Secret government
documents reveal vaccines to be a total hoax
by Ethan A. Huff
If you
have children, you are more than likely already aware of the official U.S. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) "Immunization
Schedules," which today recommend an astounding 29 vaccines be given
between birth and six years of age, including yearly flu shots, as well as
another five to 16 vaccines between ages seven and 18 (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/).
But a recent investigative report compiled by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, Ph.D.,
uncovers more than 30 years of hidden government documents exposing these
vaccine schedules as a complete hoax, not to mention the fraud of the vaccines
themselves to provide any real protection against disease.
Though her paper focuses primarily on the British health system's elaborate
cover-up of the dirty truth about its own national vaccination program, the
tenets of the study's findings still apply to vaccination schedules in general,
which are typically designed for the purpose of serving corporate interests
rather than public health. Government authorities, it turns out, in an ongoing
bid to satisfy the private goals of the vaccine industry, have deliberately
covered up pertinent information about the dangers and ineffectiveness of
vaccines from parents in order to maintain a high rate of vaccination
compliance. And in the process, they have put countless millions of children at
risk of serious side effects and death.
You can access Dr. Tomljenovic's full paper here:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
Hiding
the truth and covering up data to encourage vaccine compliance
Through several Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) requests, Dr. Tomljenovic was able to obtain transcripts of
private meetings that were held between the Joint Committee on Vaccination
and Immunization (JCVI), a so-called "independent expert advisory
committee" that makes recommendations to the government about vaccine policy, and various
British health ministers over the years. And after poring through this plethora
of information, which had previously been veiled from public view, Dr.
Tomljenovic made some disturbing discoveries.
"[T]he JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization) made
continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and
contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in
order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for
'herd immunity,' a concept which ... does not rest on solid scientific
evidence," explains Dr. Tomljenovic in the introduction to her paper.
"Official documents obtained from the U.K. Department of Health (DH) and
the JCVI reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such
practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting
the national vaccination program."
These are some strong accusations, but the information Dr. Tomljenovic gathered
speaks for itself. Not only did the JCVI routinely ignore questions of safety
as they came up with regards to the ever-expanding vaccination schedule, but
the group actively censored unfavorable data that shed a "negative"
light on vaccines in
order to maintain the illusion that vaccines are safe and effective. Beyond
this, the JCVI regularly lied to both the public and government authorities
about vaccine safety in order to ensure that people continued to vaccinate
their kids.
You can access Dr. Tomljenovic's full paper here:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
JCVI
was fully aware of MMR vaccine dangers as early as 1989, but covered them up
Beginning on page three of her
report, Dr. Tomljenovic begins outlining the sordid details of meetings held as early as
1981 where the JCVI clearly engaged in fraud, cover-up, and lies about vaccines
to protect the vaccine industry, not children, from harm. Minutes from these
meetings reveal that the JCVI actively tried to cover up severe side effects
associated with common vaccines like measles and whooping cough (pertussis),
both of which were clearly linked at the time to causing severe brain damage in
a substantial percentage of the children that received them.
Of particular concern was how the JCVI handled unfavorable data on the
controversial MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella. 10 years before Dr.
Andrew Wakefield published his study on MMR in The Lancet, JCVI was
already fully aware that the National Institute for Biological Standards and
Control (NIBSC) had identified a clear link between MMR and vaccine-induced
meningitis and encephalitis. But rather than come forward with this information
and call for further safety assessments on the vaccine, the JCVI instead
censored this critical information from the public, and blatantly lied about
the safety of MMR for years.
"The extent of the JCVI's concerns with the implications of scientific
assessment of vaccine safety on vaccine policy explains why they were opposed
to any long-term surveillance for severe neurological disorders following
vaccination," writes Dr. Tomljenovic. "[I]nstead of re-evaluating the
vaccination policy, at least until safety concerns were fully evaluated, the
JCVI chose to support the existing policy based on incomplete evidence that was
available at that time."
In other words, the JCVI was more concerned with protecting the reputation of
the dangerous MMR vaccine, as well as many other questionable vaccines, than
with protecting children from sustaining serious injuries as a result of
getting the jabs. As far as the MMR vaccine is concerned, this critical piece
of information not only reinforces the legitimacy of Dr. Wakefield's findings
from 10 years later, which were illegitimately declared to be fraudulent by the
establishment, but also illustrates just how painfully long this scam has been
taking place.
