Showing posts with label kariong. Show all posts

Thursday, 2 October 2014

Lost Civilisation in Australia?

Ancient Rock Walls and Formations in Australia may have dramatic implications

Throughout our many expeditions wandering through the bush, time after time we kept running into rock formations and walls that, if consulting accredited texts and curriculum on Original history and geology, just didn’t seem to make sense. On more than one occasion, those on site have been unanimous in remarking that the uniformity of shape and precision of line and angles seem so similar to many ancient walls found throughout South America.

If just one of the six examples presented is indeed an artificial construction, this immediately contradicts a fundamental assumption underpinning all accepted versions of Original history before the British armada and soldiers invaded. We are assured that until the Invasion there was no metal blade in the Original tool-kit. The problem being, what we saw included a consistency and delicacy of incision, shape and form of rock that contradicts this technological vacuum.

Our intention in this article is to present a series of what at the very least can be called extreme geological anomalies, and most likely much more. Coincidentally or not, many of these formations are extremely close to the controversial Kariong Glyphs. We are of the opinion the hieroglyphs are not only genuine, but bear witness to two narratives, the most recent being an ancient Egyptian tale of misfortune and death, and an older account engraved in a much more ancient Original script. Irrespective of the credentials of these engravings, this site is merely a base point and background setting to these formations, tunnels and walls.

The Back Door/Shaft

First the immediate surrounds, then further afield. The closest site to the glyphs is a back-shaft and tunnel that runs under some of the same rock on which the glyphs are engraved. There is one large chamber at the left side, which is quite possibly a very recent excavation, but not so the shaft. The straight lines, flat ceiling, parallel walls and what some claim to be the remains of a doorway, seem to carry the touch of human hands and metal. No doubt others will claim it is also part of the mischief that also included the engravings around the corner.

But what the critics are not aware of is that the hieroglyphs on the three sandstone walls are not unique in this area. Not far from the back shaft/tunnel is another set of no less than 13 hieroglyphs. They are much smaller than the engravings on the walls, about one third the size, more worn and the incisions are nowhere near as deep or sharp. Despite the apparent differences the narrative is identical and back-shaft/tunnel affirming. The bottom three glyphs of the right panel read: Back-door/shaft, Coffin/Death and a Sacred Staff for use in the After-World.

According to the NPWS, after close to a week of phone calls trying to contact the appropriate spokesperson, there is nothing to be added or subtracted to the claims the shaft and glyphs are both fakes. I did ask for a formal response and was promised one, but days passed and finally I lost patience. If a formal reply is received at a later date, that official explanation will be included in another article.

According to sources we are in contact with, quite a few people saw the hieroglyphs and went inside the tunnel before 1960.

But we never embrace absolutes, the chances are the shaft is not natural, it’s positioning, being less than two metres from the glyphs implies just through that association alone it is part of something either incredibly important or devious. The timing is the point of debate, not that it is artificial, that is agreed.

The Healing Table

Just up the slope, less than 50 metres from the glyphs, is the next candidate under consideration. It has been claimed to be a mummification table used to treat and prepare the body of the Pharaoh’s son Nefer-Ti-Ru, who died from snake bite. What we can state with confidence is that it is either an extreme example of a natural process, or a “healing table. Original Elder, Gerry Bostock, has assured me that it is indeed a healing table, because of this that is the only term we use.

If natural, the lipping seems far too uniform with an almost level, flat top of over 2 cms. Some parts of the top edge is severely weathered, others seem untouched. The grain inside is smooth, completely uniform and without any fracture or variation in colour. The rock may have had a natural depression to begin with which was worked into a smoother shape with the table inserted. Or perhaps the far more technologically challenging option of the rock shelf being carefully cut into shape with the mould inserted to make a neat fit, is applicable? What really pushes the limits is that natural and all non-natural possibilities require great amounts of heat, enough to melt rock.

It must be also conceded that there are sandstone formations in the area which have been subjected to intense heat and do share similarities. On flat platforms nearby there are semi-melted formations, but all are much smaller and nowhere near as uniform, smooth and symmetrical.

