"All the World's a Stage We Pass Through" R. Ayana

Showing posts with label human evolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label human evolution. Show all posts

Thursday, 10 December 2015

Chimpanzees and monkeys have entered the Stone Age


Chimpanzees and monkeys have entered the Stone Age

 Humans are not the only species to have entered the Stone Age (Credit: Karl Ammann/NPL)

We think of the Stone Age as something that early humans lived through. But we are not the only species that has invented it


By Colin Barras


In the rainforests of west Africa, the woodlands of Brazil and the beaches of Thailand, archaeologists have unearthed some truly remarkable stone tools.

It's not the workmanship that makes them special. If anything, a casual observer might struggle to even identify them as ancient tools. It's not their antiquity that's exceptional either: they're only about the same age as the Egyptian pyramids.

What makes these tools noteworthy is that the hands that held them weren't human.

These stone tools were wielded by chimpanzees, capuchins and macaques. The sites where they have been unearthed are the basis of a brand new field of science: primate archaeology.

The tools are crude. A chimpanzee or monkey stone hammer is hardly a work of art to rival the beauty of an ancient human hand axe. But that's not the point. These primates have developed a culture that makes routine use of a stone-based technology. That means they have entered the Stone Age.


New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides) uses tool to forage (Credit: Roland Seitre/NPL)

New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides) uses tool to forage (Credit: Roland Seitre/NPL)


A few decades ago, biologists thought humans were the only species that made extensive use of tools.


Not any more. We now know that many mammals, birds, fish and even insects use objects in their environment as tools to make their lives easier.

Many primates use tools too. In 2014, for instance, there were reports of a wild gorilla using a twig to fish ants out of a nest. But primates don't, as a rule, turn stones into tools.

"Orang-utans, bonobos and gorillas have been seen using plant tools but never stone tools," says Michael Haslam at the University of Oxford in the UK, and leader of the Primate Archaeology (Primarch) project.


A chimpanzee uses a stone hammer (Credit: Justine Evans/NPL)

A chimpanzee uses a stone hammer (Credit: Justine Evans/NPL)


Exactly why stone tools are so rarely used by great apes is a mystery, he says.

But it might have to do with the fact that stones are not readily available to species that spend much of their time in and around trees. "Plants are ubiquitous in primate habitats but stones are not," says Haslam.
This means that even if a particularly clever great ape does begin using stone tools, there aren't enough rocks around for that tradition to be aped by others in the group, and passed down through the generations.

However, the chimpanzees of west Africa do seem to have managed to pass their stone-based technology – which they use to crack open nuts – down many generations. We know this because of a landmark study in primate archaeology that was published in 2007.


The dense forests of the Ivory Coast (Credit: André Quillien/Alamy)

The dense forests of the Ivory Coast (Credit: André Quillien/Alamy)


"Normal", human archaeology relies on the idea that we can recognise human behaviours in the artefacts we leave behind. Tiny scuffs and marks that might be dismissed by the casual observer carry a wealth of information to the trained observer.

"Primate archaeologists" led by Christophe Boesch at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, set about applying these principles to chimpanzee tools.

In the rainforests of Ivory Coast they excavated an area of the forest floor down to a depth of about 1m, unearthing a 4300-year-old horizon rich in stone artefacts.

Some of those stone artefacts have been worked with a level of precision possessed by humans alone.

But others had marks that suggested they had been used in a cruder way, as pounding tools for cracking open tough nuts: just as chimpanzees in the region use stone tools today.


Chimpanzees have been using stone tools for millennia (Credit: Bernard Walton/NPL)

Chimpanzees have been using stone tools for millennia (Credit: Bernard Walton/NPL)


Boesch and his colleagues had previously studied modern chimpanzee stone tool culture in the region. This research revealed that the chimpanzees have an idiosyncratic way of choosing and using their tools.

