How to Defeat Admiralty Courts
And the Law of the See
by Judge Dale:
The
Catholic word “See” conceals the influence of the Holy Roman Church over the corrupt corporate government and
legal system.
The term
“see” comes from the Latin word “sedes”, meaning “seat”, which refers to the
Episcopal throne (cathedra).
The term
“Apostolic See” can refer to any see founded
by one of the Apostles, but, when used with the definite article, it is used in
the Catholic Church to refer specifically to the see of
the Bishop of Rome, whom that Church sees as successor of Saint Peter, the
Prince of the Apostles.[22] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See
Sedes Sacrorum (Latin Sedes for seat/see,
Sacrorum for holy) otherwise known as Santa Sede and the “SS” also known in
English as “Holy See” refers to the legal apparatus as a whole by which the
Roman Catholic Pope and its Curia of Bishops claim historical recognition as a
sovereign entity with superior legal rights. (http://one-evil.org/content/entities_organizations_holy_see.html)
The
Catholic Church uses two legal personalities with
which to conduct its international affairs: the first is as an International
state known as the Vatican City
State, to which the Pope is the Head of Government. The second is as the
supreme legal personality above all other legal personalities by which all
property and “creatures” are subjects.
The legal
enforcability of its first personality as an International State is constrained by international
law. The sovereign status of the Vatican City remains dependent upon the
continued recognition of an agreement known as the “Lateran
Treaty” signed between Catholic Facist Dictator and . . . Benito Mussolini
in 1929 and his political supporter Pope Pius XI. This recognition remains in
defiance and contempt to existing international laws prohibiting recognition of rogue states and laws
created by mass murdering dictators.
The legal
enforcability of the second personality of the Catholic Church as the Holy See is dependent upon the
continued adherence to legal statutes, definitions, conventions and covenants
as have been accumulated since the Middle Ages concerning the primacy of the
Pope over all property and creatures. These statutes,
conventions and covenants remain the fabric and foundation of the modern legal
system of most states in the world.
To extend
its legal strength using its second personality, the Catholic Church considers
the region controlled by every bishop a See.
Admiralty Law
Admiralty law was
introduced into England by the French Queen Eleanor of Aquitaine while she was
acting as regent for her son, King Richard the Lionheart. She had earlier
established admiralty law on the island of Oleron (where it was published as
the Rolls of Oleron) in her own lands (although she is often referred to in
admiralty law books as “Eleanor of Guyenne”), having learned about it in the
eastern Mediterranean while on a Crusade with her first husband, King Louis VII
of France. In England, special admiralty courts handle all admiralty cases.
These courts do not use the common law of England, but are civil law courts largely based upon the Corpus Juris
Civilis of Justinian.
Admiralty
courts were a prominent feature in the prelude to the American Revolution. For
example, the phrase in the Declaration of Independence “For depriving us in
many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury” refers to the practice of
Parliament giving the Admiralty Courts jurisdiction to enforce The Stamp Act in the American
Colonies.[4] Because the Stamp Act was unpopular, a colonial jury was unlikely
to convict a colonist of its violation. However, because admiralty courts did
not (as is true today) grant trial by jury, a colonist accused of violating
the Stamp Act could
be more easily convicted by the Crown.
Admiralty
law became part of the law of the United States as it was gradually introduced
through admiralty cases arising after the adoption of the U.S. Constitution in
1789. Many American lawyers who were prominent in the American Revolution were
admiralty and maritime lawyers in their private lives. Those included are
Alexander Hamilton in New York and John Adams in Massachusetts.
In 1787
John Adams, who was then ambassador to France, wrote to James Madison proposing
that the U.S. Constitution, then under consideration by the States, be amended
to include “trial by jury in all matters of fact triable by the laws of the land
[as opposed the law of admiralty] and not by the laws of Nations [i.e. not by
the law of admiralty]“. The result was the Seventh Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution. Alexander Hamilton and John Adams were both admiralty lawyers and
Adams represented John Hancock in an admiralty case in colonial Boston
involving seizure of one of Hancock’s ships for violations of Customs
regulations. In the more modern era, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell
Holmes was an admiralty lawyer before ascending to the federal bench. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admiralty_law
The Roman
Court is very confusing – even for some judges – because it does not operate
according to any true set rules of law but
rather by presumptions of law. If
these presumptions presented by the Private Bar Guild (BAR attorneys) are not
rebutted they become fact and thereafter
are said to stand as a “Truth in
Commerce.” Despite the façade, the world is a playground of
commercial business and is secretly owned by private foreign corporations.
