Hyperspace: The Dimension Next
Door
Hubble's New
"Runaway Planet":
A Unique Opportunity for Testing the Exploding Planet Hypothesis and Hyperdimensional Physics
A Unique Opportunity for Testing the Exploding Planet Hypothesis and Hyperdimensional Physics
For
some time, we have been asked to provide an overview of a subject intimately connected
with -- but not dependent upon -- the confirmation of "intelligent ruins at
Cydonia," on Mars:
Unknown to most current physicists and students of science (if not the general media and public), the beginnings of modern physics launched over 100 years ago by the so-called "giants" -- Helmholtz, Lord Kelvin, Faraday, Maxwell and many others -- laid a full and rich tradition in this currently little-known field: the open, heatedly debated scientific and philosophical premise that three-dimensional reality is only a subset of a series of higher, hyperspatial, additional dimensions, which control not only the physics of our very existence, from stars to galaxies to life itself ... but potentially, through time-variable changes in its foundations --
Dramatic coming changes in our lives.
This bold theoretical and experimental era, at the very dawn of science as we know it, came to an abrupt end at the close of the 19th Century. That was when our currently accepted (and very different) view of "physics" -- everything from the "Big Bang" Expanding Universe Cosmology, to Relativistic limitations imposed by "flat" space and non-simultaneous time, complicated by a non-intuitive "Quantum Mechanics" of suddenly uncertain atomic "realities" -- all took a very different turn ... from where they had been headed. Imagine our surprise, when -- as part of our Enterprise Mission effort to verify the existence of intelligently-created ruins at "Cydonia" -- we suddenly realized we might have stumbled across the geometry of this same 19th Century, pre-Relativity "hyperdimensional physics"--
But encoded on a completely separate world!
Even more startling: this "lost science" was -- somehow --geometrically memorialized on the same planet ... the planet Mars ... that may have seen its "end" as a direct result of this same physics ...
According to
the former Chief of the Celestial Mechanics Branch of the U.S. Naval
Observatory, astronomer Thomas
Van Flandern, Mars may once having been the satellite of a former
major 10th planet of the solar system, that once orbited between current
Jupiter and Mars. Sixty-five million years ago, for some currently unknown
reason (according to Van Flandern's 25-year-old theory ) -- that planet
suddenly exploded-- Releasing Mars into its currently "anomalously elliptical" orbit of the Sun ...
With NASA's recent announcement of the potential discovery of the first "extrasolar, Jovian-class planet" physically detected beyond the confines of our solar system, the timing seemed particularly appropriate to update our original description of "hyperdimensional physics" at the United Nations, in 1992. And to call for some unique tests of this hypothesis, now that extensive new NASA observations of "the planet" are being planned for the next few months.
It is particularly ironic that these same tests could also provide striking new evidence supporting Van Flandern's 25 year-old "exploding planet hypothesis" ...
On May 28, 1998, NASA
held the latest in a recent series of unprecedented news
conferences in Washington D.C.; the announcement of the first direct
detection (as opposed to inferences deduced from "stellar wobbles")
of a possible planet located beyond our local solar system. The discoverer -- Dr.
Susan Terebey, founder of the "Extrasolar Research Corporation"
-- serendipitously located the potential planet while using the Hubble Space
Telescope (HST) and the newly-installed "NICMOS" Camera last year to
study newly-forming stars. 
Officially termed
"TMR-1C," at the announcement NASA press conference Dr. Terebey
described her at first slow realization of the uniqueness and potential
importance of this "find"; ultimately her attention was drawn to a
mere "pinprick of infrared light" in close association (on
the Hubble "NICMOS" image -- ) with two much brighter stars.
Immersed in a dense cloud of interstellar dust, this faint, solitary object --
the only other IR source (besides the stars themselves) visible against the
dust -- was strategically located at the precise end of a long, slender
filament of light. Terebey discovered, upon preliminary measurement, that this
"filament" extended over a 100 billion miles ... directly
connecting the "pinprick" with the twin, newborn parent suns. 
Several months into her
analysis, Terebey reached the tentative conclusion that this tiny "IR
speck" was most likely the first Hubble image (if not any image!)
of a newborn, runaway giant planet -- "recently" ejected
from a prior orbit of the nearby stars themselves. From the faint infrared
luminosity of this isolated object and contemporary models of planetary
formation, Terebey estimated that its mass has to be only "2 to 3 times
Jupiter's." The "filament," she theorized, is most likely a
"tunnel" literally bored through the dense cloud of surrounding gas
and dust by the passage of the ejected planet itself -- a tunnel that, acting
like a "lightpipe," is scattering infrared energy down its entire 130
billion-mile length from the nearby stars themselves. 
Because Taurus (the
celestial region in which these remarkable objects are located) is now
behind the Sun as seen from Earth, it will be several months before Hubble can
be used to acquire additional data on the "planet." There are also
plans to enlist major ground-based telescopes in this campaign. What is
critically needed is spectrascopic data on this object; if it is not
merely a misidentified small star (such as a red dwarf, drastically dimmed by
the copious dust still swirling in the vicinity of the nearby brighter stars),
but is in fact a cooling planet, this will be instantly apparent from its
spectrum. Which brings us to the unique hyperdimensional possibilities this discovery has now presented.
Astrophysical discovery
of "glowing planets" -- planetary bodies which shine in
the infrared via internal energy sources, not just by reflected light --
stems from completely unexpected ground-based telescopic observations of this
solar system, beginning in the mid-1960's: the startling detection of "anomalous
internal infrared radiation" coming from the planet Jupiter. Later Pioneer
and Voyager in situ spacecraft observations across the 70s and 80s added
the other "giant planets," Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, to the list of
solar system worlds that -- somehow, without internal nuclear fusion processes,
like stars -- still manage to radiate more energy out into space than
they receive directly from the Sun. 
After much initial
debate, the conventional understanding of these anomalous "infrared
excesses" eventually settled on three possible internal sources: 1)
left-over "primordial heat" from the literal formation of the planet;
2) heating caused by eventual internal separation of light elements in
so-called "gas giant" planets (helium from hydrogen), releasing
potential energy as the helium falls further toward the center of the planet (a
form of ultra-slow, "continued gravitational contraction"); and 3),
anomalous energy release due to excess radioactive decay of heavy element
concentrations located within gas giant rocky cores. Of the three current explanations for these "energy anomalies," only the first applies to Jupiter ... because of its mass -- 318 times the Earth's; a planet of that minimum mass is required (in the model) if it's to retain significant thermal energy across the immense lifetime of the solar system ... almost 5 billion years since the planet's formation ... and still be able to radiate observable heat. And, as can be seen from this diagram, the current ratio of absorbed solar energy to emitted 5-billion-year-old internal Jovian energy is still almost two to one!
