My Crystal Clear Stance on Vaccines
(which aren't
immunizations)
by Dr Kurt Perkins,
PhD
Recently, I asked for feedback with a survey that went out
in my email newsletter… One question I asked was ‘What should I STOP doing?’
Below is a response that caught my attention and feel it’s one that many of you
may have questions regarding so I need to address it. This is going to be
lengthy but I want to be CLEAR with
my response, and hopefully a little fun doing it.
"You should clarify your
position on immunizations. If you just totally throw out immunizations because
of their toxicity then that's being ignorant and
incorrect. I agree that some of the ingredients In immunizations are toxic to
our body but so are the diseases they are preventing!! Much more so! Our
generation and the ones coming after us have never experienced a loved one who
is debilhatated by polio or a disformed baby from a mother who had Rubella
while pregnant. So we have gotten ignorant of what the cost is for not having
those vaccines and say that he stuff In the vaccines is toxic. Not addressing
the toxicity of the disease it's preventing. This makes it hard to take things
you say seriously because what else are you leavin out or not being completely
honest about. If you want people to trust you on your other points, you need to
address everything about the immunizations so that your argument has merit.
Like if you say you are lobbying or for a more natural form of immunizations
without the toxic elements that would be a more reasonable argument."
After
reading it a few times, I’m trying to think who would write this.
Remember it’s anonymous but I still like to guess. Usually when I get
questions regarding vaccines with the argument they are good because of what
happened with polio and many other communicable diseases, it’s usually someone
in the Baby Boomer type
population. It could also be someone in the medical field. As I mentally scanned my list of clients,
email contacts, Facebook
friends, and professional organizations, I could only think of one person that
fits my assumed social profile.
The only
person it could be is my mom.
Imagine your mom calling you out like this, questioning your integrity and
honesty? Pretty hurtful, right? Therefore I need to make my
position on vaccines (not immunizations)
crystal clear, just like mom suggested.
This will be lengthy, I don’t want to leave ANYTHING
out, but these are the points as to why I will never choose to vaccinate my own
son and any future kids my wife and I have. Just to be clear, I’ll go to
jail before allowing someone to force a vaccine into my child’s arm.
VACCINATION
vs. IMMUNIZATION:
Clarification
needs to be created regarding VACCINATION vs. IMMUNIZATION.
I’m all for immunization. The problem created by media and pharmaceutical
influence is that people equate immunization with vaccination.
Vaccination is simply injecting
something into your body. This does not create immunity for your body. These are 2 totally
separate entities.
Another
thing that irks me is my ‘mom’s’ comments about me leaving out stuff and
therefore destroying my credibility. I would like to add I make ZERO money off of this
blog. I may book some speaking gigs from it but those revenues will come
nowhere near the $20 BILLION per year
the makers of vaccines cherish. Who do you think has more weight on their
shoulders to hide information? Huh, mom? Huh?
With
building immunity, it’s a natural process. With that natural process,
your body uses many defences. The
first layer of defence is your skin. This blocks out any harmful
opportunistic buggers. With a vaccine, this law of nature is totally
bypassed by injecting you with a needle full of stuff your skin would never
allow past it.
You also
have a respiratory system that
also aids in defence. You cough, you sneeze, and you blow your nose, in
attempt to expel the potential invader. Coughing, sneezing, and snorting are results of your immune system
working. Don’t suppress it with fever reducers, anti-histamines,
etc. You’re just making it easier for the invader.
You also
have your gut-associated lymph system to
fight with the stronger stuff. If your system is so deficient to get past
these natural defenses, the potential invader, live or dead, enters the
blood stream. Once something is in your blood stream, it can be
transported any anywhere in your body, not good at all. It’s like open bar at a chiropractic
convention.
A vaccine
violates all laws of natural immune defences by taking a potential pathogen
along with all the TOXIC ingredients
(aluminium, formaldehyde, adjuvants, etc) directly into your blood
system. This process would never occur in building natural
immunity. That last sentence is kind of an oxy-moron. Immunity is a
natural thing. Vaccines are an artificial thing.