For instance, chimpanzees will often deliberately opt for particularly large and heavy stone hammers, between 1kg and 9kg, while humans prefer to use stones that weigh 1kg or less. Many of the 4300-year-old stone tools weighed more than 1kg, suggesting they were used by chimpanzees.


Chimpanzees also use their stone tools to crack open certain types of nuts that humans don't eat. Starch residues on some of the ancient tools came from these nuts.

Together, these findings led to an obvious conclusion: chimpanzees have been using stone tools in the rainforests of Ivory Coast for at least 4300 years.

The chimpanzee Stone Age began at least that early, and maybe even earlier, says Boesch. However, "it is very hard to predict where you would find soil layers that would be old enough to look at earlier periods."

In theory, the chimpanzee Stone Age might have begun very early indeed.


A group of chimpanzees cracking nuts with stones (Credit: Bernard Walton/NPL)

A group of chimpanzees cracking nuts with stones (Credit: Bernard Walton/NPL)


Chimpanzees are our closest living relative. The fact that they, like us, can use stone tools might imply that the common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans was the first to develop a stone based technology.


Haslam says this is unlikely. If that was the case we might reasonably expect all chimpanzees to use stone tools, but only a small number of communities in west Africa do so.

It's more logical to imagine that the chimpanzees of west Africa have developed a stone tool tradition in the time since they split from central and east African chimp communities. Haslam says this happened between 500,000 and 1 million years ago.

It now seems that this west African chimpanzee Stone Age is completely distinct from the human Stone Age.


A bearded capuchin eating a nut cracked using a stone (Credit: Mary McDonald/NPL)

A bearded capuchin eating a nut cracked using a stone (Credit: Mary McDonald/NPL)


There have been reports going back a few centuries that bearded capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus) in Brazil use stone tools. A study in 2004 confirmed that they do.

So do long-tailed macaque monkeys (Macaca fascicularis aurea) in Thailand, according to a study published in May 2015.

Neither species sits particularly near humans in the primate evolutionary tree.

"Capuchins are New World monkeys, separated from us by some 35 million years of evolution," says Haslam. "Even the macaques are separated from us by around 25 million years."

In other words, the Stone Age primates are so widely scattered across the evolutionary tree that they must have each come up with the technology independently. "We have multiple inventions of the same behaviour," says Haslam.


Long-tailed macaques live on islands in Thailand (Credit: Mark MacEwen/NPL)

Long-tailed macaques live on islands in Thailand (Credit: Mark MacEwen/NPL)


His team is now applying the same sorts of techniques that Boesch used to study the chimpanzee archaeological record in Ivory Coast to investigate the history of tool use by the macaques and capuchins. This research, conducted as part of the Primarch project, is not yet published.

"We have now recovered buried stone tools from activity areas of all the stone-tool-using primates," says Haslam.


The capuchins, like the chimpanzees, use their stone tools to crack open nuts, and also to dig for tubers.

"Every time someone has gone to look at wild groups of bearded capuchins in their natural habitat, they've found stone tool use," says Haslam. "This species may be the only one other than humans that has ubiquitous stone artefacts."

By contrast, the macaques live on islands and use their stones to crack open shellfish.

Both species of monkey have apparently passed the tradition down the generations. That means there is a deep history of stone tool use in at least three primates other than humans.

Chimpanzee and monkey stone tools look very primitive. But then again, our ancestors' stone tools were just as primitive too, long ago.


South American capuchin monkeys have learned to use stone tools (Credit: Dave Watts/NPL)

South American capuchin monkeys have learned to use stone tools (Credit: Dave Watts/NPL)


In May 2015, archaeologists working in Kenya published details of the earliest stone tools ever made by members of our lineage.

These "Lomekwian" stone tools were recovered from 3.3-million-year-old deposits. According to the team that found them, they were produced using techniques similar to those used by stone-wielding chimps and monkeys.

This means studying primates that use stone tools could tell us about the nature of early human behaviour. However, drawing conclusions won't be easy: early humans are very different from chimpanzees and monkeys.

