Confirmation Tianjin was Nuked
This was no chemical fire, this
was China's 9-11
by Ian Greenhalgh, Britain – with Jeff Smith, USA
Fat
Man – “We’ve come a long way baby!”
We unfortunately had more activity on our airline crash team in the last year or so, where those teams are weighted with senior pilots and crash investigators, mostly through long time contacts. When we get into mini-nuke investigations the list grows much shorter as there are fewer of those folks around.
As you will quickly learn below, if you do not know what to look for and have some depth in the scary science of what make various things go boom, and the trail left behind to tell you what it was, then having the evidence in front of you is of no consequence.
We have added more technical material than usual for a general audience as this piece had to also be written for weapons and explosive experts around the world, as they will catch onto this game very fast. Fortunately explosives are an intensively studied field with massive amounts of testing and data collected. The people who look at this stuff in their profession have to be walking encyclopedias of the past research so they can spot a tiny clue in a photo of massive destruction.
We have stepped up to the plate to do this because we have the ability and for the reason I gave Dr. Jim Walsh of MIT’s Securities Studies Program. On a recent Press TV The Debate show on the anniversary of the Nagasaki bombing, I had planned to plug mini-nukes once again as the elephant in the living room of terror threats that the world now faces.
It is also one where there is a total security, media and academic institutional stand down on warning the public about any of this as more than a few countries have and are using these. That group does not include Veterans Today and it never will.
We feel we have a duty to push exposing this threat until the public wakes up that if they don’t get off their butts and start screaming you are going to see more of these happening. We have warned that doing nothing would only embolden those doing this, and we were right.
So I dedicate this article today to “expert” Mr. Walsh who was upset by my mention of the mini-nuke threat to the point of attacking it saying,
“I think this idea that there has been testing of mini-nukes around the world is crazy conspiracy talk. No serious person believes this… there is a test ban treaty that has monitoring testing posts all around the world designed to detect nuclear explosions associated with testing, they have never turned up any of this. I know of no serious person who believes that.”
My context of course, which I am sure Walsh understood, was not in formal testing, but “live” testing…as in on people and targets to demonstrate what they can do and to send a message to someone(s)…and yes…to terrorize people. So Mr. Walsh, excuse me if we don’t consider you and your buddies “serious people” as with you protecting us we are in sad shape. And speaking of that, you and your crowd need to shape up or ship out, sir… Jim W. Dean ]
[ Update: We have a followup
article showing a frame by frame analysis of the explosion video]
_________________________
Within days, aerial photos
revealed the stunning extent of the damage. A steaming black crater marks
ground zero, while the apocalyptic surrounding landscape is charred and
flattened. Rows of burnt-out cars and twisted shipping containers stretch into
the distance on all sides.
The
extent of the devastation is such that it must have been a very big bang
indeed.
The
total burned area spans 20,000 square meters and continues to be dangerous—more
explosions were reported by Chinese authorities on the 15th of
August. Residents within a 3-mile radius have been relocated; at least 85
victims of the accident have been reported dead.
We
were immediately suspicious, such huge explosions have to be viewed with
suspicion these days when tactical nuclear weapons can and are used with
alarming frequency – 9-11, The Khobar Towers, the Haiti Earthquake and most
recently, air dropped on Yemen.
Massive devastation over a wide area.
The mobile phone
as radiation detector
The
key clue that allowed us to identify the use of a nuke in Yemen was the
presence of scintillating pixels – white dots that flashed on and off briefly
in the mobile phone videos of the explosion. The CCD imaging sensor within the
camera phone is being struck by radiation thus causing a pixel to overload and
appear white; in this way a mobile phone can serve double duty as a crude but
effective radiation detector.
When
the Tianjin blast occurred I immediately looked at the mobile phone footage of
the blast and tried to find scintillating pixels; I couldn’t find any, but the
huge white hot fireball and sheer size of the blast effect apparent in the
footage (shaken buildings, breaking windows etc.) certainly didn’t feel like a
conventional explosion to my relatively untrained eyes.