FLAWED
RESEARCH:
The
scientific mantra of vaccines is that they are safe and effective based on their
research. Their
research is flawed and is a double standard from any other drug product
studied. The Gold Standard in research design is the double blinded,
randomized controlled trial (RCT).
This
means that people are split into 2 groups randomly and participants are given
either the real thing or the fake thing being tested. Then progress is
charted on who gets better, who gets worse, and the like. In theory there
should be no bias as to reporting because the researchers don’t know who is in
the placebo or the real intervention group.
How many vaccines have ever been studied in this
manner? ZERO!
The reason? The researchers will say they cannot perform an RCT because
it would be unethical to NOT give a child a vaccine because if that child dies
of something that could have been prevented, then they don’t want to be
responsible. But if someone dies in their trials from taking their
anti-depressants, it must be ok.
Hey drug
companies, I will volunteer my child
to be in the placebo group and compare him to the health and well being of
those that have gotten all the recommended vaccines. I’m sure I can
gather a few hundred thousand more to be in the placebo group to create a large
sample.
Instead
of research to see safety and effectiveness, they instead see if the person builds anti-bodies to
the antigen (the foreign invader) that is in the vaccine. If antibodies
are built, then it’s ‘safe and effective,’ or so they lead us to believe.
These studies are rarely, if ever done on kids younger than 4 years old.
How can you say it's safe or effective for a baby if it's never studied on a
baby?
The 2
populations that have limited production of anti-bodies are infants and geriatrics, the 2 most heavily vaccinated populations. If
their ability to produce anti-bodies is low, then the vaccine would be
pointless. The whole premise of the vaccine is that you get injected with
a foreign invader and you produce anti-bodies against it. If you can’t
produce anti-bodies well then what’s the use of injecting something to try and
stimulate that reaction?
With
kids, their ability to produce any antibodies until after age 6 months is very
limited. This is why breast milk is so important to infants. Mom passes
the anti-bodies to baby, that usually last about 6 months. The immune
system is very primitive that young. The baby needs to spend way more
energy in growth phase opposed to protection phase.
A mature nervous system (which controls your immune) system doesn't happen that
early. Infants cannot talk, a sign of a mature nervous system. Infants
cannot walk, a sign of a mature nervous system. Infants cannot control
urination or defecation, a sign of a mature nervous system. Giving a
child a vaccine with an adult dose and assume they would react the same way
doesn't make sense.
Even if the whole vaccine theory really worked, it would be absolutely
pointless to inject a baby of 6 months or less with a vaccine. With a
child’s immune system being very immature until age 2, the overload of 36
vaccines by the age of 18 months seems about as logical as drinking from a fire
hydrant.
When I bring this point up, I'll get the skeptic asking for specific reference
of an infant not producing anti-bodies sufficiently. Honestly, I don't
have it, it's my own logic. In the same breath, if I ask them to produce
specific reference for an infant that can produce anti-bodies sufficiently,
they cannot produce that evidence either. Pro-vaccinators can't attack the vaccine choice crowd as unscientific
with arguments that are unscientific.
BOOSTER
BUST:
This is
another aspect to the junk science of vaccines that exposes kids only 18 months
old to 36 shots.
In their research of efficacy (how long
something will work), they have no idea. For this reason, we have
multiple shots for multiple antigens. Just take the latest HPV vaccine,
the 3 series shot given to 12 year old girls to prevent HPV (an STD) which
“MIGHT” but has never been confirmed, contribute to cervical cancer.
The
manufacturer is only claiming 5 years
of efficacy. The problem with this is 2 fold. 1. The average
age of cervical cancer is 50. 2. The shot is administered to 12 year old
girls.
So we
have a system pushing multiple shots (boosters) with a supposed 5 year efficacy
timeline onto pre-teen girls, that was never tested on them, for a disease that
has an average age of 50. You give it a 12 year old and by the time she’s
17 the effects are worn off and then you claim you can prevent cervical cancer
as they get older. And I’m the quack for speaking out against
vaccines.
