Divine Creation

Divine Creation

by Millennium Twain

A brief lapse in the history of covert physics, a period of ecstatic truth, erupted a century ago -- a period for whom the name Nikola Tesla is best associated with. In the spirit of his contemporary Kristian Birkeland, and predecessors Andre-Marie Ampere, Michael Faraday, and Galileo Galilei -- Tesla and others participated in a public awakening of our knowledge of the living electromagnetic aether of consciousness, of electricity (fire, plasma) and magnetism, of the discovery of the two (and only two) forms of matter or charge, the electron and the proton.

To all who were clear, honest, scholars it was to become abundantly revealed that light or electromagnetism (experience, consciousness) was the source and construct for the physical world, for matter. Soon, a few honest physicists and electrical engineers, like Winston Bostick, would even assign numbers, frequencies and wavelengths and radii, to the Lissajous Standing Wave topology of the Electron -- though none, publicly, were to do so for the Proton ...

As the British and European institution of covert physics responded immediately.

The 'Copenhagen' Intelligence school, led/followed/orchestrated by Max Planck, Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Erwin Schrödinger, and Paul Dirac et al insisted upon a philosophy (politics) which demanded that the proton and neutron, the nucleus of the atom, never be looked at, never be discussed as an electromagnetic wave. This was very similar to the Western-World wide hush (and chuckle) that followed the publication of Albert Einstein's nonsense by Max Planck, the 'Special' Theory of Relativity that required that light be defined (not derived) to have a constant velocity (and involved, oops, a division by zero) -- though every experimenter in the world (viz. the peerless Sommerfeld and Brillouin who DID laugh, in print) knew lightwaves have a variable velocity dependent upon the media and frequency.

The response of the 'free and loose' North Americans was labeled 'numerical' -- that is they just went ahead and did it, iterated through the experiments and measurements, not caring whether their language was academically appropriate, or approved of by the "King or the Continent". That is they were the first to develop, test and deploy the nuclear bomb, along with a vast industrial base of globally-reaching aircraft. The UK, Rothschild and European Monarchy could not prevent the development and application of the knowledge of electromagnetism, electronics, and nuclear technology, but they did end up owning and controlling more than enough to further the world-domination they retained and expanded, courtesy the US and Rockefeller.

It only took another decade, in the US, for the lid to be clamped down HARD on experimenters and theorists in the area of electronics and electromagnetism. The pioneering days of radio and television, and energy research, were to be submerged by computers and microelectronics and solid state physics, and the theoretical and experimental knowledge of electronics and electromagnetism was erased from the textbooks and disappeared from the media and schools.

Ditto the knowledge of Rocketplanes first flown by the Germans in the 1940s, later reincarnated as Spaceplanes (Aerospace Planes) by the US in the 1950s. The Spaceplane and Nuclear Fusion technologies, pioneered in the early-to-mid 20th century, gave the Rockefeller/Rothschild Corporate-State uncontested and unsung access to orbit and all of the Solar System, and hands-down control/ownership of every government, every institution, every corporation on the Earth. What our 'handlers' at Lockheed and the Aerospace Industry in general labeled the "High Ground" of outer space.

In the case of Astronomical and Astrophysics knowledge, the dumbing down, the controlling dogma of the JudeoChristian Corporate State never got to see the volcanic eruption of a Tesla, a wide 'opening' or brief 'renaissance' ... only a gradually accumulating karma and challenge to the Covert Physics, pioneered by thousands of plasma physicists and geophysicists, and 'free-energy' researchers, for whom the trivial and obvious lies of the "Science Machine" were too laughable to believed, and too murderous to be obeyed.

Amaterasu, our GrandMother Sun, of a (Hundred?) Thousand Names ...

Yes we are still awash in a sea of Corporate-$hills... and Consumer-trash … and the majority of the alcoholic New Age and similar illiterates who don't have the language or the eye-sight to distinguish between a Spaceplane, a Flying Disk, a Giant Aerospace Dirigible, a Cloud, the Moon, the Sun, an Aurora, an Airliner, a Balloon, a Star, a Planet, or anything.

[The peerless Nikola Tesla was clear and emphatic, Special Relativity (which the Black Hole cointel requires) is a fraud. Tesla's honest physics included electrons accelerated to many times lightspeed, and cosmic rays traveling at fifty times lightspeed!]

