"All the world's a stage we pass through." - R. Ayana

Friday, 20 April 2012

The Solar Helix: Spiral orbits and the New Paradigm

The Solar Helix
Spiral orbits and the New Paradigm

The Vortex Solar System as proved by Dr. Keshava Bhat. This means the end of the academic, heliocentric "clockwork face" orbit theory, invented by the "Catholic military priest" Nicolas Copernicus and later cherished by Newton, brahe, Kepler, Galileo, Einstein, Hawking, Sagan and the rest of their academic ilk…

The proof of Dr. Bhat's assertion that the outer planets can be seen throughout the year! The inner ones disappear in the 30 degree cone of illumination of the Sun, they do not pass behind it as claimed by academia. The two to three weeks the outer planets disappear is due to their being within the 30 degree cone of illumination of the Sun from an Earth bound perspective.

Definition of Heliacal Rising - Literally, rising with the Sun. When a planet or a star, after it has been hidden by the Sun's rays, becomes visible again.

Animation showing the changing aspect of Saturn's rings at various opposition dates from 1993 to 2020, with additional orbital and observational details. The image is shown with Celestial North up (note that astronomical telescopes will normally show images inverted).

Note that Saturn's rings change their angle to our earthbound observations, which is due to our mutual helical trajectories. If the planets orbited the Sun upon its ecliptic as academic clockwork face diagrams claim, then this would not be remotely possible. The academic heliocentric Copernican model of the Solar System is kaput!

Note that if you imagine that the Earth is represented by the 12 green balls surrounding the Sun and project the Sun forward, past your computer screen, onto the tip of  a vortex cone which centers the helical paths of the planets which follow it, you will see the true dynamic motions of our Solar System. 

The Great Solar  Serpent

The Vortex Solar System of the late great  Dr. Keshava Bhat, M. Sc., Ph.D., of  Manipal, India

This playlist explores the causes of the helical trajectory of our solar system. Unfortunately the academics in the case "our solar system's orbit" opted for an imaginary binary star theory. There is no other star as is clearly seen, so it is sad they did not trash this theory.

The Path of the Solar Serpent's Vortex- drawn in 1880, from The OAHSPE
1, Sun. 2, Mercury. 3, Earth. 4, Mars. 5, Artaea. 6, Vesta. 7, Ceres. 8, Jupiter. 9, Saturn. 10. Uranus.

The reason we have a helical trajectory above and below the galactic ecliptic is because we are moving with other stars in a huge vortex arm of the galaxy which moves us above and below the galactic ecliptic in 25,625 year cycles for each hemisphere.

This  proves the helical trajectory of our solar system which is what Dr. Keshava Bhat discovered with his personal observations of the Solar System from equatorial regions around the globe for a period of 40 years.

Our Solar System is a huge vortex with the planets following the Sun, we are not orbiting it as quackademicians have been claiming since the time of Copernicus!

Also a must read!

Helical Helix: Solar System a Dynamic Process

by: Dr. Keshava Bhat

Figure 19b  page 35

This diagram demonstrates that the so-called tilting of the Earth's axis is an illusion due to our position in the master vortex of the Sun above and below its Ecliptic at peaks called solstices and twice a year as we intersect the ecliptic at the Equinoxes.

The illusion to our senses is created by a belief in academic clockwork orbits on a flat plane, which would mean that the Earth would have to tilt to account for this process. According to Dr. Bhat the Earth is not tilting at all. It is following the Sun in a Vortex trajectory and the seasons are seen to change due to our position in relationship to the ecliptic plane of the Solar Vortex.

"If only one can pause for a while and think retrospectively, the formidable scientific empire erected through centuries is crumbling down".

-         Dr. Bhat's, "Book 1998", (Chapter 4: Genetic Engineering: Gate to Heaven or Hell?)
The Sensational Spiral, Screwing, Solar System Spermatozoa-like Spectacle of our Sun

Herbolario Tropical : Una manera sencilla de vivir mejor (1985)
Las Bases del Naturismo : Naturaleza y bienestar humano (1991)
El Sentido de la Vida , desde el embarazo hasta la muerte (1994)
La Vuelta al Conuco : Produccin Naturista para un mundo en crisis (Co
author) (1997)
Goodbye to Ruling Scientific Model, proposal for a new science (1997)
Sarala chikitseyinda samagra chintanadedege (Kavyalaya Mysore 2005)

It should be called the "Precession of the Ages of the Zodiac". It is the effect of our entire Solar system in its serpent-like, spiraling vortex trajectory below the apparently stationary Zodiac.