But that wasn’t all Gerry Bostock shared when talking about this sacred sandstone healing table, he insists it can heal women, not men. For women with a pure heart and soul who lay inside, they would also travel to the stars. For now that is as cryptic as we need to be, except to add that we have compiled or witnessed the experiences of five women who took up the challenge. All confirmed everything Gerry said was absolutely true, we will fully expand on this in our upcoming book, but what needs to be understood is that this rock formation, whether natural or artificial, may have more to it than plain old sandstone.

Klaus Dona’s Tunnel

At a location not that far away, but seldom, if ever, walked near or seen, there is what we feel is an extremely unusual tunnel and wall that really does push the boundaries. Despite our many excursions into the bush, and those yet to come, there is no way we would have ever found this site, for that we are eternally grateful to Klaus Dona’s guidance, access to the latest advances in technology and photographs.

It really is quite a steep slope getting to this site. To gain entry to the opening of this construction, each of us had to straddle a three metre drop, and in my case did so not fully convinced I was able to breach the divide.

What became immediately apparent was that the entrance seemed so unnatural, but we must point out that our opinions are based on experience, common sense, and no degree in geology. Irrespective of courses not studied, it was patently obvious the tunnel was under pressure and compression from above. The top section of the platform was literally sliding down the slope and causing mayhem inside this tunnel. Being the thinnest, I was able to progress close to 15 metres before the walls narrowed too much to continue.

Amongst the dozens of rocks replete with straight edges and 90 degree angles found throughout, was a wall I kept returning to. It is three metres in height and double that in length, and what immediately caught my attention was the four straight horizontal layers of individually cut pieces of rock. Although my eye may be untrained to the finer geological nuances, it was obvious each layer of rock was different, and seemingly cut to fit to the shapes of those adjoining. The repetition of form, precision of cut and join is so reminiscent of the ancient walls in South America.

Ancient Mortar

But this is Australia, the land of naked nomads and rock and stick technology, never masons of the highest order. Up until a little over 200 years ago neither metal blade nor wheel was part of the Australian landscape, or so the approved history books allege. If it isn’t natural, it wasn’t manufactured by any Original person or those who entered the continent after the Invasion. We suspect the tunnel originally measured 75 metres and is merely one part of a much bigger story and evidence of an earlier civilisation, or maybe it is just another freak of nature.

Another Block in the Wall, Only Bigger

A couple of kilometers further away from the hieroglyphs than the tunnel, there is another wall exhibiting what seems to be a very similar style of construction. Once again, the joins are extremely tight, I could insert the thinnest of twigs about 15 cms inside before it broke, but unlike the last wall, the individual sandstone blocks were much larger, some weighing hundreds of kilograms. And unlike the other wall, we are convinced that there is a mortar-like substance evident between some of the blocks. In what only adds to the technological intrigue, this section of the wall, which we feel is part of the larger remaining section measuring about 40 metres, seems to be cemented to the natural cliff-face directly behind. It is as if the wall was built around and attached to the cliff.

The Place with no Name

The next site is some distance from the cluster near Kariong, about thirty kilometers away. In our upcoming books we refer to it as “The Place With no Name,” and there is not one type of unusual rock formation, but five distinct categories. Each group is either an amazingly rare geological formation, or the result of human hands. The real problem we face if determining the natural forces responsible, is that we have five rare geological variations and all virtually within a stone’s throw of each other. That’s a double rarity.

Ancient Drain

When Gavin Bragg first made contact with us he sent three photos to whet our appetite, and some time later, the readers of Ancient Origins. The drain pictured was positioned amongst the softest sandstone I’ve ever encountered, the slightest pressure can see the rocks disintegrate into individual grains. A very small piece of the passage of drains that ran ten metres was examined by a highly qualified geologist who noted that it is the hardest type of sandstone in the region. For any who suspect it may be the result of geological processes, both lips on this drain measured exactly 68 millimetres across.

