There`s
still too much suspicion raised when it comes to various deaths of UFO
investigators.
It is to frequent and they are too many. And this has been going on since 1947.
And still does. It’s all from death by gunshot to the head. Death by probable
poisoning. Death by alleged suicides, Death by strangulation. Deaths by
implantation of radioactive isotopes, Deaths by implantation of deadly viruses.
The list goes on and on.
I Remember
how I got into this topic regarding UFO investigators mysterious deaths. It
started when I read the first reports 1981 of the late astronomer Dr. M.K.
Jessup? He was the first to reveal details of the famous Philadelphia
Experiment, he died in 1959 in Coral Gables, Florida, an apparent suicide. And
now many years later I still keep an eye on whats happening to our investigators.
Yet the
recent suspicious deaths of UFO investigators John E Mack, Lloyd Pie, Alistair
Beckham, Mr.X, UyrangĂȘ Hollanda, Phil Schneider, Ronald Rummel, Dr. Alan J
Hynek, Danny Casolaro, Dr Karla Turner, Ron Johnson, Con Routine, Ann
Livingston as well as the deaths of a host of researchers in the past and many
more, only add emphasis to a reality with which many of the more aware
UFOIogists are now quite familiar. Not only is UFO research a potentially
dangerous area, but the life span of the average serious investigator falls far
short compared to the national average.
Because if
you investigate this you will find that, many UFO researchers working on their
research in the 1970s and 1980s died under some very mysterious circumstances,
and many things points towards that may have been killed. This is also the
conclusion reached by an amateur astronomer, a former U.S. government adviser
Timothy Hood.
Hood made
this statement at an international conference in Amsterdam dedicated to search
for extraterrestrial intelligence. And I believe his statement to be true. But
for all the researchers trying to find extraterrestrial life and revealing the
truth it’s still unpleasant. Hood’s conclusion was prompted by a 30-year study
of this topic.
“In a
relatively short time, 25 people who worked in the space field died for various
reasons. When discovered this tragic phenomenon, seriously believed that it had
to do with aliens. According to Timothy Hood, these deaths were not accidental,
but rather, were the work of special services that eliminated the experts
because they knew too much.”
Let’s take a
look at some of these unusual “deaths” allegedly done by suicide…
Captain UyrangĂȘ
Hollanda – Brazil
During the
months of September through December 1977, the Brazillian Air-Force under the command
of a Captain UyrangĂȘ Hollanda, was sent to the island of Colares to investigate
a series of incidents in which over 80 people reported being attacked by beams
of light from UFO’s, paralyzing two of them and leaving puncture and burn marks
on their skin.
The
investigation was codenamed “Operation Saucer”. This operation collated over 15
hours of film, 500 photos, and hundreds of documents with detailed drawings and
interviews with over 3000 witness’.
The files
were to remain classified by the Brazillian Government until 1997, when UFO
investigator’s A J Gevaerd and Marco Petite of UFO Magazine were allowed
partial access. They were also contacted by the then retired Cpt Hollanda who
gave them a vivid recollection of the whole series of events.
Some three
months after the interview, he was found dead hanging by his own belt.”
Ron
Rummel
In early
August, 1993, Ron Rummell (also known as Creston) was found dead in a Portland,
Oregon park.
He had been shot through the mouth and was supposedly holding a gun in his
hand. The police labeled it a suicide and cremated the body the next day without
performing an autopsy or notifying relatives.
Allegedly
having shot himself in the mouth with a pistol. Friends say, that no blood was
found on the pistol barrel and the handle of the weapon was free of
fingerprints. In addition, according to information now circulating, the
suicide note left by the deceased was written by a left-handed person. Rummel
was right-handed. Perspiration on the body smelled like sodium pentothal.
Sverdlovsk
Case – Russia
This entire
alleged incident was actually reported on a 1998 TNT special, “The Secret KGB
UFO Files,”
and hosted by former James Bond actor Roger Moore. The program showed startling
filmed segments of the alleged UFO crash — as well as several minutes of the
supposed autopsy of the dead alien. According to records the UFO crashed in
1969. I believe that this case is true. But I don’t believe the actual autopsy
was genuine. This was probably added later and had really nothing to do with
the Sverdlovsk crash.
And In April
and May 1979, an unusual anthrax epidemic occurred in Sverdlovsk, Union of
Soviet Socialist Republics. Soviet officials attributed it to consumption of
contaminated meat. U.S. agencies attributed it to inhalation of spores
accidentally released at a military microbiology facility in the city.
Epidemiological data show that most victims worked or lived in a narrow zone
extending from the military facility to the southern city limit. Farther south,
livestock died of anthrax along the zone’s extended axis.
Many
scientist allegedly also died during this outbreak. So the “TNT special” crew
had a hard time getting in touch with several of the scientists who dealt with
the craft. And It is now concluded that the escape of an aerosol of anthrax
pathogen at the military facility caused the outbreak. Convenient?
U.S.
Secretary of Defense
May 1949,
the life of the first U.S. Secretary of Defense, James Forrestal, came to an
end when he plunged to his death, from a window of the Bethesda, Maryland,
National Naval Medical Center. Rumors abound that Forrestal’s classified,
government work gave him unique access to the U.S. Government’s most guarded
UFO secrets of all – secrets that Forrestal was intent on disclosing to the
world, had his untimely and suspicious death not got in the way.
Lets also
take a look at Alaistair Beckham and his fellow colleagues as yet an example.
Were these scientists victims of a corrupt defense industry? Have they been
espionage pawns? Are the deaths nothing more than an extraordinary coincidence?
I don’t think so..
Did 22 British SDI
Researchers really ALL Commit Suicide?
This is
from the “Sheldon list.” The famous American writer Sidney Sheldon, working on
his novel “The End of the World”, drew attention to a series of mysterious
deaths among British specialists developing space weapons.
Fifty-year-old
Alistair Beckham was a successful British aerospace- projects engineer. His
specialty was designing computer software for sophisticated naval defense
systems. Like hundreds of other British scientists, he was working on a pilot
program for America’s Strategic Defense Initiative better known as Star Wars.
And like at least 21 of his colleagues, he died a bizarre, violent death.
DOSSIER OF DEATH
AUTO
ACCIDENT–Professor Keith Bowden, 45, computer scientist, Essex University. In
March 1982 Bowden’s car plunged off a bridge, into am abandoned rail yard. His
death was listed as an accident.