Vaccine companies urged to manipulate data
sheets, skew safety studies to promote vaccines
If
this is not bad enough, Dr. Tomljenovic also drudged up copious amounts of
information on the JCVI's longtime habit of encouraging vaccine companies to
deliberately alter their data sheets in order to make dangerous and ineffective
vaccines appear safe and effective, in accordance with their recommendations.
When the JCVI's guidance contraindications for MMR, for instance, did not match
those of the vaccine's manufacturer, JCVI apparently instructed the
manufacturer to alter its data sheets to avoid "legal problems."
Similarly, the JCVI's official policy was to cherry-pick unreliable studies to
support its own opinions on vaccines rather than rely on independent,
scientifically-sound studies to make vaccine policy recommendations. Once
again, the JCVI's position on the safety and effectiveness of MMR is an
excellent example of this, as the group flat out ignored legitimate MMR studies
in favor of industry-backed junk studies like the infamous 2005 Cochrane
Review, which technically proves nothing about the alleged safety of MMR
because the 31 studies it evaluated did not even meet the group's basic
methodological criteria.
"Over the years, the JCVI has consistently promoted the MMR vaccine as
safe, based on studies that have been proven to be either irrelevant,
inconclusive, or methodologically questionable," explains Dr. Tomljenovic,
adding that the JCVI routinely chose to rely on flawed epidemiological studies
that only identified "association" rather than "causation,"
a rather ironic inaccuracy in light of how scrutinizing the establishment
typically is of studies that contradict its own positions.
The eye-opening, 45-page paper goes on to explain how vaccine schedules were
established through the calculated downplaying of vaccine safety concerns and
the over-inflating of vaccine benefits; the promotion of dangerous new vaccines
into the pediatric schedule through deception; the discouraging of vaccine
safety follow-up studies; and the widespread brainwashing of the public through
manipulation and scientific sleight-of-hand tricks.
Be sure to check out the complete study for yourself:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
Flu Vaccines, Big Pharma fraud, quack
science, the CDC and WHO
A remarkable article was published
by authors
Richard Gale and Dr. Gary Null of the Progressive Radio Network (http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com).
It may be the most shocking (and important) public health article published in
the last [few] years. If you read just one health article this entire month,
make it this one.
The article is remarkable not just for its timeliness on the issue of mandatory
vaccinations and public health policy, but also for its damning evidence that
exposes the fraud and quackery of the vaccine industry (as well as the
corruption at the CDC and WHO).
As you'll read below, flu vaccines remain a mainstay modern medicine only because
they provide a reliable source of profits for the pharmaceutical industry which
now virtually dictates public health policy thanks to its powerful lobbying
resources. And the CDC, for its part, has now become little more than the
regulatory branch of Big Pharma, pushing vaccines on the entire population even
though the scientific evidence reveals quite clearly that flu vaccines simply
do not work. (Vitamin D actually works far better at preventing flu infections,
but the CDC won't recommend vitamin D to anyone.)
What you're about to read below is absolutely shocking. If you're a reader of
NaturalNews, you probably already realized the vaccine industry was a sham, but
I bet you didn't know just how deep this rabbit hole really goes... until now.
That's why I'm reprinting the entire article by Richard Gale and Dr. Gary Null
below. Here's a link to the original source: http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/richardgale/29813/the-cdc-votes-in-fa...
Give this article a serious read. It is one of the most important articles
you'll ever find on this topic. Dr. Gary Null, you may already know, is one of
the most brilliant researchers, thinkers and writers in the health freedom field, and
I've come to respect his work a great deal. I don't yet personally know Richard
Gale, but his words carry tremendous weight.
If you link to this story from your own web page, be sure to give proper credit
to the original authors (Richard Gale and Gary Null). The bold emphasis
in the article below is my own (I added it). I also added subheads for improved
organization of the article.
CDC Votes in Favor of a
Flu Vaccination Assault on Americans’ Health
by Richard Gale and Gary
Null
A central principle of democracy
is freedom of choice. We can choose our political party, our religion, and the food we
eat, but this does not seem to be the case when it comes to our medical choices
and our freedoms to make them.
The unanimous 11-0 vote by the members of the Centers for Disease Control’s
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) favoring every American
over the age of six months receive the flu influenza vaccine is one
more attempt by our federal health officials to open up our bodies to the free
market capitalism of pharmaceutical coffers. It is another step to mandate a
vaccine across the nation, a policy that has many supporters in the pro-vaccine
science community.