It
was actually VT Contributor and expert on all things nuclear, Jeff Smith who
taught us about scintillating pixels and the use of a mobile phone camera to
detect radiation; therefore I consulted him about the lack of scintillation in
the Tianjin footage:
Scintillation
is based on the distance from the blast. The farther you get away from the
blast the less neutron exposure you get. CCD Cameras will detect scintillation
but only at high levels. They are not sensitive to far field radiation
patterns. All CCD cameras were too far away to be sensitive enough to show
scintillation properly.
So
you have to look at the white out in the centre of the photo. This is where the
brightness is so great that it overloads the ccd pickup chip causing a clipping
effect. The fact that the fireball was whited out or clipped indicates that the
colour temperature was over 4,000 degrees C. Only achievable in a nuclear
blast. The cameras auto gain circuit clips the video level for being too bright
so you get a white out on the screen.
The fireball
with white hot centre.
No
scintillation but a clear piece of evidence indicating a nuclear explosion in
the form of the huge white fireball – once again, mobile phone footage proves
useful in deciphering the truth.
The parking
lots full of toasted cars
As
reports and images became available, we studied them carefully for evidence of
the use of a nuclear weapon and sadly, it was not long before we found it – the
first big clue coming with the pictures of the thousands of toasted cars that
looked eerily like those seen on 9-11.
Thousands of burnt out Volkswagen Beetles close to ground
zero in Tianjin.
While
a layman like myself can recognise the overall similarity, it takes an expert
to fully analyse the evidence contained in the pictures; luckily, at VT we have
such an expert in the erstwhile Jeff Smith who provided the following analysis:
Normal
people are not trained in what to look at so they simply ignore the obvious.
However, once you see enough explosions like this you begin to spot the
artefacts in the photos real fast. Unfortunately all of these people that know
this stuff usually work for the government. Just like I did.
The
big clue is in the ash produced and the exploding radiators on the cars. They
show the radiation and the blast patterns the best. All melted rubber, glass,
and aluminium but no melted steel? This tells you it is from radiation and not
from a gasoline fire. Temps between 1500 degrees C for melting aluminium and
less than 3,000 degrees C for melting steel. Everything organic ashes below 450
degrees C.
This
had a plasma fireball that was over 4,000C! Only a nuke can do that. The clue
is in the white ash leftover from the thermal blast.
White ash caused by the thermal blast covered everything
near ground zero.
A.
The fuel tanks did not explode.
B.
The rubber tires were ashed not burned see the white powder residue around the
cars.
C.
The radiators are all gone; indicating Freon explosions.
D.
All the glass is ashed or melted; also the the glass was blown out not in.
E.
All new white cars show extreme effects from very high temperature heating. The
paint is badly damaged due to a very high oxidation rate effect.
F.
Silicone rubber tires ash at 500 degrees centigrade. Glass ashes at 1500
degrees centigrade. Gasoline at 250 degrees centigrade. Tires melted but no gas
tank explosions; just like on 911.
G.
Yellow Volkswagen Beetle cars untouched due to location indicating radiation
shielding from a nearby building. Just like on 911….
H.
Finally and most important is all of the nano particle sized ash on the ground
everywhere. Purple haze in photo is an indication of toxic levels of the gases
fluorine, chlorine and sodium.
Conclusion;
The damage to the cars was produced by neutron radiation damage and not by
conventional explosives or a fuel-air explosion. The distance from ground zero
is too great for a standard blast to melt the glass and tires. Also the cars
fuel tanks were shielded from the heat of the ignition source.
Purple haze indicating the presence of toxic levels
of the gases fluorine, chlorine and sodium.
So
there you have it, the ‘smoking gun’ evidence of a nuke is to be found among
the smoking wreckage of those incinerated cars. However, the pictures of burnt
out cars contain more evidence to be analysed before we move on to the other
evidence.
The melted
radiators and the role of Freon
As
you can clearly see in the picture below, the radiator of this vehicle has been
completely destroyed, incinerated into ash. Only the steel top plate remains, all of the
aluminium and copper of the radiator core have been turned into a pile of ash.
