new illuminati: keelynet

Showing posts with label keelynet. Show all posts

Sunday, 27 December 2009

Free Energy from Micro-Combustion: The Clem Engine Reborn

The Clem Engine Reborn

Free Energy from Micro-Combustion

by Jerry W. Decker - 11/08/09 for keelynet.com

Usually I hate recaps, where a book or article will consist of the first 80% being history, making the reader wait for the meat of the story, ‘where’s the beef indeed’. So I’ll keep my recap as brief as possible since NEXUS readers usually know these things from their own researches. Bear in mind what you are about to read has been pieced together from various anecdotal information over the years.

The closest I’d yet come to anyone directly associated with the Clem engine was when I tracked down his daughter Teresa (thanks to investigative funding from Ken in Las Vegas) and met with her and her two adult children. It’s a long story and you can read all that I had gathered over the years at KeelyNet.com, or go directly to the Clem files and it will take you to the Index page which lists four files.

What exactly was the Clem Engine you might ask?

Back in the mid-1970s, gifted inventor Richard Clem was working for the city of Dallas, operating heavy equipment when he noticed that a heated asphalt sprayer for paving streets would continue running for many minutes after the gas engine was turned off. This aroused his natural curiosity and from this, he designed and built a closed system engine that was purported to generate 350 HP and run itself. The engine weighed about 200 pounds and ran on cooking oil at temperatures of 300 F..

Richard installed the engine in a modified automobile chassis and drove the car up and down Central Expressway in Dallas, around the area and even took a trip to El Paso and back. This sensational discovery was in the news at the time and even on local Dallas television.

I was told the engine consisted of a cone mounted on a horizontal axis (we later were told it was vertical). The shaft which supported the cone was hollow and the cone had spiraling channels cut into it.

These spiraling pathways wound around the cone terminating at the cone base in the form of nozzles (rim jets). Construction of the engine was from off the shelf components except for the hollow shaft and the custom cone with the enclosed spiral channels.

When fluid was pumped into the hollow shaft at pressures ranging from 300-500 PSI (pounds per square inch), it moved into the closed spiraling channels of the cone and exited from the nozzles. This action added to the spin of the cone. As the velocity of the fluid increased, so did the rotational speed of the cone.

As the speed continued to increase, the fluid heated up, requiring a heat exchange and filtering process. At a certain velocity, the rotating cone became independent of the drive system and began to operate of itself. The engine ran at speeds of 1800 to 2300 RPM. Literally capturing a ‘tornado in a box’.

Shortly after, the inventor died from a heart attack and I was told his papers and models were removed (later we found out his second wife sent them all to the dumpground as trash!), the son of the inventor is said to have taken the only working model of the machine to a farm near Dallas. There it was buried under 10 feet of concrete and has supposedly been running at that depth for several years. So I was told by Al Holman, my first source.

In later conversations, our contact says the engine had been tested by Bendix Corporation. The test involved attaching the engine to a dynamometer to measure the amount of horsepower generated by the engine in its self-running mode.

It generated a consistent 350HP, (actually it was 325HP) for 9 consecutive days which astounded the engineers at Bendix. They concluded the only source of energy which could generate this much power in a CLOSED SYSTEM over an extended period must be of an atomic nature, or a small hidden internal combustion engine.

I I really question both of these because anything atomic would require many feet of heavy, thick lead shielding and the small engine suspicion makes no sense because 1HP = 746Watts, so 325 HP is about 243KW. We all know how big a gas or diesel powered home emergency power generator is and they only produce 3-10KWs, so I have to discount both of these speculations for power generation.

As the years have passed, we have accumulated slightly more information, such as the fact that he first tried engine oil but found it would break down too soon due to the high heat produced by the engine, so he used Mazola cooking oil which would operate over many months at the requisite +300 degrees F..

Roughly four years have passed with no new information coming in about the Clem engine until around Halloween of 2009. The KeelyNet.com server crashed and was down for four days so I consulted with longtime friend and associate Dan York and ended up switching the keelynet.com domain name over to hostgator.com where I rented server space, thanks to advice from another longtime, close friend Paul Carlson. I received many emails wanting to know what happened and since my email was also on Dan’s server, I couldn’t answer until I was setup at hostgator.