The vote raises an alarm about our federal government’s scientific integrity,
and calls into question its true allegiance and purpose: to protect the health
of American citizens or increase Big Pharma profits. If the recommendation were
ever enforced, the US would be the only nation in the world with mandatory flu
vaccination. However, what our investigations show and what differentiates the
US health agencies from the health ministries in other nations, is that in the
US federal health system Big Pharma money, lobbying and corporate favors are
what shape drug and vaccine policies and this is rampant throughout the system.
Mandatory
vaccines fail in Japan
Mandatory influenza vaccination
has been tried before across a nation. During the 1980s, Japan had mandatory
flu vaccination for school children. Two large scale studies that enrolled
children from four cities with vaccination rates between 1 and 90 percent
discovered no difference in the incidences of flu infection. As a result, in
1987, Japanese health authorities ruled that flu vaccination was ineffective
and was no more than a serious financial and legal liability if it was to
continue. The mandatory policy was quickly overturned. By 1989, the number of
Japanese taking the flu vaccine
dropped to 20 percent. A follow up study at that time found that there was
statistically insignificant change in influenza infection rates compared to
when the vaccine was mandatory.[1]
Now we are hearing that for the forthcoming 2010-2011 flu season, the H1N1 flu
strain will be included in the seasonal flu vaccine. This will be a
quadravalent vaccine comprised of four strains including the H1N1. As of this
month, the World Health Organization (WHO) continues to evaluate the H1NI virus
at a 5 level pandemic and issues warnings to deaf ears now that people realize
the WHO’s word is disreputable. Nevertheless, we should still brace ourselves
for another year of old yarn, fear-mongering, media spin and more voodoo
science.
A brief overview of the past H1N1 pandemic boondoggle will help us to understand
the addiction of denial permeating the ranks of the CDC’s advisory committee.
It presents a picture of a delusional bubble, unrelated to medical facts, that
the CDC has found comfort to
float within. The simple fact remains that the CDC is disconnected from
anything resembling legitimate science thereby making their recent decision
ludicrous and criminally irresponsible.
The CDC’s predictions of particular strains during past flu seasons has never
been especially accurate. In fact, often it has been extraordinarily dismal.
The previous swine flu prediction in 1976 resulted in only one swine flu death
but hundreds of people suffering permanent disabilities, including death, from
the vaccine. For the 1992-1993 flu season, the prediction made for the virus
used in the vaccine was off by 84 percent. For the 1994-1995 season, it was off
by 43 percent for the primary strain targeted and off 87 percent and 76 percent
for the other two strains. The Laboratory Center for Disease Control’s study
comparing vaccine strains with the strains appearing during the 1997-1998
season found the match off by 84 percent. One would achieve a greater accuracy
rate by simply flipping a coin.
The
CDC's scare tactics
An article published in the
prestigious British Medical Journal in 2005, “Are US Flu Death Figures More PR Than
Science” is apropos for addressing the wildly inflated figures by the WHO and
CDC to present their case for mass vaccination measures. The article begins,
“US data on influenza deaths are a mess.” The study reviews the CDC’s own
statistical data and finds numerous inconsistencies and incompatibilities
between “official estimates and national vital statistics data.” Although the
government’s predictions never came close to the “dire outcomes” stated by our
health officials, the CDC’s own communication strategy was marked by high
levels of fear.[2]
The US government’s assessment of the past H1N1 scare is another example of
flawed science and incompetence. In last August’s issue of USA Today, the White
House’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, which receives its
recommendations from the CDC, warned us that the H1N1 would kill between
30-90,000 American citizens. At the same time, the CDC was predicting 2 million
people would be infected and as high as 40 percent of the entire population.
The WHO, which sleeps in the same bed with the CDC in their shared complexes in
Atlanta, was screaming figures of 7.5 million deaths worldwide. Consequently, the
FDA fast-tracked swine flu
vaccines manufactured by 5 different drug makers, none which met reliable
standards of viable clinical testing and data to determine their efficacy and
safety.
And pregnant women, young children and the elderly were primary targets --
those also most susceptible to serious vaccine adverse reactions. Over $1.6
billion tax dollars went to Big Pharma on orders of 229 million doses, of which
only 90 million were actually administered and the remaining 71 million left to
decompose on shelves or dump off on poorer nations out of the graciousness
of the American philanthropic spirit.
