"All the World's a Stage We Pass Through" R. Ayana

Showing posts with label cloning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cloning. Show all posts

Thursday, 23 April 2015

Evasions of the Body Snatchers - Human Body Parts: A Great New Profitable Industry


Evasions of the Body Snatchers
Human Body Parts: A Great New Profitable Industry

 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/A_human_eye_1_day_after_a_cornea_transplant.jpg

Human Harvest: China’s Organ Trafficking

 

 

 

By Leon Lee

 

 

Are political prisoners in China being killed for their organs? Dateline has a special investigation into disturbing claims over the use of live donors in the country’s transplant trade.


10,000 organs are transplanted in China every year, yet there are only a tiny number of people on the official donor register.

It’s become a destination for people wanting to avoid waiting lists and get a quick transplant. The industry is said to be worth a billion dollars.

But where are the organs coming from?

“Somebody’s being killed for the organ,” human rights lawyer David Matas says. “There’s no other way to explain what’s happening.”


David Matas and fellow Nobel Peace Prize nominee David Kilgour have spent years investigating the allegations of organ harvesting in China.

 
He and fellow Nobel Peace Prize nominee, lawyer and politician David Kilgour, have spent years investigating organ trafficking in China.

They believe some of the organs come from members of the Falun Gong movement – a quasi-religious group with millions of followers, which is banned by the Chinese Government.

“Falun Gong, before it was repressed was very popular in China,” David Matas says. “It’s estimated, according to government of China statistics, between 70 and 100 million people, which was then more than the membership of the Communist Party of China.”

Investigators claim thousands of them have been detained by authorities.

“I testify to the atrocious crime that the hospital committed in removing livers and corneas from living Falun Gong members,” says former worker Annie.

“Some of them were still alive when they were secretly burnt in the incinerator that was in the boiler room.”


Falun Gong is a quasi-religious organisation, which started in 1992, but is banned by the Chinese authorities.



Her husband at the time was a surgeon responsible for removing organs. They fled China to escape the work, but he then faced an attempt to kill him.

“Some people in the hospital knew about this, but they were too afraid of being killed to speak up,” she says.

David Matas believes such evidence is the only way of explaining the fast availability of organs.
  
“Everywhere else in the world it would be months and years,” he says. “When you book a transplant in advance, for a heart transplant, and you go to China and you get a transplant within a few days.”


“I went to the mainland on 25 June. So I waited two to three weeks,” says patient Rourou Zhuang.

She travelled from Taiwan for a kidney transplant, but only found out later that her donor could potentially have been killed to order.

“I was totally shocked to find out about the source,” she says. “I also feel very sad I participated in that. So I thought I should tell my story to let the public know.”


Rourou Zhuang travelled from Taiwan to China for a kidney transplant
Rourou Zhuang travelled from Taiwan to China for a kidney transplant.



The Chinese Government wouldn’t appear on camera for Dateline's program, but it refutes the claims.

“The main source of our organs is from death row prisoners,” Health Minister Jiefu Huang has said previously in an interview with state television.

However, the Chinese Government did make its own documentary challenging evidence gathered from undercover phone calls for the program.

One doctor, Lu Guoping, replies ‘that’s right’ when asked by an investigator posing as a patient if the organs come from Falun Gong members.

But the same doctor has a different response in the government film.

“I told her that I had never been involved in transplant surgery. I couldn’t answer her, as I didn’t know how they got the organs,” he says.


The Chinese Government refutes the allegations about organ harvesting.
The Chinese Government refutes the allegations about organ harvesting.



Laws banning transplant tourism to China are already in place in Israel and Spain and are being debated in many other countries.

China has also faced heavy criticism from the UN over the use of death row prisoners for organs, but the human rights lawyers spearheading the investigation want much more action.

“We would like to see all the names of all the doctors that are involved go on a list,” David Kilgour says. “They would know that they have an excellent chance someday of facing the International Criminal Court in The Hague.”