No adult of any intelligence every believed the frauds for long, that of Big Bangs, Black Holes, Cosmic 'Expansion', the dogma spewed by Hubble, the covert lines by Feynman, or his Shuttle cover-up ruse; the dumbing down by Sagan, the pre-literate textbooks scribbled out by the graduate students of Stephen Hawking...

For nearly a century we have known they have been fudging the numbers over the size of the cosmos, and re-fudging the numbers (off by an order of magnitude) every decade or so. Halton Arp, of the Redshift Controversy, is one of the most visable of astronomers to point out that the numbers for the galactic scales and quasar distances are too large by a factor of two or so, approximately doubled.

In the case of our Local Stellar Neighborhood -- Stars to whom the Black Aerospace Industry now has StarShip Access -- the numbers have been fudged, expanded, by a factor of 2-4. Thus Alpha Centauri which NASA and the Covert Institution claims is some 4 lightyears distant -- a journey of about four years at one gravity starship acceleration -- is actually but 1-2 lightyears distant, by my current estimates -- a journey of only 2-3 years at one gravity acceleration. For any Solar-binary companion of our Sun, say a Red Dwarf or Brown Giant, at a quarter or half light-year distance, the travel times by 'Rockefeller Starship' would be relatively short.

Essentially ALL physics, electronics, aerospace and astronomical knowledge of ANY economic or strategic value, as all scientific knowledge, is held strictly proprietary and secret within the Black Security State. Not more than one percent of our knowledge, for example, of our interplanetary environment (including infrastructure) and our local interstellar space -- not more than one percent is released into the public media. About ninety-nine percent is retained classified and secret. Whereas the Hubble Space Telescope, for example, and NASA, will conceal and prep and sanitize their photographic and other data for a year before public release, the Black Sector Space Industry has more than a hundred times the observing and data recording capacity of Hubble and NASA ... and apparently tens of thousands of scientists, technicians, and prisoner/slaves in orbit, on the lunar farside, on and around Mars, and now amongst the nearest stars. (NASA was founded in 1958 to take the world's attention AWAY from our Spaceplanes and Corporate Space Program, to dumb down the world for decades with exploding rockets and rocket-shuttles.)

Is there anything I have left out of this overview of the Covert World Bankster State? Did I make it abundantly clear that EVERYTHING, all history, all science, is disinfo, cointel, propaganda, brainwashing for the purpose of identifying the willing consumer/soldier cattle, to better aggregate them into their caste/lives of ignorance and servitude? [Google "Millennium Twain" if you are 'dieing' for more ...]

Have any of our thoughtful friends on facebook NOT read the breathtaking portraits of our living cosmos by the handful of honest physicists of the 20th century? Robert L. Carroll, Thomas G. Barnes, Jack Hobart Piddington, Philip Kanarev, Winston Bostick, Milo Wolff? I am sure everyone reading this note knows of Viktor Schauberger, and has access to the books by Halton Arp and Eric Lerner, who spoke half of the truth before selling out to the institution.

The functions of CERN's 'Large Hadron Collider' by the way are: 1) Particle Beam missile defense shield for the European Union, 2) Nuclear (Plasma) Fusion energy power plant, 3) global Supercomputer Intelligence Engine, and 4) Superluminal Proton-wave transceiver for interplanetary communications.

Why does the JudeoChristian and Corporate State in general label our living wilderness of Ancestors, of Stellar and Galactic Deities, a 'Universe'? Why a living rainbow superluminally-spinning SuperStar, Central Mother Sun, a Black Hole? Why non-existent Big Bangs, a non-existent 'Expanding Universe', non-existent Entropy, universal death? Because death is their ruling paradigm, the ways and means of creating and maintaining a consumer-clone-idiot world ...

And life, consciousness, the sacred, the divine, the Song of its ending!

Nearest local Stars, about Sol, our Sun ... including in order of closeness (to 10 Covert lightyears) Alpha Centauri Trinary, Barnard's Star, Lalande 21185, Luyten 726-8 AB, Ross 154, Sirius Trinary, UGPS 0722-05, Wolf 359 -- (to 20 lightyears) 36 Ophiuchi trinary, 40 (Omicron2) Eridani trinary, 61 Cygni binary, 70 Ophiuchi binary, 82 Eridani, Altair, CD-46 11540 / Gl 674, CD-49 13515 / Gl 832, Delta Pavonis, DENIS 1048-39, DX Cancri, Epsilon Eridani, Epsilon Indi, Eta Cassiopeiae binary, EV Lacertae, EZ Aquarii trinary, Gliese 229, Gl 570 / HR 5568 ABC, Gliese 876 / Ross 780, Groombridge 34 AB, Groombridge 1618, J. Herschel 5173 AB, Kapteyn's Star, Lacaille 8760 / AX Mic, Lacaille 9352, LHS 1565 / GJ 1061, (LP 944-20), Luyten's Star, Procyon binary, Ross 128, Ross 248, Sigma Draconis, Struve 2398 AB, Tau Ceti, Teegarden's Star, Van Maanen's Star, Wolf 424 AB, Wolf 1055 AB / VB's Star

Why do the Personalities, the Deities, Planets and Stars of all sacred peoples of all times -- why do they have names? For the same reason every human and every one of our ancestors had names, minds, consciousness.