However, as we witnessed in 2009 and the early months of 2010, people woke up
to the false alarm of a swine flu pandemic. Often intuition is better suited to
sniff out a hoax and scandal than the pseudo-science our federal health
officials give obeisance to behind closed door conference rooms. And in the
case of the so-called H1N1 pandemic, intuition proved correct. Our health
agencies’ warnings and numbers propagandized over mainstream media simply did
not add up and have been consistently found to be contrary to more medically
reliable and unbiased facts generated by independent sources without ties to
the private vaccine manufacturers.
Whenever the CDC, the FDA and the US Department of Health and Human Services
post figures, it is a prudent rule of thumb to be suspicious and investigate
their accuracy. The fact of the matter is that the CDC is completely
clueless about this past season’s flu infection rate and the number of
deaths due to the H1N1 strain. Let us explain why.
No
proper testing was ever conducted
Immediately
following the WHO’s decision in May 2009 to cease laboratory testing of samples
to determine the actual biological cause of infectious cases with
influenza-like symptoms, the US followed suit. Therefore, no matter what they
tell you, no matter what Dr. Gupta and other tools of the media and
establishment have to say, no proper testing was performed. Only PCR technology
can determine the actual subset of a Type A flu strain, such as H1N1. But PCR
diagnosis was not routinely performed in order to monitor and track rates and
the spread of infection. By its own admission, a CDC report found that rapid
influenza kits used in hospitals and clinics were wrong as much as nine out of
ten times, and on average between 40-69 percent. The CDC determined that
the instant tests are “not highly worthwhile for diagnosing H1N1 infections.”
So why would any organization responsible for the tracking of an infectious
disease believed to be a global health threat, potentially threatening the
lives of millions of people, make such a decision to not carefully monitor flu
infections is beyond comprehension, unless it knowingly determined, with malice
of forethought, that the H1N1 strain was mild and not a national danger. And
many independent experts in infectious diseases had been stating this
throughout the season but our health agencies preferred to ignore their
warnings.
Yet it is the reported death rates due to H1N1 infection that seriously call
the CDC’s integrity into question. According to the CDC reports, anywhere
between 8,870 and 18,300 Americans died from swine flu. For the sake of
simplicity, the health feds conveniently circulate the figure of 12,000 deaths.
Projections in the UK were equally off the mark. The British Ministry of Health
was expecting 65,000 deaths, but reported only 500 towards the season’s end.
British citizens, however, were better informed of the scandalous hoax and of
the 110 million vaccine doses purchased, under contracts amounting to over $864
million to the drug makers (not including national preparatory measures
bringing the total to over $1 billion for a small population), only 6 million
Brits, approximately 10 percent, were vaccinated.
What figures does the World Health Organization report for the number of
worldwide swine flu deaths? 18,036. That is correct, not millions. That is only
5 percent of the global figure for deaths associated with the regular seasonal
flu. I don’t need an advanced degree to notice a grave discrepancy here, unless
we are to believe that the H1N1 virus was on autopilot to target victims with
American birth certificates or citizenship. But the reasons for the CDC’s
erroneous numbers are quite easy to understand.
The
CDC's flawed statistics
First, as mentioned, the CDC did
not monitor the swine flu with any precision and accuracy. Our officials don’t
have, and never had, the data to make any accurate determination.
Second, the CDC does not distinguish between deaths caused by an influenza
virus and deaths due to pneumonia. The two are lumped together in their
mortality statistics and pneumonia-related deaths are reported as having an
initial influenza cause. For example, if we take the combined figure of flu and
pneumonia deaths for the flu period of 2001, and spin the figures, we are left
believing that 62,034 people died from influenza. The actual figures are 61,777
died from pneumonia and only 257 from flu.
Even more amazing, in those 257 cases, only 18 were scientifically identified
as positive for the flu virus. These are the CDC’s own figures. But does the
New York Times, Boston Globe, Washington Post and all the others report this? No.
Do any of the puppets that mumble on television, with access to official
sources and data, actually do their homework? No.
A separate study conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics for the
flu periods between 1979 and 2002 reveals that the actual range of annual flu
deaths were between 257 and 3006, for an average of 1,348 per year.[3] This is
a far cry from the 36,000 annual flu deaths still found on the CDC’s website
and vomited by the major media.
