“Out of Africa” Theory Officially Debunked?
Atlantean Gardens
Scientific evidence refuting the theory of modern humanity’s African genesis is common knowledge among those familiar with the most recent scientific papers on the human Genome, Mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosomes. Regrettably, within mainstream press and academia circles, there seems to be a conspicuous – and dare we say it – deliberate vacuum when it comes to reporting news of these recent studies and their obvious implications.
Australian historian Greg Jefferys explains that,
"The whole ‘Out of Africa’ myth has its roots in the mainstream academic
campaign in the 1990′s to remove the concept of Race.
When I did my degree they all spent a lot of time on the ‘Out of Africa’ thing
but it’s been completely disproved by genetics. Mainstream still hold on to
it."
It did begin the early 90’s. And the academics most
responsible for cementing both the Out-of Africa theory and the complementary
common ancestral African mother – given the name of “Eve” – in the public arena
and nearly every curriculum, were Professors Alan C. Wilson and Rebecca L.
Cann.
In their defense, the authors of this paper were fully
aware that genealogy is not in any way linked to geography, and that their
placement of Eve in Africa was an assumption, never an assertion.
A very recent paper on Y-chromosomes published
in 2012, (Re-Examing the “Out of
Africa” Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasians) in the Light of DNA
Genealogy written by Anatole A. Klyosov and Igor L.
Rozhanski) only confirms the denial of any African ancestry in non-Africans,
and strongly supports the existence of a “common ancestor” who “would not
necessarily be in Africa. In fact, it was never proven that he lived in
Africa.”
Central to results of this extensive examination of
haplogroups (7,556) was the absence of any African genes. So lacking was the
sampling of African genetic involvement, the researchers stated in their
introduction that, “the finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend
from “African” haplogroups A or B is supported by the fact that bearers of the
Europeoid, as well as all non-African groups do not carry either SNI’s M91,
P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262”.
With the haplogroups not present in any African genes and
an absence of dozens of African genetic markers, it is very difficult nigh on
impossible to sustain any link to Africa. The researchers are adamant that
their extensive study “offers evidence to re-examine the validity of the
Out-of-Africa concept”.
They see no genetic proof substantiating an African
precedence in the Homo sapien
tree, and maintain that “a more plausible interpretation might have been that
both current Africans and non-Africans descended separately from a more ancient
common ancestor, thus forming a proverbial fork”.
We regard the claim of “a more plausible explanation” as a
gross understatement, since there is absolutely nothing plausibly African
turning up in any test tubes. In fact, the researchers made note of their
repeated absence stating “not one non-African participant out of more than 400
individuals in the Project tested positive to any of thirteen ‘African’
sub-clades of haplogroup A”. The only remaining uncertainty relates
to the identity of this “more ancient common ancestor”. All that can be stated
with confidence is that humanity’s ancestor did not reside in Africa.
Unfounded accusations of racism have
become common as the prevailing Afrocentric hypothesis is constantly being
challenged by the growing mountain of conflicting scientific evidence,
especially in the evolving field of genetics.
It is now scientifically
irrefutable fact that the "human species" has been found to contain a
substantial quantity of DNA (at least 20%) from other
hominid populations not classified as Homo sapien; such as Neanderthal,
Denisovan, African archaic, Homo erectus, and now possibly even
"Hobbit" (Homo floresiensis).
If not given drugs to prevent infant death, the
pregnant body of a rhesus negative mother will attack, try to reject, and
even kill her own offspring if it is by a rhesus positive man.
The Domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris) is a sub-species
of the gray wolf (Canis lupus), and they produce hybrids.
There are numerous other examples of where two separate
species (for example with different numbers of chromosomes) can also produce viable
offspring, yet are considered separate species. That said, humanity has been
shown to be, genetically speaking, a hybrid species that did not all share the
same hunter-gatherer ancestry in Africa.
Recent sequencing of ancient genomes suggests that interbreeding went on
between the members of several ancient human-like groups more than 30,000 years
ago, including an as-yet unknown human ancestor. "there were many hominid
populations,” says Mark Thomas, evolutionary geneticist at University College
London.
Recent genetic studies are touting shocking headlines
about how ancient humans 'rampantly interbred' and indulged in inter-species interracial sex
with multiple mystery sub-races in a "Lord Of The Rings"-style world
of different creatures, including mystery DNA - neither human nor Neanderthal, not yet identified.
