Herd Immunity: Flawed Science and Mass Vaccination
Failures
The
oft-parroted sound bite – "we need herd immunity"- implies that if
ninety five percent of the population can become "immune" to a
disease via vaccination,
target immunity levels will be met and diseases will either be eradicated or
controlled. This sound bite is the most commonly pulled weapon used by the
vaccinators, only second to "smallpox and polio were eradicated by vaccination."
"Herd immunity" is the trump card for the defense of vaccination on
TV, Internet, medical journals and newspapers as to why we should be vaccinated
over and over throughout our lives, with an ever-increasing number of vaccines.
Paul Offit
smiled and PLAYED THE CARD while peddling his book on the comedy
central channel as Steven Colbert jokingly said, "if the vaccines work so
good for you, why do I need one?" Dr. Mark Segal PULLED IT
on fox news as Mary Holland, JD eloquently described the issue of vaccine
injury and loss of legal recourse in an era of forced and mandated vaccines. In
addition to flaunting several false allegations and sound bites, Dr. Segal's
well-rehearsed rant brushed right over the issue at hand, the fact that victims
of vaccine injury have no legal right to sue – and instead launched into his
agenda of scaring the listeners by parroting the "herd immunity"
dogma.
The hype
about herd immunity unfortunately creates a wall of hostility between those who
vaccinate and those who delay some vaccines, avoid certain vaccines, or quit
vaccinating altogether.
Since the
beginning of vaccination, there is little proof that vaccines are responsible
for eradicating disease even when herd immunity vaccination levels have been
reached. Yet celebrity doctors rattle on about your unvaccinated neighbor being
the biggest threat to your child – as if vaccination was the only way to avoid
an illness or stay healthy.
To make
matters worse, this intimidation to vaccinate is played out in an environment
where WHO and vaccine manufacturers have been accused of scandalous
misrepresentations of disease risk or vaccine safety and effectiveness. If the
allegations against these entities are true, which I believe they are, we are
being systematically altered, sickened and manipulated by powerful governing
bodies that either don't understand the risks of vaccination, or don't care. We
are told that the health of the herd is more important than any single life,
and you now have no conventional legal recourse when your little sheep is
wounded by any type of vaccine, no matter how it happened.
The
Money Factor
The
population of the world is expanding over the past 200 years where vaccines have
been used, and this makes obtaining herd immunity even more expensive and
impossible today than ever. How many billions of people would need to be
vaccinated how many times to eradicate just one illness based on the theory of
vaccine herd immunity? How much would that cost? Consider the cost of vaccines,
refrigeration, vaccinators, and hazardous waste removal. Just look at chicken
pox vaccine at $7.25 per dose for the CDC discounted price. Each child gets 2
doses.
The US
census shows 25.7 million children between 0-5 years. Just the cost of the
vaccines to vaccinate each of those children, not including the lifetime of
boosters, refrigeration, administration and waste, costs the government over
372 million dollars. Chicken pox vaccines are now being exposed for the failure
they are, but vaccine profits are still climbing. After the members of the herd
stopped transmitting natural immunity to each other because of the vaccine
effect, shingles increased. The response- more doses of vaccine for children
and a shingles vaccine to adults. There is a recent journal abstract describing
the failure of herd protection by varicella
vaccines. In a SEPARATE
DOCUMENT, Dr. Goldman says:
"Prior
to the universal varicella vaccination program, 95% of adults experienced
natural chickenpox (usually as school aged children)—these cases were usually
benign and resulted in long term immunity. This high percentage of individuals
having long term immunity has been compromised by mass vaccination of children
which provides at best 70 to 90% immunity that is temporary and of unknown
duration—shifting chickenpox to a more vulnerable adult population where
chickenpox carries 20 times more risk of death and 15 times more risk of
hospitalization compared to children.
Add to this
the adverse effects of both the chickenpox and shingles vaccines as well as the
potential for increased risk of shingles for an estimated 30 to 50 years among
adults. The Universal Varicella (Chickenpox) Vaccination Program now requires
booster vaccines; however, these are less effective than the natural immunity
that existed in communities prior to licensure of the varicella vaccine."
In India,
doctors are concerned about profit margins being protected before human lives,
with recommendations to vaccinate every child with more expensive, newer
vaccines. Dr Jacob
Puliyel describes the problems he sees..
"An
analysis in the Lancet showed how the Pneumococcal vaccine reduces only 4 cases
of pneumonia per 1000 children. The cost for vaccinating 1000 children comes to
$ 12,750. Treating the 4 cases of pneumonia in India using WHO protocol, would
cost $ 1. The pneumococcus strains prevalent in India are nearly all sensitive
to inexpensive antibiotics like penicillin. In the US which has been using the
pneumococcal vaccine for some years now, there has been a strain shift –
strains covered in the vaccine are being replaced by other strains. Ominously the
new strains are more antibiotic resistant. Vaccine has simply made the problem
of pneumococcal disease worse. Yet this vaccine is being pushed in Africa and
Asia....It is not about lives lost in poor countries – it is all about the cash
register. These organizations and their sponsors have profit margins to
protect. Ethics is not a major issue with them."