And here is the catch. If we apply the same criteria to determine the actual
number of swine flu related deaths in 2009-2010, serious vaccine adverse
effects, besides the hundreds of reported miscarriages, would far outweigh
deaths and injury due to the virus.
Third, there are over 150 different viruses during any given flu season that
can cause flu-like symptoms, such as adenovirus, parainfluenza, bocavirus, etc.
Very few of these are ever tested. For example, in Canada where actual
infection rates are more carefully monitored, during the 2004-2005 flu season,
the Canada Communicable Disease Report showed that of the 68,849 laboratory
tests performed for influenza, only 14.9% tested positive for a flu virus.
The remaining 85.1% specimens were a result of other pathogens impervious to
flu vaccines.[4] For the following 2005-2006 season, Health Canada received
68,439 tests for influenza like infections. Of these, only 6,580, or 10.4%
confirmed positive for influenza. The rest, 89.6%, were other pathogens.[5] So
no vaccine would have benefitted or protected those almost 90 percent in
Canadians.
In the US, however, the CDC relies upon an esoteric witch’s brew of figures
based upon various mathematical algorithms and speculative projections with no
sound basis in reality. On one CDC site we find evidence of their flawed
methodology: “Statistical modeling was used to estimate how many flu-related
deaths occurred among people whose underlying cause of death on their death
certificate was listed as a respiratory and circulatory disease.”[6] This is clearly
an indication of policy turned dogmatic with utterly disregard for sound
scientific evidence. It is all business as usual, negligent disregard for
scientific reason, and full speed ahead.
And while the brilliant minds in the CDC decide to expose all Americans to the
adverse risks of influenza vaccination -- Guillain-Barre Syndrome,
schizophrenia, neurological disorders, miscarriages, polyneuritis,
encephalitis, multiple sclerosis, intense headaches suggestive or meningeal or
brain irritation, aphasia (loss of speech), bronchopneumonia, sexual impotence,
angor pectoris, anaphylactic reactions and death[7] -- we should not lose sight
of what is unfolding across the great pond in the European Union’s
investigations into the CDC’s favorite bed partner -- the WHO, an utterly
corrupt organization at every level.
Corruption
at the WHO
Two reports recently published
have indicted the WHO for serious malfeasance and conflict in interests behind
the fabrication and propagation of the 2009-2010 H1N1 swine flu pandemic and
has been called a “momentous error” in global health oversight. The people at
the WHO had as much accuracy in their predictions as the Bush administration
did with WMDs in Iraq.
The British Medical Journal printed a research paper by its Features Editor,
Deborah Cohen, and Philip Carter from the Bureau of Investigative Journalism in
London, charging the largest global health organization with exaggerating
the H1N1 flu and being steered in their decisions and fraudulent fear campaign
by the pharmaceutical industrial complex. According to the authors,
“credibility of the WHO and the trust in the global public health system” has
been damaged.
A second devastating preliminary report released by the Health Committee of the
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (CE) found gross negligence and
lack of transparency in the WHO’s handling of the swine flu scare. Throughout
the WHO’s key advisory committees, particularly a secretive group known as the
“emergency committee”, which steered the WHO’s assessment and predictions of
the spread of H1N1 flu virus and advised them to announce a level 6 pandemic,
were scientists entrenched in the morass of private vaccine and drug interests,
particularly GlaxoSmithKline (H1N1 vaccine and Relenza anti-viral drug maker)
and Tamiflu maker Roche AG.
Even worse, the WHO never publicly disclosed widespread conflict of
interests. Paul Flynn, the rapporteur for the CE’s report stated, “the
tentacles of drug company influence are in all levels of the decision-making process,”
and “they vastly over-rated the danger on bad science.” Following a lengthy
investigation, a preliminary report, which still awaits a final version next
month, states the result of the WHO’s negligence in proper oversight resulted
in the “waste of large sums of public money and unjustified scares and fears
about the health risks faced by the European public”
The WHO continues to withhold the names of the 16 members sitting on its
secret “emergency committee.” However, this week, two of the members resigned,
notably Dr. John MacKenzie from Curtin University in Australia, who was the WHO
advisor who first urged the organization to call a pandemic and is well known
to be entangled in financial interests and investments with the pharmaceutical
cartel.