Out of Atlantis, NOT Out of Africa
Since Cro Magnon Man was first discovered in 1868, he has presented fundamental puzzles for traditional scientists. Today there
is still no solution in sight for the traditional anthropologists.Cro Magnon Man appeared abruptly in Europe and North America, starting from around 35,000 years ago, lasting to about 12,000 years ago.
The first recognized discovery of a Cro Magnon was in 1868, only 20 years before the Secret Doctrine was written by Madam Blavatsky.
Blavatsky quotes a man of science as saying:
"On
the contrary, one of the oldest types, that of the men of the cave of
Cro-Magnon, is that of a fine race, tall in stature, large in brain, and on the
whole superior to many of the existing races of mankind."
The scientist is quite right.
Skull types are known after the name of the place where they are first
discovered and Cro Magnon was discovered in a cave in France. He is still
considered by scientists today to be taller and larger brained than the average
human living today.
The first puzzle causes these physical characteristics to be not pleasant for the anthropologist. To fit in more gracefully with their theories, Cro Magnon should have been shorter and smaller brained than the average for humans today.
A second and major puzzle for anthropologists is
that Cro Magnon man appears to arrive with his culture from no
discernable origin. He does not show any discernable development. His culture
was distinctly superior to others around him. This could be seen clearly in the
nature of his tools.
His art work was also seen to be superior. He painted those fantastic cave walls that we hear about and his advanced culture does not appear to come from any source that we can identify.
The advanced culture of Cro magnon gives all the appearance of arriving from elsewhere already fully developed.
 |
Stone engraving found at
Lussac-les-Chateaux.
|
Notice the relatively
modern-looking, tailored clothing with sewn arms and legs. Also shoes and a
hat!
Cro-Magnon Men are sometimes depicted as clean-shaven, and
even playing musical instruments.
These 'cave men' also had houses! We do not know what
exactly they were made of but we do have the post holes. It's becoming
easier to see by now that the Cro magnon specimen is becoming
undesirable from the view point of traditional politically correct science.
But the third and worst problem of all is that science cannot determine where his bones come from. His skeletal
structure does not have traces developing from any surrounding area. And at
that, his skeletal structure, as mentioned, is not what science would like to
find.
To help demonstrate this yet more emphatically, here
are a series of quotes showing the "developed somewhere else" nature
of Cro Magnon culture:
According to Prof. Francois Bordes, world renown archeologist and former director of the Laboratory of Prehistory at the University of Bordeaux, the Aurignacian [Cro Magnon] tool tradition without doubt originates outside of Europe, ready-made, although from where is still a mystery (Bordes, 1968).
Dr. John E. Pfeiffer, professor of anthropology at Rutgers University observes: "The Aurignacian is quite distinct from the Parigordian" [a separate older European style]; they arrive "from some area outside of Western Europe"; with an already "established way of life."
Archeologist Frank Hibben states that the Aurignacian industry is "indubitably non-European in origin";
These "invasions" are all associated with waves of Cro-Magnon occupation. No formative, or "gestation," stages have ever been found on any continent for any of the Cro-Magnon tool industries.
Professional anthropologists haven't the foggiest idea of the origin of these invasions. They invariably appeared on the western shores of Europe and Africa, even including some of the Atlantic isles next to those continents. Always the sites are clustered in the west, the number of sites diminishing towards the east [with an exception in the Levant]. Combe Capelle sites [of more ancient European man] are more or less evenly distributed all over Europe and the Near East. This has been a mystery that has plagued anthropologists for over a hundred years. To the west, there is nought but empty ocean: how could the invasions come from there?
The mystery of these invasions has been so embarrassing that today anthropologists don't want to talk about it any more. Some have gotten around the problem by blurring the distinction between true "Atlantic" Cro-Magnons and the "eastern" European types. Calling all modern men "Cro-Magnon," is merely skirting the issue; but this is not a scientific way to deal with the problem. (R. Cedric Leonard)
The map below shows the distribution of Cro
magnon archeological sites where fossil discoveries have been made.
It shows the distribution in
Europe as occurring in France, in the Pyrenees, along the Atlantic coast of Portugal, in southern coast of Spain on
either side of the Straits of Gibraltar, in northern Morocco on the Atlantic
and Mediterranean coasts and along rivers.