MISSING PERSON–Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Godley, 49, defense expert, head of
work-study unit at the Royal Military College of Science. Godley disappeared in
April 1983. His father bequeathed him more than $60,000, with the proviso that
he claim it be 1987. He never showed up and is presumed dead.
SHOTGUN
BLAST–Roger Hill, 49, radar designer and draftsman, Marconi. In March 1985 Hill
allegedly killed himself with a shotgun at the family home.
DEATH
LEAP–Jonathan Walsh, 29, digital-communications expert assigned to British
Telecom’s secret Martlesham Health research facility (and to GEC, Marconi’s
parent firm). In November 1985 Walsh allegedly fell from his hotel room while
working on a British Telecom project in Abidjan, Ivory Coast (Africa). He had
expressed a fear for his life. Verdict: Still in question.
DEATH
LEAP–Vimal Dajibhai, 24, computer-software engineer (worked on guidance system
for Tigerfish torpedo), Marconi Underwater Systems. In August 1986 Dajibhai’s
crumpled remains were found 240 feet below the Clifton suspension bridge in
Bristol. The death has not been listed as a suicide.
DECAPITATION–Ashaad
Sharif, 26, computer analyst, Marconi Defense Systems. In October 1986, in
Bristol, Sharif allegedly tied one end of a rope around a tree and the other
end around his neck, then drove off in his car at high-speed. Verdict: Suicide.
SUFFOCATION–Richard
Pugh, computer consultant for the Ministry of Defense. In January 1987 Pugh was
found dead, wrapped head-to- toe in rope that was tied four times around his
neck. The coroner listed his death as an accident due to a sexual experiment
gone awry.
ASPHYXIATION–John
Brittan, Ministry of Defense tank batteries expert, Royal Military College of
Science. In January 1987 Brittan was found dead in a parked car in his garage.
The engine was still running. Verdict: Accidental death.
DRUG
OVERDOSE–Victor Moore, 46, design engineer, Marconi Space Systems. In February
1987 Moore was found dead of a drug overdose. His death is listed as a suicide.
ASPHYXIATION–Peter
Peapell, 46, scientist, Royal Military College of Science. In February 1987
Peapell was found dead beneath his car, his face near the tail pipe, in the
garage of his Oxfordshire home. Death was due to carbon-monoxide poisoning,
although test showed that the engine had been running only a short time. Foul
play has not been ruled out.
ASPHYXIATION–Edwin
Skeels, 43, engineer, Marconi. In February 1987 Skeels was found dead in his
car, a victim of carbon-monoxide poisoning. A hose led from the exhaust pipe.
His death is listed as a suicide.
AUTO
ACCIDENT–David Sands, satellite projects manager, Eassams (a Marconi sister
company). Although up for a promotion, in March 1987 Sands drove a car filled
with gasoline cans into the brick wall of an abandoned cafe. He was killed
instantly. Foul play has not been ruled out.
AUTO
ACCIDENT–Stuart Gooding, 23, postgraduate research student, Royal Military
College of Science. In April 1987 Gooding died in a mysterious car wreck in
Cyprus while the College was holding military exercises on the island. Verdict:
Accidental death.
AUTO
ACCIDENT–George Kountis, experienced systems analyst at British Polytechnic. In
April 1987 Kountis drowned after his BMW plunged into the Mersey River in
Liverpool. His death is listed as a misadventure.
SUFFOCATION–Mark
Wisner, 24, software engineer at Ministry of Defense experimental station for
combat aircraft. In April 1987 Wisner was found dead in his home with a plastic
bag over his head. At the inqust, his death was ruled an accident due to a
sexual experiment gone awry.
AUTO
ACCIDENT–Michael Baker, 22, digital-communications expert, Plessey Defense
Systems. In May 1987 Baker’s BMW crashed through a road barrier, killing the
driver. Verdict: Misadventure.
HEART
ATTACK–Frank Jennings, 60, electronic-weapons engineer for Plessey. In June
1987 Jennings allegedly dropped dead of a heart attack. No inquest was held.
DEATH
LEAP–Russel Smith, 23, lab technician at the Atomic Energy Research
Establishment. In January 1988 Smith’s mangled body was found halfway down a
cliff in Cornwall. Verdict: Suicide.
ASPHYXIATION–Trevor
Knight, 52, computer engineer, Marconi Space and Defense Systems. In March 1988
Knight was found dead in his car, asphyxiated by fume from a hose attached to
the tail pipe. The death was ruled a suicide.
ELECTROCUTION–John
Ferry, 60, assistant marketing director for Marconi. In August 1988 Ferry was
found dead in a company-owned apartment, the stripped leads of an electrical
cord in his mouth. Foul play has not been ruled out.
ELECTROCUTION–Alistair
Beckham, 50, software engineer, Plessey. In August 1988 Beckham’s lifeless body
was found in the garden shed behind his house. Bare wires, which ran to a live
main, were wrapped around his chest. Now suicide note was found, and police
habe not ruled out foul play.
ASPHYXIATION–Andrew
Hall, 33, engineering manager, British Aero- space. In September 1988 Hall was
found dead in his car, asphyxiated by fumes from a hose that was attached to
the tail pipe. Friends said he was well liked, had everything to live for.
Verdict: Suicide.
When you
collect the information and put together in these cases, you can clearly see
that there are a surprising huge number of ufologists who have died in the most
strange ways and circumstances since the 1950s. Prominent activist Stephen Bassett,
supports the idea that the U.S. government has regularly murdered innocent
citizens who have tried probing into UFO cases like Roswell or who have tried
to get the Government to reveal the truth about UFOs.” And if you look at the
latest headlines in this area, there are no exceptions.
“A crop
circle researcher found floating in the sea”
“A plane
supposedly shot down by the U.S. military is believed to have been carrying
fragments of a flying saucer”
“The rapid
decline of a UFO expert who believed he had found an alien skull
- Scroll down
through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
Do you LIKE this uniquely informative site?
Hours of effort by a genuinely incapacitated invalid are
required every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate, moderate and
publish this website from a tiny cabin in a remote forest.
Now that most people use ad blockers and view these posts
on phones and other mobile devices, sites like this earn an ever shrinking
pittance from advertising sponsorship. This site needs your help.
Like what you see? Please give anything you can -
Contributeany amount and receive at least one
New Illuminati eBook!