The profits
to vaccine manufacturers and the government must be enormous.
The CDC is
in the vaccine business. Members of the CDC's Vaccine Advisory Committee accept
payment from vaccine manufacturers. Sanofi-Pasteur, Merck and others
specifically seek to employ CDC staff once their contracts have run out.
Relationships have included sharing a vaccine patent, owning stock in a vaccine
company, payments for research, payment to monitor manufacturer vaccine tests,
and funding academic departments. Thanks to a 1980 law, the CDC currently holds
dozens of licensing agreements. It also has numerous ongoing projects to
collaborate on new vaccines.
The
science?
What science
is there behind the belief that the herd can be protected by vaccinating enough
of the sheep?
Or that any disease has been eradicated from the planet thanks to a vaccine?
Recently, I
was told by a vaccinator that "herd immunity is just a definition and so
it can't actually be wrong. " But the assumption of a 95% vaccination rate
giving the herd a chance at eradication or higher levels of health – can be
wrong. Let us go back in time and see just where the idea behind this
definition probably comes from. Dr A.W. Hedrich in 1929, studied the natural
occurrence of measles.
"On the
basis of field surveys of various workers, it is inferred that approximately
95% of the children in cities suffer measles attacks by the fifteenth birthday.
" [1]
Before vaccines,
outbreaks of measles were observed in 2 to 3 year cycles, and 95% of the
population developed immunity by the age of fifteen.
The original
idea that vaccination could strengthen the herd's immunity, assumed that there
was only one clinical event, and that one natural exposure equated life-long
immunity. But this was not the case back when the diseases circulated freely.
Vaccinators miss the point that the body defends most efficiently as a result
of ongoing re-exposure.
They try to
mimic this with boosters. But the vaccination plan leaves the elderly(due to
vaccine-induced immunity being short-lived and antigens taken out of
circulation) and the very young(due to lack of transferrable maternal immunity)
more vulnerable to several diseases that were not a threat to them before
vaccination. In the case of chicken pox, vaccination renders the elderly more
apt to shingles infections, because the herd has now lost the continued and
benign re-exposures to children with chicken pox.
Instead of
figuring out why a very small number develop dangerous invasive conditions,
vaccine enthusiasts recommend vaccinating as often as possible in order to
protect against something that would never be a danger to the vast majority of
those vaccinated. If you constantly swab throats of healthy people most would
be carrying and circulating supposed pathogens, as commensals.[2] At any one
time in any society, neisseriae(the
bacteria isolated in some cases of meningitis) are being circulated, yet most
of the time, nothing happens, other than the body notes it, defends against it,
and the host has no idea that they even carried it.[3] But now that vaccines
for as many types as possible have been developed, the vaccine is the answer to
the problem. This is typical for diseases today.
Measles
It is well
documented that prior to vaccination, cycles of natural infection added to the
herd's immunity.
"The formal
demonstration that both maternal antibodies and early exposure to infection are
required for long-term protection illustrated that constant re-infection cycles
have an essential role in building a stable herd immunity.
In a
population that is not constantly exposed to the infection during early infancy
under the immunologic umbrella of maternal antibodies or vaccinated thoroughly
a serious risk of re-emerging infections may arise. " [4]
Vaccination
creates a "quasi-sterile" environment that opens up the possibility
of disease outbreaks.
"Attempts
to eradicate measles virus or poliovirus eliminates antigen exposure of infants
to these pathogens. Such quasi-sterile epidemiological situations may actually
increase the risk of outbreaks." [5]
We know this
is possible because there have been eruptions of measles in the USA in
populations that were 100 percent vaccinated.
"The
affected high school had 276 students and was in the same building as a junior
high school with 135 students. A review of health records in the high school
showed that all 411 students had documentation of measles vaccination on or
after the first birthday, in accordance with Illinois law." [6]
Within the
scope of vaccination, when a quasi-sterile situation is created, and measles
breaks out in the midst, the only solution within that paradigm is to vaccinate
more people, more often. This is a backwards solution to the problem when
considering who remains susceptible even in the face of full compliance:
infants and non-immune adults. Susceptible age groups have essentially traded
places since vaccinating.
What used to
happen with measles is that infants were protected by maternal antibodies,
adults were protected by continued exposure, and infected children handled the
disease normally and became immune for long periods of time. So, while measles
vaccines have decreased the expression of measles infections, it has not
necessarily improved the bigger picture. And certainly there are numerous
troubles with the side effects of the vaccine.
Prior to
vaccination, mothers were naturally immune to measles and passed that immunity
to their infants via placenta and breast milk. Vaccinated mothers may have
vaccine immunity, which is not the same immunologically, as natural immunity.
One of the major differences in the vaccine-induced immunity is that it cannot
be passed from mother to infant.