After the Voyager fly-bys of the 1980's, the second "internal heat" proposal -- the "helium drip model" -- was favored for the observed heat excess in the Saturn situation. But, because of their relatively light masses (less than 30 times the Earth's), only the third possibility -- massive internal radioactive decay -- has been seriously attempted as an explanation for Uranus' and Neptune's more puzzling "anomalous infrared emissions."
There are, however, serious problems with all of these "conventional" explanations -- particularly after these spacecraft flybys, for all planets less massive than Jupiter.
For instance, during the Voyager encounters of Uranus and Neptune, spacecraft instruments detected a barely measurable (but significant) "infrared excess" (as opposed to merely infrared re-emission of absorbed solar energy) for Uranus of about "1 to 1.14"; whereas for Neptune (essentially its planetary "twin") the ratio of internal heat to intercepted sunlight was a striking "three to one!"
However, simultaneous "doppler tracking" gravity measurements conducted during the fly-bys (looking for anomalous trajectory changes to the spacecraft motion, caused by gravitational effects from increased percentages of heavy radioactive elements in the cores of Uranus and Neptune) detected no anomalous central concentrations in either planet ... necessary, if the excess observed IR radiation is in fact caused by "excessive internal radioactive element concentrations."
Even more perplexing, Uranus has a pronounced axial tilt ("obliquity" is the technical term) compared to all the other planets of the solar system -- some 98 degrees to the plane of its orbit of the Sun; Neptune's is much more "normal": about 30 degrees. [For comparison, Earth's obliquity is about 23.5 degrees]. One recently proposed alternative to the "internal radioactivity model" is "the recent collision model": that Uranus -- somehow, long after its formation -- suffered a massive impact with another major object, perhaps an errant moon ... This, according to the theorists, in addition to accounting for the current "tipped over situation" of the planet, would have also added a significant amount of geologically "recent" internal energy to Uranus, driving up internal temperatures by equivalent amounts. This model argues that these resulting elevated temperatures in Uranus, derived from a massive "cosmic collision," could thus account for Uranus' current "infrared excess," as observed by Voyager in 1986.
There is only one problem with these ideas: the "excess radioactivity theory," and the "cosmic collision model" are both apparently dead wrong.
Uranus, with no apparent core concentration of "heavy radioactive
elements" (so said Voyager), yet the one solar system planet with
an axial "tilt" consistent with a major interplanetary collision --
is barely radiating "over unity" at its distance from the Sun
("over unity"= more energy coming out than is going in); Neptune -- essentially Uranus' twin -- by striking
contrast, and with a perfectly "normal" obliquity, is radiating
almost three times more energy "out" than it's getting from
the Sun. When these two planets are "normalized" (i.e., when their
differing distances from the Sun are taken into account), their absolute
internal "over unity" energy emissions, in fact, are just about
the same. So, based on these "local" solar system observations, there's apparently something drastically wrong with current astrophysical theories relating to "anomalous internal planetary energy resources" ... the same theories that Dr. Susan Terebey and NASA are now relying on to tell them (and us) both the age and mass of her newly-discovered "runaway planet."
Enter Hyperdimensional Physics.
The existence of unseen hyperspatial realities ... that, through information transfer between dimensions, are the literal "foundation substrate" maintaining the reality of everything in this dimension.
The mathematical and physical parameters required for such "information/energy gating" into this spatial dimension from potential "n-dimensions" were primarily founded in the pioneering work of several 19th Century founders of modern mathematics and physics: among these, German mathematician Georg Riemann; Scottish physicist Sir William Thompson (who would eventually be Knighted by the British Crown as "Baron Kelvin of Largs" for his scientific and technological contributions); Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell; and British mathematician Sir William Rowan Hamilton.
In 1867 Thompson,
following decades of inquiry into the fundamental properties of both matter and
the space between, proposed a radical new explanation for the most fundamental
properties of solid objects -- the existence of "the vortex atom."
This was in direct contradiction to then prevailing 19th Century theories of
matter, in which atoms were still viewed as infinitesimal "small, hard
bodies [as] imagined by [the Roman poet] Lucretius, and endorsed by Newton
..." Thompson's "vortex atoms" were envisioned, instead, as
tiny, self-sustaining "whirlpools" in the so-called
"aether" -- which Thompson and his 19th Century contemporaries
increasingly believed extended throughout the Universe as an all-pervasive,
incompressible fluid. 
Even as Thompson
published his revolutionary model for the atom, Maxwell,
building on Thompson's earlier explorations of the underlying properties of
this "aetheric fluid," was well on the way to devising a highly
successful "mechanical" vortex model of the
"incompressible aether" itself, in which Thompson's vortex atom could
live -- a model derived in part from the laboratory-observed elastic and
dynamical properties of solids. Ultimately, in 1873, he would succeed in
uniting a couple hundred years of electrical and magnetic scientific
observations into a comprehensive, overarching electromagnetic theory of
light vibrations ... carried across space by this "incompressible and
highly stressed universal aetheric fluid ..." Maxwell's mathematical basis for his triumphant unification of these two great mystery forces of 19th Century physics were "quaternions" -- a term invented (adopted would be a more precise description) in the 1840s by mathematician Sir William Rowan Hamilton, for "an ordered pair of complex numbers" (quaternion = four). Complex numbers themselves, according to Hamilton's clarifications of long-mysterious terms such as "imaginary" and "real" numbers utilized in earlier definitions, were nothing more than "pairs of real numbers which are added or multiplied according to certain formal rules." In 1897, A.S. Hathaway formally extended Hamilton's ideas regarding quaternions as "sets of four real numbers" to the idea of four spatial dimensions, in a paper entitled "Quaternions as numbers of four-dimensional space," published in the Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society [4 (1887), 54-7].
It is obvious from Maxwell's own writings that, even before Hathaway's formalization, his choice of quaternions as mathematical operators for his electromagnetic theory was based on his belief that three-dimensional physical phenomena (including even perhaps the basis of human consciousness itself) are dependent upon higher dimensional realities. For, in honor of another great mathematician of the time, multi-dimensional geometer Arthur Cayley, Maxwell wrote ...
"Oh
WRETCHED race of men, to space confined!What honour can ye pay to him, whose mind
To that which lies beyond hath penetrated?
The symbols he hath formed shall sound his praise,
And lead him on through unimagined ways
To conquests new, in worlds not yet created.