Of course, any verdict passed must also include the four other examples of extreme geology, but the drain is sufficient for our purposes. We believe the drain is in the wrong place when every other rock in the area falls apart when you pick it up. It is quite possible that this is part of an ancient complex, and that this drain is too hard, too uniform in measurement and too straight in line to be anything other than an ancient artifact sourced from an earlier civilsation.

Last and Most Likely Least

Our final contribution, and there are many more to choose from, is a site that I rate the lowest in probability. My main reason for including this is more as gesture of respect and thanks for a person who has been an invaluable assistance to our research, and not only in the geological arena. He is close to the site and has a great interest in that area, so in it goes as number six with a question mark.

Even though I still hold some reservations, all other members of the group were far more animated. There were other sections of this wall I felt were probably natural when everyone else was adamant that tools were at play on the rocks. They could be right, but there is one sizeable section of wall that I was less casual about. These blocks really did look like massive precut sandstone blocks. My crude twig and paper test ceded no less than 20 cms, but above is quite a steep cliff and the weights involved, if entertaining the notion that it is artificial, are quite staggering.

Ancient Drain

I have made it clear from the beginning I am not a qualified geologist, but I do claim to be an amateur who is improving every day and ready to listen. We have both a huge amount of on-site experience and professional guidance from others to bring to this equation. With that proviso established, since I’ve been onsite on each occasion, and some of what we have discussed and shown has never been published before, I feel I have the right to present an assessment of the likelihood that each site had been created by tools.

The Shaft behind the glyphs: 100% unnatural. The Healing Table: 95% unnatural. The Tunnel: 99.9999% unnatural ( I came so close 100%, but at this juncture I can’t divulge what technology Klaus Dona has access to, nor the other reasons we went to this site). The Wall attached to the cliff: 99% unnatural. The Drain (part 1 of 5): 100%. The small section of cliff: 60%.

If just one of these six sites was indeed made by human hands and tools supposedly absent in pre-Cook Original tool-kits, tear up the history books detailing Original pre-history and start again. But this time instead of the so called experts telling Original people and custodians what they think the answer is, they must learn to ask, still the ego and tongue and learn the art of reflective, silent listening. The real truth and history is out there, and Original custodians of Lore are willing to share, but only if the questions are right and intentions honourable.

From Ancient Origins @ http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-oceania/ancient-rock-walls-and-formations-australia-may-have-dramatic-implications and http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-oceania-opinion-guest-authors/ancient-rock-walls-and-formations-australia-klaus-dona

For more information about evidence in this part of Australia see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/kariong%20glyphs
For more information about lost civilisations see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/lost%20civilisation
- Scroll down through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section

Hope you like this not for profit site -

It takes hours of work every day by a genuinely incapacitated invalid to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this website from a tiny cabin in a remote forest

Like what we do? Please give anything you can -

Contribute any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!

(You can use a card securely if you don’t use Paypal)

Please click below -

For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @ the top left of http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

And see

New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati

New Illuminati Youtube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/feed

New Illuminati on Google+ @ https://plus.google.com/115562482213600937809/posts

New Illuminati on Twitter @ www.twitter.com/new_illuminati

New Illuminati on Google Follow - http://www.google.com/friendconnect/settings/edit?smpl=true&st=e%3DAOG8GaCFDeBRZ1yDY2DjCaq61tFDiwO07s%252Fwv3x8%252B%252FJgZJTLx5igbMomJIu3796Ja6n05WaS8qnJ0DLyeGk1q49tLD8m%252FhV1K%252Bq%252BQIOGOwLeWznnm5IGhzjfWzVnq5I4UJr3fw8yk%252B8W2OqwlCbL7BNsW32uouSc79Br%252BkOZQ1Fpzg6J3KMIZkzmg0%252FcPHsWUPqZv845VKS31S%252FbCm8NpINhlK1kDxUdRmcCkT37dIc4RB6PNurjCcd2%252BVkNBveCm4kAgeb8A3Q5hNj6%252FHplvQxKFI%252BW1TYBJVYqHHTKsnBPGcL6wlZdxTUwtfxWU2ZvANJQ%252F%252FUrolBwP7ovb92SZqSWMFJRnN2rsQ%253D%253D%26c%3Dpeoplesense

New Illuminations –Art(icles) by R. Ayana @ http://newilluminations.blogspot.com

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com

The Prince of Centraxis - http://centraxis.blogspot.com (Be Aware! This link leads to implicate & xplicit concepts & images!)

DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –

We provide a live link to your original material on your site (and links via social networking services) - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps spread your info further! This site is published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, - if you give attribution to the work & author. Please include a (preferably active) link to the original (along with this or a similar notice).

Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution!

If you like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large) or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

Live long and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible worlds…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

Monday, 10 December 2012

Rewriting Australia’s History: The Egyptian Connection

Rewriting Australia’s History:

The Egyptian Connection

Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs discovered outside Sydney Australia. Photo courtesy of Steve Strong and Dr. Hans Dieter von Senff

By Steve Strong

The Kariong Glyphs site is the most argued over and controversial archaeological site in Australia. Decried as utterly bogus by authorities and sceptics, it is an archaeological ‘poison chalice.’ My colleagues and I have been denounced as “dumb and dumber,” “liars,” motivated by “money” while working in an “unscientific” manner driven by an unstated “agenda,” simply because we find fault in every explanation of a hoax and merit in the notion that some of hieroglyphs were carved by ancient Egyptians.

Found in the Central Coast of NSW, there are two sandstone walls at a site that is still extremely difficult to locate. These walls have close to 300 engravings. Some claim they are a random mixture of ancient scripts done recently, others believe they are a genuine example of the earliest style of Egyptian writing (Proto-Egyptian). There are so many rumours and stories accounting for their presence, too many to canvas now, but there are a couple of explanations that seem to be the most convenient, and have become the “accepted versions”.

Without doubt the two most popular offerings relate to them merely being the scratchings of a “deranged Yugoslav” concocted in the late 70’s, or the actions and chisels of mischievous archaeology students from Sydney University in the early 80’s. According to National Parks and Wildlife Service, the engravings were created no earlier than 1983.

Such was the passionate and widespread conviction that the site is a hoax, my colleagues and I could never commit ourselves fully to believe it was a genuine ancient Egyptian artefact. On previous visits to the walls we had devoted less than five minutes to actually examining the hieroglyphs; it was far safer to focus on all the archaeology with Egyptian undertones surrounding the site and let others argue over who and when. That was before. Once we began filming an interview with the two Original spokespeople for the site (Egyptians in Australia-Part 2), everything changed. Until that day we had listed the Kariong Glyphs as ‘number 52′ in our collection of 60 odd pieces of evidence substantiating an ancient Egyptian presence in Australia. After speaking to Aunty Beve and David Fitzgerald, the glyphs have been repositioned at ‘number 1′ with daylight running a distant second.

Aunty Beve is one of the last Darkinjung Elders. She is the keeper of the women’s stories and one of the very few who has the right to speak on Original Lore and Dreaming stories in this tribal region. Her word on such matters can not be challenged. Up until now, whenever asked about an Egyptian involvement in creating the hieroglyphs in the area, Aunty Beve always refused to make any public statement.

This time she broke her silence.

She revealed that the engravings on the two walls were created by “Old Egyptians,” noting that her ancestors “all told us that story.” She also explained why many of the carvings look incredibly fresh and well tended, and certainly don’t exhibit thousands of years’ wear and tear or build up of rock varnish, as one would expect;- In ancient times the women would use their urine to clean the engravings on a regular basis. Aunty Beve went even further in noting there are other carved hieroglyphs in the region (of which we are aware of two) that are “far older” and are “not Egyptian,” but were created by Australians! Could this mean the Egyptians learnt the art of writing with hieroglyphs whilst in Australia while under Original tutelage?

Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs discovered outside Sydney Australia. Photo courtesy of Steve Strong and Dr. Hans Dieter von Senff

While the concept of ‘writing beginning in Australia’ may seem somewhat radical, it isn’t. Respected academics including Lesley Maynard and Robert Bednarik have stated that the engraved symbols found at Panaramitee (SA) may be the initial inspiration behind all forms of written communication. Bednarik conducted a ‘straw poll’ to test the likelihood that Original people “invented” the first alphabet/codified set of symbols. Bednarik was convinced that some of the art of other continents resembled the Panaramitee. He sent out copies of seven unlabelled drawings of engravings (mainly circles and arrow-like marks resembling bird tracks) and asked eight rock art specialists to identify whether they were Panaramitee style or not. In fact they were all from North and South America, Africa and Europe. The score of wrong answers was an abysmal 98%, which led Bednarik to suggest that, “It is not possible to identify a Panaramitee style or … it is a world wide style.”

With the benefit of hindsight and Aunty Beve’s guidance, it is now obvious Bednariks’ second option of “a world wide trend” was indeed the answer he sought.

Aunty Beve provided an historical Black-fella perspective in the interview while David completed the picture by providing a White-fella update, replete with “cloak and dagger” business. David Fitzgerald was a “building contractor and unofficial sites finder” for National Parks and Wildlife Services Brisbane Waters, and is a blood descendant of the mighty warrior Pemulwuy. He first became aware of the site in 1978, at least 5 years before NPWS claim they first knew of the hieroglyphs. David was very open in acknowledging there was a deliberate cover-up, and that it took some haggling by him (and even a degree of “bribery”) before they showed him the two walls in 1978.

He was taken on dusk and made to promise he would never speak of it to others. What he first saw was a huge accumulation of natural debris wedged between the two walls with only the top levels of hieroglyphs visible. The rest was submerged under tonnes of litter. According to David the collection of trees, branches, rocks and debris had built up “over decades.” David and his co-workers, under the direction of NPWS, took “two full days to clean up.” This advanced state of disrepair casts serious doubt upon the most popular version of the supposed skulduggery that led to this hoax being created.

The story goes no more three years before this massive clean-up occurred. Alan Dash, a surveyor working for Gosford Council, found a ‘deranged Yugoslav’ exiting the two walls with chisel in hand and assumed he was responsible for the exotic graffiti. Dash then walked in and examined the walls freely with barely a twig beneath his feet. Outside the incredibly remote possibility that tonnes upon tonnes of debris accumulated on this site in less than a thousand days, one of these accounts is plainly wrong.

With the Dash version virtually dismissed, I raised with David the possibility that Sydney University students were responsible. Of course, since this is claimed to have occurred in 1983 and David saw the two walls slowly reveal their narratives five years earlier, such a scenario was already not feasible. But as is often the case, many lies have their genesis in a truth, no matter how convoluted. Yes, the date was 1983. And yes, students from Sydney University were on site and standing between the walls. David should know – he took them there! But the notion that these same students then engraved the entire gallery had, at least, a small fingernail of truth within;- one of the students began scratching at the a glyph with her fingernail, David was far from impressed and made it clear she stop immediately. Soon after he escorted them from the site.

I asked David if, during these early stages, anyone from NPWS objected or claimed it was just a clever hoax. “Most definitely not, they were all blown away.” But the common reaction from those who ‘decide’ is that they “wanted nothing to do with it.” David was told “to forget about it” and “not to mention a word to anyone.” Everything was clothed in secrecy, and until rumours and talk quickly spread, it was hoped the whole inconvenient Egyptian affair would disappear and fade back into the Australian scrub. When responding to my question in relation to what avenues were available to him to counter the lies and denials coming out of NPWS and further up, he pointed out if he did object any further he would be “in danger of losing any contracts.”