Since most
vaccines are delivered by injection, the mucous membranes are bypassed and thus
blood antibodies are produced but not mucosal antibodies. Mucosal exposure is
what contributes to the production of antibodies in the mammary gland. A
child's exposure to the virus while being breastfed by a naturally immune
mother would lead to an asymptomatic infection that results in long-term
immunity to that virus. Vaccinated mothers have lower levels of virus-specific
antibodies in the serum and milk compared to naturally immune mothers and thus
their infants are unprotected.
"Infants
whose mothers were born after 1963 had a measles attack rate of 33%, compared
to 12% for infants of older mothers." Infants whose mothers were born
after 1963 are more susceptible to measles than are infants of older mothers.
An increasing proportion of infants born in the United States may be
susceptible to measles." [7]
For the
disease of measles, we see that while the clinical case rate may have declined
with vaccination, the most sensitive members of the herd are at an increased
risk- as a result of
vaccination.
Dr Peter
Aaby has produced volumes of research on measles in Africa. Initially there was
a belief that measles infection was associated with immune suppression and
higher long-term mortality, but that belief came from vaccine research, not
natural measles research.
"The
belief in persistent immune suppression was stimulated by increased mortality
after high-titre measles vaccination." [8]
Once natural
measles was monitored long-term the knowledge changed. According to Aaby,
"When
measles infection is mild, clinical measles has no long-term excess mortality
and may be associated with better overall survival than no clinical measles
infection. Sub-clinical measles is common among immunised children and is not
associated with excess mortality." [9]
Measles is
mildest when the infected person is replete with vitamins C and A. The devastation
and mortality you hear about with measles comes from starving populations.
Do you know
that 30% of cases of measles in unvaccinated are missed because they are so
mild?[10] Subclinical measles is an entity that most doctors today are unaware
of. If they are missed in unvaccinated, and there are known outbreaks of
measles in 100 percent vaccinated populations, are cases missed in vaccinated
populations too? Is measles still alive and well but going unnoticed in
vaccinated countries, until a well-publicized outbreak occurs, as vaccine
necessity is being trumpeted? What doctor would know or is even looking for
atypical measles?
Talk to your
grandmother about measles. Ask her if she saw death and destruction from the
disease. It was not a disease that needed eradication. The high death rates
were in countries where children were undernourished and lacked vitamins
necessary to process the virus. Alexander Langmuir, MD is known today as
"the father of infectious disease epidemiology." In 1949 he created
the epidemiology section of what is now known as the CDC. He also headed the
Polio Surveillance Unit that was started in 1955 after the polio vaccine
misadventures. Dr Langmuir knew that measles was not a disease that needed
eradication when he said:
"To
those who ask me, 'Why do you wish to eradicate measles?,' I reply with the
same answer that Hillary used when asked why he wished to climb Mt. Everest. He
said, 'Because it is there.' To this may be added, ". . and it can be
done." [11]
Langmuir
also knew that by the time vaccination was developed, measles mortality in the
USA had already declined to minimal levels when he described measles as a
"...
self-limiting infection of short duration, moderate severity, and low
fatality..." [12]
The vaccine
was created because it could be done, not because we needed it. Measles is not
eradicated. Outbreaks happen all over the world, and will continue. And now
infants will be unprotected because of the absence of maternal antibodies in
their vaccinated mother's milk. So much for protecting the most vulnerable in
the herd.
Smallpox
"We
were fortunate enough to address their own medical (and) health officials where we reminded
them of the incidence of smallpox in formerly "immunized" Filipinos.
We invited them to consult their own medical records and asked them to correct
us if our own facts and figures disagreed. No such correction has been
forthcoming, and we can only conclude that between 1918-1919 there were 112,549
cases of smallpox notified, with 60,855 deaths. Systematic (mass) vaccination
started in 1905, and since its introduction case mortality increased
alarmingly. Their own records comment that "The mortality is hardly
explainable."—Dr. Archie Kalokerinos from Second Thoughts on Disease
Orthopox is
a member of the family of Poxviridae. The ancestor of the poxviruses is not
known but structural studies suggest it may have been an adenovirus or a
species related to both the poxviruses and the adenoviruses. Orthopox viruses
include cowpox(vaccinia), smallpox(variola), and monkeypox. Mutations do occur
in these viruses, but at a very slow rate.
Between
October 1970 and May 1971 a poxvirus was isolated from some symptomatic
patients in West Africa. That virus is now known as "human
monkeypox." Monkeypox got its name because monkeys were the first animals
known to have harbored the monkeypox virus. Scientists now say that the primary
reservoirs for monkeypox virus are not monkeys but probably squirrels. WHO
officials in 1976 had no idea what the true reservoir of infection was.[13]
Today, according to CDC, it remains uncertain.
Smallpox was
declared eradicated worldwide by the World Health Assembly on May 8,th 1980.
Vaccination was stopped in the USA in 1972. However, poxviruses that were
indistinguishable from smallpox continued to cause human disease.