First, ye Determinants! In ordered row
And massive column ranged, before him go,
To form a phalanx for his safe protection.
Ye powers of the nth roots of - 1!
Around his head in ceaseless* cycles run,
As unembodied spirits of direction.
And you, ye undevelopable scrolls!
Above the host wave your emblazoned rolls,
Ruled for the record of his bright inventions.
Ye cubic surfaces! By threes and nines
Draw round his camp your seven-and-twenty lines-
The seal of Solomon in three dimensions.
Up to the flaming bounds of Space and Time!
There pause, until by Dickenson depicted,
In two dimensions, we the form may trace
Of him whose soul, too large for vulgar space,
In n dimensions flourished unrestricted."
-- James Clerk Maxwell
To the Committee of the Cayley Portrait Fund -- 1887
To the Committee of the Cayley Portrait Fund -- 1887
Confirmation
that Maxwell's "hyper-dimensional" inquiries extended far beyond
"mere" physical interactions can be seen from another of his
"unknown" poems ...
Upon a liquid vortex wrought
By Intellect in the Unseen residing.
And thine doth like a convict sit,
With marlinspike untwisting it,
Only to find its knottiness abiding;
Since all the tool for its untying
In four-dimensional space are lying."
In another work
("The Aether," 1876), Maxwell underscored the "ultimate"
significance of these inquiries ...
"Whether
this vast homogeneous expanse of isotropic matter [the aether] is fitted not
only to be a medium of physical Interaction between distant bodies, and to
fulfill other physical functions of which, perhaps we have as yet no conception,
but also as the authors of The
Unseen Universe seem to suggest, to constitute the material organism of
beings excercising functions of life and mind as high or higher than ours are
at resent, is a question far transcending the limits of physical speculation
..."
This startling
connection -- between Maxwell's demonstrably deep interest in questions
"hyperdimensional," including his direct homage to one of his
scientific mentors', Arthur Cayley's hyperdimensional geometry (the "27
lines on the general cubic surface" problem -- see diagram, right); and
our rediscovery over a century later of that same geometry ... at a
place called "Cydonia" ... on Mars -- is nothing short of
astonishing. But, if you doubt such a compelling connection, just reread those
key lines--
"...Ye
cubic surfaces! By threes and nines, Draw round his camp your seven-and-twenty
lines- The seal of Solomon in three dimensions [emphasis added] .."
Which, of course, are
nothing less than the geometrical and mathematical underpinnings of the
infamous "circumscribed
tetrahedral latitude" memoralized all over Cydonia ... 19.5
degrees, the identical, hyper-dimensional quaternion geometry whose
physical effects (see below) we have now rediscovered all across the solar
system ... and beyond! In a tragedy for science (if not for society in general) whose outlines we are only now beginning to appreciate, after Maxwell's death, two other 19th Century "mathematical physicists" -- Oliver Heaviside and William Gibbs -- "streamlined" Maxwell's original equations down to four simple (if woefully incomplete!) expressions. Because Heaviside openly felt the quaternions were "an abomination" -- never fully understanding the linkage between the critical scalar and vector components in Maxwell's use of them to describe the potentials of empty space ("apples and oranges," he termed them) -- he eliminated over 200 quaternions from Maxwell's original theory in his attempted "simplification."
[Oliver Heaviside, described by Scientific American (Sept. 1950) as "self-taught and ...
never connected with any university ... had [however] a remarkable and
inexplicable ability (which was possessed also by Newton and Laplace ...) to
arrive at mathematical results of considerable complexity without going through
any conscious process of proof ..." According to other observers,
Heaviside actually felt that Maxwell's use of quaternions and their description
of the "potentials" of space was "... mystical, and should be
murdered from the theory ..." which -- by drastically editing
Maxwell's original work after the latter's untimely death (from cancer),
excising the scalar component of the quaternions and eliminating the
hyperspatial characteristics of the directional (vector) components -- Oliver
Heaviside effectively accomplished singlehanded.] This means, of course, that the four surviving "classic" Maxwell's Equations -- which appear in every electrical and physics text the world over, as the underpinnings of all 20th Century electrical and electromagnetic engineering, from radio to radar, from television to computer science, if not inclusive of every "hard" science from physics to chemistry to astrophysics that deals with electromagnetic radiative processes -- never appeared in any original Maxwell' paper or treatise! They are, in fact--
"Heaviside's equations!"
Lest anyone doubt this is the case, they merely have to read a highly revealing paper on the subject by another renowned British mathematical physicist of this century, Sir Edmund Whittaker, titled simply "Oliver Heaviside" (Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society, Vol. 20, 1928-29, p.202); or, another overview of Heaviside by Paul J. Nahin, "Oliver Heaviside: Sage in Solitude" (IEEE Press, New York, 1988, p.9, note 3.).
The end result was that physics lost its promising theoretical beginnings to becoming truly "hyperdimensional" physics ... over a century ago ... and all that that implies.
Riemann's paper was a fundamental assault on the 2000-year old assumptions of "Euclidian Geometry" -- the ordered, rectilinear laws of "ordinary" three dimensional reality. In its place, Riemann proposed a four-dimensional reality (of which our 3-D reality was merely a "subset"), in which the geometric rules were radically different, but also internally self-consistent. Even more radical: Riemann proposed that the basic laws of nature in 3-space, the three mysterious forces then known to physics -- electrostatics, magnetism and gravity -- were all fundamentally united in 4-space, and merely "looked different" because of the resulting "crumpled geometry" of our three-dimensional reality ...
In terms of actual physics, Riemann was suggesting something clearly revolutionary: a major break with Newton's "force creates action-at-a-distance" theories of the time, which had been proposed to explain the "magical" properties of magnetic and electrical attraction and repulsion, gravitationally-curved motions of planets ... and falling apples, for over 200 years; in place of Newton, Riemann was proposing that such "apparent forces'" are a direct result of objects moving through 3-space "geometry" ... distorted by the intruding geometry of "4-space!"
It is clear that Maxwell and other "giants" of 19th Century physics (Kelvin, for one), as well as an entire contemporary generation of 19th Century mathematicians (like Cayle, Tait, etc.) , took Riemann's ideas very much to heart; Maxwell's original selection of 4-space quaternions as the mathematical operators for his force equations and descriptions of electrical and magnetic interaction, clearly demonstrate his belief in Riemann's approach; and, his surprising literary excursions into poetry -- vividly extolling the implications of "higher-dimensional realities" ... including musings on their relationship to the ultimate origin of the human soul (above) -- emphatically confirm this outlook.