(You can use a card securely if you don’t use Paypal)
Please click below -
And it costs nothing
to share this post on Social Media!
Dare to care and
share - YOU are our only advertisement!
For further enlightening
information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @
the top left of http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
We provide
a live link to your original material on your site (and links via social
networking services) - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps
spread your info further!
This site
is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT (unless an
individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright
holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged - if you
give attribution to the work & author and include all links in the original
(along with this or a similar notice).
Feel free
to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you
never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember
attribution!
If you
like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large)
or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…
Live long
and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible worlds…
JFK Jr. Told the World Who Murdered His Father – But
Nobody Was Paying Attention
by Jane
Grey
I suppose
most people think that from the day he saluted his father’s casket at just
three years old,
till the evening his plane went down, he just went about his business, playing
the game of life-like everyone else.
After all,
he did live, for the most part, a relatively ordinary life, in spite of being
the Prince of America’s Camelot.
So, what do
you suppose was going on in the mind of the sexiest man alive? He could have
written his own political ticket, yet he went into publishing. Many expected
him to land in politics and most likely were a bit perplexed when he decided to
publish a magazine instead.
Some thought
he was afraid to go into politics because of the “Kennedy Curse.” However, nothing could be
further from the truth. What he did proved to be more dangerous than any
political arena, and he knew that from the start. But…John-John had a
mission…and that mission was to expose the villain who orchestrated that
“dastardly act” upon his father.
Unbeknownst
to the public, John-John was digging deep for proof. And, how else could he
expose the truth when all the media outlets were controlled by the very cabal
he planned to expose? Enter…”George.”
When
he presented his magazine, “George,” to the world, he was, for all practical
purposes, signing his own death warrant.
“George” was
a veiled threat…in a symbolic sort of way. Do you see? How many men named
“George” comes to mind at just the thought of President John F. Kennedy’s so
called assassination? The cabal wanted his father dead, that is a fact, but the
namesake of John F. Kennedy, Jr.’s magazine…their minion, arranged it. And…once
he had the proof, the truth would come out in his very own magazine. Do you
see?
“As
President, John F. Kennedy understood the predatory nature of private central
banking. He understood why Andrew fought so hard to end the Second Bank of the
United States. So Kennedy wrote and signed Executive Order 11110 which ordered
the US Treasury to issue a new public currency, the United States Note.
Kennedy was
working with President Soekarno of Indonesia who was at that time the signatory
for the Global Collateral Accounts which were intended to be used for
humanitarian purposes but which were subverted at the time of the Bretton-Woods
agreement at the end of WWII.
The
intention of Kennedy and Soekarno was to end the reign of the globalist
privately owned central banking system – which is the main reason that Kennedy
was killed, and for his part Soekarno remained under house arrest for the rest
of his life.” From: All Wars Are Bankers’ Wars
There was a
rumor that John-John had obtained the proof he needed and an expose’ was in the
works, until his untimely, and mostly “suspicious,” death. Of course, the media
campaigned that he was an irresponsible thrill seeker; but then they would,
wouldn’t they? Although many people knew JFK, Jr. was murdered; and they were
right about who was responsible…they were just wrong about the reason.
John Jr. was
warned by family members about the risks involved in his pursuit. But, he was
determined to get justice for his father and bring truth to light, exposing the
darkness that shrouds our planet. So ask yourself…what would you do, if you
were a mere babe when your father, who just happened to be the most important
man in the country, was murdered in such a gruesome manner, and you never had
the opportunity to know him…would you just let it go?
Although he
was from one of the main Illuminati family bloodlines,
JFK was in fact trying to undo some of the mess – and to bring an end to the
Reserve Banking System. For his efforts he was assassinated on November 22,
1963.
The
Bush Connections
Many
researchers and historians have come to the conclusion that it was the elite power structure running the US Government
that were responsible for the assassination of JFK, and that there was more
than one reason for them doing so.
There are
photographs claiming to show that George Bush was at Dealey Plaza on the day of
the killing, and while they might be inconclusive there are multiple other
sources that George Bush was one of those responsible for the assassination of
JFK and that he was indeed there that day. The Dark Legacy takes an in-depth
look into the evidence supporting this.
It Never Ends
– MORE Startling Evidence of Bush in Dallas – by John Hankey – TheDarkLegacy.com
I don’t
think we are much encouraged to see History as science. Quite the opposite,
actually. And of course, that’s all politics. The winners write history, and
the truth be damned. Even science can have trouble trying to act like science
when political issues are involved, as we see with evolution,
tobacco-and-cancer, and global warming.
But I think
History does have a lot in common with physical science. For example, I can
remember when “Continental Drift”, the idea that Africa and America were once
stuck together, was very much considered “just a theory”; ridiculed by some,
and regarded with amusement by many, and promulgated as likely by a tiny
minority.
“Fifty
men have run America, and that’s a high figure.”
–
Joseph Kennedy, Father of JFK, in the July 26th, 1936 issue of The New York
Times
But as time
goes by, the evidence accumulates; and the meaning of old evidence begins to
settle in; and ideas that were once considered outrageous gradually get worn in
and start to be regarded as obvious common sense. Part of this process is the
continual accumulation of new evidence.
New pieces
are added to the puzzle and the picture becomes more clear. And sometimes the
hidden meaning of old evidence, that has been lying around for years, suddenly
jumps out.
Evidence of
the fossils and minerals that can be found on the east coast of Africa, and on
the west coast of Brazil, may have been lying around for years, before someone
decided to look and see if they matched, and found that they did; and proved
conclusively that west Africa and Brazil were once attached.
Trailer: (See Full Video Below)
With regard
to George HW Bush and the murder of John Kennedy, Joseph McBride found this
memo in 1988.
FBI director J. Edgar
Hoover wrote this memo 5 days after the assassination, naming George Bush as a
CIA officer.
The last,
and most crucial paragraph, is very hard to read. The following is a
transcription:
“The
substance of the forgoing information was orally furnished to Mr. George Bush of
the Central Intelligence Agency and Captain William Edwards of the
Defense Intelligence Agency on November 23, 1963, by Mr. V.T. Forsyth of this
Bureau.”
When it was
first released in 1978, George Bush was an obscure bureaucrat, a virtual
unknown. So when the best researchers on the planet saw this memo in 1978, they
didn’t pay much attention to it. When Bush became vice president two years
later, no one was able to connect his now well-known name to this obscure memo.