Monkeys in
surrounding areas where monkeypox outbreaks occur usually test negative for
monkeypox. But prairie dogs, exotic rodents, Gambian rats, dormice, rope
squirrels and other animals have tested positive. Nobody really knows when or
where monkeypox viruses originated, but they seem to be close relatives of
cowpox and smallpox. All three viruses have rodent reservoirs, which is
important when considering the history and current transmission of smallpox and
monkeypox. Today, monkeypox outbreaks are blamed on rodents or exotic pet
imports, not person-to -person transmission even though human transmission does
occur. Historically, smallpox reservoirs were also rodents – during a time when
rodents were eaten as food and when infestations were commonplace. Yet in the
discussion of smallpox outbreaks this is rarely mentioned. What we hear is how
the vaccine eradicated the disease.
THIS ARTICLE
states that monkeypox was first recorded in 1970 after the eradication of
smallpox in the Democratic Republic of Congo. University of California, School
of Public Health epidemiologist Dr Anne Rimoin states that monkeypox first arrived
in humans after smallpox eradication, even though it has been on the earth for
millennia.
"Monkeypox
has probably occurred for millennia in central Africa, but it's only since the
eradication of smallpox that it's been a disease that actually happens in
humans," Rimoin says. "
There is
absolutely zero certainty as to when monkeypox first colonized humans. It is
more accurate to say that monkeypox was first detected in humans around the
time that smallpox was being declared eradicated, not that it arrived in humans
at that time. Differentiation tests were not carried out on most cases of pox
in the past 200 years.
Laboratory
diagnostic assays for monkeypox include virus isolation and electron
microscopy, ELISA, immunofluorescent antibody assay, histopathologic analysis,
and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Unfortunately, most of these methods are
relatively nonspecific and are unable to differentiate monkeypox viral
infection from infection with other poxviruses.[14] All but PCR are fraught
with false positives, false negatives, and cross reactivity.
In the 1970s
and 1980s, biochemical tests were unreliable in differentiating between
monkeypox and smallpox. Animal challenge tests were historically used to
determine the difference between monkeypox and smallpox. The technique involved
inoculating rabbits and watching the characteristics of the pox. Initially the
two kinds of pox appear similar in the rabbit, but after a few days, monkeypox
distinguishes itself as it becomes hemorrhagic. LINK TO
DOC HERE.
The problem
with such means for distinction is that there has always been a hemorrhagic
form of smallpox.
"There
are four types of variola major smallpox: ordinary; modified; flat; and
hemorrhagic.... Hemorrhagic smallpox has a much shorter incubation period and
is likely not to be initially recognized as smallpox when presenting to medical
care. Smallpox vaccination also does not provide much protection, if any, against
hemorrhagic smallpox." [15]
ELISA is not
much of a gold standard test as it casts a very wide net, and is fraught with false positive and false negative
results.[16] ELISA
TUTORIAL HERE.
The genomes
of these three orthopox viruses are extremely conserved and require a
technology that can detect the minute differences. Polymerase Chain Reaction
(PCR) is a newer test that came on the scene in the 1980s. This test is
different in that it can potentially find pieces of DNA from a virus. The
genetic sequence of a virus has to first be mapped prior to designing a PCR
test. So before smallpox, cowpox, or monkeypox viruses were characterized
genetically, PCR could not be applied to distinguish between them.
The first
PCR test for monkeypox was used in 1997, but highly sensitive real-time PCR was
not in use until 2006.[17] Different biotech companies have developed different
tests that use different primers. PCR, while highly sensitive and specific at
about 98%, still has drawbacks, contamination being the biggest one. No test is
foolproof. Nonetheless it is probably the best assay available for detection
and distinction today.
It should
now be obvious that during the two centuries of smallpox vaccination and up
until the 1990s there was no certain way of testing for distinct orthopox
viruses. During the two centuries of vaccination, the viruses were likely to
mutate, and certain strains could have been selected out as a result of
vaccination.
Therefore,
does anyone know how much 'smallpox' disease was actually monkeypox or
vaccinia? Given that monkeypox is thought to be an ancient virus, where was it
during the smallpox epidemics? Was it called hemorrhagic smallpox?
In 1972,
scientists were asking similar questions when they said:
"Is it
possible that there is an animal reservoir for smallpox infection? Could
monkeypox be a source of new outbreaks of true variola? Or, can the monkeypox
virus undergo certain mutations and become identical in its pathogenicity and
infectiveness to the variola virus?" [18]
ACCORDING TO SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, monkeypox is not that
rare. Seven hundred and sixty cases of monkeypox were counted in the Congo
between 2006 and 2007.
Before and
during the time of eradication declaration, PCR was unavailable, and the
different poxviruses couldn't be distinguished by their DNA, but by a skin test
on rabbits, chick embryo membranes, and blood tests that were fraught with
uncertainty. It seems to me that what was once called smallpox was likely a
very non-uniform disease that could have been anything from cowpox to two forms
of smallpox to chickenpox to monkeypox.