No longer science fiction: Aborted human fetuses harvested to grow kidney organs in rats for transplantation into human patients

 

human



Human fetal kidneys harvested from aborted babies are being surgically implanted into adult rats to grow new kidneys to be transplanted into awaiting human adults.

This procedure, which is under rapid development, is being framed as a medical breakthrough by scientists who appear to be completely blind to the moral and ethical issues at stake in such a scheme.

"[This] is definitely the first time an actual whole human organ has been grown in an animal, and has sustained the life of that animal," explains Eugene Gu, the founder and CEO of Ganogen, Inc. in Redwood, Calif. "Our long-term goal is to grow human organs in animals, to end the human donor shortage." [1]

LiveScience.com reports, "The research shows that it is feasible to remove a kidney from an aborted human fetus, and implant the organ into a rat, where the kidney can grow to a larger size."

From the Ganogen.com website:



Study results have been published in the Jan. 22 issue of the American Journal of Transplantation.

 

 

The ethics question

 

To its credit, Live Science directly addresses the moral issues surrounding this technology, even offering quotes from a bioethicist who says the practice won't be tolerated. As reported on the website:

Arthur Caplan, a bioethicist at NYU Langone Medical Center, said the study itself did not concern him. However, "there is no way we're ever going to use fetal human kidneys or any other solid organs for transplant," Caplan said. "American society is morally uncomfortable enough about abortion that growing organs from fetal remains will never be accepted, and will be banned in state after state."

The researchers said they hope Caplan is wrong...


The Ganogen.com website does not appear to contain any ethics statement defining any limitations on how the developed technology might be used. It appears to company has likely not considered the ethical implications of its research. While there's no doubt the founders of the company have entered this realm with the best of intentions, they appear to be young, brilliant and naive, wholly unaware of what the roads to Hell are paved with.

Here's a picture, also from the Ganogen.com website, showing some of the organs they've managed to grow from kidney tissue harvested from aborted human babies:


 

Abortion farms and organ factories

 

Western medicine today is dominated by the attitude of "heroic interventionism" lead by "medical mechanics" who celebrate each other's abilities to grow, harvest and transplant organs across an ever-expanding list of animal and human subjects.

But just because you can achieve such transplantation results doesn't mean you should. In the same way, yes you can genetically engineer food crops to combine insect genes with plant genes and release them into the wild, but it's probably not very wise to do so due to the very real possibility of self-replicating genetic pollution.

What happens if this new fetal tissue organ harvesting procedure becomes so successful that millions of customers line up to buy the new organs? You'd very quickly see for-profit medical corporations setting up fetal abortion farms to harvest their organs for the "organ factory."




Young women would be paid (or kidnapped) to get pregnant and have their unborn babies harvested for the organ tissue. Actually, this step is practically happening today as companies like Stem Express in Placerville, California, already sell aborted human fetal tissue for "medical research."

In Nigeria, a baby farm was already in operation where teenage girls were kidnapped and forced to be impregnated against their will, only to give birth and have their children stolen away for human trafficking profits. "Thirty-two pregnant girls were rescued from a maternity home run by a trafficking ring in the southern city of Aba," reports The Guardian. [2] "The girls, mostly of school age, were allegedly locked up at the Cross Foundation clinic so they could produce babies to be sold for illegal adoption or for use in ritual witchcraft."

U.S. corporations could then purchase the harvested aborted fetal tissue from such "baby factories" being run in other countries, then they'd bring the fetal tissue to U.S. facilities where large numbers of rats (which are mammals) are subjected to the torturous procedure of having their bodies cut open and implanted with the harvested human fetal organ cells in order to grow human kidneys.

Once the kidneys grow to a suitable size, the rats would obviously be killed to harvest those organs, which would then be transported to hospitals to be surgically transplanted into humans for profit. The mainstream media would dutifully celebrate the "lifesaving medical breakthrough" and describe the mad scientists as heroes for humanity.


 

 

The medical Matrix: turning a human baby into a profit center for medical corporations

 

If there's money to be made from harvesting the organs of aborted babies, make no mistake that there are corporations more than willing to profit from the blood money.