Once again, our resident expert Jeff Smith was able to provide insight and
analysis of what we are seeing:
Incinerated remains of a car close to ground zero.
All
of the radiators exploded from Freon decomposition into methane, deuterium
fluoride, and phosgene gas; thus causing engine fires – note the melted hoods
and also how overpressure from an air burst explosion has compressed the hoods
of the cars.
The
copper-clad/aluminium automotive radiator is transparent to nuclear radiation.
It acts as a black body hollow-ram neutron reflector and functions just exactly
like its bigger brother the two staged Teller-Ulman H-bomb. What this means is
if you put DT gas or 2HF (Freon) in a vacuum chamber such as a car radiator,
you reduce its density thus it take less energy to either split it or fuse it
when exposed to neutrons, Gamma-rays or even soft x-rays from a nearby nuclear
explosion – if the blast is large enough or close enough.
This
forms the basis of a micro nuclear explosive device, with ignition temperatures
high enough to melt just about anything that comes in contact with it. The key
is in the lower density of the gas making compression of it a lot easier. This
explains all of the melted car air conditioning radiators and follow on fires.
Also the lack of fallout.
Here you can actually see the radiators at the front of
the cars are on fire but the rear of the cars are untouched.
See
Appendix A.
The Crater
at Ground Zero
Once
again, Jeff Smith was able to provide detailed analyses of the available
imagery
of the blast crater at ground zero and the damage to the surrounding area. Jeff
along with Jim stone and others stated that:
This
was NOT an accident, the fracture pattern around the crater proves a to be a
shallow sub ground burst. If it was a sub ground burst, then a small nuclear
weapon is the biggest possibility because once a nuke has to push dirt, the
blinding flash will not be seen. A slightly subsurface detonation would explain
why camera sensors did not get strange artefacts. And if it was not a nuke, it
was something else incredibly huge, but not a fuel air bomb because fuel air
bombs will not leave craters. They also leave an oily carbide residue on
everything.
Even
my layman’s eye can immediately tell that the explosion that caused this level
of devastation was far beyond a mere explosion of stored chemicals. Also, there
were no storage buildings at ground zero, just some stacks of shipping
containers. Also, it is obvious to me that immense heat was present – look at
the gray-white ash everywhere. Jeff was able to explain what I was seeing in
these disturbing images:
A
little bit more of a detailed explanation: If the blast happened at ground
level, almost all of the energy would go upwards and the blast would not have
made a large deep crater, especially one large enough and deep enough to make
that lake. If you look to the right hand side of the lake, you can see fracture
patterns in the earth, which were caused by the earth being compressed sideways
and not downwards. This would only be done with a sub surface blast. After the
blast, the earth bounced back towards the centre of the lake, which opened up
the cracks.
Look
closely at the ground around the lake. Those who claimed it was not a nuke
cited the fact that if it was, everything around the crater would be vaporized
and wiped clean. Now that we have the real crater pic from the big blast, YEP,
it matches that perfectly. Take a look at the containers laying in the lower
left corner of this picture – they have no paint or colour, which means they
had the surfaces incinerated by intense heat only a nuke or other super weapon
would reach. If this was a carbide blast, they would be black or have their
original colours to some degree, complete colour change to only gray proves
this explosion was FREAKING HOT.
That
type and size of blast crater will only happen if a massive bomb goes off a few
feet underground, such as a tactical nuke in a drain pipe which leaves scant
few alternative options. No chemical blast did that, PERIOD. The building that
is still standing in the upper right hand side of the frame is a typical
example of what is left after a nuclear test, concrete buildings seldom get
levelled, but they do get gutted by nuclear blasts. Just look through pictures
of the soviet nuclear tests and you will see this. Bottom line? The aftermath
is completely consistent with a nuclear blast.
Even to the untrained eye, the imagery of the aftermath of this awful event cannot be mistaken as anything other than horriffic; when you also have expert testimony that explains the true nature of what you are seeing the imagery becomes even more shocking and disturbing. Destruction on this scale will become commonplace if the perpetrators are allowed to get away with this as it will signal to all parties possessed of tactical nuclear weapons that it is possible to put them to use without disclosure of that fact by the media. Perhaps more concerning is China’s silence on the nuclear aspect of this great crime – they are still sticking to their story of fire setting off explosions of stored chemicals. As we have shown, this story is about as credible as the one about hijacking airliners with boxcutters; given state control of the media in China, it might be a while before people learn the truth.