"Monkeypox
virus is closely related to some other orthopoxviruses such as variola
(smallpox) virus, and it cannot be distinguished from these viruses in some
laboratory tests....In 1996-1997, an outbreak [of monkeypox] in the DRC
continued for more than a year, with a person–to–person transmission rate
estimated at 78%. However, epidemiological evidence suggests that many of the
cases in this outbreak may have been chickenpox (varicella); the number of
monkeypox cases and the transmission rate might have been overestimated due to
self-reporting and the unavailability of laboratory testing." [19]
When
vaccination stopped, monkeypox was suddenly diagnosed in humans. Diagnostic
methods were absent during the great vaccine campaigns and everything pox-like
was considered smallpox and counted as smallpox. Differentiating was not a
priority.
Variola, the
smallpox virus, is not in the smallpox vaccine. Instead, a cultured form of
cowpox, called vaccinia, is the virus used to prevent smallpox. That same
vaccine also covers monkeypox, according to the CDC:
Smallpox
vaccine is effective at protecting people against monkeypox when it is given
before they are exposed to monkeypox. (Exposure includes very close contact
with a person or animal that has monkeypox.) Experts believe that vaccination
after exposure to monkeypox may help prevent the disease or make it less
severe." [20]
"Because
the monkeypox virus is related to the virus that causes smallpox, the smallpox
vaccine can protect people from getting monkeypox as well as smallpox.
Even though
PCR can distinguish between the three viruses, clinically and immunologically
the viruses are so similar, that one virus in the vaccine is thought to
immunize against the two other viruses. During outbreaks they all look the
same.
After the
world trade center collapses in New York there were concerns over potential
bioterrorism. Forty thousand health care workers and first responders and 450
thousand military were vaccinated in 2003. They were all contagious for the
nineteen-day post-vaccine shedding period. Some doctors were asked to receive
the vaccine in order to care for those who took the vaccine and developed
vaccinia, or to care for those who became infected upon contact with a recently
vaccinated person.
Multi-state
outbreaks of monkeypox were reported in the same year.[21] Most cases are
presumed to have come from contact with prairie dogs exposed to rodents per
CDC. However all cases were not exposed to animals. ACCORDING
TO A 2005 REPORT, of 72 cases only 37 cases were laboratory
confirmed. Eleven original cases were thrown out of the database when they met
exclusion criteria. EXCLUSION CRITERIA.
There is mention of human to human infection, though in some reports this is
denied.
This is a
very strange coincidence; vaccination and concomitant pox outbreaks in the same
year. Supposedly, monkeypox is not easily transmissible between humans, but
there is a report in the literature of a 5 chain human-to -human transmission,
and human-to-human monkeypox transmission is well documented.[22] A NEW
ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE REPORT vaguely stated that "There was 'limited or no' spread of monkeypox virus through
human contact during this outbreak."
In 2003, the
year that half a million people were vaccinated in the USA – AND the only year
of monkeypox outbreaks in the USA, a multistate (Illinois, Indiana, Kansas,
Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin) outbreak, was the source of the outbreak
definitely prairie dogs? CDC doesn't state how many pox cases were exposed to
prairie dogs, just "the majority of them had direct or close
contact." The vagueness of CDC's reports gives rise to doubts. Only 37 of
72 cases were confirmed with PCR tests, and eleven of the original total were
excluded from analysis. Excluding numerous cases on frivolous grounds is one
way to dampen a negative outcome after a vaccine accident.
Considering
the link with vaccination is not far-fetched especially given that CDC reports
say that only roughly half of cases were PCR confirmed. Vaccination has long
been a relatively common means of transmitting pox outbreaks. According to
Arita and Gromyko's WHO bulletin in 1982, vaccination was a major fly in the
eradication ointment...
"During
the last 24 months, for example, surveillance reports from Canada and the
United Kingdom have included 6 and 9 cases, respectively, of vaccine
complications. At least 8 cases, however, were in persons who, while not
vaccinated themselves, had been infected with vaccinia virus after being in
contact with persons recently vaccinated. In some countries vaccination of
recruits to the armed services has continued; these recruits will occasionally
transmit vaccinia infection to unvaccinated persons, and inevitably some of the
complications will be fatal. In the United Kingdom and Finland, smallpox
vaccination of army recruits was discontinued in 1981." [23]
Without
discontinuing vaccination, it would have been impossible to stop the flow of
smallpox. Doesn't that lead you to wonder how much smallpox was the result of
the vaccine rather than natural smallpox? We know that in places like Leicester
UK, when vaccination ceased, so did smallpox. And there are numerous accounts
of smallpox disease not only being much more severe and deadly among vaccinated
populations, but also more prevalent.
Isn't it
interesting that smallpox vaccine defies everything we know about specificity
in immunity and that one vaccine covers all sorts of pox, except chicken pox?