So, how can modern "hyperdimensional physicists" -- like Michio Kaku, at City College of the City University of New York -- representative of an entirely new generation of physical scientists now reexamining these century-old implications of "hyperspatial geometries" for generating the basic laws of Reality itself, almost casually claim:
"... In
retrospect, Riemann's famous lecture was popularized to a wide audience via
mystics, philosophers and artists, but did little to further our understanding
of nature ... First, there was no attempt to use hyperspace to simplify the
laws of nature. Without Riemann's original guiding principle -- that the laws
of nature become simple in higher dimensions -- scientists during this period
were groping in the dark. Riemann's seminal idea of using geometry -- that is,
crumpled hyperspace -- to explain the essence of a a force' was forgotten
during those years ... The mathematical apparatus developed by Riemann became a
province of pure mathematics, contrary to Riemann's original intentions. Without
field theory, you cannot make any predictions with hyperspace [emphasis
added]..."
-- M. Kaku, "Hyperspace"
[ Doubleday (Anchor Books): New York, 1994]
[ Doubleday (Anchor Books): New York, 1994]
The use of little-known Hamiltonian 4-space quaternions, to represent the effect of "scalar potentials" on electric charges (as opposed to Heaviside's vectorial descriptions of direct "electric force fields") obviously have led to great confusion; because ... Maxwell's "scalar potentials" are, of course, nothing short of exactly what Riemann initially proposed--
Quantifiable "geometric spatial distortions" ... the exact marriage of hyperspatial geometry and field theory that Kaku and others mistakenly believe (because they're basing their analysis on Heaviside's surviving vectorial version of Maxwell's original "Equations") is totally missing from this greatest achievement of 19th Century physics!
According to Josephs:
"Hamilton's
algebra of quaternions, unlike Heaviside's algebra of vectors, is not a mere
abbreviated mode of expressing Cartesian analysis, but is an independent
branch of mathematics with its own rules of operation and its own special
theorems. A quaternion is, in fact, a generalized or hypercomplex number
... [emphasis added]"
And,
you will remember, in 1897 Hathaway published a paper specifically identifying
these hypercomplex numbers as "... numbers in four-dimensional space"
(above). Thus, modern physics' apparent ignorance of Maxwell's 19th Century
success -- a mathematically-based, four-dimensional
"field-theory" -- would seem to originate from a basic lack of
knowledge of the true nature of Hamilton's quaternion algebra itself!
And, unless you track down an original 1873 copy of Maxwell's "Treatise," there is no easy way to verify the existence of Maxwell's "hyperdimensional" quaternion notation; for, by 1892, the Third Edition incorporated a "correction" to Maxwell's original use of "scalar potentials" (contributed by George Francis Fitzgerald -- whom Heaviside heavily admired) -- thus removing a crucial distinction between 4-space "geometric potential," and a 3-space "vector field," from all subsequent "Maxwellian theory." Which is why Kaku apparently doesn't realize that Maxwell's original equations were, in fact, the first geometric 4-space field theory ... expressed in specific 4-space terms ... the language of quaternions!
Just another measure of Heaviside's effectiveness ...]
One of the most persistent objections to the 4-space geometries of Riemann, Cayley, Tait ... and Maxwell, was that no experimental proof of a "fourth dimension" was readily apparent; one of the more easily understandable aspects of "higher dimensionality" was that, a being from a "lower dimension" (a two-dimensional "Flatlander," for instance) entering our "higher" three-dimensional reality, would appear to vanish instantly from the lower-dimensional world (and, consequently, appear just as suddenly in the higher dimension -- but geometrically distorted.) When she returned to her own dimension, she would just as "magically" reappear ...
Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on your perspective ...) to the scientific mind, people in our dimension don't just "turn a corner one day ... and promptly vanish into Riemann's fourth dimension.'" While mathematically derivable and beautifully consistent, to "experimentalists" (and all real science ultimately has to be based on verifiable, independently repeatable experiments) there seemed no testable, physical proof of "hyperdimensional physics."
Thus "hyperspace"-- as a potential solution to unifying the major laws of physics -- after Maxwell's death, and the major rewriting of his Theory, quietly disappeared ... not to resurface for almost half a century ...
Until April of 1919.
At that time, a remarkable letter was delivered to one "Albert Einstein." Written by an obscure mathematician
at the University of Konigsberg in Germany, Theodr Kaluza, the letter's first
few lines offered a startling solution (at least, to Einstein -- unknowing of
Maxwell's original quaternion equations) to one of physics' still most
intractable problems: the mathematical unification of his own theory of gravity
with Maxwell's theory of electromagnetic radiation ... via introduction of a fifth
dimension. (Because Einstein, in formulating the General and Special Theory of
Relativity in the intervening years since Riemann, had already appropriated time
as the "fourth dimension," Kaluza was forced to specify his
additional spatial dimension as "the fifth." In fact, this was the same
spatial dimension as the 4-space designations used by Maxwell and his
colleagues in their models ... over 50 years before.) Despite its stunning (Einstein mulled over the paper's implications for more than two years, before finally supporting its scientific publication) mathematical success, in apparently -- finally -- uniting "gravity" and "light," the same question, "OK, where is it?" was asked of Kaluza as had been asked of Riemann, over 60 years before; because, there was no overt experimental proof (for instance, people and things up and "disappearing") of the physical existence of another spatial dimension. To which Kaluza this time had a very clever answer: he proposed that this "fourth dimension" -- unlike the other three we are familiar with -- somehow had collapsed down to a tiny circle ... "smaller than the smallest atom ..."
In 1926, another
essentially unknown mathematician, Oskar Klein, was investigating the peculiar
implications of Kaluza's ideas in the context of the newly-invented atomic
theory of "quantum mechanics." [Klein was a specialist in the truly
arcane field of mathematical topology -- the higher dimensional surfaces
of objects; the twisted 3-D topology of the 2-D surface of a "Klein
Bottle" is named specifically in his honor]. Quantum mechanics had
just been proposed a year or so before Klein's further topological
investigation of Kaluza's ideas, by Max Planck and many others rebelling
against perceived limitations of Maxwell's (remember, heavily sanitized by
Gibbs and Heaviside) classical Electromagnetic Theory. The "quantum
mechanics " theory would eventually become a highly successful (if
bizarre, by common-sense standards) non-geometric effort to describe
interactions between "fundamental particles," exchanging
"forces" through discrete "quantitized" particles and energy
in the sub-atomic world. Eventually, combining the two inquiries, Klein
theorized that, if it truly existed, Kaluza's new dimension likely had somehow
collapsed down to the "Planck length" itself -- supposedly the
smallest possible size allowed by these fundamental interactions. However, that
size was only about ... 10-33 cm long! 