Identifying the type of weapon and Seismology of the
event
Now
we have established that a nuclear explosion took place, let us examine more
closely the nature of that explosion. One important question is the delivery
method – was it a strike by a cruise missile or was it a bomb hidden inside a
shipping container? Or is there another answer to this question? The crater
strongly indicates the explosion was sub-surface which appears to rule out the
bomb having been smuggled into Tianjin in a shipping container. It does not
rule out a cruise missile strike however – the ground in this area is very
soft, alluvial deposits of soft silts and clays deposited over time by the
nearby river. A cruise missile impacting this soft ground at over 500mph would
surely penetrate to some depth; if a delayed action fuse was fitted to the
warhead, this would create an shallow underground explosion. Jeff Smith
provides further analysis:
Note
the crater is about 400 feet wide as measured by comparison to the standard
shipping container sizes of 40 feet. The crater is a complex crater with a
cardioid shape indicating a very low altitude or surface contact blast. Side
ways compression of the soil indicates some ground penetration. Penetration
depth of ground is based on soil type and burst height. Horizontal crater size
is roughly equal to ( for every 100 feet, 1 Kiloton in size) see charts. This
would put the blast size depending on air burst altitude to be between 3 and 5
kilotons of explosive power.
Satellite image of Tianjin with overlay of blast radius.
See
Appendix B.
If
it was a low altitude air burst, ground coupling will be less showing a smaller
Richter scale reading than usual. The only question is the fallout issue. Was
there any and of what type. Since it rained after the blast most of the fallout
went out to sea proven by the massive fish kill in the bay. The safety zone was
set at 3 kilometres. This is a correct value for small tactical nuke fallout
range. 1 KM per KT. The only other question was it a uranium weapon a plutonium
based weapon or other i.e. a fusion weapon? Uranium cannot be traced very
well but a PU based weapon can be traced down to the reactor that made it and
the chemical separation process that was used. Firemen were shown carrying
radiation and poisonous gas detectors.
Given
the 3km evacuation zone we can assume an explosive yield of around 3 kilotons.
A typical cruise missile nuclear warhead such as the Israeli ‘Popeye’
carries 6 kilograms of plutonium; using the rule of thumb of 1 kiloton yield
per kilogram of plutonium, the size of the explosion correlates with the yield
of a typical cruise missile warhead.
Jeff
also noticed that a secondary blast took place; this is another indicator of
the nuclear nature of this event, as Jeff explains:
Well
it looks like there were two major blasts not just one. There are two sections
of the video where the blast whites out the entire camera. This is the original
neutron burst going off; everything else is a secondary or the atmosphere
heating up and burning.
Note:
The reaction caused, a sustained glowing in the sky which is a well known
indicator of a nuclear explosion. Non-nuclear weapons do not provide a
sustained “Sun-like” illumination because they do not have enough energy to
ignite the oxygen and nitrogen in the atmosphere.
Another
aspect that requires study is the seismology readings of the event.. Once
again, Jeff provides some insight:
The
first blast registered 2.3 on the Richter scale and the second 2.9.
Eyewitnesses described what felt like a quake. USGS geophysicist John Bellini
says seismographs detect man-made explosions in quarries all the time, but
usually surface explosions are not detected very well because most of their
energy dissipates upward into the air. The fact is that the Tianjin explosions
registered a seismographic event that had as much energy as a small earthquake.
One can reasonably conclude that unlike a surface explosion of chemicals, this
kinetic energy released underground was caused by a powerful penetration of the
surface.
In
this article we have tried to provide a thorough but clear and concise analysis
of the available evidence and show that it is clear that this was no simple
fire in a chemical storage depot that resulted in an explosion but rather it
was the detonation of a nuclear weapon of unknown type by an unknown
party. We will examine the who and why in a follow-up article.