But when
Joseph McBride was messing around in 1988, Bush was running for president; and
when McBride saw the memo, he jumped up and shouted:
“Hey,
this memo is about Bush! It says he was in the CIA, way back in 1963!”
And for the
longest time, the focus was on this simple isolated fact: that Hoover said Bush was in the CIA in
’63.
Bush said
the memo must be referring to another “George Bush,” because he wasn’t in the
CIA at that time. But over the years, people were able to assemble the facts
from Bush’s personal life, showing his deep involvement with the CIA at that
time, and with the CIA’s anti-Castro Cubans (in the memo, Hoover calls them
“misguided anti-Castro Cubans”).
And
over time, it has become undeniable; that Hoover was referring, in his memo, to
none other than George Herbert Walker Bush. And for a while, that was it. End
of story.
But the
title of this Hoover memo is, “Assassination of President John Fitzgerald
Kennedy”. Isn’t that important?
Well, you’d
think so. But for the longest time, no one made much out it. Besides, Hoover
scarcely mentions the assassination in the memo, instead focusing on these
“misguided anti-Castro Cubans.” The body of the memo does not appear, at first,
to be in any way related to the title of the memo “the assassination of
President John F Kennedy”.
But then
Mark Lane, in his book Rush to Judgment, did the fabulous work of
demonstrating, and in fact persuading a jury, that E. Howard Hunt, a major
lieutenant in the CIA’s “misguided anti-Castro Cuban” program, was in Dallas
and involved in the assassination.
With this
background, with this framework to guide the researcher, it was then possible
to assemble the considerable evidence linking Bush to Hunt.
People might
have taken some notice before that Bush made the unusual request, as Nixon’s
ambassador to the UN, to be given an office in the White House. They may have
noticed that Hunt,although
he was not being paid by anyone in the White House, or answering to anyone that
we know of in the White House, also had a White House office.
“The very word “secrecy” is repugnant
in a free and open society; and we are as a people
inherently and historically opposed to secret
societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings…
Our way of
life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around
the globe… no war
ever posed a greater threat to our security.
If you are
awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only say that the danger has never been more
clear and its presence has never been more imminent… For we are opposed around the world by a
monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for
expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on
subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas
by night instead of armies by day.I
t is a
system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the
building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military,
diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political
operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes
are buried, not headlined. Its
dissenters are silenced, not praised.
No
expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.”
But with the
Hoover memo in hand, establishing Bush as a supervisor of the CIA’s “misguided
anti-Castro Cuban” operation, it is possible to connect Bush to Hunt at the Bay
of Pigs. With this memo in hand, it is possible to connect Bush and Hunt as two
CIA operatives with offices inside the White House.
With this
memo in hand, it is possible to answer who it was that Hunt answered to inside
the White House; and how he got the office in the first place. And with all
that, it is possible to connect Bush to Hunt, and therefore to Dallas, to Hunt
in Dallas, and to the “misguided anti-Castro Cuban” assassins of John Kennedy.
Which is
what Hoover did for us when he wrote the title of the memo. Little by little,
the pieces start to fall into place. And pieces that in isolation meant
nothing, become key parts of a whole picture.
But even so,
this is not a rock-solid connection: Hunt was directly involved in the murder
of JFK. And Bush supervised Hunt.
But Bush
probably supervised a lot of CIA people, not all of whom were directly involved
in the assassination. A high-ranking officer may be connected to all of the
acts of all of his troops, by reason of his being their commander. But it’s not
a direct connection. It doesn’t establish that the officer knew about, or
approved of, or was involved in, all the actions of those troops.
Enter FBI memo # 2:
It will come
up again in a minute, so please read the first line carefully. Bush identifies
himself to the FBI as an independent oil man from Houston.
This memo
establishes that sort of direct connection between Bush and Hunt, in Dallas, on
the day of the assassination.
This memo
records Bush’s phone call to the FBI, precisely an hour and fifteen minutes
after the assassination. When I first encountered this memo, and when I first
put it into my movie, JFK II, I simply called it “weird”.
I saw it
only in isolation, a weird, isolated connection between Bush and the
assassination. It took me years to see it in context. That is, to see that this phone call
demonstrates, clearly, that George Bush, was on duty that day.
He was
staying at the Dallas Sheraton because his duty assignment was in Dallas. His
phone call to the FBI cannot have been random. This James Parrott worked for
Bush as a sign-painter; he was not an assassin; this phone call is not what it
purports to be; Bush was fulfilling some obscure under-cover function in making
this call.
So the phone
call has to be seen as part of his CIA assignment; which was clearly connected
to the assassination. This memo then establishes that Bush was in the Dallas
area, and on duty; and that his duty assignment was connected to the
assassination. And if his men were in Dallas shooting the President, as they
were, he was certainly on duty supervising them.
“The Society
[Society of Jesus aka the Jesuits] employs a variety of ruthless tactics to
accomplish its long-term goal (of a New World Order which pays homage to their
Black Pope). One is carrying out political assassinations of world leaders who
refuse to comply with its demands.
These
assassinations in the U.S. have included presidents (Abraham Lincoln, JFK),
cabinet members, congressmen, senators, diplomats, journalists, scientists and
religious and business leaders. ”
“Assassinations
are carried out by the aforementioned intelligence agencies and their Mafia
partners in the drug and gambling trades, often with collateral assistance from
the Knights of Malta, the Freemasons, the Knights of Columbus, and Propaganda
Due (P2). Such was the case in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy
and some former Popes.”
If he were
not supposed to be supervising them, his bosses would have assigned him to be
at his home office in Houston, Texas; or on his oil rigs in the Caribbean.
But, even in
context, this memo and the phone call it describes is still weird, no? I mean,
how could Bush have been so stupid as to make this insanely incriminating phone
call? Without this FBI memo, recording this phone call, we don’t know, or even
have a good clue as to where Bush was, or what he was doing the day of the
assassination. Do we?
Bush has,
until recently, simply said that he did not remember what he was doing the day
of the assassination. But with this memo, Bush tells us where he was and what
he was doing – he hands us his head on a silver platter.
What could
possibly have motivated him to make such a stupid error as making this phone
call to the FBI? It’s a valid question. It’s not an essential question. We can
still value this memo, and extract a great deal of important content from it
without answering the question of why, but the question remains.