Even today, western medicine does not consider a human baby to be "alive" until after it is born... even though an unborn child shows every sign of life that would normally be considered "alive" in a rigorous scientific context. The unborn baby shows a heartbeat, brain activity, cellular growth, nutrient metabolism, waste elimination, muscular movement and even demonstrates emotions and reactions to stimuli. Clearly an unborn baby is alive. This not deniable except by those who are intentionally dishonest.

But thanks to a medical system that can abandon all ethics and declare an unborn baby to be something less than a living human being, there's nothing stopping biotechnology corporations from harvesting aborted human babies for profit.

And because there's no moral boundary against doing this with one baby, there's also no moral boundary against doing this with millions of babies in an "abortion farm" organ harvesting operation carried by a public company with its own stock symbol on Wall Street. Who knows, maybe your favorite retirement mutual fund will buy some shares, too, because all that matters are the earnings per share, right?

Here's a picture of a modern-day chicken meat factory. Replace the chickens with human babies and you begin to get an idea of the future where medical science operates without human ethics:


   

Watch The Island movie for a preview of how this might play out

 

In the sci-fi movie The Island, starring Ewan McGregor, the world's wealthy elite pay a biotech corporation to raise human clones in a medical facility as "living organ banks." Those human clones are later killed to have their organs harvested for transplantation into the paying customer.

Much like in our own world today, the clones are controlled through a system of total media propaganda. Regular media broadcasts remind the clones that it's unauthorized to venture outside the city because the entire world has been destroyed in a nuclear war and is now contaminated with radiation, they're told. This is conducted in exactly the same way citizens of our modern world are scared into government compliance through totally fabricated or engineered stories of terrorism.




When clones are ready to have their organs harvested, they are told they've "won the lottery" to retire in luxury on a tropical island. In reality, they are euthanized and cut open to have their organs harvested for corporate profits.

This scene from the film shows one clone waking up during the organ harvesting procedure and attempting to escape:





The cloned citizens of The Island are brutally controlled by the corporation and forced to live a life of total obedience and conformity. Even their diet is rigorously controlled by the corporation, but not out of any desire to promote health. Rather, it's a desire by the corporation to make sure its "product" remains healthy, harvestable and sellable.

All along, the cloned humans -- which are considered corporate "property" -- are kept wholly oblivious to the real world and told how lucky they are to be the last of the survivors of the nuclear war (which never happened). This is the modern-day equivalent to President Obama telling us all how good the U.S. economy is doing and how lucky we are to be living in America.

    

  The Island

(2:09:20) @ https://youtu.be/JJRxvSnzQng

 

 

What was once sci-fi may soon be reality  

 

The greatest problem with science today is that it almost entirely conforms to corporate interests. As a result, it has no respect for ethics or morals. Whatever makes the most money becomes the new "science" of the day, regardless of the implications for human suffering or widespread tragedy.

Tinkering with life -- via genetic engineering, mass deployment of agricultural chemicals, cloning or organ harvesting -- is a territory fraught with ethical landmines. But motivated by greed, corporations will drive humanity right through a landscape littered with such landmines, oblivious to the violations of ethics, human rights or environmental integrity they are unleashing.

Make no mistake: If it were medically feasible right now to generate millions of dollars in transplant profits from the body of a two-year-old infant, the biotech corporations would have already declared two-year-olds to be "not yet human" and there would be massive farms running right this very minute harvesting organs from two-year-olds. Any person who protested the practice would, of course, be instantly labeled, "anti-science."

Case in point: There's money to be made right now from injecting two-year-olds with toxic metals such as mercury and aluminum, both of which are still intentionally manufactured into vaccines. Any person who protests the injecting of children with mercury is immediately labeled "anti-science" today, even though the science clearly says mercury is toxic to human neurology. Calls for removing neurotoxic substances from vaccines are met with derision by the vaccine industry, which insists all children should be injected with dozens of vaccines no matter how toxic the ingredients in them.

The exploitation of children's bodies has always been a profit center for medical corporations, and human organ harvesting, growing and transplantation may simply be the next step up for an industry deeply rooted in the evil that comes from ignoring medical ethics while prioritizing medical profits.