Why is
the Bar Guild so hell-bent on keeping everything on the private side? Because
the public side invokes constitutional issues and nothing
they do can withstand a constitutional challenge. The organic
Constitution still exists in its original glory and authority and is buried in
the US Printing Office.
All amendments since 1871 do not
exist. Why? It
was the “corporate mission
statement” for the District of Columbia that was written in
1871 to resemble the organic Constitution. It is that corporate mission statement that
has been amended since 1871 and chopped up as of late.
A Legal Way To Defeat This System
Specifically,
there is a defendant living in Florida who discovered the answer to this puzzle
and properly embraced his (all caps name / strawman) by registering it
as a “Fictitious Name” with the state of Florida.
This
process identified him as having a commercial
and intellectual proprietary interest in the (all caps name).
He, by entering it as such clearly
on the Public Record, successfully rebutted all (12)
presumptions on the private side of the Admiralty Court and nullified its
“jurisdiction.”
What did he do?
The Registration of a Fictitious Name is
something you might do if you wanted to open a commercial business and you
wanted to reserve a “creative name” to identify that business. The process,
however, does not obligate you to
ever open a business or to incorporate. It simply reserves
the name for your future use and as your commercial and intellectual
proprietary property.
For many
years patriots have attempted to disassociate their sovereign beings from the
legal fiction – the all caps name /
strawman - created by the corporate government because this
was designed to make you personally vulnerable and
convert your living being into a corporation – a thing – and the property of
the corporate government.
Certain
patriots properly decided to embrace the corporate fiction / strawman as their own personal
property by affidavit using a Financing
Statement filed under the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) as a
notice to the world. This is because an
unrebutted affidavit stands as Truth in Commerce and the
government never rebuts these affidavits.
So why
didn’t it work?
The
patriots bypassed one crucial step. They failed to rebut the
presumptions of the private side of the corporate government and courts that
imprisoned their sweat equity and labor.
An
unrebutted presumption stands as Truth
in Commerce. Their presumption nullified the affidavit and placed
them on the private side.
There are
twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the Private Bar Guilds, which, if left
unchallenged, stand as Truth in
Commerce.
These
are:
- The Public Record
- Public Service
- Public Oath
- Immunity
- Summons
- Custody
- Court of Guardians
- Court of Trustees
- Government as Executor/Beneficiary
- Executor De Son Tort (not a party to)
- Incompetence
- Guilt
I’m only
going to discuss (6) of those (12) presumptions. However, Frank O’Collins did a
superb job addressing these presumptions in an expose’ titled “A history
of today’s slavery” and I encourage you all to read it.
Canon 3228 (i): The Presumption Of Public Record
Any
matter brought before a lower Roman Court is a matter for the public record,
when in fact it is presumed by the Private Bar Guild as private business.
Unless this presumption is openly rebutted by filing or stating clearly on the
Public Record that the matter is to be a part of the Public Record, the matter
remains on the private side as private Bar Guild business under private Guild
rules.
The
defendant in this particular case recorded on the Public Record the Registration Certificate issued by
the state of Florida, identifying his registered ownership of the fictitious
(all caps name), which proved that he was not the alleged defendant on the
Courts Docket. I believe I should refer to him as the alleged defendant from
here on.
Canon 3228 (ii), (iii) and (iv): The Presumptions Of Public Service; Oath And Immunity.
If the
Judge ignores the alleged defendants Fictitious
Name Registration entered into the Public Record, which is
clearly presented to him in open Court and then decides to move forward with
the case, he violates his public
service oath and judicial immunity under these sub-sections.
Canon 3228 (v): The Presumption Of Summons
A
summons, when unrebutted, stands as Truth
in Commerce. Attendance in a Court is usually invoked by invitation
and therefore one who attends Court initiated by a summons, warrant, subpoena
or replevin bond, is presumed to accept the position of a (defendant, juror,
witness or thing) and the (jurisdiction) of the Court.
If these
instruments are not rejected and returned, with a copy of the rejection filed
clearly on the Public Record (jurisdiction) the presumed position and the
presumption of guilt also stands as Truth
in Commerce.