In researching Original history and lore, my colleagues and I take our cues from the region’s Elders and custodians. Aunty Beve and David’s testimony is the final word – some of the glyphs on the Central Coast of NSW are Egyptian. Whatever the unnamed ‘deranged Yugoslav’ chiselled, Alan Dash saw, or devious students engraved is just the White-fella’s take on history…. a sorry story that has been blindly accepted for centuries.

Our brief is simple; report as given (not amended or sanitised) the information shared with us by the Original custodians of lore and culture. After all, they were here when it happened.

For my colleagues and I, the final word on this debate belongs to the first recorded reference of the Kariong/Egyptian accord. King Bungaree was a highly respected Original Elder of the region, and in 1896 a compendium of his Dreaming stories and local knowledge was published. Reference was made by him to a Kariong Dreaming story about “two brothers” who came here in “great canoes.” Misfortune befell them and one was “bitten by a snake,” died and was “buried“ near the walls.

Three Original keepers of lore stand united in testimony, and from our point of view all questions of authenticity are no longer an issue. There are Egyptian hands at work, that is definite, and equally there is evidence of their presence everywhere around this site, and many other places. We suspect there are at least two narratives on these walls, and that the more recent account details the arrival and tragedies associated with two sons of a Pharaoh. The scribe for Nefer-Djeseb and Nefer-Ti-Ru made note of being “stranded in this wretched land” and that their chances of returning were negligible. They experienced “drought”, and for reasons unstated Nefer-Ti-Ru made his way “westward” for “two seasons.” Unfortunately, while returning, he was “bitten” not once but “twice” by a “snake”, died, and was buried near the two walls.

At the most simplistic level, those three sentences paraphrase the Egyptian narrative as supplied by Ray Johnson. He was the first to understand why previous academics dismissed the symbols as a haphazard mixture of ancient scripts; none were familiar with the most ancient form of Egyptian hieroglyph:- Proto-Egyptian. Johnson went to Egypt and presented his research to the Director General of the Cairo Museum, Dr. Abu Dhia Ghazi, who confirmed his interpretation was correct.

But that is nowhere near the end of this significant emerging truth. We are convinced the younger set of engravings is possibly 4,770 years old, but the older narrative could date back much, much further. When my colleagues and I ask for guidance on how far back and from where the inspiration came, the response is always the same; every tribal group we have met or know of carries one constant, one Dreaming story that transcends boundaries: the Seven Sisters, Pleiades. On those walls, we suspect this same story, celestial place and direct genetic involvement is recorded in stone.

For now enough of Kariong. I could discuss it in more detail, but the engravings are too detailed and need 3000 words for the briefest coverage. In the November/December edition of New Dawn we go into more detail and separate the two accounts, one of earthy origin and one from the stars. Our aim here was to establish the authenticity of the site, and because of this truth these two sandstone walls and associated archaeology rewrite Australian and world history, pose questions about why the Egyptians came here, and challenge fundamental assumptions made about the role the Australian Original people had in global pre-historic times and genetics.

Long before the Egyptians sailed to Australia, or any race for that matter, people from this continent sailed to other continents all over the world. In many of our articles and books we have presented a bounty of evidence substantiating an actual Original presence in many locations, and of course Egypt has been a prominent destination discussed in detail in our first book “Constructing a New World Map.”

Mummification, as with earlier examples we have presented, is assumed to be something uniquely Egyptian. It isn’t. Mummification is a common Original funerary ceremony and occurs at a variety of places throughout Australia. One mummified corpse, along with a canoe used in these rituals, was stolen from Darnley Island (Torres Strait) in 1875 by members of the Shervert expedition. Momentarily ignoring the dubious ethics of such desecration, it is worth noting that “world renowned medical scientist Sir Raphael Cilento, who examined the corpse stated the incisions and method of embalming to be the same as those employed in Egypt during the 21st to 23rd dynasties over 2,900 years ago.”