So far the CDC has weathered the WHO controversy in Europe unscathed. A
fundamental oversight in the CE’s investigation and hearings has been solely
targeting the WHO. It ignores the role of government health agencies’
complicity in promulgating the H1N1 hoax and the flushing away of billions of
dollars into the drug industry, especially during an economic downturn and
recession. As we witness the WHO’s indifference and denial of wrongdoing
crumble, the question remains over whether or not the CDC was complicit in the
propagandizing of the astronomically expensive H1N1 hoax.
Of course, the vaccine industry doesn’t give a damn about the investigations.
Their vaccines, anti-viral drugs, and oligarchic rule over the medical caste
system make them immune to independent international scrutiny. And we can be
assured none of the lap dogs at the New York Times, MSNBC and other major media
would expose their crimes. In the shadow of this medical charade, the drug
makers are laughing their way to the banks. No Big Pharma executive is
sitting before investigative committees to give an accounting of corporations’
role in the pandemic debacle. Instead, after scoring over $6 billion
(Associated Press, May 19, 2010) it is again business as usual and another flu
season ahead to further increase revenues.
Financial
corruption at every level
Similar to the WHO, the CDC’s
Advisory Committee on Vaccination and Practice, which voted in favor of a flu
vaccine-for-all policy, is equally stacked with individuals entrenched in financial
ties with the vaccine and drug makers. The Committee’s Chair, Dr. Carol Baker
from Baylor University, has consistently received research and educational
grants and private donations from Big Pharma. She is also on the Board of
Directors of the National Foundation of Infectious Diseases, a consulting body
of scientists frequently wined and dined and provided perks by the
pharmaceutical industrial complex.
Another Baylor University committee member, Dr. Wendy Keitel, received clinical
trial support from Novartis, the maker of the H1N1 vaccine most widely
distributed in the US. Dr. Janet Englund at the Children’s University Medical
Group in Seattle received financial support for clinical trials favoring
vaccines made by Medimmune (the nasal flu vaccine), Novartis, and Sanofi
Pasteur. Dr. Cody Meissner received Big Pharma support through Tufts University
for his supporting clinical trials for Medimmune’s RSV vaccine and for
participation in Wyeth’s streptococcus vaccine for children, Prevnar.
To put this into greater perspective, since the FDA relies on industry-funded
clinical trials and subsequent data to approve vaccines and drugs, there also
appeared in the news this month a critical finding from the German Institute
for Quality and Efficacy in Health Care, published in the peer-reviewed journal
Trials. The study investigated 90 approved drugs in the US (and let us make no
mistake, vaccines are drugs! In fact, the flu vaccine is listed as a Category C
drug; which means there are no adequate safety studies to determine whether flu
vaccination adversely affects pregnant mothers and their fetuses.) and
discovered that 60 percent of the 900 papers were unpublished and some were
concealed from the federal regulatory agencies. Forty to sixty percent omitted
clinical details or changed their final analysis. Among the pharmaceutical
industry studies alone, 94 percent were unpublished, and 86 percent of the
university studies sponsored by drug makers remained unpublished.
What does this tell us? If they were positive results, the drug companies would
without hesitation publish their findings; but if the clinical studies’ results
contradict their expectations negatively, thereby delaying and preventing
regulatory approval and licensure of a product, then there is no incentive for
their release. And they are under no regulatory obligation to publish or
produce them. Hence the American public is denied approximately 90 percent
of the actual clinical data performed on any given drug or vaccine.
Quack
science, useless vaccines and wasted money
The German
study concludes that drug makers
intentionally “conceal unfavorable results or results that do not
fulfill one’s expectations.” Therefore, the vaccine and drug makers are permitted to
conduct their nefarious, quack science behind closed doors with full
participation and cooperation from the WHO, CDC and FDA. Of course, the CDC and
FDA condone this behavior because they are completely subservient to the power
and wealth of the pharmaceutical industry.
The recent CDC vote continues a tradition of denial over independent studies
and reports warning of the over-exaggerated alarm and the dangers of pushing
forward with an H1N1 vaccine that was not given sufficient time to prove its
safety and efficacy. They even deny their own voices.
Dr. Anthony Morris is a distinguished virologist and a former Chief Vaccine
Office at the FDA. His view about influenza vaccines summarizes their efficacy
well. In Morris’s opinion there is no evidence that any influenza vaccine
thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of
influenza,’ Dr. Morris states, as a matter of record, “The producers of
these vaccines know they are worthless, but they go on selling them anyway.”