And we can
make a stab at answering it. Russ Baker in his fine book, Family of Secrets
suggests that Bush was attempting to establish an alibi. Now, by making this
phone call, he, in fact, establishes that he was in the Dallas area, and that
he was on duty, related to the assassination.
So if he’s
trying to establish an alibi to cover-up where he actually was and what he was
actually doing, what he is trying to cover up must be some pretty bad stuff,
some pretty incriminating stuff, if it’s worse than what he gives us with this
alibi.
And what
could be worse than what he gives us? Well, obviously, he must have actually
been in Dallas. In fact, I think, this situation suggests he must have actually
been in Dealey Plaza. I mean seriously. Think about it. He’s so panicked about
the truth coming out, that he puts his head in a noose and hands it to us.
It makes me
think he must have been in Dealey Plaza, he must have been in the company of
the shooters, and he must have felt that there would be evidence to prove that.
We’re just
speculating at the moment. We’ll get to the evidence right now, but I’m trying
to set the scene. If a guilty party is in a panic, trying to cover evidence
connecting them to a crime, they may invent an explanation, or an alibi, that
seems like a good idea at the time; but that in fact constitutes a very
damaging admission. Anyway, stew on that while you consider this photo:
You see this
tall thin man in a suit, with a receding hair line. Many people claim this is
Bush, standing in front of the Texas School Book Depository. And it might be.
It might be a lot of people. And perhaps, when he called the FBI and
incriminated himself, Bush was concerned that he might show up in a better
picture than this, where he was positively recognizable, looking towards the
camera.
Personally,
I don’t think this photo looks much like Bush; and in fact, I didn’t think he’d
be stupid enough to just be hanging around the murder scene. I thought he was
sufficiently high ranking that he’d leave such on-scene stuff to his
underlings. Right?
At least in
my mind, if you’re an officer like Bush, you’re the coach. You plan, you train
and prepare your people, and then you stand back and watch it happen. Or so I
thought. Fletcher Prouty was certain that he saw pictures of Ed Lansdale, a
military operative of the highest rank, signaling to the “tramps” arrested
behind the grassy knoll to “be cool,” that everything was alright.
Hunt was a
high-ranking CIA officer, chief of the CIA’s Mexico station; and his son says
he is one of the “tramps” who show up in several photos of men who were
arrested behind the grassy knoll. So, some of the highest ranking members of
the killers’ operation were apparently there, on the front line, to make sure
that when things went wrong, as they inevitably do, these high-ranking officers
could be there to fix whatever the problem was.
So, given
that high- and low- ranking CIA officers were present, this photo of this thin
man in a suit might, indeed, be Bush. It’s possible.
And now,
look at this picture of the Dal-Tex building. The Dal-Tex building is across
the street from the Book Depository, and many leading researchers into the
assassination, including Jim Garrison, say there was certainly a team of
shooters in this building:
And as you
can see, some imaginative individual has added some colour to indicate three
men in this window. Very creative, very imaginative; and at least plausible.
Still, it takes way too much imagination and effort, to see Bush’s face. But now observe this link.
Actually,
You don’t have to stop and read it, because I’ll quote the relevant part. It’s
a statement from Roger Craig, winner of the deputy of the year award for Dallas
in 1960, and one of the most honest men working that day in Dallas. He’s an
amazing and heroic fellow, worthy of all the time you could take looking into
his background and character. And here, in the following passage, he is
describing a conversation he had with Jim Garrison, and he says,
“Jim
also asked me about the arrests made in Dealey Plaza that day. I told him I
knew of twelve arrests, one in particular made by R. E. Vaughn of the Dallas
Police Department. The man Vaughn arrested was coming from the Dal-Tex Building
across from the Texas School Book Depository.
The
only thing which Vaughn knew about him was that he was an independent oil
operator from Houston, Texas. The prisoner was taken from Vaughn by Dallas
Police detectives and that was the last that he saw or heard of the suspect.”
Holy Moe
Lee! Please notice that, in speaking to Jim Garrison, Craig says “in
particular”. Apparently he and Vaughn thought this was the most significant
arrest made that day; pretty amazing given that E.Howard Hunt was arrested in
the rail yard behind the grassy knoll. And the only thing Craig knew about this
“particular” arrestee was that he had exactly the same singular CIA-cover, “an independent oil operator from
Houston, Texas”, that George Bush had used that same day in his
contact with the FBI.
Now. There
are a very limited number of possible explanations for who this “independent
oil operator” was. Let’s look at them.
It
is conceivable that the CIA had two men in Dallas area that day, supervising
the shooters, who both had the designated cover of being an “independent oil
operator from Houston.” Bush was one, as the evidence above clearly
shows; and perhaps there was another who was with the shooters in the Dal-Tex
building, supervising them directly.
But unless
the CIA overlords were trying to set Bush up, they would not have told anyone
else to use Bush’s CIA cover to identify themselves to the police. If another
man was involved in the crime, and was arrested for it, and he told the cops he
was an “independent oil operator from Houston,” this would tend to throw
suspicion in Bush’s direction.
“The
Khazarian Mafia’s intense hatred of anyone who professed faith in any God but
their god Baal has motivated them to murder kings and royalty, and make sure
they can never rule. They have done the same with American presidents – running
sophisticated covert operations to disempower them.
If that
doesn’t work the KM assassinates them, like they did to McKinley, Lincoln and
JFK. The KM wants to eliminate any strong rulers or elected officials who dare
to resist their Babylonian money-magick power or their covert power gained from
their deployment of their human compromise network.” Bush’s
association with the CIA’s Cubans was already widely known. Fletcher Prouty
knew and wrote of it. Fabian Escalante, the head of Cuban counter intelligence,
knew and has written about it. James Files, who claims very credibly, to have
been a driver for the Mafia shooters in Dallas, has spoken on-camera about it.
And FBI
director J. Edgar Hoover, knew about it and wrote about it in his memo. So Bush
was already a suspect in Hoover’s eyes. The CIA planners, then, would not have
told anyone else, “in case you get arrested, tell the cops you’re an
independent oil man from Houston”. Right? They would not have done this, since
it would tend to incriminate Bush, who was already in a highly visible, highly
suspicious position.
Another
unlikely possibility is that this “independent oil operator from Houston” was
just some innocent oil operator, who somehow managed to attract suspicion, and
was arrested. Do you think it’s possible that another oil man from Houston just
happened to be in that corner of Dealey Plaza?