The so-called "precession of the equinoxes"

The academic explanation is that the Earth wobbles one revolution on its axis approximately every 26,000 years. The Vortex Sun Model explains that the entire solar system moves in a vortical trajectory like a snake moving in 3 dimensions instead of a flat plane. As the Solar Snake moves either above or below the Galactic Ecliptic during the same time period stated above, it produces the illusion that the polar axis of our planet is wobbling if viewed only from an Earth bound perspective.

When seen from outside the Solar System the Solar Snake is creating the so-called wobble due to its vortical trajectory above and below the Galactic Ecliptic. A powerful mind can mentally image these processes and a space craft is not needed in order to gain this perspective. The Maya, Inca, Egyptians, Indians, Indonesians, Native Americans etc. all knew this and represented the Solar Force as Serpents or twin opposing serpents (twin opposing vortices). 

Excerpts from Dr. Keshava Bhat's Book Helical Helix:
Solar System a Dynamic Process

"Ruthless negation of other paradigms as superstition permitted the modern science and technology to project itself as the sole representative of Science as true knowledge. This is why in every school program the contents are copied from the mainstream paradigm".  

 Newton’s first law supposes or assumes that “a body remains at rest”. Today no celestial body is at rest. Therefore, this assumption is not substantiated....” or if in motion it remains in uniform motion with constant speed in a straight line unless it is acted on by an unbalanced external force”.

A straight line on a globe is only theoretical and practically it becomes a curve. Again a rotating Earth or any other celestial body going its orbit is bound to encounter with external forces at every instant and can never be expected to maintain a straight line. If acceleration is to be considered, there is no possibility of starting with zero at any time or at any place. Therefore, the first law becomes obsolete. The second law - when all bodies are in motion an “acceleration produced by an unbalanced force acting on a body is proportional to the magnitude of the net force and invariably proportional to the mass of the body” F=ma P=mg (weight=mass x gravity). This also becomes obsolete because on a moving object where we are located and form part of the system, [so] how to determine its mass or net force?

The situation is much clear in Heisenberg’s (1.927) uncertainty principle “It is impossible to measure accurately both the positional and momentum of a particle simultaneously”. The third law of Newton states that “when ever one body exerts a force upon a second body, the second body exerts a force upon the first body. These forces are equal in magnitude and oppositely directed.” This statement assumes that both bodies are initially at rest. Also assumes that one body moves faster than the other. The statement assumes that the bodies move in straight lines. Each body moves in n - dimension and the movement are continuous. This being the case such assumptions become historic but obsolete.

The time of action of one body is totally different from the time of any reaction. Both the curvature of the space- time unit on one hand which flows eternally as well as the impossibility of time flowing backward in the reverse direction on the other are sufficient reasons to logically discard the stated assumptions.   

Daily observations are to be marked on a sheet of paper at a definite time (local/ standard/ universal). Noon 12m is the best in the tropics; especially in the Northern hemisphere. A period of one year is the minimum time required for this study. On cloudy / rainy days the observation may be difficult or impossible. But observations adjacent to these days should be sufficient to bridge the gaps.

For the observation of the lunar motion monthly readings are necessary. In this case the phases of the moon and visibility at the time of observation are factors to be taken into account. By tracing the incident light on the paper a design is obtained corresponding to the Ana lemma. This proves that the planet always remains on one side of the Sun throughout the year. If the planet were to go around the Sun six months a year this observation is not possible.     The plane of displacement of our planet being equatorial the planetary axis is parallel to the solar axis. This is true for all the planets of the system.    

Seen from the Northern hemisphere at any time of the year the Polaris is observed in almost the same position probably because the star is moving in the same direction. Our Sun follows a helical orbit around the orbit of Polaris and one 360° year corresponds to 225.000 terrestrial years according to astronomical data. This permits the relative position of other stars in the zodiac or in the sky, their apparent disposition to explain equinoctial precession phenomenon.

The polar shift of the axis leads to the directional change of the photosphere and this in turn explains the process. Astronomical calculations made by the XVI, XVII and XVIII century astronomers never imagined that this happened. They assumed that Sun is stationary. No wonder all the calculations are made with such assumptions and perhaps they have to be calculated once again. It is also possible that the heliocentric orbits described for all the planets are again assumptions with no confirmation by direct measurement or observations.