Canada’s Vaccination Risk Awareness Network (VRAN) website is a community of
physicians, researchers and vaccine researchers and journalists reporting on
vaccines’ flawed promises and pseudo-science. Among all vaccines, the flu
vaccine is presented with “The Most Useless Vaccine Of-All-Time Award.”
Some of the most damning evidence about the efficacy of flu vaccines was
reported in two studies performed by Dr. Tom Jefferson, head of the Vaccine
Field Group at the prestigious independent Cochrane Database Group, published
in The Lancet and the prestigious Cochrane Database Systems Review. The first
study was a systematic review of the effects of influenza vaccines in healthy
children.[8] The other was a review of all the available published and
unpublished safety evidence available regarding flu vaccines.[9]
The authors of the study had also contacted the lead scientists or research
groups for all the efficacy and safety trial studies under their review in
order to gain access to additional unpublished trial studies the corporations
may possess. The conclusions are shocking. The only safety study performed
with an inactivated flu vaccine was conducted in 1976. Thirty-four years ago!
And that single study enrolled only 35 children aged 12-28 months. Every other
subsequent inactivated flu vaccine study enrolled children 3 years or older.
Dr. Jefferson told Reuters, “Immunization of very young children is not lent
support by our findings. We recorded no convincing evidence that vaccines can
reduce mortality, [hospital] admissions, serious complications and community
transmission of influenza. In young children below the age of 2, we could
find no evidence that the vaccine was different from a placebo.”[10] With
respect to adults, in 64 studies involving 66,000 adults, Jefferson noted,
“Vaccination of healthy adults only reduced risk of influenza by 6 percent and
reduced the number of missed work days by less than one day. There was no
change in the number of hospitalizations compared to the non-vaccinated.”
And in another interview for the German magazine Der Spiegel on July 21, 2009,
Jefferson seems to conclude his analysis of the H1N1 scare, “Sometimes you get
the feeling that there is a whole industry almost waiting for a pandemic to
occur. The WHO and public health officials, virologists and the pharmaceutical
companies. They’ve built this machine around the impending pandemic. And
there’s a lot of money involved, and influence, and careers, and entire
institutions! And all it took was one of these viruses to mutate to start the
machine grinding.”
Clearly there is no rationale for submitting the American population to a
vaccine with higher risks of adverse effects than its record of efficacy in
preventing flu infection. If the CDC’s vote withstands and were to ever become
the law in the land, we will witness one of the largest crimes ever inflicted
upon the American public, solely for corporate gain. Aside from rampant adverse
effects in children, many that will not appear until their later years due to
the number of toxins contained in flu vaccines, there will also be thousands
of women having miscarriages. We will have entered a new medical twilight
zone, where true science, responsible medical practice, and reliable public
health become virtually nonexistent.
About the authors:
Richard Gale is the Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network (http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com)
and a former Senior Research Analyst in the biotechnology and genomic
industries. Dr. Gary Null is the host of the nation’s longest running public
radio program on nutrition and natural health and a multi-award-winning
director of progressive documentary films, including Vaccine Nation and Autism:
Made in the USA.
Sources cited in this article:
[1] http://www.whale.to/vaccines/flu7.html
[2] Doshi, Peter. “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” BMJ 2005;
331:1412 (10 December).
[3] Doshi, Peter. “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” BMJ 2005;
331:1412 (10 December)
[4] Statement on Influenza Vaccination for the 2004-2005 Season” Canada
Communicable Disease Report. Volume 31, ACS-6, 15 June 2005.
[5] Hall, Celia (Medical Editor). “Flu Vaccines ‘Not Worth the Bother’” The
Telegraph, UK, October 27, 2006.
[6] Centers for Disease Control. “Influenza death statistics”. www.cdc.gov/flu/about/diseases/us_flu-related_deaths.htm Accessed
September 24, 2009.
[7] See the following sources: Ehrengut W, Allerdist H. Uber neurologische
Komplikationen nach der Influenzaschutzimpfung. Munch. Med Wschr. 1977;
119/705-710. Miller H, Cendrowski W, Schapira K. Multiple sclerosis and vaccinations.