Dealey Plaza today
I hope you
think it’s possible. Because, as unlikely as it seems, if you think it was
possible, then certainly Bush would have been reasonable in thinking that, as
he was being arrested, there were other independent oil operators in the crowd
who witnessed his arrest.
You see,
Bush spoke to a group of oil men in Dallas the night before the assassination.
If it were possible that some of them were in Dealey Plaza, he would need to be
terrified of the possibility that some of them might actually have seen the
arrest, and would have been able to identify him as the object of that arrest.
No wonder,
then, that Bush freaked out, and made this stupid incriminating phone call to
the FBI. Even if it showed that he was not in Houston, or in the Caribbean, but
in Dallas, at least it suggested that he was not in police custody for the
murder of the President, in Dealey Plaza.
But now stop
and think a minute: Why was he arrested? What was he doing that drew this cop’s
attention at all? What could he possibly have been doing to make this cop think
that he needed to arrest Bush?
Perhaps
walking out of a building without attracting attention is harder than it
sounds; and it reasonable to suppose that the crowd outside the Dal-Tex
building had heard the shots, had heard that the President had been wounded,
and they were carefully scrutinizing anyone who came out of the building.
But this
story shows clearly that Bush was not the sort of cold-blooded killer who could
take part in the murder of a man, and then act and look like nothing was going
on as he tried to leave the scene of the crime. And it turns out that as an old
man, Bush continues to suffer from this character trait, of being unable to
hide feelings that need to be kept secret.
As you can
see below, at Gerry Ford’s funeral, Bush suddenly breaks into a wide grin while
speaking of the Kennedy assassination. This is not a Mona Lisa smile. This is
face-wrenching spasm of glee.
In a minute
we’ll take up the question of why Bush would grin at his recollection of
watching John Kennedy’s brains splatter; the point for us now is that he
apparently had a similarly inappropriate, show-stopping expression on his face
as he attempted to exit the Dal-Tex building; he had the look of a murderer in
his eye, so clearly that it could not be missed; as this funereal-grin could
not be missed.
And the
guilt plastered all over Bush’s face drew people’s attention. And this cop,
Vaughn, arrested him.
Now
remember, Roger Craig tells this story in the context of his discussions with
New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison about the suspects who were arrested that day and
who then evaporated without leaving a mugshot, interview, fingerprint, or name.
Garrison spoke not only to Roger Craig, but he no-doubt spoke to Vaughn, who
made the arrest. And Garrison adds the following:
“At
least one man arrested immediately after the shooting had come running out of
the Dal-Tex Building and offered no explanation for his presence there. Local
authorities hardly could avoid arresting him because of the clamor of the
onlookers.
He was taken
to the Sheriff’s office, where he was held for questioning. However, the
Sheriff’s office made no record of the questions asked this suspect, if any
were asked; nor did it have a record of his name. Later two uniformed police
officers escorted him out of the building to the jeers of the waiting crowd.
They put him
in a police car, and he was driven away. Apparently this was his farewell to
Dallas, for he simply disappeared forever.”
– On the Trail of the Assassins, p. 238
This vision
of the panicked Bush being arrested, no-doubt terrified as he was taken to the
police station, and possibly even booked (though the record of any such booking
has been destroyed) provides a context that explains a number of Bush’s
otherwise-mysterious actions. Certainly Bush was freaked out and
panic-stricken! An angry crowd clamored for his arrest, and jeered his release.
Being a
newbie in these dark affairs, Bush didn’t have confidence in the ability of the
old devils at CIA to make water run uphill, to make time run backwards, to
silence the witnesses, to destroy the records, and make it all go away. And so
he panicked; he acted on his own, stupidly; he called the FBI, thinking that he
was “cleverly” providing evidence that it wasn’t him who was arrested in front
of the Dal-Tex building that day.
In
his panic-stricken state, this seemed like a good idea. He was unable to see
that he was actually creating a permanent and absolutely positive record
of his involvement.
We can now
also explain the grin. He grins ridiculously at Gerry Ford’s funeral, at the
mention of John Kennedy’s murder, not because he is such a ghoul that he thinks
splattering the contents of Kenney’s head all over Jackie Kennedy was funny;
but because mentioning the assassination causes him to recall the comedy of
errors that produced his own ridiculous panic, arrest, more panic, and so on.
Garrison
wrote his paragraph about Bush’s arrest in 1988. Deputy Craig’s article was
written in 1971 and posted in 1992. But the significance of these paragraphs was
discovered last week. There hardly was an internet in 1992 when Craig’s article
was posted. And for 19 years, no one noticed that this phrase, “independent oil man from Houston”,
is a very unique description of Bush.
No one
noticed until last month, when one of the moderators of JFKMurderSolved showed it to me. And I
wrote about it to some friends, and one of them suggested I read what Jim
Garrison had to say.
So the
pieces continue to fall into place. Little by little, the picture is filled in,
the questions get answered. And the conclusions become more incontrovertible.
This is just the sort thing that happened with the theory of Evolution and the
Big Bang theory; and the theory of continental drift [all three of which are
actually bunkum].
And someday
they may start to teach history, as a science, based on evidence, in the
universities. Really! It could happen!
At which
point, Bush’s involvement in JFK’s murder will be taught, like evolution, as
the only plausible explanation of the available reliable evidence.
Final note:
Until recently, Bush had nothing more to say about his whereabouts the day of
the assassination than that he doesn’t remember where he was. That in itself is extraordinarily
incriminating.
Everyone who
was alive at the time remembers where they were on 9-11, and on the day Kennedy
was murdered. But, saying that he doesn’t remember, however improbable, is at
least consistent with Bush’s autobiography, which mentions nothing.
Lately,
however, perhaps at least partly in response to my work, Bush and Co. have
concocted a story that he was speaking in Tyler, Texas to the Rotary Club. The
vice-president of the Rotary Club, Aubrey Irby, says that Bush was speaking
when the bellhop came over and told him, that Kennedy was dead [Kitty Kelley,
The Family: the Real Story of the Bush Dynasty, p.213; cited by Russ Baker in
Family of Secrets, p.54].
Mr. Irby
passed the information on to Mr. Wendell Cherry, who passed it on to Bush; who
stopped his speech. Irby says that Bush explained that he thought a political
speech, under the circumstances, was inappropriate; and then he sat down. As a
would-be alibi proving Bush’s innocence, there are at least three huge problems
with this story.