One of those emails asked what happened to the pictures of the red car that Clem built. I responded explaining I was having to reload all the files so it might take some time. Within the next day or so, I had the Clem files back up and received another email from this guy Jim Ray, who said he was an ex-aerospace engineer. He said he knew Clem and had some inside information if I was interested, well DUH! I emailed him my phone number and he called up that afternoon. He told me he worked with Richard Clem for awhile and helped him build motor #4 which couldn’t duplicate the efficiency of the original motor that Clem destroyed after the death and bomb threats. Just when he thought he’d figured it out, he died the next day.

From the Social Security Death Index;

Richard Clem
Born Oct. 30th, 1928
Died May 1978
Last known address Lewisville, Denton, Texas
SSN 460-20-8591

According to daughter Teresa, Clem’s second wife had trashed all of his work and sold off his equipment. Teresa told me she managed to get a working blueprint but Jim says he doubts it because Clem was very paranoid and refused to write down anything that would reveal his secret. That made some sense except Teresa told me she often helped her dad draw up plans and she had one of those drawings, yet when I met with her, she said she had signed a contract with her lawyer and a professor at some local university but admitted none of them had a clue as to how the engine worked.

Following this first phone call from Jim Ray, we exchanged many emails and he sent me about 20 documents of his company’s work (Micro-Combustion, Inc.) with what he knew of the Clem engine and how he had taken it much further, building several working models, which were tested and validated by NASA and by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Jim is President of Micro-Combustion, Inc. and I have been in extensive correspondence with him both to create a website with the intention of getting the word out about this discovery and plans to finally get this engine on the market.

We finally got all the documents posted except one and are now in the processing of tweaking it for a bit of additional information and cosmetic improvements.

If you want to learn more about this rebirth of the Clem motor, please visit Micro-Combustion.com and read the various documents. Let me quote from the History page of the website;

“The first engine built by Richard Clem was an engine he built and tested in his shop. That engine had no control valves or any means of controlling the RPMs, or closing off the fluid flow from the hydraulic pump. On the first test, it started running faster and faster, and that was when Richard cleared the shop. The engine RPMs continued to increase until it blew up.

For further information Google “keelynet clem” and review photos of Clem cars and engines. Find the photos with the two cars (one red and one in the grass) and the original engine with numbers.

The second engine was built with control valves for controlling the fluid flow, and installed in the red car depicted in the photos. That car was an old Ford. It was driven around town and eventually discarded when the crankshaft twisted beyond repair. Richard was also afraid that Ford Motor Company would lay claim to his engine. Needless to say, Richard was very protective and very secretive about his invention.

The third engine was placed in the old car body sitting in the grass. This is the car that was demonstrated at the Texas State Fair, where the news media rode on the back and Boyd Matson of a local Dallas TV station drove it. This demonstration received national and international attention.

It was at this time that Richard started to receive many threats on his life including bomb scares. Jim Ray, now president of Micro-Combustion, was there and witnessed most of it, including one bomb scare. Then someone came down from Washington and verified what Richard had built and demonstrated, and stated that he would not live thirty days if he did not destroy the engine. He did so but hid some of the crucial parts in an old scrap iron pile located in the back of his shop.

The Bendix Corporation sent down two people to test the engine for emissions or any particulate for 9 days straight 24 hours per day.

A group of people came over from Taiwan and took moving pictures of the car running up and down the road.

Engine #4 was the one on which Mr. Ray assisted, including getting some of the old parts from the scrap iron pile. It was built and put in the same old car in the grass because Richard had now removed any trace of the serial numbers from that car frame and body. This fourth engine was considered the new improved version of his “Hydraulic Motor”. It was more difficult to start; in fact the battery-powered starter would not start. Jim Ray then pushed Richard up and down the road driving his old work truck to get the old car engine started. This engine would not run very long before going dead.

Richard died before he could figure out where he had gone wrong from the first generation engines. He also never determined the chemistry or physics of the engine, and had never developed it far enough to prove out all the scientific knowledge and engineering theories for purposes of patent and commercialization.