Within about 700,000 years of those Lomekwian stone tools, human technology had moved on. First came "Oldowan" tools, including stones that had been deliberately modified to make a sharp edge by "flaking" off small pieces. A million years later, Acheulean hand axes with carefully-shaped cutting edges begin appearing in the archaeological record.

Why did our ancestors learn to make such sophisticated stone tools, and so long ago, while chimps and monkeys never got beyond a Lomekwian-style technology?


Human hands have changed less than chimps' (Credit: Doug Allan/NPL)

Human hands have changed less than chimps' (Credit: Doug Allan/NPL)


You might think it would be down to evolutionary advances in the anatomy of our hands, perhaps allowing for finer manipulation of objects.

In fact, a July 2015 study by Sergio Almécija of George Washington University in Washington, DC suggests that, if anything, human hands have changed less over the last few million years than chimpanzee hands.

"The ancestor of humans and chimps had hand length proportions more similar, but not equal, to humans than to chimpanzees," says Almécija. "In terms of [digit] length proportions, humans are in fact more primitive than chimps."

If it's not chimpanzees' and monkeys' hands that are holding them back, the problem probably lies in their brains, says Almécija.


A long-tailed macaque cracks cockles with a stone tool (Credit: Mark MacEwen/NPL)

A long-tailed macaque cracks cockles with a stone tool (Credit: Mark MacEwen/NPL)


"It seems plausible that the ability to create stone tools requires some additional cognitive abilities: not just recognising what would be a useful tool, but also creating it," says Alexandra Rosati at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts.


Humans' larger brains, and our resulting greater smarts, may be what allowed us to make ever better tools. But it's difficult to say exactly why our ancestors' brains began to swell.

One idea, suggested by primatologist Richard Wrangham, also at Harvard, is that our growing brains were fuelled by the development of cooking. "Larger brains require a lot of energy to grow and maintain, and cooking increases the energy available from food relative to a raw diet," says Rosati.

It's not clear when humans first invented cooking. It may have been long after our brains began swelling, which would mean Wrangham's idea is probably wrong.

But if he is correct, it suggests that a 2015 study by Rosati and her Harvard colleague Felix Warneken is very significant. Chimps might not have learned to control fire, but Rosati and Warneken found that they have enough smarts to appreciate the benefits of cooking.


A black-striped capuchin eating a cracked nut (Credit: Mary McDonald/NPL)

A black-striped capuchin eating a cracked nut (Credit: Mary McDonald/NPL)


In a series of experiments, Rosati and Warneken introduced chimps to an "oven": a container into which the apes could place food, which would later be returned to them in a cooked state.

The chimps were far more likely to put raw potato chips into this "oven" than into a second container that returned the food still raw.

What's more, when the chimps were given wood chips as well as raw potato chips, they generally didn't bother placing the wood into the "oven". That suggests they didn't see it simply as a cooked food dispenser, but understood that it would only cook edible things.

The chimps were even prepared to carry raw food from a remote location to the "oven" to have it cooked. This reflects the way our ancestors must have begun transporting food to the fireside millions of years ago.


Control of fire was a major step in human history (Credit: Ariadne Van Zandbergen/Alamy)

Control of fire was a major step in human history (Credit: Ariadne Van Zandbergen/Alamy)


Of course, until chimps do learn to control fire – if they ever make that leap – they won't be able to put their appreciation of cooked food to use. But Rosati and Warneken's work suggests that the relevant brain pathways, which perhaps allowed our ancestors to develop bigger brains and more advanced stone tools, are present in chimpanzees too.

It's possible that chimpanzees – and macaques and capuchins – haven't yet reached the limits of their technological capabilities, says Haslam.

But it's not clear whether they will have the opportunity to advance their Stone Age technology.

"We are shrinking their populations dramatically through habitat destruction and hunting," says Haslam. "Smaller populations cannot spread and sustain complex technologies as well as larger groups."