The Greek observers like Aristarchus (About 270 B.C.) had suggested a heliocentric orbit for planets and the credit goes to Nicolas Copernicus (1514, 1.543) [Mikolaj Kopernik Polish churchman] for confirming such hypothesis. Based on these ideas or assumptions Tycho Brahe, Kepler and Newton arrived at mathematical models to describe the same phenomenon. All the planets known at that time are supposed to move along heliocentric orbits along the equatorial plane with particular degrees of axial inclinations for each one. The individual orbits are considered to be elliptic.

In a dynamic system the Earth should accelerate to go beyond the Sun during six months but decelerate to return to the area behind the Sun. The Sun is estimated to maintain about 20km/s revolution on its orbit. Fresh calculations may be necessary to describe this type of motion. The constellations at the background are sufficient evidence to deny the heliocentric orbits for planets.  

The Sun at 500 light seconds distance, when visible within a cone of 30° maintaining a background of one constellation, say for example Aries, (Hamel at 68ly) the Earth maintains in the opposite constellation at midnight, namely Libra. After six months to maintain heliocentric orbit, the midday of today should become midnight and the midnight should become midday. This has not taken place!    

Remember the Polaris located just above the North Pole at a distance of 430ly. The helical orbit of the Sun follows the helical orbit of the Polaris and therefore, Polaris is visible from the Northern hemisphere always in the same place.  Other planets also follow identical helical orbits. The solid angle at the source of light and the distances to each planet are maintained uniformly. Planets Mercury and Venus are closer to the Sun and are called the inner planets whereas Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and Pluto are considered as outer ones. Fresh calculations and models will have to be made to describe the respective orbits. A comprehensive three- dimensional model of the solar system is possible only after that.

When observed after about 56.000 years, 90° solar displacement along its orbit, the Polaris is bound to be visible at another place and that has to be explained in this way. It is not the Earth, but the Sun that has moved along its orbit. Since Earth follows the Sun, the optical illusion explains a helical orbit for each celestial body, orbit of our star served as reference for another body but dependent on this one (for helical orbits see under Earth orbit)   30° arc in the direction of equatorial plane orbital displacement where the ram force is maximum (20km/s speed) for the exposed surface can explain the whole model. If planets were to go round the Sun on heliocentric orbits, there should be some reference to this phenomenon in the literature. But as it is, nothing is available.  

The heat produced due to friction and infrared rays is more at the tropical area compared to the rest of the planetary surface. But the cold front at one Pole and the warmer hemisphere on the other maintains the extreme conditions during six months each. This permits the illusion that the visible Sunlight has light and heat in it. Further it is possible that the atmospheric mantle moves just behind the hydrosphere and lithosphere following the orbit and obviously the heat transferred to the gaseous atmosphere moves in respective directions.  

The orientation of the crescent indicates the relative position of the planet on its orbit as seen from the earth’s surface. The images of these crescents through one full orbit should be sufficient to demonstrate the helical nature of the orbit.

The waxing and waning moon also exhibits the crescent shape when the moon is located in between the earth and the sun, but on one side. It is noteworthy that the lunar/solar eclipses do not occur every month. This is the clue to the fact that orbit of the moon is not around the earth. Images of other planets like Mars, Jupiter and Saturn (visible with unaided eye) reflect light from a disc 30° arc., again visibility only 30° conical constitute a complex system. All calculations will have to be considered once again.  

The natural satellites like the Moon maintain their own orbits twining around the helical orbit of the associated planet. The orbits of the natural satellites (Moons) closely follow behind the planets encircling the respective planetary orbit. When there are several of these satellites each one maintains individual orbits but all follow the respective planet.   The illumination coming from photosphere of the Sun, rotating on its own axis (average 27 days) and maintaining a helical orbit (equatorial plane) naturally should spread all over. But the receiving surface of the planet is located at a constant distance (149597893 Km =AU) and the solar axis and that of the Earth are parallel to one another. Owing to an inclination of 23°27’30’’ (=46°55’’ solid angle) at the apex of a cone the Earth is illuminated at this angle. However, the orbit of the Earth completes the base of this cone maintaining the angle and the relative distance as a constant. With this design, the observation of 12 constellations in sequence at the background can easily be explained maintaining the day/night relation uniformly.