Only those who are committed to the path of genocide, of planetary murder, of global enslavement, deny the names and personalities, the light and consciousness and evolution of every personality, every thee and me.

When we sing the death-song, we invite and spread death, a diminishing economy.

When we Sing the harmonies of life, the sacred, every culture, every ancestor, all wisdom of all time, we become the Voice of Creation Divine.

A growth economy!

My original X49 Scramjet Spaceplane engineering design, in Cinema 4D, from 2001 ... added to backdrop of our neighbor Alpha Centauri trinary system. feathers are from the Tombi, or Japanese Kite, of the Hawk family.

for an introduction to Spaceplane Design and Economics see:

http://groupkos.com/mtwain/X49Specs.html

http://groupkos.com/mtwain/X49Electra.html

beginning of my discussion of the Interstellar Aerospace 'CounterIntelligence' State here:

Sirius Sol

Rigil Kentaurus

Remote Viewing Group

The Electron, outer ring -- and Proton, inner toroidal ring of 137 loops -- standing 'Lissajous' Topology electromagnetic waves of known, and published, 'octave-based' harmonic frequencies, velocities and wavelengths! the two forms of charge, matter, physicality: woven of universal light, song, spirit ... por todas las cosas, all our relations ... fear, conflict, division, servitude, ignorance, separation ending ... divine completeness, birthing ...

Links to Chapters of "The Undiscovered Physics":
http://www.facebook.com/soverania#!/album.php?aid=41230&id=1187826805


And yes, have you NOT noticed the Topology of Stars of greater and greater mass and brilliance? Small stars are orange or yellow, generally spin slowly, and are nearly spherical, only slightly flattened -- Medium stars are white and bright, spin more rapidly, have greater magnetic polar fields and radiation, and are flattened in the North/South polar direction, like a rubber ball which someone is standing on.

The larger brighter Blue-White stars are spinning VERY rapidly, are very flattened, with VERY strong poloidal fields and radiation. What happens at the next stage of increase of stellar mass, temperature and spin?

The spin velocity reaches the speed of light, and the magnetic field and radiation reaches such intensity that the flattened disk pops into a torus, a donut shape, is 'skewered' by the intense poloidal magnetic fields and oft-accompanying particle beams.

It becomes a Toroidal SuperStar, a Central Sun, as is Sagittarius A*, the Superluminally-Spinning Mother Star at the Centre of our Milky Way galaxy where (nearly) points the Solar Conjunction of 21 December 2012...

The Awakening to all our Ancestors, not one of us an 'Alien' -- each a Divine Personality, All Our Sacred Relation ...

For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the search box @  New Illuminati or click on any label/tag at the bottom of the page @  http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

And see

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com

 New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

 New Illuminati on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-Illuminati/320674219559   

The Prince of Centraxis – http://centraxis.blogspot.com

This material is published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

Blacklight Power (Inc): New Clean Commercial Energy Source

Blacklight Power (Inc)

 New Clean Commercial Energy Source

BlackLight Power, Inc. is the inventor of a new primary energy source with applications to heating, distributed and central power generation, and motive power. It is based on a new chemical process of releasing the latent energy of the hydrogen atom, the BlackLight Process, with the formation of a prior undiscovered form of hydrogen called "hydrino”. 

In principle, green power plants can be operated continuously as power reactions are maintained in conjunction with regeneration of the solid fuel using known industrial processes. The only consumable, hydrogen, can be obtained ultimately from water due to the two-hundred fold energy gain relative to breaking water into hydrogen and oxygen.

Recently, the Company achieved a breakthrough solid fuel that it is very efficient at liberating energy from forming "hydrinos" and requires essentially no energy to reverse the chemical product back into the initial solid fuel. Regeneration was achieved simply with heat. This enables simplistic and efficient systems that use heat liberated by forming "hydrinos" resulting in a significant decrease in the time to commercialization.