Thus, the main obstacle to experimental verification of the
Kaluza-Klein Theory (and the reason why people simply didn't "walk into
the fourth dimension"), was that quantum mechanics calculations affirmed
that the only way to physically probe such an infinitesimally tiny
dimension was with a new machine ... an "atom smasher." There was only one small
"technical" problem ... The energy required would exceed the output of all the power plants on Earth ... and then some!
The flood of "verifications"gushing forth from atom smashers all around the world, feverishly engaged in probing the new area the experimentalists apparently could verify: the multiplying populations of "fundamental particles"spawned by the bizarre mathematical world (even more bizarre than "N-dimensions") of Quantum Mechanics.
30 more years would pass ... before (almost by mathematical "accident") in 1968, the current mainstream "flap" of renewed scientific interest in "hyperspace" would be, like the legendary Phoenix, "magically" reborn -- a theory now known as "Superstrings" ... in which fundamental particles, and "fields," are viewed as hyperspace vibrations of infinitesimal, multi-dimensional strings ... From those relatively inauspicious beginnings, stretching across more than 60 years, the current focus of scientific research papers on "hyperspace" -- from continued research into updated versions of the old "Kaluza-Klein Theory"; to discussions of the much newer "Supergravity" hyperspace unification model; to the exotic "String Theory" itself -- has grown geometrically (over 5000 papers by 1994 alone, according to Michio Kaku -- see above). This much attention to a subject involving realities you can't even see, represents nothing short of a fundamental psychological revolution sweeping across a major segment of the worldwide scientific community.
For most physicists currently interested in the problem, the "Superstring" hyper-dimensional model has overwhelming advantages over all its predecessors. Besides effectively unifying all the known forces of the Universe ... from electromagnetism to the nuclear force ... in a literally beautiful "ultimate"picture of Reality, it also makes a specific prediction about the total number of N-dimensions that can form:
"Ten" (or "26," depending on the rotation of the "strings").
The bad news is: they can't be tested either ...
As all ten dimensions are curled up (in the model) inside the same experimentally unreachable "Planck length" which spelled the scientific demise of the original Kaluza-Klein ...
Impasse.
The "hottest" mainstream scientific theory to come along in more than half a century, the next best thing to a "Theory of Everything" (and seriously attempting to become precisely that ...), is not only a Hyperdimensional Model of Reality ... it is another one which, by its fundamental nature--
Can't scientifically be tested!
While a "hyperdimensional model" which can be tested easily -- as this paper will unequivocally show -- for over a 100 years has been systematically ignored.
Is it just us ... or is there something truly wrong with this picture?
Lt. Col Thomas E. Bearden, retired army officer
and physicist, has been perhaps the most vocal recent proponent for restoring
integrity to the scientific and historical record regarding James Clerk Maxwell
-- by widely promulgating his original equations; in a series of meticulously
documented papers on the subject, going back at least 20 years, Bearden has
carried on a relentless one-man research effort regarding what Maxwell really
claimed. His painstaking, literally thousands of man-hours of original source
documentation has led directly to the following, startling conclusion:
Just how successful, Bearden documents below:
"
... In discarding the scalar component of the quaternion, Heaviside and Gibbs
unwittingly discarded the unified EM/G [electromagnetic/ gravitational] portion
of Maxwell's theory that arises when the translation/directional components of
two interacting quaternions reduce to zero, but the scalar resultant remains
and infolds a deterministic, dynamic structure that is a function of
oppositive directional/translational components. In the infolding of EM energy
inside a scalar potential, a structured scalar potential results, almost
precisely as later shown by Whittaker but unnoticed by the scientific
community. The simple vector equations produced by Heaviside and Gibbs captured
only that subset of Maxwell's theory where EM and gravitation are mutually
exclusive. In that subset, electromagnetic circuits and equipment will not
ever, and cannot ever, produce gravitational or inertial effects in
materials and equipment.
"Brutally, not a
single one of those Heaviside/ Gibbs equations ever appeared in a paper or book
by James Clerk Maxwell, even though the severely restricted Heaviside/Gibbs
interpretation is universally and erroneously taught in all Western
universities as Maxwell's theory. "As a result of this artificial restriction of Maxwell's theory, Einstein also inadvertently restricted his theory of general relativity, forever preventing the unification of electromagnetics and relativity. He also essentially prevented the present restricted general relativity from ever becoming an experimental, engineerable science on the laboratory bench, since a hidden internalized electromagnetics causing a deterministically structured local spacetime curvature was excluded.
"Quantum mechanics used only the Heaviside/ Gibbs externalized electromagnetics and completely missed Maxwell's internalized and ordered electromagnetics enfolded inside a structured scalar potential. Accordingly, QM [quantum mechanics] maintained its Gibbs statistics of quantum change, which is nonchaotic a priori. Quantum physicists by and large excluded Bohm's hidden variable theory, which conceivably could have offered the potential of engineering quantum change -- engineering physical reality itself.
"Each of these major scientific disciplines missed and excluded a subset of their disciplinary area, because they did not have the scalar component of the quaternion to incorporate. Further, they completely missed the significance of the Whittaker approach, which already shows how to apply and engineer the very subsets they had excluded.
"What now exists in these areas are three separate, inconsistent disciplines. Each of them unwittingly excluded a vital part of its discipline, which was the unified field part. Ironically, then, present physicists continue to exert great effort to find the missing key to unification of the three disciplines, but find it hopeless, because these special subsets are already contradictory to one another, as is quite well-known to foundations physicists.
"Obviously, if one wishes to unify physics, one must add back the unintentionally excluded, unifying subsets to each discipline. Interestingly, all three needed subsets turn out to be one and the same ..."
-- T.E. Bearden, "Possible Whittaker Unification of
Electromagnetics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics,"
(Association of Distinguished American Scientists
2311 Big Cove Road, Huntsville, Alabama, 35801)
Electromagnetics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics,"
(Association of Distinguished American Scientists
2311 Big Cove Road, Huntsville, Alabama, 35801)
Given
Bearden's analysis -- what did we actually lose ... when science
"inadvertently lost Maxwell ..?"
The "electrogravitic" control of gravity itself!!
The critically-important research cited by Bearden was originally published by "Sir Edmund Whittaker" (the same cited earlier in this paper), beginning in 1903. The first was titled "On the partial differential equations of mathematical physics" (Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 57, 1903, p.333-335); the second, "On an Expression of the Electromagnetic Field due to Electrons by means of two Scalar Potential Functions" (Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Vol.1, 1904, p. 367-372).