Jim was with Richard one Saturday afternoon and he stated that he thought he had figured out where he had gone wrong. The next morning Richard had a heart attack and died. As previously stated, this engine was different from the first three, as validated by a third party from San Antonio.

Several years and many different configurations later, Mr. Ray duplicated this particular engine and then tried over a period of several years to figure out what the first engine’s actual configuration was and how it was different from this new generation engine. However, this engine was the one that produced 10 hp of torque as documented by NASA and Oak Ridge National Energy Lab in 2004 in South Louisiana.

It was in 2005 that a NASA scientist and Jim Ray saw on the Internet the picture of the actual first engine (the turbine) and noticed it had a double chamber.

As the president of Micro-Combustion he then figured out how to build this engine with the double chamber, but did not have sufficient funds or shop capability to complete or rebuild this design, instead concentrating on the physics and chemistry of the original engine.

Richard had claimed that it was perpetual motion but since there is no such thing Jim felt there was some unknown factor in the equation of the Laws of Physics.

The company has now postulated a theory complying with these equations and Laws of Physics as to what made Richard’s engine run without air induction and/or combustion of any given amount or type of fuel. Please see the paper by Dr. John Scott and Jim Ray entitled “Dissociation of the Molecules in the Vapor of a Bubble Produced in the Process of Cavitation”.

Jim Ray continued to study the Clem engines, and years later, after the forming of Micro-Combustion, Inc., continued to better understand the principles behind its operation. Patent applications were filed and have since been updated with the important discoveries of Drs. Nguyen and Scott (see Articles and Tests).”

So you can see the progression over time has been a long and hard fought battle to document and validate the Molecular Dissociation process using micro-bubble cavitation. Another quote from the micro-combustion.com website will further elucidate how the engine works;

“The Cavitation-Ignition Bubble Combustion (CIBC) engine is a new discovery in green energy technology that holds the potential to replace fossil fuel altogether. The basic idea behind this new engine is simple but revolutionary:

it utilizes a small air bubble in a fluid (the fuel) as the combustion chamber to compress, ignite, and capture the energy (heat) released by the combustion of the fuel-air contents of the bubble.

The fuel also happens to be the working fluid, which drives the turbine blades to extract power. The CIBC engine can run on just about any liquid hydrocarbon fuel, including plant, mineral, or recycled oils.

Although the CIBC engine can operate on petroleum-based fuels, they are not required. Its ability to operate on alternative liquid fuels holds the potential, if fully realized, to transform the transportation sector by reducing or eliminating our nation’s reliance on domestic or imported petroleum-based fuels.”

One more quote to give you an idea of the enormity of this work and how it will affect the world once the engines are put into production;

Advantages of the Micro-Combustion CIBC Engine:

1. Combustion of a small vapor/air bubble hydro-dynamically.

2. Not mechanically grounded.

3. Does not emit greenhouse gases (Produces but doesn’t emit).

4. Hydraulic and rotary in operating principle.

5. No need for fossil fuel.

6. No need for refined fuel.

7. Can use any type of oil or fluids in an unrefined state, even used waste oils.

8. Compatible with our present service depot infrastructure.

9. No exotic materials required.

10. Very few moving parts.

11. Compact and light weight.

12. Low cost to manufacture.

13. High peak temperature – higher than Otto cycle (Automobile) or Diesel.

14. More efficient than internal combustion engine or Diesel.

15. Bubble proper is combustion chamber.

16. Bubble combustion heat isolated from material by working fluid.

17. Universal in usage applications, including automotive.

18. Can be downsized without compromising power output.

19. Engine operating principle and function is similar to that of an inertia wheel.

20. Fuel is plentiful, cheap, convenient, and totally domestic without requiring or consuming any additional food source such as ethanol or other bio-fuels.

As you can see, this engine is for real and is the next incarnation of the original Richard Clem engine. You have no idea of the elation I felt when I learned of this thanks to Jim Ray and Rob Woods. It has been so many years digging, studying, collecting and sharing information hoping that one day it would yield a rediscovery of the Clem engine and so it has happened.