What a visual check of the map makes clear is that Cro
Magnon sites hug the Western shores facing the Atlantic Ocean for Europe and
northern Africa. And as referenced above, the number of sites thin
out as one moves eastward.
The Cro Magnon civilization came from the West, and
arrived in "waves". They had developed their culture somewhere
west from the Atlantic, and arrived fully developed when encountering
Neanderthal occupied Europe.
Madam Blavatsky claimed that Atlantis was
located in the Atlantic Ocean generally across from the same areas that are
heavily populated by sites on that map.
For example, Blavatsky asserts a land connection in ancient days between Atlantis and North Africa:
What is now N.W. Africa was once connected with Atlantis
by a network of islands, few of which now remain. (SDii790)
So then the conclusion is clear. Cro Magnon came from
somewhere in the Atlantic, not sub-Saharan Africa, possibly the fabled Atlantis from which
the Atlantic is said to have received its name.
Of course science can not place their origin. Their origin
is not there any more. It sank below the rising sea levels, which have been rising
since the ice age ended. The polar caps have risen over 400
feet during the past 20,000 years, not just during the industrial revolution of
the last two centuries.
So it would come as no
surprise that their culture was higher than those around them when one
realizes that it came from the territory Plato described as Atlantean. Unfortunately, since
WW2 it has become politically incorrect to propose any alternative to the
currently accepted "out of Africa" hypothesis.
Now there is one more key location of Cro Magnon man -
that is, the Canary Islands. The aboriginals of the Canary Islands, before
Spain discovered the island and destroyed most of their populace, were called
Guanches. Science recognizes that the Guanches were Cro Magnon.
Today, due to some intermarriage, some traits of the Cro
Magnon still atavistically appear - individuals will sometimes be taller and
blond with blue eyes. Mostly the culture of the Guanches was wiped
out. However, some mummies remain and as shown later some valuable information
will be gleaned from those mummies.
The distribution map shows sites
in northern Morocco. Those are today the Berbers. The Tuaregs are also a Berber
speaking group that is nomadic. Science recognizes that the Berbers are also
descended from Cro Magnon man.
The Berbers were in North Africa long before the Arabs arrived. The Berbers are considered the aboriginals of the area and their origins beyond that are not known. From a traditional source:
Despite a history of conquests, the Berbers retained a
remarkably homogeneous culture, which, on the evidence of Egyptian tomb
paintings, derives from earlier than 2400 B.C. The alphabet of the only partly
deciphered ancient Libyan inscriptions is close to the script still used by the
Tuareg. The origins of the Berbers are uncertain, although many theories have
been advanced relating them to the Canaanites, the Phoenicians, the Celts, the
Basques, and the Caucasians. In classical times the Berbers formed such states
as Mauritania and Numidia.
Leonard establishes a point that the influence of Atlantis
was likely global:
So why bother with this obscure and out-of-the-way outpost
[in the Levant: Lebanon, Israel, and Palestine]? I am convinced that, at least
toward the end, the Atlantean civilization was an empire. From the evidence
uncovered, there were outposts, not only in the Levant, but also on the
Atlantic seaboard of Africa, the Canary Islands, in northern France, in Egypt,
the Bahama Islands, in Peru and Bolivia, and possibly even Antarctica.
The Basques are in the Pyrenees and are said to derive from the Cro Magnon. The Guanches are the now deceased aborigines of the Canary Islands and are of Cro Magnon descent.
The Atlanteans likely moved both to South France and
to the Guanches in the Atlantic Ocean, as is described by Professor
Retzius in the "Smithsonian Report":
"With regard to the dolichocephalic
trait [those who have a head unusually long (front to back) relative to
width (as do Cro Magnon)] of America, I entertain a hypothesis still more bold,
namely, that they are nearly related to the Guanches of the Canary Islands, and
to the Atlantic populations of Africa, Tuaricks, Copts, which Latham
comprises under the name of Egyptian-Atlantidæ. We find one and the same form
of skull in the Canary Islands, in front of the African coast, and in the Carib
islands, on the opposite coast which faces Africa." (Professor Retzius, "Smithsonian
Report," 1859, p. 266.)