Whittaker, a leading world-class physicist himself, single-handedly rediscovered the "missing" scalar components of Maxwell's original quaternions, extending their (at the time) unseen implications for finally uniting "gravity" with the more obvious electrical and magnetic components known as "light." In the first paper, as Bearden described, Whittaker theoretically explored the existence of a "hidden" set of electromagnetic waves traveling in two simultaneous directions in the scalar potential of the vacuum -- demonstrating how to use them to curve the local and/or distant "spacetime" with electromagnetic radiation, in a manner directly analogous to Einstein's later "mass-curves-space" equations. This key Whittaker paper thus lays the direct mathematical foundation for an electrogravitic theory/technology of gravity control. In the second paper, Whittaker demonstrated how two "Maxwellian scalar potentials of the vacuum" -- gravitationally curving spacetime -- could be turned back into a detectable "ordinary" electromagnetic field by two interfering "scalar EM waves"... even at a distance.
Whittaker accomplished
this by demonstrating mathematically that "the field of force due to a
gravitating body can be analyzed, by a spectrum analysis' as it were, into an
infinite number of constituent fields; and although the whole field of force
does not vary with time, yet each of the constituent fields is an undulatory
character, consisting of a simple-disturbance propagated with uniform velocity
... [and] the waves will be longitudinal (top) ... These results
assimilate the propagation of gravity to that of light ... [and] would require
that gravity be propagated with a finite velocity, which however need not be
the same as that of light [emphasis added], and may be enormously greater
..." (Op. Cit., "On the partial
differential equations of mathematical physics") 
Remarkably, four years before
Whittaker's theoretical analysis of these potentials (pun intended ...), on the
evening of July 3-4, 1899, Nikola
Tesla (right) -- the literal inventor of modern civilization (via the now
worldwide technology of "alternating current") -- experimentally
anticipated "Whittaker's interfering scalar waves" by finding them in
nature; from massive experimental radio transmitters he had built on a mountain
top in Colorado, he was broadcasting and receiving (by his own assertion)
"longitudinal stresses" (as opposed to conventional EM "transverse
waves") through the vacuum. This he was accomplishing with his own,
hand-engineered equipment (produced according to Maxwell's original, quaternion
equations), when he detected an interference "return" from a passing
line of thunderstorms. Tesla termed the phenomenon a "standing columnar
wave," and tracked it electromagnetically for hours as the cold front
moved across the West (Nikola Tesla, Colorado Springs Notes 1899-1900, Nolit,
Beograd, Yugoslavia, 1978 pp. 61-62). [Many have since speculated that Tesla's many other astonishing (to the period) technological accomplishments, many of which apparently "were lost" with his death in 1942, were based on this true understanding of Maxwell's original, "hyperdimensional" electromagnetic ideas ...]
Tesla's experimental earlier detection notwithstanding, what Whittaker theoretically demonstrated years after Tesla was that future electrical engineers could also take Maxwell's original 4-space, quaternion description of electromagnetic waves (the real "Maxwell's Equations"), add his own (Whittaker's) specific gravitational potential analysis (stemming from simply returning Maxwell's scalar quaternions in Heaviside's version of "Maxwell's Equations"...), and produce a workable "unified field theory" (if not technology!) of gravity control ...
Unless by now, in some government "black project," they already have--
And what we've
deliberately been "leaked" over the last seven years, in repeated video
images of "exotic vehicles" performing impossible, non-Newtonian
maneuvers on official NASA TV shuttle coverage ... is simply the result! Theory is one thing (Maxwell's or Whittaker's), but experimental results are supposedly the ultimate Arbiter of Scientific Truth. Which makes it all the more curious that Tesla's four-year observational anticipation of Whittaker's startling analysis of Maxwell -- the experimental confirmation of an electromagnetic "standing columnar (longitudinal) wave" in thunderstorms -- has been resolutely ignored by both physicists and electrical engineers for the past 100 years; as have the stunning NASA TV confirmations of "something" (above) maneuvering freely in Earth orbit.
In that year two
physicists, Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm, conducted a seminal
"electrodynamics" laboratory experiment ("Significance of
Electromagnetic Potentials in Quantum Theory," The Physical Review,
Vol. 115, No. 3, pp. 485-491; August, 1959). Aharonov and Bohm, almost 100
years after Maxwell first predicted their existence, succeeded in actually measuring
the "hidden potential" of free space, lurking in Maxwell's original scalar
quaternion equations. To do so, they had to cool the experiment to a mere 9
degrees above Absolute Zero, thus creating a total shielding around a superconducting
magnetic ring [for a slightly different version of this same experiment -- see
diagram; the oscillation of electrical resistance in the ring (bottom graph)
is due to the changing electron "wave functions" -- triggered by the
"hidden Maxwell scalar potential" created by the shielded magnet --
see text, below]. Once having successfully accomplished this non-trivial laboratory set up, they promptly observed an "impossible" phenomenon:
Totally screened, by all measurements, from the magnetic influence of the ring itself, a test beam of electrons fired by Aharonov and Bohm at the superconducting "donut," nonetheless, changed their electronic state ("wave functions") as they passed through the observably "field-free" region of the hole -- indicating they were sensing "something," even though it could NOT be the ring's magnetic field. Confirmed now by decades of other physicists' experiments as a true phenomenon (and not merely improper shielding of the magnet), this "Aharonov-Bohm Effect" provides compelling proof of a deeper "spatial strain" -- a "scalar potential" -- underlying the existence of a so-called magnetic "force-field" itself. (Later experiments revealed a similar effect with shielded electrostatic fields ...)
All of which provides compelling proof of "something else," underlying all reality, capable of transmitting energy and information across space and time ... even in the complete absence of an electromagnetically detectable 3-D spatial "field"--
Maxwell's quaternion ... hyperdimensional "potential."
If a "potential" without a field can exist in space -- as Maxwell's quaternion analysis first asserted, and Aharonov-Bohm "only" a century later ultimately found -- then, as defined by Maxwell in his comparisons of the aether with certain properties of laboratory "solids," such a potential is equivalent to an unseen, vorticular (rotating) "stress" in space. Or, in Maxwell's own words (first written in 1873 ...):
"There
are physical quantities of another kind [in the aether] which are related to
directions in space, but which are not vectors. Stresses and strains in solid
bodies are examples, and so are some of the properties of bodies considered in
the theory of elasticity and in the theory of double [rotated] refraction. Quantities
of this class require for their definition nine [part of the
"27-line"...] numerical specifications. They are expressed in the
language of quaternions by linear and vector functions of a vector ..."