In this
particular case the alleged defendant rebutted his forced appearance by
presenting the Judge with the recorded registration certificate issued by
Florida. This certificate statedhe is not the defendant on the
courts docket. ‘The name is fictitious and I am the
registered owner of that name under Florida law.’
Canon 3228 (vi): The Presumption Of Custody
Those who
attend a Court initiated pursuant to the command of a summons or warrant, is
presumed to be “corporate property or a thing” and therefore is liable to be
detained in custody by the Courts appointed or elected “Custodian.”
Custodians
may only retain custody over “property and things” and not flesh and blood
living beings. Unless this presumption is openly challenged by rejection of the summons or warrant on the Public
Record, the presumption stands as Truth in Commerce and you are thereafter treated as a
“thing or property.”
In this
particular case this presumption was absolutely rebutted when the alleged
defendant proved his arrest was a case of mistaken identity and
in no way could the Court Custodian detain him after that.
Sixteen
words written across the face of the summons or warrant; notarized and filed on
the Public Record will cure most problems. Those words are:
I do not accept this offer to
contract and I do not consent to these proceedings.
In
addition to the above sections of Canon Law 3228, the defendant has also
unknowingly rebutted the balance of the (12) presumptions:
- Court Guardians
- Court Trustees
- Government as Executor and Beneficiary
- Executor De Son Tort (not a party to)
- Incompetence
- Guilt
This
particular defendant succeeded in accomplishing all of this by “registering”
his ALL CAPS name as a “Fictitious Name” in
which only he now owns an absolute commercial and
intellectual proprietary interest in the state of Florida.
By entering it in the (Public Record) he has overcome all (12) presumptions and
nullified the “prosecution and jurisdiction” of the private Roman court. His
next step would be to record it in the UCC, which is a notice to the world.
Checkmate.
There
is no way for the corporate government and private Roman Court to proceed
against this living being. If the prosecutor was to disclose
the presumptive frauds that the Court has been operating under in the private
side, it would also nullify the case and subject the judge to arrest and
damages for “prosecutorial fraud” and the “absence of jurisdiction.”
Please
note that the judge’s only legal response to
the alleged defendant is to Order a
“Stay” until the defendant secures counsel (meaning an
attorney and BAR Guild member). If it is reported that the
alleged defendant has not secured counsel the case remains absolutely
deadlocked! If this open “stay” does not cause him any
harm (and it shouldn’t) he can choose to
- do nothing or
- he can file a two page “Motion to Dismiss” or
- he can file a “Rule to Show Cause” seeking a summary judgment for damages on behalf of his living being.
What would happen if the individual follows the judge’s advice and hires an attorney? In all probability his attorney would use the alleged defendant’s “signed power of attorney” to withdraw the “Fictitious Name Registration” from the Public Record. The defendant would more than likely be imprisoned, tried on the private side, and convicted!
What
other applications can this process be used for?
- licensing
- tax collections
- foreclosures
- debt collections
- the vehicle code, to name a few.
Again,
checkmate! (Don’t you just love a good story with a happy ending?)
For more information about admiralty law see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/admiralty%20law
- See ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
This
not for profit site is maintained by an invalid -
It takes hours of work every day
to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this website from a
tiny cabin in a remote forest
Like what we do? Please give enough
for a meal or drink if you can -
Donate any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!
Please click below -
Xtra Image – http://www.history.org/almanack/places/hb/images/capitolgeneralcourt.jpg
Videos - http://youtu.be/ME7K6P7hlko
http://youtu.be/ptHQu68MdMs
http://youtu.be/ptHQu68MdMs
For further enlightening
information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @ http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
And see
New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati
New Illuminati Youtube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/feed
New Illuminati on Google+ @ https://plus.google.com/115562482213600937809/posts
New Illuminati on Twitter @ www.twitter.com/new_illuminati
The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com
The Prince of Centraxis - http://centraxis.blogspot.com (Be Aware! This link leads to implicate &
xplicit concepts & images!)
DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide a live link to your original material on your site (and
links via social networking services) - which raises your ranking on search
engines and helps spread your info further! This site is
published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an individual
article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright holder) –
reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you
give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably
active) link to the original (along with this or a similar notice).
Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or
mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web –
but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a donation (no
amount is too small or too large) or leave a comment – and thanks for reading
this far…
Live long and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible
worlds…
From the New
Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Add your perspective to the conscious collective