Can you imagine, nowadays, if a vaccine researcher suggested that an illness
could be prevented by using a slightly related virus? Today's vaccines contain
numerous strains and types of the same organism. Polio vaccine has 3 types of
poliovirus, influenza 2 strains of type A and one strain of type B. But
smallpox vaccine today contains one of many possible strains of a related
virus, not even the smallpox(variola) virus at all. In Jenner's time, it is
anyone's guess which viruses ended up in the vaccines since the technique was so
primitive and typing methods were not available. Still, these vaccinia vaccines
are thought to have eradicated smallpox, and serve as the foundation for
vaccine faith.
Scientists
back in the 1800s and early to mid 1900s had no way to differentiate smallpox,
cowpox, monkeypox or most other pox diseases in humans. Nor was there any
effort to differentiate, until the disease was declared eradicated – just like
when polio was eradicated. Anything that looked like polio, but not caused by a
polio virus, was called acute flaccid paralysis.
Monkeypox and smallpox look identical on
physical examination. Have a look at these two photos:
You probably
can't tell the difference between the two diseases, and neither can most
doctors. Edward Jenner and the doctors of the 1800s and 1900s were also unable
to distinguish smallpox – major and minor, monkeypox, or cowpox, or even
chickenpox.
"When
[monkeypox]infection in human beings does occur, it can be clinically
indistinguishable from smallpox, chickenpox, and other causes of a
vesiculopustular rash." [23A]
It is now
known that many cases of smallpox were mild. These are termed variola minor.
Variola major and variola minor are indistinguishable using the sensitive PCR
test,[24] and thus represent the same infectious organism.
Do you think
your doctor would know a case of variola minor if he/she saw it? Or would it
just be called chicken pox? Do you think your doctor would even think that it
could be smallpox, given that smallpox is thought to be eradicated? There are
clinical means to distinguish the difference, but few doctors think of it, and
in the minor forms of smallpox it wouldn't matter anyway.
Many believe
that smallpox was eradicated from the planet because of vaccination. I once
believed this idea that was taught to me in medical school, and that all
conventional doctors parrot as if they understood the history. With just a
little research it becomes evident that even though smallpox seems to have
disappeared, this was not the result of mass vaccination.
It is
obvious that the vaccines of 1796-1900s were not purified or uniform, yet they
serve as the foundation for successful vaccination. They were made on farms
from scrapings of infected cow bellies, coarsely filtered, and mixed in
glycerine. While today's vaccine product may be more meticulously manufactured,
the CDC admits that the science behind even modern smallpox recommendations has
been little more than a guess.
"...data on duration of protection and recommendations on periodicity of
vaccinations are limited and based to a large extent on historic precedent and
expert opinion used to develop previous ACIP recommendations for smallpox vaccination
for laboratory workers using orthopoxviruses." [25]
And CDC has
no idea what antibody titer is protective.
"The
levels of antibody reported by these tests indicate only exposure, and the
protective antibody titer against smallpox infection is unknown." [26]
They surmise
that the vaccine provides high-level immunity for 3-5 years.
Here
is a graph of smallpox vaccination deaths and smallpox disease deaths, from
England spanning the years of 1906-1922.
The
vaccine-associated deaths are conspicuously high, at about half the rate of
smallpox deaths.
Dr. Charles
T. Pearce in his 1868 essay on vaccination wrote:
"It is
a remarkable fact that Jenner's[the inventor of smallpox vaccine] first child,
his eldest son, on whom he experimented, died subsequently of
consumption[tuberculosis]. Another of his subjects, the man Phipps, whom Jenner
vaccinated, also died of consumption."
Those who
were vaccinated for smallpox were noted to be more severely affected by
smallpox and tuberculosis. Many were exposed to tuberculosis from tuberculous
animals that were used to make vaccines. CLICK HERE TO LINK TO "SMALLPOX AND THE FIRST
VACCINE" CHAPTER FROM OUR UPCOMING BOOK.
Smallpox
manifested in several different forms(ordinary, modified, malignant,
hemorrhagic). Genetically the minor and major forms of variola are related and
indistinguishable by PCR. Individual susceptibility, rather than the virus
probably made the biggest difference. Susceptibility would have certainly
increased after injection of filthy vaccines that contained myriad bacteria and
viruses.
What is most
likely is that the appearance and disappearance of epidemics had much to do
with the constitution and care of the population of the times. Scurvy was
common in areas with hemorrhagic smallpox. This is no surprise to anyone who
understands the full spectrum of ascorbic acid's function in the body,
especially on blood vessels.
Pox
epidemics declined as a result of sanitation and improved nutrition. During the
era of smallpox most people were living in squalor, eating no fresh food, but
rotten milk and rotten meat, drinking sewer water, living among filthy rodents,
and working long hours for little pay. Pox viruses are ancient, but smallpox
evolved as a deadly killer as humanity devolved to overcrowded city dwellers
living with filth, squalor, and desperation.
Historical
evidence points to the fact that the vaccinated were amongst the sickest in
times of smallpox vaccines. Protests against the vaccinators and smallpox
vaccination were massive.[27] Parents commonly chose jail rather than permit
their newborn babies to be vaccinated. Entire towns and districts revolted
before the disease was finally declared eradicated, and the vaccine madness
ended.