In other words, chimps and monkeys might have the capacity to make much more sophisticated stone tools, but they may never get the chance to achieve that potential: all because of another group of primates that became master stone tool manufacturers.




For more information about animal intelligence see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/animal%20intelligence
- Scroll down through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section


Hope you like this not for profit site -
It takes hours of work every day by a genuinely incapacitated invalid to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this website from a tiny cabin in a remote forest
Like what we do? Please give anything you can -  
Contribute any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!
(You can use a card securely if you don’t use Paypal)
Please click below -



Spare Bitcoin change?




For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @ the top left of http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com


And see


 New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati

New Illuminati Youtube Channel -  https://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/playlists

New Illuminati’s OWN Youtube Videos -  
New Illuminati on Google+ @ For New Illuminati posts - https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RamAyana0/posts

New Illuminati on Twitter @ www.twitter.com/new_illuminati


New Illuminations –Art(icles) by R. Ayana @ http://newilluminations.blogspot.com

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com



DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide a live link to your original material on your site (and links via social networking services) - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps spread your info further!

This site is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT (unless an individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged - if you give attribution to the work & author and include all links in the original (along with this or a similar notice).

Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution!

If you like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large) or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

Live long and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible worlds…


From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

Wednesday, 25 November 2015

Human Evolution is Driven by Consciousness Say Researchers


Human Evolution is Driven by Consciousness Say Researchers

Transformation-Consciousness -1



The mind and the brain are one and the same. There is no separation. In fact, consciousness itself is merely a bi-product of our central nervous system. It’s almost inconsequential. That’s lucky for us, isn’t it? We get to experience all the colors, tastes and sounds of the world, but as Shakespeare said, in the end it is all just “sound and fury signifying nothing”. This is the common assertion from modern science – consciousness is a sideshow of biology, unimportant and playing no active role in the development of human physiology. Biology creates consciousness, not the other way around. So they say.

We’re just cogs spinning in the machine, waiting to break down. After that, it’s lights out, and in the end our consciousness has played only a small part in our fleeting proceedings.

And yet, our experience of the world doesn’t really reflect this position, does it? Consciousness feels central to who we are. We are immersed in it when making complex choices, and the experiences we have can be so emotive or profound that they lead to a spiritual awakening which can transform our lives. Furthermore, we can decide to make that happen. We have the choice. We can direct our consciousness at ourselves and alter how we perceive the world around us.

So how, then, can the scientific community so quickly dismiss consciousness as a mere product of biology at best, something which has little affect on us as individuals or as a species?

The truth is, it can’t.

 

Your Thoughts Define You

 

Since the 1970s there has been a growing movement among consciousness researchers. Stalwarts of a purely materialistic view of consciousness such as Christof Koch, have had to reassess their perspectives on what awareness itself is, how it is produced, and what it means for us as a species and the universe as a whole.

This movement has been fueled by a failure on the part of neuroscience and psychology to prove the mechanical, biological underpinnings of conscious thought. The truth is that after centuries of enquiry we are no further forward in explaining how consciousness works. In fact, we may now be farther from a solution than we were a few decades ago. At least then we could say that we just didn’t understand the brain well enough and that, once we did, we would be able to explain why we are the way we are, why we think what we think, and why we feel the way we feel.

But no evidence has been forthcoming. The scientific community stays largely silent on this lack of evidence, hoping that eventually some proof will be found to support the accepted and materialistic view of conscious thought.

This is starting to change. With every passing year an increasing number of reputable scientists such as Sir Roger Penrose come forward, telling us to rethink consciousness. Indeed there are several exciting theories about how consciousness could be central to everything, that it could be affecting us as individuals and a species. Quantum Mind, the idea that consciousness actually creates reality itself, may be an extreme reaction to this shift in perspective, but there are newer theories which could be just as revolutionary, requiring no leaps of faith, and could force us to reinterpret consciousness as a powerful agency which can actually shape who we are and what our species is through the power of thought. In this way consciousness may be primary and could actually alter biology through the decisions we make.