BlackLight's results have been published widely and replicated by independent groups. On August 11, 2009, BlackLight announced off-site validation of its breakthrough solid fuel chemistries, as well as identification of the hydrino reaction product. Read the results in the Rowan University Report "Report on Synthesis and Studies of "Generation 2" Lower Energy Hydrogen Chemicals".

NEWS RELEASE

BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces Independent Validation of Breakthrough New Energy Source Based on a New Form of Hydrogen and Chemistry Capable of Continuous Regeneration

Cranbury, NJ (August 12, 2009)

BlackLight Power, Inc. (BLP) today announces that scientists at Rowan University have for the first time independently formulated and tested fuels that on demand generated energy greater than that of combustion at power levels of kilowatts using BLP’s proprietary solid-fuel chemistry capable of continuous regeneration.  

Operating power systems using BLP’s chemistry, Rowan University professors have reported a net energy gain of up to 6.5 times the maximum energy potential of the materials in the system from known chemical reactions. 

In a joint statement, Dr. K.V. Ramanujachary, Rowan University Meritorious Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Dr. Amos Mugweru, Assistant Professor of Chemistry, and Dr. Peter Jansson P.E., Associate Professor of Engineering said, “In independent tests conducted over the past three months involving 10 solid fuels made by us from commercially-available chemicals, our team of engineering and chemistry professors, staff, and students at Rowan University has independently and consistently generated energy in excesses ranging from 1.2 times to 6.5 times the maximum theoretical heat available through known chemical reactions.”

“Additionally, we have analyzed the reaction products and are confident that the procedures we have followed and chemicals we have procured and reacted are not capable of generating the quantities of heat we have observed with previously known chemistry.  This significant disclosure by BLP makes it readily possible for other laboratories to demonstrate the repeatability of these reactions that produce anomalous heat regularly in our university laboratory.  Moreover, we have also reproduced BLP’s tests that identify a novel form of hydrogen as the likely explanation of the additional heat evolved.”

Based on the solid fuel used and power generated at scales of approximately 30 kW, the reaction appears scalable to any level.  Moreover, BLP scientists were able to regenerate the fuel by simply applying heat.  This breakthrough advances the commercial viability of the BlackLight Process as a new non-polluting energy source that was first announced by BLP in October 2008.

Proof of Power

The validation by the Rowan University team provides further evidence that the observed energy gain will enable the operation of commercial power plants by continuously replacing the hydrogen that is consumed by the BlackLight Process to form hydrinos.  Hydrinos are a prior undiscovered form of hydrogen in lower-energy states produced by the BlackLight Process as latent energy is released by hydrogen atoms.  The energy released forming a hydrino is over 200 times the energy required to extract hydrogen from water by electrolysis to produce the new hydrogen fuel consumed during the BlackLight Process. 

“The advanced version of the solid fuel is very efficient at liberating energy from forming hydrinos and requires essentially no energy to reverse the chemical product back into the initial fuel.  Regeneration was achieved simply with heat.  This is enabling of continuous generation of power using simplistic and efficient systems that use heat liberated by forming “hydrinos” to concurrently maintain regeneration.  The system is closed except that only hydrogen consumed in forming hydrinos needs to be replaced,” said Dr. Randell Mills, Chairman, CEO and President of BlackLight Power, Inc.

“The observed energy gain and successful thermal regeneration of the solid fuel show the feasibility of using the solid fuel in a recycled manner as a replacement for fossil and nuclear fuels in power plants.  These developments are anticipated to result in a significant decrease in the time to commercialization”, noted Dr. Mills.

John Miller, recently appointed to the Board of Directors of BLP and former president of Standard Oil, described the recent advances saying, “The successful development of new-generation chemistry and its simple thermal regeneration is a major historical step toward near-term, commercial hydrino power.  Our recent execution of eight billion watts of commercial licensing agreements demonstrates that the power market is beginning to agree.”

Proof of Existence of Hydrinos

BLP also announces successful independent production and characterization of a new form of hydrogen by professors at Rowan University.  In the study independently performed at Rowan University laboratories, Professor Ramanujachary and Professor Mugweru synthesized from base materials the previously undiscovered form of hydrogen and were able to characterize hydrogen atoms existing in lower-energy states – called hydrinos – as predicted by BLP.  In further confirmation, the Rowan University team was also able to identify similar hydrino signatures from net energy producing systems operating in Professor Jansson’s laboratories.  This represents the first time BLP has taught independent labs the techniques for making hydrinos from scratch.  