So what are the efficacy rates of other vaccines?
Who knows? They don’t study that, they assume and say we need more.
Once the vaccine is FDA approved and on the market, there’s no need to put any
more money into it to study the effects. Instead, we have a test tube of
4 million new subjects each and every year where they can just sit back, relax and never worry about a
law suit because the government has protected them from any and all liability.
Since no studies go into how long the vaccine would last, then there can be an
endless recommendation of potential booster shots. The part that really
confuses me are the shots that are 4 part series. If the first 3 didn't
confirm immunity, how do we know that the last shot was 'the one' that provides
lifetime immunity? Why would the 2nd to last shot be good for only a year
but the last one be good for an entire lifetime? That's pretty arrogant and sketchy logic.
POLIO
PUSHERS:
If I were
to ask you what polio looks like, you probably have images of wheel chairs, crutches and
kids limping around. You would be absolutely correct…less than 0.5-2% of the time. I
want to make it clear that I am not downplaying the devastation of that
2%. The point I’m making, hopefully it’s clear enough, is that I am
making decisions based on statistics
not emotion. As a parent, it's very hard to separate the two sometimes.
In over
95% of the time, polio presents with the following symptoms: slight fever, malaise, headache, sore throat,
and vomiting. These start 3-5 days after exposure and recovery is
24-72 hours with a result of lifetime immunity. Bet you never heard that
from your pharma influenced media or doctor?
In fact,
if you went to your doctor with those symptoms and you were told you had polio,
you would leave his office laughing and write bad reviews on his Google Places
page.
The
remaining 3% was non-paralytic polio.
This presented for 2-10 days as high fever, severe headache, stiff neck,
hyperesthesia/parasthesia in extremities and some asymmetrical limb
weakness. Take this list of symptoms to your doctor and you will probably
get a label of meningitis, not
polio.
But Dr.
Kurt, the vaccine saved all those people from getting the paralyzing
version. If you look at the charts below, you will see that Polio was already massively decreasing prior
to any vaccine ever introduced. I would also like to add that the highest
incidence came at a time our country was in despair (poor sanitation, hygiene,
nutrition) during the depression.
|
|
Polio was already on the way out
prior to any introduction of vaccines.
|
It was a
time where sanitation was poor, hygiene was poor, and nutrition was poor.
These are the reasons that third world countries have problems with
communicable diseases, not lack of
vaccines. As the Great Depression was clearing up, people were
living cleaner and healthier and there was also the introduction of a drug
class called antibiotics that was given for any sniffle, cough, or fever.
The last
natural case of polio in the US was 1979, yet we still give kids 4 rounds of
this vaccine at 2, 4, 6-12 months, and 4-6 years. But the fear tactics
continue of, “it can come back or you don’t know about the destruction it caused.”
I’m not being ignorant to history. I’m being reasonable about the
present.
What
about Typhoid and Scarlet Fever? They had just as
much devastation and with no vaccine, they are not a problem. Nature took
its course and with the advent of better sanitation, hygiene, and nutrition,
they wiped themselves out.
|
|
Notice no vaccine for Typhoid of
Scarlet Fever, yet they naturally decreased?
|
RUBELLA
RANT:
This was
another scary moment for women back in the middle part of the last century, as stated by my ‘mom’s’
criticism above. You may be more familiar with this being called German
measles. Symptoms for Rubella are a mild rash, fever of 99+, and joint soreness.
There was
a big scare back in 1964-65 with 12.5 million cases diagnosed, with 20,000 of
those cases or 0.16% of them
being newborns. As a result there were 11,000 or 0.088 % abortions (surgical and spontaneous) as well as 2,100 or 0.017% neonate deaths. Again,
having a child die is something I hope I or you never have to experience.
I can’t even imagine that experience but when I look at the actual chances of
my child being infected or dying from this illness, there’s not much cause for
concern in present day.