Well, let’s not be premature, as a matter of fact, I won’t be satisfied until these motors are in use everywhere.

No doubt you can see many correlations throughout history and today, Keely’s Molecular Dissociation and his Cavitation Engine, Schauberger’s Implosion Engine the Zokwendle, Griggs Hydrosonics and several more which adds that much more credence to this new Clem Engine understanding.

"Sonoluminescence can occur when a sound wave of sufficient intensity induces a gaseous cavity within a liquid to collapse quickly. This cavity may take the form of a pre-existing bubble, or may be generated through a process known as cavitation.

Spectral measurements have given bubble temperatures in the range from 2300 K to 5100 K (3680.33F. to 8720.33F.), the exact temperatures depending on experimental conditions including the composition of the liquid and gas. Detection of very high bubble temperatures by spectral methods is limited due to the opacity of liquids to short wavelength light characteristic of very high temperatures.

Writing in Nature, chemists David J. Flannigan and Kenneth S. Suslick describe a method of determining temperatures based on the formation of plasmas. Using argon bubbles in sulfuric acid, their data show the presence of ionized molecular oxygen O2+, sulfur monoxide, and atomic argon populating high-energy excited states, which confirms a hypothesis that the bubbles have a hot plasma core. The ionization and excitation energy of dioxygenyl cations, which they observed, is 18 electronvolts. From this they conclude the core temperatures reaches at least 20,000 Kelvin (35540.33F.)." - Wikipedia Source

That is really a 'dry heat'! And who would have thought you could produce that kind of temperature in a liquid environment? So much for heat, now let's find out about sonoluminescent pressure;

"The high resolution multibubble sonoluminescence (MBSL) spectra arising from the ultrasonic irradiation of metal carbonyls and other volatile metal- containing compounds dissolved in silicone oil saturated with helium or argon are reported. These MBSL spectra showed that the pressure within the bubble at the point of emission was on the order of 300 bar (300 bar = 4,351.1321402 pounds/square inch) in argon- saturated silicone oil, which is consistent with simple adiabatic compression during cavitation." - Pressure during sonoluminescence

Of course modern science slowly catches up yet rarely acknowledges the original discoverers of phenomena years ahead of their time. Keely reported blue flashes of light from his acoustic focusing devices which we now call sonoluminescence.

Now tell me you can't imagine how Keely could have used focused soundwaves and tuned resonators to produce hmmm....light....pressure...heat....MOTIVE FORCE?

Also a direct correlation between sonoluminescence and standing waves is the animation in the left column of the keelynet.com page. It is a representation of how the aether/zpe influx reflects from Keely's Neutral Center to form a standing wave. Very similar to a sonoluminescent bubble and the formation by the SUCTION of cavitation and it's collapse to produce intense heat and pressure.

It is the aether/zpe influx which cascades into the neutral center and is reflected outwards to form the boundary of all matter to create what is called mass, gravity, time, weight and indeed, reality, all of which are encompassed in this seminal singularity animation.

In the terms used by Keely in the late 1800's, he referred to this standing wave boundary as;

'This far shalt thou go, and no further.'

Also see Matter as Bubbles in the Aether - "The occultists labour the point that instead of matter being solid within an empty insubstantial aether, the aether itself is VERY DENSE (one thousand million times denser than platinum, according to Oliver Lodge's estimate), and matter is REALLY JUST BUBBLES-the ABSENCE OF AETHER. The 19th century concepts underlying this occult cosmology are easily visualized in terms of liquid in a cylinder.

Fizzing can be induced if the piston is moved; thus did Cosmic Fohat - Superforce - induce a quantum-vacuum transition (Mulaprakriti to Koilon), releasing energy which tore the aether apart into numerous 'subatomic particles' - BUBBLES - which we see as substantial even though they are, in fact, THE ABSENCE OF SUBSTANCE. Thus was matter SUCKED INTO EXISTENCE in the cosmic expansion. Paul Davies writes that "what appears as empty space is actually a seething ferment....of quantum activity, teeming with [ghost] VIRTUAL PARTICLES and full of complex interactions. ....A real particle...must be always viewed against this backdrop of frenetic activity."