This
is a very significant event that will undoubtedly prove to be of great
importance in subsequent world events. In many ways, this is China’s 9-11.
Let
us all hope that unlike 9-11, the Nuking of Tianjin does not become the cassus
belli for a whole series of unjustified, brutal and bloody conflicts.
One
thing is already very clearly illustrated by this tragic event – the gloves are
most definitely off when it comes to the use of tactical nuclear weapons; we
are living in an new nuclear age where a great number of countries possess the
means to create and deploy tactical nukes and most worrying of all, these low
yield weapons can be used and have already been used without fear of
mutually assured destruction; the doctrine that prevented the Cold War from
going nuclear. This makes the world a much more dangerous place and undoubtedly
means we will see many more nuclear explosions in future.
There
is an old Chinese curse – “may you live in interesting times”; these are
certainly ‘interesting’ times for anyone who is paying attention to events in
China.
See
Appendix C for further reading and reference materials.
Appendix A:
An
introduction to the physical principles of thermonuclear explosive devices
would be incomplete did it not give at least a cursory overview of the
different approaches to igniting thermonuclear
micro-explosions.
A
thermonuclear micro-explosion is an explosive release of thermonuclear energy
many orders of magnitude smaller than from a thermonuclear weapon. To achieve
this goal, the fission trigger must be replaced by some other means of
producing the required ignition temperature, but in a much smaller volume and
without the large energy release.
The
possibility of thermonuclear micro-explosions is itself a consequence of two
facts: first, the fact that the minimum volume to make a thermonuclear
explosion is given by the range of the charged
fusion
products \ 0 , and, second, scaling. At solid densities and thermonuclear
temperatures the range is of the order of a few centimeters and, is inversely
proportional to the density p of the thermonuclear explosive. We can therefore
write for this range.
X0
= a/p, a — const.
For
the DT reaction we easily find that the minimum ignition energy is about 108
Joules. To obtain a useful gain the output energy should be at least ~ 100
times larger, that is, 1010 Joules = 10 n erg, which corresponds to the
explosive power of approximately 2 tons of TNT.
The
ignition energy can be substantially reduced by increasing the density of the
thermonuclear explosive. However, since for p > p, the compression to higher
densities also requires energy, the input energy is in reality larger than the
value given by Eq. (132).
The
time r to deposit the energy in the target is given by r ^ r/v, where v is the
thermal expansion velocity of the thermonuclear plasma of radius r, which is a
function only of the temperature.
Appendix B:
From Veterans Today @ http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/08/25/confirmation-tianjin-was-nuked/
For more information about nuclear weapons see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/nuclear%20weapons
- Scroll down
through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
Do you LIKE this uniquely informative site?
A genuinely incapacitated invalid maintains, writes, edits,
researches, illustrates, moderates and publishes this website from a tiny cabin
in a remote forest.
Now that most people use ad blockers and view these posts
on phones and other mobile devices, sites like this earn an ever shrinking
pittance from advertising sponsorship.
This site needs your help.
Like what you see? Please give
anything you can -
Contribute any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!
(You can use a card securely if you don’t use Paypal)
Please click below -
And it costs nothing
to share this post on Social Media!
Dare to care and
share - YOU are our only advertisement!
Videos - https://youtu.be/4Ps17ohzNco
For further enlightening
information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @
the top left of http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
And see
New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati
New Illuminati Youtube Channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/playlists
New Illuminati’s OWN Youtube Videos
-
New Illuminati on Google+ @ For
New Illuminati posts - https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RamAyana0/posts
New Illuminati on Twitter @ www.twitter.com/new_illuminati
New Illuminations –Art(icles) by
R. Ayana @ http://newilluminations.blogspot.com
The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com
DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide
a live link to your original material on your site (and links via social
networking services) - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps
spread your info further!
This site
is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT (unless an
individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright
holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged - if you
give attribution to the work & author and include all links in the original
(along with this or a similar notice).
Feel free
to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you
never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember
attribution!
If you
like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large)
or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…
Live long
and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible worlds…
From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