Dr. Ramanujachary remarked, “Recent advances in techniques at BLP in production of this new form of matter appear to make it straightforward for any lab in the world to synthesize sufficient volumes to characterize this previously unknown form of hydrogen.” Dr. Mugweru continues, “Knowing the starting materials of the synthesis reaction and fully characterizing the by-products, other than a new form of hydrogen, we were unable to make an assignment to known species for the signatures observed.”

Light Signature of Hydrino

BLP also announces today the publication of a paper, by Dr. Randell Mills, Dr. Kamran Akhtar, and Dr. Ying Lu in the Central European Journal of Physics describing a significant new confirmation of hydrinos.  For the first time, BLP confirms direct spectral observation of transitions of hydrogen to form hydrinos.  These experiments showing hydrogen spectral emissions below 80 nanometers, the previously known ground state, are decisive evidence of the existence of hydrinos theoretically predicted by Dr. Randell Mills.  Describing the significance of the breakthrough, Dr. Mills said, “This is smoking-gun evidence of the existence of hydrinos, the light signature observed is from pure hydrogen and at much higher energy than deemed possible for this element in any known form.”

Successful Application of Theory

BLP has published eight journal articles in the past seven months reporting the energetic characteristics of its power-producing process and released in July the newest edition of the Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics that predicts hydrinos.  These are available at: http://www.blacklightpower.com/.

BLP’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Millsian, Inc., a developer of molecular modeling applications of classical physics, announces the release today of Millsian 2.0 Beta software that can visualize the exact three-dimensional structure and calculate physical characteristics of a boundless number of molecules of any length and complexity including complex proteins and DNA.  BLP believes that Millsian software represents a major breakthrough that may impact nearly all businesses involved in drug development, material science, and chemistry.  More importantly, it proves that classical laws of physics apply at the atomic and molecular scale, the principle that predicted hydrinos.

Professors Peter Jansson, K.V. Ramanujachary, and Amos Mugweru, have released reports outlining the full documentation and results of the off-site replication and independent testing of the new power systems, new-generation chemistry, and hydrino characterization testing that is available at: http://www.blacklightpower.com/.  

A technical paper giving the detailed chemistry that BLP believes laboratories can easily follow and replicate is given at http://www.blacklightpower.com

About BlackLight Power

BlackLight Power, Inc. is the inventor of a new primary energy source and a new field of hydrogen chemistry with broad commercial applications. 

BlackLight Power has invented a new primary energy source with applications to heating, distributed power generation, central power generation, and motive power based on a new chemical process of releasing the latent energy of the hydrogen atom, the BlackLight Process.

For more information, please visit http://www.blacklightpower.com/

About Rowan University

Rowan University, Glassboro, N.J., is a highly ranked comprehensive public university that offers bachelor through doctoral degrees.  The University comprises seven colleges: Business, Communication, Education, Engineering, Fine & Performing Arts, Liberal Arts & Sciences, and Professional & Continuing Education.  U.S News & World Report ranks Rowan's College of Engineering 12th in the nation among programs that offer bachelor and master degrees.

Glossary:

BlackLight Process: A novel chemical process invented by BLP causing the latent energy stored in the hydrogen atom to be released as a new primary energy source.  

Hydrino: Hydrinos are a new form of hydrogen discovered by BLP.  Hydrinos are produced during the BlackLight Process as energy is released from the hydrogen atom as the electron transitions to a lower-energy state resulting in a smaller radius hydrogen atom.

Spectral Emissions: Spectral emission of an atom such as hydrogen is a unique signature that acts like a fingerprint of its characteristics.  Each line of the spectrum is characteristic of and identifies the energy levels of the atom.

Applications of BlackLight Process

Two of the potential applications of its technology are in heating and electric power production.  The heat-generating prototypes have shown the BlackLight Process to be potentially competitive with existing primary generation sources over a range of scales from micro-distributed to central power generation.  The BlackLight Process thermal power source may be ideal for interfacing with commercially available electric power generating equipment.  BlackLight technology may be well-suited for the utility industries and could reduce or eliminate problems such as those arising from the variable regional supply and price of fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil, and the cost of building out a suitable supporting infrastructure and transmission grids, as well as eliminate pollution, greenhouse gas emission and other market, supply, infrastructure, or environmental adversities.

Media Contacts:

Ramya Kumaraswamy

Hill & Knowlton for BlackLight Power, Inc.