And let's not forget cold fusion, which really isn't 'cold' since the goal is to produce intense, sustained heat for the production of steam to run generators. Do you see all the tie-ins to this fascinating Micro-Bubble Cavitation Combustion discovery?

Imagine an engine the size of a basketball running your car, truck, boat, etc.. And it is scaleable, meaning the bigger it is the more power it produces so we could power trains, shipping freighters, even airplanes, but the best part is to hook it up to a generator and produce all the power for your home.

Finally we could get off the grid which would lead us toward the mythical ‘Autonomous Home’ where you generate all the power you need for heating, air conditioning, cooking, condensing water from the air and dissociating waste. But we still would want, though not truly NEED; internet access, cable tv and cellphones or Skype via the internet.

My dreams of a Utopia grow closer every month, free energy, gravity control, electronic or biological ways to heal and rejuvenate the body and one day I see robot factories mining other planets to produce unlimited goods at no cost to anyone.

This rebirth of the Clem Engine in the form of the ‘Cavitation-Ignition Bubble Combustion (CIBC) Engine’ by the good folks at Micro-Combustion, Inc. is a major stepping stone on that path and I will do all I can to help them complete their work and get these amazing engines on the market. Don’t forget, check out the Micro-Combustion, Inc. website at micro-combustion.com. It is the biggest ‘green’ thing I can think of getting involved with.

Additional Information

I checked out the patent application and found it fascinating. Some of the drawings were so reminescent of the original Clem Engine drawing that I just had to produce a graphic showing these similarities;

Here are the Original Clem files on KeelyNet

~ Check out full details at Micro-Combustion, Inc. ~

From http://keelynet.com/energy/clemreborn.html

For further enlightenment enter a word or phrase into the search box @ New Illuminati:

http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

or http://newilluminati.blog-city.com (this one only works with Firefox)

And see

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com

New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

New Illuminati on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-Illuminati/320674219559

The Prince of Centraxis – http://centraxis.blogspot.com

This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright (unless an individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

Saturday, 12 September 2009

Something from Nothing Revisited: Free Energy

Something from Nothing Revisited

by Jerry Decker

Most mainstreamers have the erroneous conception that alternative science fans, experimenters and researchers are looking to 'create' something from nothing in order to provide power necessary to run their perpetual motion machines or free energy devices. The majority of people I know and communicate with are seeking one thing, a working free energy or gravity control device. Something we all can see, test, build (or buy) and use to make all of our lives easier.

It gets ever more tedious having to explain and correct people who write or call in, calling me and others who think along similar lines flakes, fools, idiots or other choice insults. They haven't bothered to study the very subjects they are ranting against, they haven't bothered to ask questions, follow any discussions or read any documents relating to the subject. Yet they have no problem writing rude or insulting letters, full of ad hominem attacks, believing themselves to be the possessor of all that is right and true.

Where does the error lie?

I've often thought of writing up a webpage explaining it in terms and analogies the 'critics' can understand, so that is what this page is attempting to do. This paper is intended to address four key points which I consider as the basis for all energy production;

1) the concept of aether/zpe
2) creation of energy from nothing
3) thermodynamics
4) conversion

the 'Lost Aether' now called ZPE (zero point energy)

Purists prefer the term Aether but I think the term should be used interchangeably with the newer ZPE, also called the spacetime metric or vacuum energy. It is spelled with an A to avoid confusion with the chemical ether. Much like the popular 'Browns' gas' which was essentially stolen from Dr. Rhodes who patented it in 1966 and has continued with additional research, I think the cleanest, most rational thing to do at this late stage is to call it 'Hydroxy gas' as used during WWII and earlier. Because of such confusions, I choose to use the term Aether in combination to form 'Aether/ZPE' and so include the old and the new.