-- J.C. Maxwell, "A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism,"
(Vol.1, 3rd Edition, New York, 1954)
(Vol.1, 3rd Edition, New York, 1954)
There is now much fevered discussion among physicists, (~100 years post-Maxwell) of the Quantum Electrodynamics Zero Point Energy (ZPE) of space -- or, "the energy of the vacuum"; to many familiar with the original works of Maxwell, Kelvin, et. al., this sounds an awful lot like the once-familiar "aether" ... merely updated and now passing under "an assumed name." Thus, creating -- then relieving -- a "stress" in Maxwell's vorticular aether is precisely equivalent to tapping the "energy of the vacuum" -- which, according to current "quantum mechanics' models," possesses a staggering amount of such energy per cubic inch of space. Even inefficiently releasing a tiny percentage of this "strain energy" into our three dimensions -- or, into a body existing in three-dimensional space -- could make it appear as if the energy was coming from nowhere ... "something from nothing." In other words, to an entire generation of students and astrophysicists woefully ignorant of Maxwell's real equations, such energy would appear as--
"Perpetual
motion!" Given the prodigious amount of "vacuum energy" calculated by modern physicists (trillions of atomic bomb equivalents per cubic centimeter ...), even a relatively minor but sudden release of such vast vacuum (aether) stress potential inside a planet ... could literally destroy it--
Finally answering the crucial astrophysical objection to the "exploded planet model" that Van Flandern has been encountering ...
"But Tom -- just how do you blow up' an entire world?!"
The answer is now obvious: via hyperdimensional "vacuum stress energy" ... ala Whittaker and Maxwell.
As we shall show, it is this "new" source of energy -- in a far more "controlled" context -- that seems also to be responsible now for not only the "anomalous infrared excesses" observed in the so-called "giant outer planets" of this solar system--
It is this same source of energy (in the Hyperdimensional Physics Model) that, according to our analysis, must now be primarily responsible for the radiated energies of stars ... including the Sun itself.
Since, in three dimensions, all energy eventually "degrades" to random motions -- via Kelvin and Gibb's 19th Century Laws of Thermodynamics (it's called "increasing entropy") -- "stress energy" of the aether (vacuum) released inside a material object, even if it initially appears in a coherent form -- driving, for instance, the anomalous (1400 mile-per-hour!), planet-girdling winds of distant Neptune's "jet streams" -- will eventually degrade to simple, random heat ... ultimately radiated away as "excess infrared emissions" into space. It's the initial, astrophysical conditions under which such "Maxwellian space potentials" can be released inside a planet (or a star ...), that have been the central focus of our efforts for ten years --
To create a predictive, mathematical "hyperdimensional model" of such physics.
The entire question comes down to--
"What set of known spatial conditions will slowly, predictably, release the potential strains of 4-space into 3-space' ... inside a massive world ... so that when this energy inevitably degrades to heat, its radiative signature identifies the original hyperdimensional' source?"
Fortunately, we are surrounded by almost half a dozen examples close at hand: the giant, "anomalously radiating" planets of this solar system (and some major moons). Over the past decade, as we have attempted to understand their anomalous IR radiation, one thing has become clear -- to a first order, the "infrared excesses" of the giant planets all seem to correlate very nicely with one parameter each has in common -- regardless of their individual masses, elemental compositions, or distance from the Sun:
Their total system "angular momentum."
The mass of a body and the rate at which it spins, in classical physics, determines an object's "angular momentum." In our Hyperdimensional Model, it’s a bit more complicated -- because objects apparently separated by distance in this (3-space) dimension are in fact connected in a "higher" (4-space) dimension; so, in the HD model, one also adds in the orbital momentum of an object's gravitationally-tethered satellites -- moons in the case of planets; planets, in the case of the Sun, or companion stars in the case of other stars.
When one graphs the total angular momentum of a set of objects --
such as the radiating outer planets of this solar system (plus Earth and Sun)
-- against the total amount of internal energy each object radiates to space,
the results are striking: The more total system angular momentum a planet (or any celestial body) possesses (as defined above -- object plus satellites), the greater its intrinsic "brightness," i.e. the more "anomalous energy" it apparently is capable of "generating."
And, as can be seen from this key diagram, this striking linear dependence now seems to hold across a range of luminosity and momentum totaling almost three orders of magnitude ... almost 1000/1!
Especially noteworthy, the Earth (not "a collapsing gas giant," by any stretch of the imagination) also seems to fit precisely this empirical energy relationship: when the angular momentum of the Moon is added to the "spin momentum" of its parent planet, the resulting correlation with measurements derived from internal "heat budget" studies of the Earth are perfectly fitted to this solar-system-wide empirical relationship -- even though the Earth's internal energy is supposedly derived from "radioactive sources."
And, as can be seen from the accompanying historical comparison, this striking solar system linear relationship is actually more tightly constrained (even at this early stage) than the original Hubble "redshift data" supporting the Big Bang!
This discovery contains major implications, not only
for past geophysics and terrestrial evolution ... but for future geological and
climatological events -- "Earth changes," as some have termed them.
These may be driven, not by rising solar interactions or by-products of
terrestrial civilization (accumulating "greenhouse gases" from burning
fossil fuels), but by this same "hyperdimensional physics." If so,
then learning a lot more about the mechanisms of this physics -- and quickly!
-- is a critical step toward intervening and eventually controlling our future
well-being, if not our destiny, on (and off!) this planet ...
L=mr2 = total system angular momentum (object, plus
all satellites)
"You
can recognize truth by its beauty and simplicity. When you get it right, it is
obvious that it is right -- at least if you have any experience -- because
usually what happens is that more comes out than goes in ... The inexperienced,
the crackpots, and people like that, make guesses that are simple, but you can
immediately see that they are wrong, so that does not count. Others, the
inexperienced students, make guesses that are very complicated, and it sort of
looks as if it is all right, but I know it is not true because the truth always
turns out to be simpler that you thought ..."
It could even be true.
But, as can be seen
from examining the luminosity/angular momentum diagram again, there also
appears to be one glaring exception to this otherwise strikingly linear
relationship: The Sun itself.