Mobile: 646-552-8639

Office: 212-885-0552

ramya.kumaraswamy@hillandknowlton.com

From - http://www.blacklightpower.com/

Images – http://www.alt-energy.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/blacklight_plant_process_diagram_550.jpg

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhWdmyMbosnV3TJvWii6ZXIvIRbwDwwWuEEPwzHvWoHLYbYS4zs98Pyibt42BSYHSig3ky7g_4ZepvPcK2qN-xKKOwg7cyNsgvF7I_c37u-P6z1A6TY3ZIzHLpOLuktYPUs3b9cJSHxcQU/s320/blacklight2.JPG

http://www.greentechmedia.com/content/images/articles/blacklight.jpg

http://www.hilavitkutin.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/blacklight_ceo_energianlahde.jpg

 

For further enlightenment enter a word or phrase into the search box @  New Illuminati:

@  http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com (or click on any tag at the bottom of the page for direct references)

or @ http://newilluminati.blog-city.com  (this one only works with Firefox)

And see

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com

 New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

 New Illuminati on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-Illuminati/320674219559 

The Prince of Centraxis – http://centraxis.blogspot.com

This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright (unless an individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

Einstein Was Wrong

Einstein Was Wrong

Debunking the underpinnings of all that’s taught by conventional thought

by michael.suede

1. Quasars’ brightness does not correlate to their observed red shift as it does with galaxies. This refutes the notion of “expanding space” and the big bang. High red shift quasars can be well accounted for with known properties of light acting in the plasma vacuum of space. Paper proving this here.

2. Quasars with low red shift have been found more often than not to match their host galaxy. This proves Halton Arp’s ejection model of quasar formation. Paper proving quasars match their host galaxies red shifts, with the odds of correlation 1.5 in a million, can be found here. Further, high and low red shift objects re observed to be interacting with each other. The odds of quasar/galaxy quartet NGC7630 being a random chance alignment occurrence are on the orders of billions to one. However, NGC7630 does not stand alone; dozens of other interacting objects have been observed.

3. Quasars with low red shift along with galactic red shift can be explained by the CREIL effect, a property of light acting in the plasma vacuum of space interacting with diffuse hydrogen. This effect can account for all the effects of galactic red shift cause by “expanding space.”

4. Quasar red shift is observed to be quantized, as is shown in the published papers listed here. This means the earth must be at the center of the universe in order for the big bang model to be true. Quantization is shown to be related to the harmonic 0.062 in quasar and galactic red shift here. This harmonic finding has never been refuted to my knowledge.

5. The M87 galactic jet has been observed to eject matter at speeds faster than the speed of light. Theories proposing orientation as a solution for this do not agree well with observation. Los Alamos plasma physicist Anthony Peratt has shown how charged plasma can account for all observations of the M87 galactic jet without the need to invoke ‘black holes’. Indeed, Peratt’s theory, which is based on Alfven’s work, can account for the double jets we observe in some AGNs – which I believe remains unexplained in the standard model. Double radio sources were predicted by Alfven before their discovery. Paper showing this to be true can be found here.

6. Physicist Stephen Crothers has demonstrated the physics behind black holes to be a fallacy. Black hole physics violates SR, which means it also violates GR. Even by the mainstreams own standards, black holes are an impossibility. SR forbids infinite point mass particles such as a black hole singularity. Further, Schwarzschild’s original paper that proposed the solution to the Mercury orbit problem, from which the black hole is supposedly derived, is regular in all of space-time. This absolutely refutes the notion of black holes. Schwarzschild’s original paper in English can be found here.

7. The LIGO has never detected a gravitational wave. This non-detection directly refutes previous theory and stands in direct contradiction to predictions made by the theory of general relativity.

8. A recent study of Quasars show them to be devoid of all effects of time dilation. This directly refutes the notion of “expanding space” and the big bang. This is a primary falsifying observation of Einstein’s theories. Article on the subject here.

9. All observational evidence of the Sun refutes the notion that the Sun is a gravitationally collapsing gas cloud that is powered by a hydrogen to helium fusion reaction. The surface of the Sun is only observed to reach around 6000 degrees, while the corona high above it can get into the millions of degrees. Sun spots are the deepest place we can see into the Sun, yet they are the coldest places we can measure. These observations directly refute the notion that heat energy is being released from the core of the Sun.