Here’s
the thing with Rubella. It’s the mom that is in danger, not the
child. The problem is if mom gets infected with Rubella in her first 4
months of pregnancy then she can pass it along to her fetus. The child is
born with it.
So why
even give the shot to kids? There’s no concern about them getting
pregnant. My only concern is that the easiest place to contract a
communicable illness in our country is the hospital or OBGYN’s office, the
places you're going to bring your child for the 'Well Baby Check.' If you really are concerned about
the Rubella, why not wait until you are planning on getting pregnant to get the
shot as an adult?
I know,
because that would deplete a massive piece of the market away from the drug
companies. It just decreased that market from a potential 4 million
babies each year to about ½ of that by just targeting women. As a man,
why would I worry about German measles? The market would be
decreased even more because not all women want kids.
But
Rubella is tied into a vaccine that includes regular measles as well as
mumps. Name a day in history that
anyone got all three infections, measles, German measles, and mumps ALL on the
same day. It doesn’t happen. Then why create vaccines like
this?
This is
getting lengthy so let me throw in some charts for your viewing pleasure.
MEASLY
MEASLES:
The only
stat I could find for deaths from measles in the US was in 2003 we had 2 deaths. 1 death was attributed to post bone marrow
transplant surgery and the other was a 75 year old with pneumonia. Media
loves to report when there are measles outbreaks but what you'll never hear in
their reports is that anyone died from it.
|
|
Even at its peak around 1920,
with a mortality of 15 per 100,000, the chance of death was 0.014%.
|
|
|
Again, around 1918, the death
rate for PERTUSSIS was
about 17 per 100,000 or 0.017%. By the time the pertussis vaccine was
widely used, the rate of death was around 0.002%.
|
|
PERTUSSIS
PUSH
You can
see from the charts above that pertussis or Whooping Cough was virtually wiped out prior to
any vaccine ever introduced. Whooping cough gets a lot of media attention
with outbreaks happening in California. What gets failed
to mention is that the overwhelming majority of the kids that have been
diagnosed have been fully vaccinated.
I'm just waiting for an onslaught of media that people need to get MORE booster
shots of DPT. It's already given at 2, 4, and 6 months (useless due to no
way of building anti bodies). It's also given at 15-18 months and then
boosters at 4-6 years. Seriously? If 5 shots aren't working, how
many more until it does?
Why does pertussis travel so well in communities? Poor sanitation, poor
hygiene, poor nutrition.
This seems to be a very emotional issue as no parent enjoys hearing the awful
cough and wheezing associated with Pertussis. But is the shot safe?
According the research of the last 50 years, the vaccine is safe. But
what test showed it was safe?
It's called the Mouse Weight Gain Test.
"Researchers" would vaccinate mice at their stomachs. If the
mice continue to gain weight and don't die right away, it's considered safe. I
wish I could make this stuff up.
And if you haven't heard, adults should the shot because it will protect the
young. In 2012, Australia stopped this adult vaccine program all together
because there was no proof that it was protecting the young. The US
pushes on with commercials, celebrities, and PSAs about how adults should get
the shot to protect the young. Follow the money trail.
Should I go on? After all, I don't want to leave anything out.
HEPATITIS
B.S.
You
should only be scared of this illness if you have sex with an infected person, have multiple sex partners, have
other STDs, you are a man that has sex with other men, inject drugs (isn't that
a vaccine?), or share needles, syringes, or other drug equipment.
I'm
failing to see the need for 3 shots of this into a baby at birth, 1-2 months,
and then again at 6-18 months. I could be wrong. Maybe there are IV drug using, prostitute babies out
there.
DIPHTHERIA
DUPED
The symptoms that warrant 4 shots of this vaccine before
the age of 15 months are:
sore throat with a low grade fever with
an adherent membrane at the back of the throat. The weird thing is that
in order for the toxins to be released, a specific strain of bacteria has to be
infected with a specific virus called a B phage. In other words, a
certain bacteria has to make out with a certain virus. In any case, it's
nothing a simple antibiotic can clear up, no need for a vaccine.