(The Tuaricks mentioned in the above paragraph are
the Tuaregs mentioned still earlier as descended from the Cro Magnons.) Madam
Blavatsky seems to be in agreement:
If, then, Basques and Cro-Magnon Cave-Men are of the same
race as the Canarese Guanches, it follows that the former are also allied to
the aborigines of America. This is the conclusion which the independent
investigations of Retzius, Virchow, and de Quatrefages necessitate. The
Atlantean affinities of these three types become patent. (SDii791)
Here she says it again in shorter form:
A race which MM. de Quatrefages and Hamy regard as a branch of the same stock whence the Canary Island Guanches sprung-offshoots of the Atlanteans, in short. (SDii678)
Here she is quite clear:
The Guanches of the Canary Islands were lineal descendants of the Atlanteans. This fact will account for the great stature evidenced by their old skeletons, as well as by those of their European congeners the Cro-Magnon Palæolithic men. (SDii791)
And finally, she claims all of European paleolithic man as Atlantean:
Palæolithic European man of the Miocene and Pliocene times was a pure Atlantean, as we have previously stated.
The Basques are, of course, of a much later date than this, but their affinities, as here shown, go far to prove the original extraction of their remote ancestors. (SDii790)
The Cro Magnon Invasions
About 35,000 years ago, well after the first
appearance of Modern Man,
a taller, sea-faring, race suddenly "invades" the
western shores of Europe and North Africa. This rugged, innovative,
large-brained people is dubbed Cro-Magnon.
About 17,000 years later the Aurignacian culture is
replaced by another smaller "invasion" (circa. 18,000 B.C.) known as
the Solutrean, then 16,000 years ago the Magdalenian "invasion"
occurs, These "invasions" are all associated with Cro-Magnon Man.
Finally the Azilian "invasion" occurs very close to the magic date of 10,000, ending forever the Upper Paleolithic Age.
An anthropological fact usually ignored is that there are notable differences in types of paleolithic man. The terms Cro-Magnon and Modern Man are used as if they were synonymous, whereas strictly speaking they are not. All Cro-Magnons are Modern, but all Moderns are not Cro-Magnon.
Cro-Magnon's distribution is limited to western portions of Europe and North Africa, as well as a number of Atlantic islands. Even some limited portions of South America have a type called Cro-Magnoid (meaning possessing some Cro-Magnon characteristics).
The Upper Paleolithic Age covers the period from circa.
38,000-10,000 B.C. During this period two main physical types of Modern Man
flourished throughout Europe, Asia and Africa--the eastern and western.
The "western" is known as Cro-Magnon, but the
"eastern" are known by various other names, such as Brunn Man, or
Combe Capelle (wherever the remains were first found).
These eastern types are generally shorter, more gracile, and rather smaller-brained than Cro-Magnon. The latter does not imply any particular degree of intelligence, but is merely stated as a defining characteristic.
Average stature of the Combe Capelle Man was about
five feet four inches, whereas Cro-Magnon Man averages over 6 foot.
The tool assemblage associated with Combe Capelle is known as the Perigordian, and is merely a continuation of the earlier Neanderthal's toolkit (the Mousterian), whereas the various Cro-Magnon tool assemblages are definitely not.
The beautiful cave paintings found throughout the Pyrenees
and Cantabrian mountains which have become world famous are the work of
Cro-Magnon. The art impulse of the "eastern" branch of Upper
Paleolithic mankind seems to be characterized by the small, carved female
"fertility" images.
Cro-Magnon villages consisted of houses (we don't know
what they were made of: all we have is the post hole patterns). They had spear
throwers, harpoons, bows and arrows, arrow straighteners, obsidian razors,
needles, musical instruments, even bone calendars (carved with symbolic
notations bordering on writing;).
A number of sites dating back as far as 15,000 B.C show
evidence of the practice of agriculture. Archeologists, not knowing how to
account for such a circumstance, have labeled these activities as "a false
dawn".
During the Period (15,000-10,000 B.C.) the innovations in
technology came so fast that archeologists had to divide it up into Magdalenian
I-VI.
Significantly, the final "invasion," the
Azilian, occurred approximately 10,000 B.C., close to the date when Plato
says Atlantis sank.
Although occurring in time at the beginning of the
Mesolithic, the Azilian is Upper Paleolithic in character. All other European
tool industries are Mesolithic in character at this time. Four Cro-Magnon
invasions have been noticed in North Africa during this same time period,
although more work involving dating needs to be done there.