The first is
that it is inconceivable that Bush would not have remembered such an event; or
that he would have left it out of his autobiography, since it shows what a fine
and respectful fellow he is. If he didn’t remember it sooner, or include it in
his autobiography, it’s clearly because it never happened.
The second
huge problem with this story is that it couldn’t possibly have happened; that
is, it is made impossible by Bush’s original alibi, his phone call to the FBI,
as you’ll see:
The
witness who tells this story, Aubrey Irby, says that Bush excused himself and
sat down. It doesn’t say that he rushed out of the room in a frantic search for
a phone.
The problem
is that Walter Cronkite’s announcement to the world that Kennedy was dead came
at 1:38 PM.
Certainly,
no one was listening to Walter Cronkite in the same room in which Bush was
speaking. Therefore we can be sure that this bellhop, who told Irby that
Kennedy was dead, was in another room. The bellhop had to make the decision
that he had heard enough of the news to leave off listening to the news.
This is no
small point. Texas governor Connally was severely wounded. Lyndon Johnson was
reportedly wounded. There was much other news to be confirmed. At some point,
then, the bellhop decided to stop listening and go make an announcement. There’s no reason to think Irby would
be the first person he would tell.
But at some
point he went to the room where Bush was speaking and informed Mr. Irby that
the president was dead. This walk to find Irby took time, of course. Mr. Irby
had to receive the information, and then he had to decide to inform Mr. Wendell
Cherry, the president of the Kiwanis.
Mr. Cherry
had to decide that he should interrupt Bush’s speech; Mr. Cherry had to then
walk over to Bush and tell him the news.
Bush had to
decide what to say; and he had to say it. And, according to the only witness,
Mr. Irby, Bush “then sat down”. Somehow, when he was finished sitting, without
attracting Mr. Irby’s attention, Bush had to seek and find a phone. This would
have been a hotel phone, so he would likely have had to go through the hotel
switchboard to get an outside line.
Do
you suppose the switchboard was busy after the announcement of the President’s
death?
It’s a good guess. In Washington D.C. so many people rushed to make a phone
call that the phone system went down. In any case, once he got through to the
hotel operator and got an outside line, Bush then had to call information and
get the number of the FBI.
After
getting through to information, and getting the number, he then had to call the
FBI; and penetrate their switchboard, which was, no doubt, very busy; and he had
to locate an agent, on what must have been the busiest day in the history of
the Dallas bureau.
How many
minutes do you suppose that would take? Twenty seems a fair guess, though it
seems implausible that a civilian could even get through, given all the
official police business going on at the time.
We know that
the Dallas FBI was all over the murder scene, confiscating camera film and
intimidating witnesses; so it’s hard to imagine how Bush, an hour after the
shooting, was able to reach an agent at all. Given the “sitting” that Mr. Irby
observed Bush doing, for all this to have transpired in 45 minutes would be
tidy work.
But
Bush had to do all of this, as the FBI memo states, by 1:45, seven minutes
after the news of Kennedy’s death first went out; which is blatantly
impossible.
The third
problem is this question of why Bush would feel that it was necessary to
concoct such a story at all? Why does he have to tell us this lie? Why does he
have to get others, like Irby, to lie for him? The irony is that the harder he
tries to make himself appear innocent, by lying, the more evidence he gives us
of his guilt.
There are
some people who manage to point to this and say “ahah! That’s why Bush was in
Dallas! Not to kill the President, but to speak to the other oilmen!” But as
the Hoover memo shows, being an oilman was just a cover for Bush’s real
occupation as a CIA supervisor of trained killers. He needed an excuse for being in
Dallas. This speaking engagement provided him with one.
From
the Director of Dark Legacy: John Hankey
George Bush
killed Kennedy. Or was it the Mafia? Maybe Castro did it. Who cares? It was 40
years ago. What difference does it make?
It matters.
The day he
died we lost an invaluable treasure. This video documents that we lost a man of
peace, who tried to cool off the cold war, and to get the American people to
see their Russian enemies, not as despicable inhuman monsters, but as people
like us.
On November
22, 1963, you lost the man who saved your life on October 17, 1962. At the
height of the missile crisis, Kennedy’s generals and advisors were urging him
to launch a first strike attack against Cuba.
They assured
Kennedy that the Russian missiles in Cuba were not nuclear and were not ready;
but that he and they should quietly slip away to the safety of bomb shelters
anyway, just to be safe; and then launch an attack, leaving the rest of us out
to die. Kennedy thought about it. And then he told them that nobody was going
anywhere.
If anyone
died, they would be the first to go, sitting as they were in the Whitehouse,
the prime target of those Russian missiles. Together they then figured out a safer
plan. Robert McNamara, Secretary of Defense at the time, recently learned from
the Russians that the missiles were armed, were ready, were nuclear, and that
their commanders were authorized to use them in case of an attack.
If you live
in the northern hemisphere, the lives of your parents, and your future, were
certainly saved by John Kennedy on that day. It matters that his killers be
exposed.
In his
farewell address, President Eisenhower had warned Kennedy, and the rest of us,
of the threat posed to democracy by what Eisenhower called “the military
industrial complex.”
And while
Kennedy famously went after the CIA, and refused to commit troops to Vietnam, I
always wondered why he didn’t more openly attack this military industrial
complex. And then I stumbled upon a speech he gave at the United Nations.
As you will
see in the video, he called upon the Russians, and United Nations, to help him
to take on this military industrial complex, in order to “abolish all armies
and all weapons.” But he was swept away.
And in the
years since, millions have died in needless wars, trillions of dollars have
been wasted on “defense”, and millions more people have lived and died
needlessly in poverty. It
matters that we lost him.
In 2007,
Bruce Willis told Vanity Fair magazine;
“They
still haven’t caught the guy that killed Kennedy. I’ll get killed for saying
this, but I’m pretty sure those guys are still in power, in some form. The
entire government of the United States was co-opted.”
Now Willis
probably would not mind my suggesting that he’s no genius. At best, his
observation is common sense. 80% of the American people agree with him. Indeed,
this video, proving that Kennedy was brought down by the most powerful men in
the world and their hired thugs, is not based on secret documents.