The interpretation of this phenomenon constitutes a new approach to explain observed facts in nature.   This observation definitely shows that the planet Earth never maintains a heliocentric orbit at all. Similar situation is observed with all the planets in the solar system. This statement is totally contradicting the existing views of Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, Kepler, Galileo, Newton and others including the modern astronomers that all the planets in the solar system follow heliocentric orbit. In order to explain the seasonal variations it was necessary to assume the planetary axis inclination of 23°27’30” in relation to the solar axis, consequently the heliocentric orbit had to be extended as an ecliptic.

This assumption has caused all the misconceptions in the name of Science around the world. Even after the observation that Sun is not stationary but has its own orbital displacement in addition to the rotation as a celestial body, no more calculations and revisions relative to the planetary orbits are reported. As a matter of fact all celestial bodies are in motion. Their relative distances remain doubtful. It is time to think in terms of a dynamic model.   In every case the flow of water is helical leaving sand bunds, corroded rocks and eroded soil as evidence of this path way.

Since the spirals appear in three dimensions and directions it has been impossible to detect and describe the natural phenomenon so far. The human intelligence should make use of this energy without obstructing the free flow of water. Celestial bodies, on the other hand, all move with an axis in a definite pattern that may be identified as HELICAL. This type of rotation or orbital revolution maintains the body in position in relation to other components. Action, reaction, interactions and cumulative effects may be envisaged for the entire system.

An observer is involved in the movement and there is no possibility of proving any point to anybody. As an observer is unable to distinguish the process as a whole, he should be happy with the outcome. All celestial bodies move helically at all time. Scope for applied research The axial rotation of Earth at 0.5 km/sec (= 1800 km/h) and the claimed orbital revolution at 30 km/sec (=108,000 km/h) are significant dynamic forces not utilized for human use. If only a proper technology is developed to harness these free energies humanity can enjoy all comforts almost free of cost. It is ever lasting source. The orbital velocity of the sun is given as 19.9 km/sec. All the planets and their satellites move along with the main source of power, the Sun. Each celestial body has its own specifications and calculations may be taken up by interested parties to include all other planets.

For example, Uranus is known to have an orbit of 84.01 years duration. It exhibits several uniqueness of its own. Its axis is said to have an inclination of 98° with reference to the Sun. According to the present approach the orbit of Uranus is so wide that the solid   angle at the cone apex is 98 x 2 = 196°. Obviously its motion looks like a somersault. The interval between solstice and solstice is 42 years. The planet rotates in a direction contrary to that of the Earth.  


Dr. Bhat was an ethnobotanist promoting Natural Health Reeducation Movement. He has been teaching and training people on his philosophy in different countries around the world. (Venezuela, Peru, Colombia, Brazil, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Mexico, Bolivia, Guadaloupe, United States of America, Canada, France, Spain, Italy and India.)

Born in Pallathadka, South India on January 3 1940 and passed on into the higher realmsJuly 25th 2010, while vacationing in Yellowstone Park.
Graduated from the Madras University in B.Sc ( 1959 ), M.Sc (1961) and Ph.D in Botany (1966)
Worked as a Research Assistant in the Madras Presidency College, Madras (1966-1968) and obtained the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (C.S.I.R) senior fellowship in 1968-1969.
Worked as a Senior Professor at the Universidad de Oriente, in Cumana, Venezuela from 1969 to 1987 

Help This Unique Site Survive
Donate any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!
Just click in the jar - 

For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the search box @  New Illuminati or click on any label/tag at the bottom of the pagehttp://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

And see

 New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati

New Illuminati Youtube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/feed

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com

This material is published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com


  1. Wow, people actually believe this croc? Amazing! What a mockery to science!

  2. Correction, the failed gravity based, black hole, dark matter mythical universe conjured up in the minds of a cabal of psyentist claiming to understand how the natural universe works are the mockery to science! You are living in a hyperreality and don't even have a clue. Start reading the works of Walter Russell, Viktor Schauberger and D.B Larson and hopefully you might realize that you are actually understanding the universe through the imaginations of men who use straight lines when describing a Phi universe, men who cheat and make up new rules when the universe does not behave the way that they would like it to work, you may know this term as "cosmological constant."

  3. I want to use your theory for a paper i am writing for an astronomy course at the Royal
    Military College of Canada. May I reference some of your findings?


Add your perspective to the conscious collective