They are known as the Aterian, Ibero-Maurusian, Mouillian
and the Capsian (Bordes, 1968; Clark, 1977, et al.). Dr. Bruce Howe (1967) of
Harvard University states:
"The bulk of the datable Aterian appears to be
earlier than any European Solutrean. The earliest Aterian is so far
undated."
In conclusion, we have four Cro-Magnon invasions (each
more advanced than the last) happening over a period of just under 25,000
years--the Aurignacian, Solutrean, Magdalenian and Azilian--the last one
occurring just when Atlantis was said to have subsided, and since that magic
date, no more Cro-Magnon invasions. So were the Cro-Magnon’s Atlanteans?
The human skull that challenges the Out of Africa theory
By John
Black
This is the account of the discovery of a skull that has the potential to change what we know about human evolution, and a suppression and cover-up which followed.
In 1959, in an area called Chalkidiki in Petralona, Northern Greece, a shepherd came across a small opening to a cave, which became visible when a thick covering of snow finally melted. He gathered a group of villagers to help him clear the entrance so they could go inside and explore. They found a cave rich in stalactites and stalagmites. But they also found something surprising – a human skull embedded in the wall (later research also uncovered a huge number of fossils including pre-human species, animal hair, fossilized wood, and stone and bone tools).
The skull was given to
the University of Thessaloniki in Greece by the President of the Petralona
Community. The agreement was that once the research was done, a museum would be
opened featuring the findings from the Petralona cave, and the skull would be
returned to be displayed in the museum – something that never happened.Dr Aris Poulianos, member of the UNESCO's IUAES (International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences), later founder of the Anthropological Association of Greece, and an expert anthropologist who was working at the University of Moscow at the time, was invited by the Prime Minister of Greece to return to Greece to take a position of a University Chair in Athens. This was due to the publication of his book, ‘The Origins of the Greeks’, which provides excellent research showing that Greek people didn’t originate from the Slavic nations but were indigenous to Greece. Upon his return to Greece, Dr Poulianos was made aware of the discovery of the skull at Petralona, and immediately started studying the Petralona cave and skull.
The ‘Petralona man’, or Archanthropus of Petralona, as it has since been called, was found to be 700,000 years old, making it the oldest human europeoid (presenting European traits) of that age ever discovered in Europe. Dr Poulianos’ research showed that the Petralona man evolved separately in Europe and was not an ancestor of a species that came out of Africa.
In 1964, independent German researchers, Breitinger and Sickenberg, tried to dismiss Dr Poulianos’ findings, arguing that the skull was only 50,000 years old and was indeed an ancestor that came from Africa. However, research published in the US in 1971 in the prestigious Archaeology magazine, backed up the findings that the skull was indeed 700,000 years old. This was based on an analysis of the cave’s stratigraphy and the sediment in which the skull was embedded within. Further research in the cave discovered isolated teeth and two pre-human skeletons dating back 800,000 years, as well as other fossils of various species.
Today, most academics who have analyzed the Petralona remains say that the cranium of the Archanthropus of Petralona belongs to an archaic hominid distinguished from Homo erectus, and from both the classic Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans, but showing characterists of all those species and presenting strong European traits. A skull dating back 700,000 which is either Homo sapien or part Homo sapien is in direct conflict with the Out of Africa theory of human evolution.
The research, after an interruption due to the dictatorship in Greece, continued up to 1983. It was then ordered by the government that all excavations at the site were forbidden to anyone, including the original archaeological team, and for 15 years nobody had access to the site or to the findings – no reason was provided by the government. Was this denial of access to prevent the extraction of whatever new scientific conclusions remained hidden within the incredible fossils embedded within the layers of the caves’ walls?
After the Anthropological Society of Greece took the case to the courts, 15 years later they were again allowed access to the cave. Since then the Ministry of Culture is trying in any way to overcome the Courts decision and further trials proceed.
Dr Poulianos’ findings
contradicted conventional views regarding human evolution and his research was
suppressed. Dr Poulianos and his wife were physically attacked and
injured in their home in 2012 and the culprits were never been found. He and
his team have been denied further access to the cave to complete their research
and study, and the whereabouts of the skull is now unknown. Today a sign sits outside the cave of Petralona stating that the skull found in the cave was 300,000 years old, and on Wikipedia today you will see references dismissing the evidence and trying to date the Petralona skull within acceptable parameters – between 160,000 and 240,000 years old.