Photo courtesy of zakairan.com

And recently, an announcement was made by a team of scientists from a British Museum who “discovered from 1,000 years B.C. onwards, eucalyptus resin (only found in Australia) was used in Egypt when embalming the dead,” which further demonstrate this ancient link between Australia and Egypt. [1]

What needs to be understood is that the Original influence in Egypt is not just related to higher realms of the esoteric, limited to a select few, but had spread throughout the landscape. In the eyes of most Australians, where there are gum leaves so too koalas, kangaroos and sundry native species. That being the case, the Cairo Times (1982) report that “archaeologists working at Fayum, near the Siwa Oasis uncovered fossils of kangaroos and other Australian marsupials” would seem to be yet another way of restating the obvious. [2]

In what is possibly the most famous example of a long-standing Australo-Egyptian formal liaison, the discovery in King Tut’s tomb of a dozen wooden boomerangs, each of a unique design and typical Original patterning, should have caused a huge unrest within Australian academic circles. Instead it was met with a deafening silence. Is this apathy? Or an inconvenient truth of massive proportions? [3] [4] [5]

My colleagues and I were recently contacted by 3 separate sources over 3 consecutive days, and in each case (bar one specific narrowing of focus) the news was as identical as it was amazing; the gold used in Tut’s tomb was carrying an Australian ‘signature’. We have since tried to chase up the credentials of this claim. As things stand it is a work in progress. Perhaps some Wake Up World readers may be able to add more?

Ancient Egyptians in Australia. Ancient Australians in Egypt. None of this can be found in text books or school curriculum in any part of Australia. What makes me sad is that this glaring omission from Australia’s history does not stand alone; it is merely one chapter among many. Equally, it needs to be acknowledged that the Egyptians were but one of many nations that made contact with the First Australians. The Phonecians, Chinese, Vikings, Spanish, Portuguese and Amerindians all walked on these shores well before Cook. And all, bar the British, stayed for a period of time and left when asked. So much has been lost and stolen since the invasion, but in the spirit of Wirritjin (Black-fella White-fella Dreaming) the Original keepers of lore are revealing secrets never before shared, of a past and a heritage that was never forgotten – just hidden until the time is right.

Video Documentary – “Egyptians in Australia” Part 1 by Steven Strong

Article References

[1] ‘Australia’s unwritten history’, Walkabout, August 1967, pp. 19-23. Paraphrased

[i]n February 1964 the tomb of a woman, probably dating back to 1,000 B.C., was found on the site of an ancient city in the Jordan Valley. Examination of the body suggested that eucalyptus oil had been used to embalm it. The only sources then of such oil were the gum-trees of Australia and New Guinea. Now, of course, they are relatively common overseas but only since Baron von Mueller instituted a seed exchange between Australia and other parts of the world … [Terry 1967: p. 21]

[2] Paul White. “The Oz -Egyptian Enigma,” Exposure 2, no 6, 1996
[3] “The Tutankhamen Exhibit- Other Items”, Tour Egypt
[4] “Tutankhamen Tomb”, Suite 101
[5] Robin Stummer, 23rd Mar. 1997,”Brit brains solve the Riddle of the ‘rang- Robin Stummer on the Scientist putting the boom in boomerangs”, The Independent.

About the Author

Steve Strong, with his son Evan, have co-written Constructing a New World Map, Mary Magdalene’s Dreaming and Forgotten Origin (published by University Press of America) and soon to be published Shunned. He has written over a dozen articles on Original history and lore for the National Indigenous Times, with four articles in New Dawn. With close to 30 years of contact with Gumilaroi people and tribes of the Bundjalung Language Confederation, and the benefit of extensive consultation with many Elders, the history revealed is part of an Original narrative that was almost lost. For more information ForgottenOrigin.com

Article photos are courtesy of Steve Strong, Dr. Hans Dieter von Senff and zakairan.com

From Wake Up World @ http://wakeup-world.com/2012/10/29/re-writing-australias-history-the-egyptian-connection/

For more information about hidden history see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/hidden%20history
For more information about the Kariong glyphs see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/kariong%20glyphs
- See ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section

You Can Help This Unique Independent Site's Author Survive

Donate any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!

Just press the button-