. Basic economics proves that choice and competition create lower prices. Not monopolies. This applies not only to American grocery stores, but also in terms of feeding developing nations where food is scarcer. Moreover, stronger Monsanto herbicides, compatible with herbicide resistant seeds, are giving rise to mutant Wolverine-ish super weeds that have adapted and are rapidly spreading through the air to farms that don't use Monsanto GMOs, destroying obviously vulnerable crops. Say nothing of the inevitable mutant bugs that will adapt to the pesticides that are implanted into the Monsanto Mon 810 genetic code. And if further studies indicate similar organ damage in humans, the externalized costs to health care systems will begin to seriously out-weigh the benefits of cheaper food.

Ultimately, there are better, healthier ways to make cheaper food. Until then the best thing we can do is to demand further investigations and buy organic products whenever practical.

And if you can't afford to buy organic, O'Brien recommends, "A great first step, given how pervasive these ingredients are in processed foods that often use these ingredients to extend shelf life, is to reduce your exposure to processed foods and stick with pronounceable ingredients and foods that your grandmother would have served her kids."

Meanwhile, let's endeavor to make Monsanto a household name. But not in a good way.

On January 15, the Obama Justice Department launched an anti-trust investigation against the corporate behemoth over its next generation of genetically modified "Roundup Ready" soybean seeds. The very next day, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case Monsanto v. Geertson Seed Farms, which challenges the safety of genetically modified agricultural products -- the centerpiece of the Monsanto empire. If the investigation fails, farmers will have to switch over to the next generation of Roundup Ready seeds in 2014. And the cycle of corporate abuse and monopolization will continue.