TRICKED
by TETANUS
One thing
I would like to point out is the ridiculousness of giving a tetanus shot AFTER
you have a puncture wound.
Why get a puncture wound that definitely contains tetanus after a puncture
wound that might not contain tetanus? It's sketchy enough to say you're
immune from tetanus from the regular vaccine schedule but to say there are
curative powers by getting the vaccine AFTER the puncture wound is pretty ballsy,
yet many line up to get injected after they think they might have
tetanus.
Let's
look at who is at risk for tetanus? Is it babies?
|
In 23 years, there were only
1,277 cases of tetanus, with close to 1000 of those being people over the age
of 40. I'm not too concerned about my baby.
|
|
|
After
all, where do you find tetanus? It's in soil and the intestines of animals and humans. I want my son to
experience nature but I draw the line at playing in the intestines of animals
or humans.
POINTLESS
PNEUMOCOCCAL
Pneumococcal
disease is caused by Streptococcal pneumonia bacteria. The interesting thing is
that there are more than 90 subtypes
but the vaccine only contains 7 subtypes. Are the other 83 subtypes not
important or am I playing roulette with another shot? I got accused of
leaving out stuff, what about this vaccine?
It's
estimated based on population studies (estimates), not actual stats that there
are 40,000 cases of pneumococcal disease each year. There is also an
estimated (not confirmed) about 4,400 deaths (0.0014% chance of death) each year, with the highest mortality
rate being in the elderly with underlying conditions (deficiency and toxicity).
With the
shots given at 2, 4, 6, and 15-18 months, what chance does a baby have of
developing anti-bodies against this disease? Next to nill.The first 3
shots are pointless.
RARE
ROTOVIRUS
Rotovirus
is responsible for diarrhea. It's estimated that 55,000 children are hospitalized each year
in the US. There's an estimated 527,000 deaths worldwide due to
rotovirus.
How many
die in the US? The only stat I could find was from 1996 Journal of
Infectious Disease where less than 40
kids died of rotovirus. Again, any death from anything for a child
is devastating. But let's compare rotovirus to lighting strike deaths. Lightning strikes kill about 60 people each
year. You have a greater chance of dying from lightning than you
do rotovirus.
Not to
mention the rotovirus shots are administered at ages 2, 4, and 6 months, a time
where a baby cannot develop antibodies against the antigen.
All those
worldwide deaths? Those are coming from the same reasons we had a polio
epidemic, poor sanitation, poor
hygiene, poor nutrition.
MUMPS
BUMPS
In 2004,
there were 350 deaths due to mumps. 312 were from Egypt. 2 were from the US, leaving you with a 0.00000065% chance of dying from mumps.
Mumps
never posed a threat to the health and vitality of the American public.
In regards to the incidence of mumps, even the CDC states, "before vaccination, mumps was a common
illness in children, infants, and adults." Why create a
vaccine? There's big money in vaccines. The vaccine industry has
4,000,000 potential new clients every year that will be repeat buyers until the
age of 18.
ABRACADABRA
VARICELLA
From
1990-1994, there was about 100 deaths each year due to chicken pox split
between kids and adults.
Your chance of death by chicken pox is
0.000032%. I'll take my chances by not giving this shot to my
child. My decision. You have to do what's best for your family. If
my kid does get chicken pox and your kid is vaccinated, then you shouldn't
worry about it, right? Your child is protected.
HEPATITIS
A-HOLE
How do
you contract Hepatitis A?
Eat food that someone else pooped in that is infected with Hepatitis A.
There are no statistical reports of
deaths from Hep A, just a 0.0098% chance of contracting it. The
solution is good sanitation, hygiene, and nutrition. Eating out is going
to be a risk but again, I'll take my chances of eating food prepared by other
people. I have a greater chance of dying from a lightning strike.