Smallpox
vaccination ended in the 1980s because smallpox had declined and because there
was so much trouble with the old unsafe vaccine. That same trouble with the
newer supposedly more safe smallpox vaccines is why smallpox vaccination ended
after the 2003 first responder effort. Which makes you wonder just how much
more trouble there was with the old smallpox vaccine which had a very long list
of known bacterial and other "contaminants" because of its method of
production. After the 2003 vaccines, reports of generalized vaccinia, autoinoculation,
erythema multiforme, myopericarditis, ocular vaccinia, and postvaccinial
encephalitis were reported.
Smallpox was
declared eradicated before clear distinctions between different poxviruses were
made using DNA analysis. Symptoms alone are what were counted for smallpox
during smallpox epidemics. Vaccination was a major source of smallpox
outbreaks, and only a small portion of the earth's entire herd was ever even
vaccinated. Considering all of this, how can anyone believe that smallpox was
eradicated with a vaccine?
_____
With every vaccine suppressible disease, the general hysteria level usually
depends on the availability of a vaccine. Once a vaccine was available, the
disease was suddenly made out to be more problematic. Look how dangerous
chicken pox became after the vaccine was developed.
_______
Pertussis is now hot news and the unvaccinated interrupting herd immunity is
raised over and over, despite the science that shows the vaccinated are by far
and away the most affected by whooping cough.
"Our unvaccinated
and under-vaccinated population did not appear to contribute significantly to
the increased rate of clinical pertussis. Surprisingly, the highest incidence
of disease was among previously vaccinated children in the eight to twelve year
age group." [28]
This is the
most recent, but not the first study to demonstrate 86% of cases of proven
whooping cough are in the vaccinated. How can getting even 100% vaccination
uptake create an immune herd with such vaccines?
Mumps vaccine
was known to be ineffective after two major outbreaks in vaccinated populations
in the USA. Yet the solution was to double the boosters in children with a
vaccine that is now ALLEGED
by two former Merck scientists, to have been known to be ineffective by Merck's
executives.
Jenner's
initial promise was "We have a vaccine that will protect you for life with
one injection." But even he was revaccinating his patients yearly, within
5 years of making that statement. And when that doesn't pan out with whooping
cough, measles, mumps and whatever, the authorities say,, "We have a
highly effective vaccine if it is given on time with boosters," then
"This is an excellent vaccine when 3 or 4 boosters are given, and adults
are revaccinated." Or in the case of whooping cough, introducing an
all-together new vaccine. There is a new nasal vaccine in the pipeline for
newborns, which will be given alongside the already ineffective whooping cough
vaccine series in childhood. This will no doubt be touted as a wonderful
combination.
Eradication
target dates are constantly moved forward, and the unvaccinated or the vaccine
refusers are blamed for all outbreaks. Or in the case of Pakistan, they are
branded TERRORISTS
or RELIGIOUS
FANATICS for not wanting their children to have 30 oral
polio vaccines by age 5. I have outlined in a PREVIOUS BLOG, just
what is really going on in India and how her people are being terrorized by WHO
and CDC as the rate of paralysis continues to skyrocket.
I believe
that when diseases disappear from sight, the disappearance is never solely by
virtue of the vaccine. Yet the vaccine always gets the credit, because the
blind faith in vaccines is prioritized over the scientific evidence. Evidence
to the contrary of the value of vaccination is consistently snuffed out and
kept away from the mainstream media, so that the herd never hears a peep of the
truth. Instead, they get the "herd immunity" sound bite, which gives
undeserved credit to the risk-benefit ratio of vaccination. Inside the web of
half-truths and misinformation, the vaccine religion somehow justifies the
public display of resentment and fear of the unvaccinated.
A special
thank you to "O" from "INSIDE VACCINES"
for assistance in editing this document.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Hedrich AW. 1930. The corrected average attack rate of measles among city
children. Am. J. Epidemiol. 11 (3): 576-600.
2. Hjuler IM. 1995. Bacterial colonization of the larynx and trachea in healthy
children. Acta Paediatr. 1995 May;84(5):566-8. PMID:7633155
3.Caugant DA. 2009. Meningococcal carriage and disease—population biology and
evolution. Vaccine. 2009 Jun 24;27 Suppl 2:B64-70. PMID: 19464092
4. Navarini AA et al. 2010. Long-lasting immunity by early infection of
maternal-antibody-protected infants. Eur J Immunol. Jan;40(1):113-6. PMID:
19877011
5. ibid. Navarini.
6. Measles Outbreak among Vaccinated High School Students – Illinois. MMWR.
June 22, 1984 / 33(24);349-51
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00000359.htm
7. Papania M. et al. 1999. Increased susceptibility to measles in infants in
the United States. Pediatrics. Nov;1045(5):e59 pp 1-6. PMID 19545585.
8. Aaby P. et al. 2002. Low mortality after mild measles infection compared to
uninfected children in rural west Africa. Vaccine. Nov 22;21(1-2):120-6.
PMID:12443670
9. ibid Aaby.