In effect, we are all living in The Island and being lied to on a daily basis about what's real. The truth, it turns out, does not support the profit interests of the all-powerful corporations.


From Natural News @ http://www.naturalnews.com/048411_organ_harvesting_aborted_babies_biotech_medicine.html


For more information about organ transplants see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/organ%20transplants
- Scroll down through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section


Hope you like this not for profit site -
It takes hours of work every day by a genuinely incapacitated invalid to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this website from a tiny cabin in a remote forest
Like what we do? Please give anything you can -  
Contribute any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!
(You can use a card securely if you don’t use Paypal)
Please click below -



Spare Bitcoin change?


Xtra Image - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/A_human_eye_1_day_after_a_cornea_transplant.jpg



For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @ the top left of http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com


And see


 New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati

New Illuminati Youtube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati


New Illuminati on Twitter @ www.twitter.com/new_illuminati


New Illuminations –Art(icles) by R. Ayana @ http://newilluminations.blogspot.com

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com



DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide a live link to your original material on your site (and links via social networking services) - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps spread your info further! This site is published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged,  - if you give attribution to the work & author and include all links in the original (along with this or a similar notice).

Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution!

If you like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large) or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

Live long and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible worlds…


From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

Saturday, 23 March 2013

Clone alone: Who needs sex?


Clone alone: Who needs sex?

We’re discovering many females can make babies without any male help. So why do animals bother with the messy business of sex at all?

http://www.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/cms/mg21729061.600/mg21729061.600-1_1200.jpg
 The baby pit viper is with its only parent, and is a clone of her (Image: Charles Smith)  
 



See more in our image gallery: "Who needs sex? Six animals that cloned alone"

JUST over a decade ago, a baby hammerhead shark slipped silently from its mother's belly into the welcoming waters of the aquarium at the Henry Doorly Zoo in Nebraska, creating ripples that are still spreading around the world. The mother had had no contact with male sharks for at least three years, and DNA tests confirmed that the pup had no father. "It was unprecedented," says shark geneticist Demian Chapman of Stony Brook University in New York, who carried out the paternity test. It was the first virgin birth ever confirmed in a shark.

The pup's unexpected arrival was swiftly followed by an unexpected departure: it was killed by a stingray only a few days later. Yet it has since become apparent that the pup was not as singular as first thought. In the past few years, many other vertebrates have been shown to produce offspring by virgin births. All of which begs the question: why do we animals bother with males at all?

Until recently, virgin births in animals that reproduce sexually were seen as an anomaly – something that simply does not happen in the wild. "The dogma is that this is a captive syndrome only seen in animals in zoos and aquaria," says Warren Booth of the University of Tulsa in Oklahoma.

This view is understandable given that in mammals, virgin birth – or parthenogenesis – is abnormal and extremely rare. Eggs do sometimes start developing without being fertilised by a sperm, but the embryos usually die or turn cancerous. One boy is known to be partly the result of a "virgin birth" – his body is a chimera of normal cells and cells formed by parthenogenesis. But full virgin births do not occur naturally in mammals because our paternal and maternal genes are stamped with different chemical marks or "imprints". Without both sets, gene activity is disrupted.

Aside from mammals, though, virgin births are turning out be surprisingly common. The list of vertebrates known to be able to reproduce parthenogenetically as well as sexually now includes several shark species, boa constrictors, turkeys and Komodo dragons. The biggest surprise is that it seems to happen in the wild, not just in captivity.

Last year, Booth and his colleagues analysed 59 litters from two species of North American pit viper, caught when they were already pregnant (Biology Letters, vol 8, p 983). Two of the litters were virgin births – the first recorded cases in the wild (one of these snakes and its offspring are pictured above right). "We think this type of reproduction is a lot more common in reptiles and certain other animals than was previously thought," says Booth. "It's really changing the way we think about reproduction in reptiles."