 

 

 

Beyond the Individual: Consciousness as a Force in Evolution

 

 

A recent debate between Deepak Chopra and Richard Dawkins illustrates the divide between materialism and this new form of duality perfectly – that mind and body somehow coexist and are both intertwined while having distinct qualities of their own. What’s most fascinating about this debate is that Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist and argues a strict Darwinian interpretation of consciousness. In short, he proposes the status quo: We are conscious because the genes which create our brains have survived through a process of natural selection. They have survived because consciousness gives us an evolutionary edge – to be able to plan, anticipate and think creatively etc. Consciousness is created by biology, and this arrow of causality only goes in one direction.

A good summation of the debate was written up by Stuart Hameroff, but while plenty of people have cause to be skeptical of Deepak Chopra’s ideas, he may actually have a point. You see from Dawkins’ perspective consciousness is created by biology, therefore, it cannot have any affect on biology. This is the strictly materialistic view. However, there is evidence which suggests this might be incorrect.

For example, stress is a major killer. It leads to high blood pressure, heart disease, and there is even some evidence that it can cause or exacerbate cancer. But, if Dawkins’ theory is correct and biology controls consciousness and not the other way around, then we should not be able to affect our own biology through sheer will. And yet, through relaxation techniques we can lower our blood pressure. We can make a conscious decision to exercise or reduce our caffeine intake to lower our stress levels. These are common conscious decisions which alter our physiology.

Taking this one step further, a physicist is claiming that consciousness doesn’t just affect our individual biology, but that it may have the power to change both personal and species wide evolution. In a recent research paper, Professor Beichler of the International Academy of Consciousness argues that just through thinking, the neuronal connections within our brains change. This describes consciousness as the actor, not the subject. In this way consciousness is altering biology, not the product of it. This explains how people can change life-long habits or transform their personalties for the better when choosing to do so. The brain is essentially rewired, and consciousness is the electrician.

There’s one more profound implication of this perspective. A position which completely contradicts Dawkins’, placing consciousness at the center of everything we are. Numerous studies have shown that changes to brain physiology can directly alter the body’s DNA through a process called epigenetics. Recently, an  article for the Scientific American reported that a person’s DNA could be changed simply through meditation. If this is correct, then consciousness itself could change our genetic makeup. If these genetic changes are then passed on to future generations, it could transform the evolution of our species.

The question is, where are our thoughts leading us?


About the Author
 
Leif Davenport is an activist and writer from Scotland, as well as a staff writer for Waking Times.


References:

– http://www.wired.com/2013/11/christof-koch-panpsychism-consciousness/
 – http://consc.net/papers/facing.html
 – http://www.quantumconsciousness.org/
 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WXTX0IUaOg
 – http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stuart-hameroff/darwin-versus-deepak-whic_b_7481048.html
 – http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/causes-of-cancer/cancer-controversies/stress
 – http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/changing-our-dna-through-mind-control/





For more information about consciousness see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/consciousness
- Scroll down through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section


Hope you like this not for profit site -
It takes hours of work every day by a genuinely incapacitated invalid to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this website from a tiny cabin in a remote forest
Like what we do? Please give anything you can -  
Contribute any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!
(You can use a card securely if you don’t use Paypal)
Please click below -



Spare Bitcoin change?





For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @ the top left of http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com


And see


 New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati

New Illuminati Youtube Channel -  https://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/playlists

New Illuminati’s OWN Youtube Videos -  
New Illuminati on Google+ @ For New Illuminati posts - https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RamAyana0/posts

New Illuminati on Twitter @ www.twitter.com/new_illuminati


New Illuminations –Art(icles) by R. Ayana @ http://newilluminations.blogspot.com

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com



DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide a live link to your original material on your site (and links via social networking services) - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps spread your info further!

This site is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT (unless an individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged - if you give attribution to the work & author and include all links in the original (along with this or a similar notice).

Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution!

If you like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large) or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

Live long and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible worlds…


From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com