HiB-izness
This
series of 4 shots are given at 2, 4, 6, and 12-15 months. Again, if a
baby cannot develop antibodies until after 6 months, what's the point of giving
a child any shot this early? HiB is a common cause of bacterial
meningitis. If it's bacterial than a simple antibiotic should do the trick. There's no need to
add more shots that contain heavy metals into a child's ecosystem.
FLU and
H1N1 HOAX
Do I even have to discuss these? Even pro vaccine people think these are
ridiculous.
The TRUE
COST.
The cost
of vaccinating is WAY larger than the cost of not-vaccinating. Check out
this German study. I wish someone in the states would do this. It
will probably never happen because there is too much lobby money going into the
Sacred Cow of Vaccines. If
this were done in the US, I would throw in rates for Autism (1 in 88 or 1.14% chance), Type-1 Diabetes, and
childhood cancer.
In the
US, 1/4 of children have a chronic illness. Any nation that adopts our style
of healthcare sees similar results.
Other
costs are not just the chronic illness rates but the actual costs of vaccine
damages. In 1986, President Reagan signed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act into public law (Public Law
99-660).
On
October 1, 1988, the National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program was created. The government also set
up the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. Since 1991 $1.8 BILLION has been awarded to those
vaccine injured. 75% has been awarded for reactions to the DPT
shots.
To
clarify my position on vaccines, I am
not, nor will not ever lobby for cleaner ingredients for vaccines.
If vaccines had organic ingredients, I still would choose to not
vaccinate.
I will
lobby and help those that lobby for vaccines to be a parental decision, not a state or federal mandate.
I will
not kick anyone out of my practice that chooses to vaccinate but I will welcome the masses of those parents
that choose to NOT vaccinate with open arms or a homey hug.
I will
continue to educate and support those that educate in the name of choice.
There are some great organizations and doctors out there that do it much better
and bigger than I can.
THOSE
PEOPLE ARE:
POOR
NUTRITION
I keep
harping on the poor sanitation, poor hygiene, and poor nutrition aspect of why communicable diseases
spread but you're probably wondering about the poor nutrition. In our
infants, breast milk is going to be the absolute best form of nutrition.
Antibodies get passed from mom to baby until baby can start forming some on
his/her own.
I know there are some women out there having trouble breast feeding.
There are options like buying breast milk from other nursing moms. This
may sound gross but genetically, it's a heck of a lot saner than giving a child
milk
from a cow, a totally different species.
There are also ways to make your own infant formula that aren't full of cow's
milk, sugar, high fructose corn syrup, artificial flavorings, etc. Just
Google it.
But mom needs to get good nutrition. By good nutrition, I'm not talking
about the food pyramid/plate garbage pushed by the government that includes all
the foods subsidized by the government. I'm talking about genetically
compatible nutrition. Read more on my thoughts regarding nutrition. I want
to be clear.
I sincerely hope my point is clear. Obviously there are 2 sides to the
story and I presented the one less known, hardly ever heard, and greatly
ignored. You can take it and choose to not vaccinate, get extra vaccines
or pick and choose certain ones, it doesn't affect me one bit. Just make
sure you look at both sides to make an informed decision.
Contact Dr. Kurt
From More Health, Less
Health Care @ http://www.drkurtperkins.com/2012/05/my-crystal-clear-stance-on-vaccines.html
For more information
about the brainwashing cult of vaccination see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/vaccination
- See ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
Hope you like this
not for profit site -
It takes hours of work every day
to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this website from a
tiny cabin in a remote forest
Like what we do? Please give enough
for a meal or drink if you can -
Donate any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!
Please click below -
And see
DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide a live link to your original material on your site (and
links via social networking services) - which raises your ranking on search
engines and helps spread your info further! This site is
published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an individual
article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright holder) –
reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you
give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably
active) link to the original (along with this or a similar notice).
Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or
mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web –
but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a donation (no
amount is too small or too large) or leave a comment – and thanks for reading
this far…
Live long and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible
worlds…