Even more astonishingly, the pit vipers were caught in areas with plenty of males. So these snakes do not seem to be reproducing this way only as a last resort when mates are scarce.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjokyNuKPLhDOOLr2xTn5ffjng13Aga2r3ATOI3wt8LP_vm-xPKUJoU6cPZ_3G5leYLooL7G_h50vgF-he0RMX2g9auy1REJxtQHP-7b9-_6taUbur_s0gQoGEaDQ3bv3rqKvCM3WNJXvcj/s1600/parthenogenesis.jpgIndeed, as evolutionary biologists and any girl who has ever dumped her boyfriend will tell you, there are many benefits to doing away with males. In female-only species, every individual can produce offspring, so the population can grow faster than species with males and females. Time spent looking for love means less time looking for food, and there is the risk of catching a nasty disease during mating or being eaten while distracted. To top it all, sex randomly shuffles the genetic deck creating new, potentially flawed blends of genes when the old ones tend to be working perfectly well. All of which makes the preponderance of sex in the animal kingdom something of an enigma.

So can vertebrates manage without males? The first hint they can came in 1932 with the discovery of an all-female species of fish found in southern Texas and northern Mexico: Amazon mollies (Poecilia formosa), named after the legendary tribe of female warriors.

Even though there are no male Amazon mollies, it turns out that the females still need males. Their eggs will not develop unless stimulated by sperm. So they court and mate with males from any one of several related species, but the offspring inherit only the mother's DNA – a phenomenon called gynogenesis. This peculiar arrangement means Amazon mollies can only live in the vicinity of one of these other species.

Altogether, around 90 female-only species of fish, amphibians and reptiles have now been discovered, but like the molly most still need males of other species to be present. The rest, including some whiptail lizards and geckos, seem to thrive without any male involvement at all, though they do show signs of mating behaviour: the whiptail lizards pseudocopulate with other females of the species, earning them the nickname "lesbian lizards". "But in my view that's no different to two dogs mounting. It's about establishing dominance," says Peter Baumann of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research in Kansas, Missouri, who studies parthenogenesis.

So a few species do not need males at all. The question is why the number is so low, given that in theory females that reproduce only by parthenogenesis should produce more offspring and outcompete sexual ones. While much remains to be discovered, there appear to be several reasons why the male of the species is needed. One could be that all-female species soon go extinct.

http://universe-review.ca/I10-82-parthenogenesis.jpg

All-female species

 

Models suggest that unisexual species can do fine in the short term, but in the long run they run into trouble as their genomes stagnate. Without the ability to reshuffle their genome and get rid of harmful mutations, their survival time is likely to be between 10,000 and 100,000 generations (Evolution, vol 44, p 1725).

The whiptail lizards and geckos have not reached this limit yet, but some all-female species are much older. The Amazon molly is about 280,000 years, or 800,000 generations old. And it is a mere whippersnapper compared with another gynogenetic species, the Ambystoma mole salamanders that live around the Great Lakes region of North America. This all-female species appeared around 5 million years ago, so it has survived for about 1 million generations. How do these species manage it? They cheat by stealing DNA.

After they mate with males from other species, the DNA in the sperm is usually discarded, but every now and then part of it is incorporated into the genome of the offspring. Mollies occasionally steal fragments of chromosomes, while mole salamanders plunder entire sets. Jim Bogart at the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada, has coined the term "kleptogenesis" to describe the process. He think it allows the females to get hold of genes that are better adapted to their current environment and thus compete with sexual animals.

The unisexual salamanders can dump entire sets of chromosomes, too, which helps prevent the build-up of harmful mutations, Bogart says. "The system is very cool and is driven by natural selection – when a clone runs into problems, new clones evolve."

So unless all-female species can nick genes from males, they may not survive long. What's more, the creation of a unisexual species also seems to require unusual circumstances. There is no evidence that a single sexual species can slowly evolve into an all-female one. Instead, every unisexual species discovered so far, with just one possible exception, was created instantaneously by two species interbreeding. The unisexual whiptail lizard Aspidoscelis neomexicana, for example, was formed in one fell swoop when a male A. inornata had sex with a female A. tigris. One mating was all it took to instantly create a new species.