BMJ. 1967. April 22: 210-3. Hennessen W, Jacob H, Quast U. Neurologische
Affektionen nach Influenza Impfung. Der Nervenarzt. 1978. 49/90-96. Wells CEC.
British Medical Journal. 1971. 2: 755.
[8] Jefferson T, Smith S, Demicheli V, Harnden A, Rivetti A. Assessment of the
efficacy and effectiveness of influenza in healthy children: systemic review.
The Lancet 2005; 365: 773-780.
[9] Smith S, Demicheli V, Jefferson T, Harnden T. Matheson N, Di Pietrontonj C.
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children. Cochrane Database Syst.
Rev. 2004. 3:CD004879.
[10] Reaney, Patricia. “No Evidence Flu Shots Work for Under-2s: Study.
Reuters, September 22, 2005; Jefferson, Tom. “Safety of influenza vaccines in
children.” The Lancet, 2005. 366:803-804.
Multiple vaccine doses
have resulted in up to 145,000 child deaths in past 20 years
by Jonathan Benson
The recommended childhood
vaccination schedule has changed dramatically over the years, with children now receiving
upwards of 30 vaccines, including multiple combination vaccines, before the age
of six. And in many cases, doctors and nurses administer half a dozen or more
vaccines all at once during a single visit to make sure children get all these
shots and to save time. But according to data compiled from the government's Vaccine
Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), as many as 145,000 children or
more have died throughout the past 20 years as a result of this multiple
vaccine dose approach, and few parents are aware of this shocking fact.
In a study recently published in the journal Human & Experimental
Toxicology, researchers evaluated the overall number of hospitalizations
and deaths associated with vaccines administered between 1990 and 2010, and
compared this data to the number of vaccines given at one time to individual
children. Hospitalizations and deaths resulting from one vaccine dose were
compared to those of two vaccine doses, in other words, and the same all the
way up to eight vaccine doses. Researchers also evaluated overall
hospitalization and death rates associated with getting one to four combined
vaccine doses, five to eight combined vaccine doses, and one to eight combined
vaccine doses.
Upon analysis, the team found that the more vaccines a child receives during a
single doctor visit, the more likely he or she is to suffer a severe reaction
or even die. According to Heidi Stevenson from Gaia Health, for each
additional vaccine a
child receives, his or her chance of death increases by an astounding 50
percent -- and with each additional vaccine dose, chances of having to be
hospitalized for severe complications increase two-fold. To sum it all up, the
overall size of the vaccine load was found to be directly associated with
hospitalization and death risk, illustrating the incredible dangers of
administering multiple vaccines at once.
Parents
of children who become injured after just one vaccine tend to cease further
vaccinations, suggests data
Interestingly,
the total number of reported hospitalizations and deaths from getting just one
vaccine was higher than the number reported for getting two, three, or even
four vaccines. Though
the precise reason for this is unknown, it is believed that newborns mostly
fall into the one vaccine category, and those that are injured by a single
vaccine tend not to get any more vaccines, hence the immediate decrease
observed among children who received only two vaccines. Once a child reaches five
vaccinations; however, the hospitalization and death rate jumps dramatically,
the reason for which was not investigated as part of the study.
"Our findings show a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses administered and the
percentage of hospitalizations and deaths reports to VAERS," wrote the
authors in their conclusion. "In addition, younger infants were
significantly more likely than older infants to be hospitalized or die after
receiving vaccines. Since vaccines are administered to millions of infants
every year, it is imperative that health authorities have scientific data from
synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines that infants are
likely to receive."
You can view the complete results of the study in their entirety here: http://gaia-health.com
For
more information about the mad and unproven practice of vaccination see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/vaccination
-
See ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
You Can Help This Unique Independent
Site Help You
Donate any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati
eBook!
PLEASE press the button -
Xtra Images – http://www.occupykualalumpur.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Vaccine-e1348370996567.jpg
http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000838251/polls_Dees_Vaccine_Slow_Kill_2259_671437_poll_xlarge.jpeg
http://www.rushfm.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/vaccine-danger.jpg
http://thetruthisnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Vaccines-Have-Been-Based-on-Medical-Fraud-for-Over-a-Hundred-Years-289x300.jpg
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8341/8230553281_c703e5febf.jpg
And see
This
site is published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an
individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work
& author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original
along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or
software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay
glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please
send a small but heartfelt donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading
this far…
Live
long and prosper!