It is all
information that has merely been suppressed. Oswald allegedly shot Kennedy from
behind. But the day he died, the NY Times carried the story, told by the
doctors in Dallas, that Kennedy had an entrance wound in his throat, another in
his right temple, and a large gaping exit wound in the back of his head.
After
talking to the emergency room doctors, Kennedy’s press secretary described, to
the assembled press, a shot to the right temple from the right front that went
“right through the head.”
All of the
witnesses near the right front, the grassy knoll, described hearing shots from
that direction, and dozens of witnesses raced up the knoll in pursuit of the
shooters. These
witnesses talked to the press. But all of this information has been suppressed
for the last 50 years. By whom? Who could?
You will
also see in this video the overwhelming best evidence, from the best witnesses,
proving beyond a reasonable dispute, that Kennedy’s body was stolen from Air
Force One, and the wound to his right temple was mutilated, before the autopsy.
Jackie
Kennedy kept watch over an empty casket on the flight from Dallas to Bethesda
Naval Hospital. Then the body was quietly taken to Bethesda for the autopsy,
arriving 20 minutes before Jackie and the empty casket. Who had the power to
arrange this?
Who HAS the
power today to suppress all this evidence?, and to continue to bombard us with
ridiculous lies about a lone gunman? It’s a short list, isn’t it? It doesn’t
include the mafia, or the Russians, or Castro. It does include the Bush family
– or rather their masters in Big Oil; the banking elite; the backbone of the
military industrial complex. These men, and their successors, carried out the
attacks of 9-11. It matters.
In the
covert war against the communist regime in Cuba under the CIA’s Operation
Mongoose, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff unanimously proposed state-sponsored
acts of terrorism in side the United States.
The plan
included shooting down hijacked American airplanes, the sinking of U.S. ships,
and the shooting of Americans on the streets of Washington, D.C. The outrageous
plan even included a staged NASA disaster that would claim the life of
astronaut John Glenn.
Reeling
under the embarrassing failure of the CIA’s botched Bay of Pigs invasion of
Cuba, president Kennedy rejected the plan in March of 1962. A few months later,
Kennedy denied the plan’s author, General Lyman Lemnitzer, a second term as the
nation’s highest ranking military officer.
In November
of 1963, Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas.
Relying
exclusively on government documents, statements from the best witnesses
available, and the words from the mouths of the killers themselves, Dark Legacy
produces a thoroughly substantiated criminal indictment of George Herbert
Walker Bush, establishing beyond a reasonable doubt his guilt as a CIA
supervisor in the conspiracy to assassinate John F. Kennedy. If we could
present this evidence to a jury in Texas, he would pay with his life.
Part one
presents the overwhelming mountain of evidence that President Kennedy was hit
by bullets from the front and rear. Every witness in the Dallas emergency room
attests, on camera, to the fact that a bullet from the right front blew a
fist-sized hole in the back of the President’s head. The New York Times carried
these statements on the day of the murder; and has covered them up ever since.
Part two
presents the on-camera testimony of the witnesses who actually handled the
President’s body, the FBI report, and the photographic evidence all proving
unequivocally that the President’s body was stolen from the Secret Service and
the wounds altered, before the body was delivered to Bethesda Naval hospital
for the autopsy. Jackie Kennedy accompanied an empty casket on the plane flight
home. Who had the power to do all this without attracting public attention? It’s
a short list.
Part three
presents the Nazi-connections of the Bush family, which prompted the FBI to
seize their assets during WW II, as Nazi assets. It presents the suppressed
fact that Watergate burglar and CIA operative E. Howard Hunt was found by a
jury to have been in Dallas and involved in the conspiracy to kill Kennedy.
Hunt was a
supervisor of the misguided CIA-led anti-Castro Cubans who broke into the
Watergate. He is not only connected to Bush through Watergate; and through
Bush’s father, Prescott; but five days after the assassination, the head of the
FBI, J. Edgar Hoover, wrote a memo, titled “Assassination of President John
Fitzgerald Kennedy” in which he named “George Bush of the Central Intelligence
Agency” as the supervisor of what Hoover himself called the “misguided
anti-Castro Cuban” killers of the President. Bush has said he doesn’t remember
the events of that day, but FBI documents place him in Dallas.
It is
difficult to assess the stature and significance of someone who has been dead
as long as John Kennedy. His killers have also been his detractors, actively
desecrating his memory, as they did his body. The movie begins with a short
presentation of some of his most powerful and important speeches; including a
stunning speech to the UN in which Kennedy calls for the complete abolition of
the military industrial complex. These same men the military industrial
complex, ripped him from us, and the darkest features of our history since that
time are all directly the result of his murder.
What will
happen when the American people, and those of other Western nations, emerge
from their cocoon of denial and face the reality that their rulers are among
the worst criminals in human history?
Will the
people follow their leaders’ example and lapse into lawless, psychopathic
behavior? Will Western leaders “flee forward” by launching wars designed to
conceal the bloody tracks linking them to past misdeeds? Or will the pathocracy
be overthrown and replaced by something more humane?
On such questions
hinges the future of humanity. Given the high stakes, you would have to be
crazy not to help spread the truth, change the system, and save the planet.
Evidence of
Revision is a 9 hour long documentary series whose purpose is to present the
publicly unavailable and even suppressed historical audio, video, and film
recordings largely unseen by the American public relating to the assassination
of the Kennedy brothers.
It also
details t he little known classified Black Ops actually used to intentionally
create the massive war in Viet Nam, the CIA “mind control” programs and their
involvement in the RFK assassination and the Jonestown massacre and other
important truths of our post-modern time.
- Scroll down
through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
Hope you like this
not for profit site -
It takes hours of work every day by
a genuinely incapacitated invalid to maintain, write, edit, research,
illustrate and publish this website from a tiny cabin in a remote forest.
Now that most viewers see these posts
on mobile devices, sites like this receive an ever diminishing amount of
revenue from advertising… less than a pittance.
Like what you see? Please give anything
you can -
Contributeany amount and receive at
least one New Illuminati eBook!
(You can use a card
securely if you don’t use Paypal)
For further enlightening
information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @
the top left of http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
We provide
a live link to your original material on your site (and links via social
networking services) - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps
spread your info further!
This site
is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT (unless an
individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright
holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged - if you
give attribution to the work & author and include all links in the original
(along with this or a similar notice).
Feel free
to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you
never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember
attribution!
If you
like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large)
or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…
Live long
and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible worlds…