 

Other observed anomalies that refute the notion the Sun is a gravitationally collapsing gas cloud: neutrino deficiency, neutrino variability, differential rotation by latitude, differential rotation by depth, sun spots, the sun spot penumbra, even magnetic field, etc... the list goes on. Refutations to existing arguments as well as links to the solar models in question can be found here. In conjunction with this point, see point 19 as refutation against magnetic reconnection as a mechanism of heat transport.

10. All comet nuclei that have been directly observed have proven to be rocky with no visible water present on the surface. This refutes the standard theory of comets. Comets are also observed to emit x-rays and have filamented tails. This is unexplained by the standard model, yet these observations were predicted by plasma cosmologists. Supporting articles from a wide range of sources can be found here.

11. All comets observed falling into the Sun or passing very near the Sun have subsequently been followed by coronal mass ejections. This is not explained at all by the idea a comet is a dirty snowball, yet this is well explained by plasma cosmology’s view of comets. Also, comets have observed to brighten at distances too far from the Sun to possibly be attributed to sublimating ice. This too is explained well by plasma cosmology's view of comets.

12. Stars have been observed that are too cold to possibly host nuclear fusion. These stars are called brown dwarf stars and may be the most numerous stars in the galaxy. The explanation of these objects by the standard model is poor. If the star is too small to gravitationally ignite a fusion reaction, it stands to reason they shouldn't be cooling at all. They should be simple gas giants. However, they are well explained and predicted by the electric star hypothesis.

13. GPS clocks and all other phenomena that supposedly “proves” Einstein’s version of relativity can be accounted for better using steady state models of the universe. Lorentz's model can well account for observations in a steady state universe. Physicist Tom Van Flandern lays out the evidence here. An alternative theory based on Lorentz’s work that accounts for why the MM experiment null result, as well as all other aberrations, can be found here. Similarly, physicist Randal Mills has demonstrated predictive success with a model solely based on classical physics. The simplicity of these models and accuracy of their predictions merits further review.

14. The WMAP has show the existence of large scale voids in the supposed “cosmic background” from the big bang. These voids were not predicted and directly refute the notion of the big bang. Further, as the ACG so eloquently states, it seems that there are spurious temperature anisotropies that are comparable with the entire anisotropy found in the WMAP team’s maps. Therefore the entire analysis of cosmological parameters based on these maps is wrong. Indeed it seems very puzzling that an analysis that is so contaminated with errors should come up with parameters anywhere near those expected by LCDM models.

15. The CDMS project has never detected any observational evidence of dark matter despite years of trying. This directly refutes the notion that dark matter exists and is the supposed “missing mass” of galaxies. The theory of dark matter is tantamount to physicists simply making up matter to account for the failure of their gravitational models.

16. Quasar Q2237 “The Einstein Cross” – this quasar directly refutes the notion of gravitational lensing. This quasar is supposedly ONE quasar being lensed into 4 images. The individual quasars are observed to brighten and dim independently. They are not oblong in shape. They are visibly connected by a plasma field. They are observed to change position. All of these observations are in direct contradiction to gravitational lens theory. I personally find the micro-lensing explanation to be a stretch of the imagination. The notion that gravitational micro-lenses are the cause of this effect are at such extreme odds that it is next to impossible for them to properly account for the variations observed over time.

In conjunction with argument 16:

If you agree that gravitational lensing is caused by black holes, it follows that you agree that all super-massive black holes must exhibit gravitational lenses;

If you agree that all super-massive black holes must exhibit gravitational lensing, then explain why we don’t see any lensing effects at the center of the Milky Way. High mass objects bend light according to GR as was supposedly demonstrated in the 1919 eclipse paper here, given that, the measurement arm excuse seems to fly in the face of standing theory. In fact, gravitational lensing theory has so many contradicting theories in support of it, one can not find a single standard view of lensing to even refute. I could attempt to refute one model, only face conflicting data from another model, and so forth - of course none of the models are backed up by any laboratory experimentation.

Further, if we look strictly at the observational evidence in support of lensing, excluding red shifts, we find that halo structures are all that's left to explain. If the assumption is made that red shift is caused by some other property beside expanding space, all one needs to do is explain the observed halo effects and light refraction. There exists in our own solar system such a massive halo effect that is not caused by gravitational lensing. The Phoebe ring of Saturn is a great example of a non-gravitational lensing halo.

Further, given that we know it’s possible to bend light here on earth without gravity, it stands to reason that there is probably some real property of plasma acting in space that can account for what is observed.

See the Berkeley's lab that works on bending light.

17. All Hubble deep field images show fully formed galaxies at the supposed “edge of the universe.” – if we are actually looking back in time to the birth of the cosmos, this should not be so. We should see developing galaxies, not fully formed galaxies.