Recently, Professor C.G. Nicholas Mascie-Taylor of the University of Cambridge sent a letter to the Ministry of Culture in Greece saying that the correct date of the skull is 700,000 years old and not 300,000. He has also challenged the government’s suppression of information regarding this incredible discovery.
Bouboulinas 20-22,
Athens 106 82,
Greece
5 September 2012
Dear Sir,
I am writing on behalf of the European Anthropological Association, which is the umbrella professional and academic association linking all of the national European biological anthropology and human biology societies, to express our concerns about the conservation of the Petralona Cave and Skull, the misinformation of the dating of the skull, as well as the treatment of personnel associated with the conservation of the Cave.
The bases of our concerns are that the skull has been damaged through many scratches and the crown of a tooth (1st molar) cut off. As requested by Anthropological Association of Greece what is required is a detailed description of the present status of the skull, so that no one in future can arbitrarily damage it further. There is also the problem of dating which has been scientifically dated at about 700,000 years ago not 300,000 as is given at the information desk. There is a very detailed record of the excavations and findings which need to receive further public presentation but which have never been catalogued so as to prevent specimens going missing.
It is very unfortunate that the Greek Archaeological Department stopped Dr Aris Poulianos from further work in the Cave without any explanation. It is also very worrying that Dr Poulianos and his wife were physically attacked and injured in their home earlier this year and the culprits have not been found. He was also verbally abused when attempting to give an invited presentation to teachers and school children.
Senior anthropologists and geologists have also been denied access to the Cave and the specimens for further study on a number of occasions without substantive reasons. Earlier this year there has also been misinformation given to the Greek Parliament concerning financial aspects of the Cave.
I look forward to receiving answers to these questions.
Yours faithfully
Professor C G N Mascie-Taylor MA, PhD, ScD (all Cambridge), FSB, FNAS (Hungary)
Professor of Human Population Biology and Health and President of the European Anthropological Association
(Reference)
However, independently if there is a scientific dispute on the above, it is only sad to become aware that research is not allowed to those who are not coordinated to the “standard” knowledge, risking even their lives in front of gun shooters.
Is this a cover up of an incredible discovery that the powers-that-be do not want us to have access to? You be the judge.
From Atlantean Gardens @ http://atlanteangardens.blogspot.com.au/2014/05/out-of-africa-theory-officially-debunked.html
http://atlanteangardens.blogspot.com.au/2014/05/out-of-atlantis-not-out-of-africa.html
http://atlanteangardens.blogspot.com.au/2014/04/the-cro-magnon-invasions.html
and Ancient Origins @ http://www.ancient-origins.net/human-origins-science/human-skull-challenges-out-africa-theory-001283
For more information about the cromagnon see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/cromagnon
- See ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
Hope you like this
not for profit site -
It takes hours of work every day
to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this website from a
tiny cabin in a remote forest
Like what we do? Please give enough
for a meal or drink if you can -
Donate any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!
Please click below -
For further enlightening
information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @ http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
And see
New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati
New Illuminati Youtube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/feed
New Illuminati on Google+ @ https://plus.google.com/115562482213600937809/posts
New Illuminati on Twitter @ www.twitter.com/new_illuminati
New Illuminations –Paintings in
Light by R. Ayana @ http://newilluminations.blogspot.com
The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com
The Prince of Centraxis - http://centraxis.blogspot.com (Be Aware! This link leads to implicate &
xplicit concepts & images!)
DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide a live link to your original material on your site (and
links via social networking services) - which raises your ranking on search
engines and helps spread your info further! This site is
published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an individual
article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright holder) –
reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you
give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably
active) link to the original (along with this or a similar notice).
Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or
mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web –
but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a donation (no
amount is too small or too large) or leave a comment – and thanks for reading
this far…
Live long and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible
worlds…
From the New
Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
ENGMA MAN: A Stone Age Mystery (57:00) Australian and Chinese scientists uncover strange ancient human remains from a remote cave in South West China and are confronted with a shocking possibility. Could these bones represent a new human species? @ http://iview.abc.net.au/programs/enigma-man-a-stone-age-mystery/NH1203W001S00
ReplyDelete