Independent research, involving over 30 years of attempted confirmation of the Sun's basic energy source -- in the form of solar/terrestrial observations of tiny atomic particles called "neutrinos," supposedly coming from the center of the Sun -- have left laboratory physicists and astrophysicists with a major astronomical enigma:
The Sun is not emitting anything like the number of neutrinos required by the "Standard Solar Model" for its observed energy emission; if its energy is due to "thermo-nuclear reactions" (as the Standard Model demands), then the observed "neutrino deficit" is upwards of 60%: even more remarkable, certain kinds of primary neutrinos (calculated as required to explain the bulk of the solar interior's fusion reactions, based on laboratory measurements) turn out to be simply missing altogether!
So -- what really fuels the Sun?
The answer to the Sun's apparent violation of the Standard Solar Model -- ironically, is contained in its striking "violation" of our key angular momentum/luminosity diagram:
It doesn't.
The obvious answer to this dilemma is that the HD model is simply wrong.
The less obvious is that we're missing something ...
Like ... additional planets (above)!
By adding another big planet (or a couple of smaller ones) beyond Pluto (several hundred times the Earth's distance from the Sun -- below), we can move the Sun's total angular momentum to the right on the graph, until it almost intersects the line (allowing for a percentage, about 30%, of internal energy expected from genuine thermonuclear reactions ...). This creates the specific "HD prediction" that "the current textbook tally of the Sun's angular momentum is deficient because ..."
As a dividend, this promptly presents us with our first key test of the Hyperdimensional Model:
1) Find those planets!
2) HD energy generation in both planets and stars
should be -- must be -- variable.
Initially, this
"excess energy" can appear in many different forms -- high-speed
winds, unusual electrical activity, even enhanced nuclear reactions --
but, ultimately, it must all degrade to simple "excess heat." Because
of the basic physical requirement for resonance in effectively coupling
a planet (or a star's) "rotating 3-D mass to the underlying 4-D aether
rotation," this excess energy generation must also, inevitably, vary
with time -- as the changing orbital geometry of the "satellites"
interacts with the spinning primary (and the underlying,
"vorticular aether"...) in and out-of-phase. For these reasons, as stated earlier, time-variability of this continuing energy exchange must be a central hallmark of this entire "HD process."
[Incidentally, understanding this basic "hyperdimensional transfer mechanism," in terms of Maxwell's original quaternions (that describe "a rotating, vorticular, four-dimensional sponge-like aether"), immediately lends itself to creating a "Hyperdimensional Technology" based on this same mechanism.
The fundamental "violations" of current physics exhibited by so-called "free energy" machines -- from the explicitly-rotating "N-machine" to the initially frustrating time-variable aspects of "electro-chemical cold fusion"-- are now elegantly explained by appropriate application of Maxwell's original ideas.
Even more extraordinary: the recent startling demonstration, broadcast nationwide on ABC's "Good Morning America" last year, of a "physically impossible" major reduction -- in a few minutes! -- of long-lived radioactive Uranium isotopes. Normally, such processes require billions of years to accomplish. This too is now elegantly explained by the Hyperdimensional Model-- As -- an "induced hyperspatial stress," created by the machine ... the same stress that initially (in the Model) induces "unstable isotopes" in the first place. By technologically enhancing such vacuum stress within these nuclei, via a retuning of Maxwell's "scalar potentials," the normal radioactive breakdown process is accelerated -- literally billions of times ...
Even now, Jupiter's four major satellites (which have collective masses approximately 1/10,000th of Jupiter itself), during the course of their complex orbital interactions, are historically known to cause time-altered behavior in a variety of well-known Jovian phenomena--
Including --
"anomalous" latitude and longitude motions of the Great Red
Spot itself. As we presented at the U.N. in 1992, the Great Red Spot -- a mysterious vortex located for over 300 years at that "infamous" 19.5 degrees S. Latitude, via the circumscribed tetrahedral geometry of the equally infamous "27 line problem" -- is the classic "hyperdimensional signature" of HD physics operating within Jupiter.
The existence of decades of recorded "anomalous motions" of this Spot, neatly synchronized with the highly predictable motions of Jupiter's own moons, are clearly NOT the result of conventional "gravitational" or "tidal" interactions -- in view of the relatively insignificant masses of the moons compared to Jupiter itself; but, following Maxwell and Whittaker, the hyperdimensional effects of these same moons -- via the long "lever" of angular momentum on the constantly changing, vorticular scalar stress potentials inside Jupiter -- that is a very different story ...
So, Hyperdimensional Test number three:
3) Look for small, short-term amplitude-variations
in the infrared emission levels of all the giant planets ...
synchronized (as are the still-mysterious motions of the GRS on Jupiter) with
the orbital motions and conjunctions of their moons.
Confirmed short-term variations in the current planetary IR outputs, of "a few hours" (or even a few days) duration -- and synchronized with the orbital periods of the planets' satellites themselves -- would thus be stunning evidence that all the "mainstream" explanations are in trouble ... and that the Hyperdimensional Model deserves much closer scrutiny ...
In this same vein: unlike all "conventional NASA explanations," in a phenomenon akin to "hyperdimensional astrology," the HD model also specifically predicts significantly larger, long-term variability in these major planetary IR outputs ... of several years duration. These (like the shorter variations triggered by the changing geometry between the satellites) should be caused by the constantly changing hyperdimensional (spatial stress) interactions between the major planets themselves ... as they continually change their geometry relative to one another, each orbiting the Sun with a different relative velocity.
Since the prevailing NASA view is that these planets' "excess" IR output must be constant over time, no one has bothered to look for any further correlations -- between a rising or falling internal energy emission ... and the (now, historically well-documented) semi-periodic eruptions of such "storms."
They should.
Continues via links below…
From The Enterprise Mission @ http://www.enterprisemission.com/hyper1.html & http://www.enterprisemission.com/hyper1a.html & http://www.enterprisemission.com/hyper2.html & http://www.enterprisemission.com/hyper2a.html
And see Timespace via Hyperspace In Your Life @ http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/2011/01/infinity-and-beyond-hyperspace-in-your.html
For more information about hyperspace see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/hyperspace
Help This Unique Independent Site
Survive
Donate any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati
eBook!
Just click in the jar -
For further
enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the search box @ New Illuminati or click on any label/tag at the
bottom of the page @ http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
And see
New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati
New Illuminati Youtube
Channel - Subscribe @ http://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/feed
The Her(m)etic Hermit -
http://hermetic.blog.com
The Prince of Centraxis - http://centraxis.blogspot.com
(Be Aware! This link leads
to implicate & xplicit concepts & images!)
This
site is published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an
individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work
& author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original
along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or
software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay
glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please
send a small but heartfelt donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading
this far…
Live
long and prosper!
From the
New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Add your perspective to the conscious collective