18. Gravity is not constant. Every attempt to measure gravity has resulted in changes over time. No method of measuring gravity has ever proven gravity to be constant as is mandated by the general theory of relativity. This is direct falsifying observational evidence that GR is wrong, which also means SR must be wrong.

19. “Magnetic reconnection” as it applies to its use in explaining the Sun and the aurora’s violates the known laws of physics. Magnetic fields can not merge and snap imparting force. Magnetic field lines are not real objects. A paper by Scott proving this. This was also shown to be unnecessary by Falthammar here. AND Alfven himself rejected this idea in Cosmic Electrodynamics and in this paper here.

20. Neutron stars and pulsars violate the known laws of physics. The proposed density of neutrons in these stars by the standard model violates the Island of Stability in nuclear chemistry. Neutrons can not be packed together that densely without having them fly apart instantaneously. Also, in pulsars, rotation rates have been observed on the order of 1200 hz. This also flies in the face of standard theory. It is impossible that a star can rotate that fast. The outer edges of the star would be approaching appreciable speeds of light. Plasma cosmology offers a far simpler explanation that doesn’t violate any laws of physics.

21. Saturn's rings are observed to emit radio waves. This is not well explained at all by gravitational models of ring formation. Further, to quote the KTH annual 2008 report:

The data obtained by the Cassini Radio and Plasma Wave Science instrument (RPWS) during the shallow (2005-02-17) and the steep (2005-07-14) crossings of the E ring revealed a considerable electron  depletion in the proximity of the Enceladus orbit. Assuming that this depletion is a signature of the presence of charged dust particles, the main characteristics of dust down to submicron sized particles have been derived. The size distribution is found to be well described by a power law with an index 5.5 to 6...Two papers have been submitted to Planetary and Space Science.

22. Io's volcanoes are observed to move around the surface and leave burn marks behind them. Also the volcanoes plumes exhibit filamentation. Peratt and Dessler demonstrated how electric forces could account for Io's oddities.

23. Standard galaxy formation models require the use of black holes and dark matter to achieve approximate model fit to observation. These hypothetical entities have never been proven to exist. Peratt has demonstrated super-computer formulations of plasma using standard classical physics to produce a galaxy formation model that does not require any hypothetical entities. His model well agrees with observations.

24. Stars located at the center of the galaxy do not agree with the standard model of galaxy star formation. They are too young by the standard model of measuring a star's age to have formed at the locations observed. Theories that attempt to account for this are orders of magnitude improbable.

25. Frame dragging has never been definitively proven despite numerous attempts to look for it using numerous satellites. The most famous of which is Gravity Probe B. The final report issued by the Gravity Probe B team utilizes a hypothetical model to account for the effects of static build up induced error on the gyros. The raw data showed no signs of any frame dragging at all. Given that a purely hypothetical model was used to massage the data, the reports findings lack any definitive proof of frame dragging.

26. The Pioneer space probe speed anomaly can not be explained by standard model physics. Plasma cosmology offers a proper explanation.

27. After nearly 100 years, Einstein's theories have not been unified. They are not falsifiable. These two facts alone merit reconsidering their continued use. The lack of unification and lack of fundamental ties to reality demands explanation. The LCDM model of the universe has no less than 5 adjustable parameters that can arbitrarily be adjusted to account for observation. This is no different than Ptolemy's epicycles that were continually adjusted to account for observation without providing any real explanation of the mechanics behind what is being observed.

28. Galaxies have been observed to be moving in dark flows. This observation stands in contradiction to the standard model of galaxy and universe formation. Such movement can be well accounted for in an electric model.

And finally, a large collection of papers in support of the arguments made.

Professor Donald Scott lays out the case for plasma cosmology at the NASA Goddard Space Center’s Engineering Colloquia in this video.

From http://fascistsoup.com/2010/04/11/einstein-was-wrong/  as presented @ http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=34496&sid=f8d658c6906561336f18b33de5f260c0

YouTube @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y09KQxcSjc&feature=player_embedded

Xtra Images - http://www.feandft.com/Cold_Electric_sun_4.jpg.gif

http://www.holoscience.com/news/img/Electric%20gravity.jpg

For further enlightenment see –

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com

New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

 http://newilluminati.blog-city.com

New Illuminati on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-Illuminati/320674219559  

The Prince of Centraxis – http://centraxis.blogspot.com

This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

 http://newilluminati.blog-city.com