10. Kandapal SD. 2003. MEASLES ANTIBODY STATUS AMONGST NINE MONTHS FIVE YEARS
UNVACCINATED CHILDREN. Indian J Prev Soc Med. Vol 34 (1) pp 8-16.
11. Langmuir A.1962 .The importance of measles as a health problem. AJPH vol 52
no 2 pp1-4.
12. Ibid Langmuir.
13. Arita and Henderson. 1976. Monkeypox and whitepox viruses in West and
Central Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 1976; 53(4): 347–353.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2366520/
14. Weinstein Robert. 2005. Reemergence of Monkeypox: Prevalence, Diagnostics,
and Countermeasures. Clin Infect Dis. 41 (12): 1765-1771.
15.US FDA. Vaccines, blood and biologics. Smallpox.
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/QuestionsaboutVaccines/ucm070429.htm
16. Human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) are a common cause of false positive
ELIZA. A person can develop HAMA for different reasons. The clinical use of
monoclonal mouse antibodies (e.g., for radioimaging, in the treatment of some
cancers) often produces HAMA. HAMA may also arise because of incidental or
occupational exposure to foreign proteins (e.g. veterinarians, farm workers,
food preparers) or due to the presence of domestic animals in the home
environment. Blood transfusion and dialysis are among other sources of heterophilic
antibodies.
17. http://ci.vbi.vt.edu/pathinfo/pathogens/MPV.html
18. Is monkeypox a reservoir of smallpox? December 25, 1972. JAMA.
1972;222(13):1645-1646.
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=346137
19. Monkeypox. 2009. Center for food security and public health. Iowa state
university. Pg 1-9. www.cfsph.iastate.edu/Factsheets/pdfs/monkeypox.pdf
20. CDC Fact Sheet. Smallpox vaccine and monkeypox.
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/monkeypox/smallpoxvaccine_mpox.htm.
21. US CDC. MMWR. July 11, 2003 / 52(27);642-646. Update: Multistate Outbreak
of Monkeypox — Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin, 2003.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5227a5.htm
22. Fenner et al. 1989. Smallpox and its eradication. Page 1306.ISBN-10:
9241561106
23. Arita and Gromyko. Surveillance of orthopoxvirus infections, and associated
research, in the period after smallpox. Bull World Health Organ. 1982; 60(3):
367–375. PMCID: PMC2536002 eradication
23A. Lancet Review. Jan 2004. Monkeypox. vol 4. pp 21-25.
24. Loveless BM. 2009. Differentiation of Variola major and Variola minor
variants by MGB-Eclipse probe melt curves and genotyping analysis. Mol Cell
Probes. 2009 Jun-Aug;23(3-4):166-70. Epub 2009 Apr 5.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19345728
25. US CDC Emergency preparedness and response. CDC Interim Guidance for
Revaccination of Eligible Persons who Participated in the US Civilian Smallpox
Preparedness and Response Program.
http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/revaxmemo.asp
26. US CDC. Emergency preparedness and response. Questions and Answers About
Post-event SmallpoxVaccination
http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/faq/post_event.asp
27. Durbach, Nadja. 2004. Bodily Matters: The Anti-Vaccination Movement in
England, 1853–1907. ISBN-10: 0822334127
28. Witt M et al. 2012. Unexpectedly Limited Durability of Immunity Following
Acellular Pertussis Vaccination in Pre-Adolescents in a North American
Outbreak. Clin Infect Dis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54(12):1730-5.
PMID:22423127
Dr. Suzanne
Humphries
is a conventionally educated medical doctor who has taken the walk into,
around, and out of the allopathic paradigm. She fully and successfully
participated in the conventional system for 19 years, witnessing first-hand how
that approach fails patients and creates new disease time and again. Prior to
medical school, she earned a bachelor’s degree in physics from Rutgers
University.
Dr.
Humphries is on the board of directors of the International Medical
Council on Vaccination. She lives in Maine, USA.
Visit her
website is drsuzanne.net
- Scroll down
through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
Hope you like this
not for profit site -
It takes hours of work every day by
a genuinely incapacitated invalid to maintain, write, edit, research,
illustrate and publish this website from a tiny cabin in a remote forest
Like what we do? Please give anything
you can -
Contribute any amount and receive at
least one New Illuminati eBook!
(You can use a card
securely if you don’t use Paypal)
Please click below -
Spare Bitcoin
change?
Xtra Images by David Dees – http://americanfreedomunion.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/1-Dees-forced-vaccinations-on-sheeple.jpg
https://coto2.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/dees_vaccine8_med.jpg
And see
New Illuminati’s OWN Youtube Videos
-
DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide a live link to your original material on your site (and
links via social networking services) - which raises your ranking on search
engines and helps spread your info further!
This site is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT
(unless an individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright
holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted
& encouraged - if you give attribution to the work & author and include
all links in the original (along with this or a similar notice).
Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or
mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web –
but remember attribution!
If you like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too
small or too large) or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…
Live long and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible
worlds…