This is, as you might expect, incredibly rare: most interspecies hybrids are either sterile or can reproduce sexually with one or both parent species. But there is no doubt it does happen. In 2011, Baumann's team managed to create a new unisexual species in the lab by fertilising eggs from one unisexual whiptail lizard species with sperm from a sexual species (PNAS, vol 108, p 9910).

This merging of two different genomes may help unisexual species get off to a good start, by giving them the hybrid vigour seen when plants are crossbred. What's more, these hybrids reproduce in a special way. There are different forms of parthenogenesis, producing either half clones or full clones (see diagram). Species that have managed to ditch males, like the unisexual whiptail lizards, produce full clones.

 

Abandoning sex

 

Animals that only occasionally resort to parthenogenesis almost always produce half clones, however, and these are likely to suffer from severe inbreeding because they get a double dose of any harmful mutations. This could be why few survive. Parthenogenic pitviper litters contain fewer eggs, with the occasional live healthy hatchling but many more stillborn and deformed baby snakes, for instance. So abandoning sex does not offer the big advantage in terms of producing more offspring that theory suggests.

Last but not least, virgin births do not always produce daughters as you might expect. In birds and some reptiles, the females possess both male and female sex chromosomes, which means in theory they could produce both males and females by parthenogenesis. In practice, boa constrictors only seem to have female virgin births – but pit vipers and turkeys have only been observed to have male virgin births (see "A turkey's tale").

In these species, then, far from being a way to do without males, virgin birth is a way of making more of them. "The theory is that if you have a lone female snake on an island, she can reproduce asexually to produce a male, and then breed back with it sexually to produce more offspring," says Booth. We do not know if this is the case yet. Booth is keeping a watchful eye on his pit viper offspring, to see if and how they reproduce.

But the evidence so far suggests that males can relax. Some females may be able make babies without them, but sooner or later their descendants have to resort to having sex with males again if they want to avoid extinction. Now there's a boost for the male ego.

This article appeared in print under the headline "Look, no dad!"

  http://www.newscientist.com/data/images/archive/2906/29061601.jpg

 

A turkey's tale

 

Virgin birth appears to be an extremely rare phenomenon in birds. There have been anecdotal reports of it in chickens, but these have not been confirmed.

The only bird that is undoubtedly capable of producing healthy offspring this way is, appropriately enough, the bird eaten to celebrate a mythical virgin birth. Yes, the turkey.

In the 1950s, researchers at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center in Maryland discovered Beltsville Small White turkeys sometimes produced male offspring by parthenogenesis. Most were able to develop and reproduce normally. The researchers managed to increase the frequency of such births by selective breeding.

Helen Pilcher is a freelance writer based in the UK. Follow her on @HelenPilcher1

Issue 2906 of New Scientist magazine

  • From issue 2906 of New Scientist magazine, page 34-36.
  •  

From New Scientist @ http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21729061.600-clone-alone-who-needs-sex.html?full=true  


For more information about new views of evolution see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/evolution  
- See ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section


YOU can help this unique independent website survive and stay online from a small cabin in a remote rainforest
Donate any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!
Please click in the jar -


Images – https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjokyNuKPLhDOOLr2xTn5ffjng13Aga2r3ATOI3wt8LP_vm-xPKUJoU6cPZ_3G5leYLooL7G_h50vgF-he0RMX2g9auy1REJxtQHP-7b9-_6taUbur_s0gQoGEaDQ3bv3rqKvCM3WNJXvcj/s1600/parthenogenesis.jpg
http://universe-review.ca/I10-82-parthenogenesis.jpg



For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @ http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com


And see




 New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati

New Illuminati Youtube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/feed



The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com



The Prince of Centraxis - http://centraxis.blogspot.com (Be Aware! This link leads to implicate & xplicit concepts & images!)



DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide a live link to your original material on your site - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps spread your info further! This site is published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an individual article or other item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original (along with this or a similar notice).
Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large) or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

Live long and prosper!


From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com