In a nutshell, aether/zpe is the energetic 'quantum foam' of space. It permeates and sustains the universe. It pops in and out of existence in a ceaseless 'jitter' and in its wake produces the effect of gravity, other energies and the localizations (condensations of energy) that produce matter. Just as E=MC^ where matter can be exploded to produce immense forces, so too can energy be coalesced and condensed to produce matter. It has been detected by Casimir as an immense pressure by the forces exerted on two dielectric plates and erroneously described as an 'attraction' as extracted from this rectifying chaos file;

The Casimir force is a short range attraction between any two objects caused by...electromagnetic fluctuations in the vacuum. ... any two plates, whether conductor or dielectrics, would experience a fourth power force law ... also proportional to the dielectric constant of the plates. ... The equations are only valid down to a separation distance proportional to the minimum wavelength at which the plates are still a good conductor or the dielectric constant is not unity. For distances closer than that ... attractive force will ... increase ... at a rate proportional to the third power of the separation distance. ... The closest separation distance ...[that has been attained is 14 Angstroms]... (about five atoms) with two crossed cylinders of mica.... ...the measured force between the two mica cylinders was over ten tons per square meter!

I won't belabor the explanation of aether/zpe with all the information available on the net but I do want to make one other point. Nature seeks equilibrium. When equilibrium is disturbed, it produces polarization, a separation into two distinct forces, a positive - pressure wave and a negative - vacuum wave, both of which seek to rejoin in order to achieve an equilibrium that matches the ambient environment. Whenever you have polarities, you have a gradient for each polarity. This gradient can be thought of as having the greatest inensity on the outside of the wave where it is furthest from the ambient zero reference when both are at equilbrium.

Gravity decreases as you ascend from the earth. In this case, it means it is strongest nearest the earth. Therefore, you have a gradient which can be tapped to use the gravity increase over distance (height) to produce work. Aether/ZPE being omnipresent also has densities that are gradients. The Casimir plates do not push together when even an inch apart, but place them within 14 angstroms and the pushing of the ambient ZPE forces them together with a pressure of 10 tons per square meter as earlier quoted. Do not tons convert to pressure? Can we not take advantage of this pressure as Maclay is attempting under the auspices of his $300,000 NASA grant? There is a new science coming which will revolutionize the world in ways we cannot now imagine.

the Creation of Energy error

This first issue deals with the commonly held consensus that we seek;

Something from Nothing
and are attempting to create energy.

The standard erroneous statement made by orthodox science goes as far back as Newton where Sir Isaac Newton once observed:

"The seekers after perpetual motion are trying to get something from nothing."

To my view and in my communications with many others, nothing could be further from the truth. No one that I have ever communicated with has ever suggested that energy was being created. Instead, many of us believe it is possible to extract energy from the repulsion/attraction of magnetism, from gravity and from the omnipresent aether/zpe. But let us not limit our seeking to just 3 sources, but expand it to include ANY ENERGY OR FORCE GRADIENT, knowing that the polarities, when placed in the proper arrangement, MUST COMBINE to create the natural condition of equilibrium. As the polarities move to recombine, we intend to guide them through the wheelwork of our machinery to do practical work. It also might be possible to tap into the force which causes the equilibrium disruption in the first place since there is an expansion and a collapse cycle to any equilibrium disturbance.

'Irreversible Entropy' and 'Closed Systems'

The two major errors made by modern science is sticking to the BELIEF in the 1st and 2nd 'laws' of thermodynamics; The 1st law states;

The total energy, including heat, in a (closed) system is conserved. By ``closed'', we mean a system that is completely cut-off, or insulated from its surroundings, so that no material or energy enters or leaves.

The 2nd law states;

...for a spontaneous process, there is a net increase in entropy. The second law is possibly the most misunderstood scientific principle. The two most obvious misuses are;

1. Perpetual motion machines

2. The statement "Evolution is impossible since entropy can't decrease".

With regard to point #1;

there IS no closed system possible with materials and forces currently available (at least publicly) that can prevent the passage of aether/zpe and GRAVITY into the so-called 'closed' system,

ergo, additional forces from outside the box and which pass into and through the box are necessarily injecting extra energy INSIDE the box which can be intercepted and converted to add energy to the closed system. Can anyone deny that gravity permeates the box? If it did not, the box would float off into space with nothing to hold it down. Would it not follow that an aether/zpe would also permeate the closed system? We must learn to CONVERT or TRANSLATE that additional energy (aether/zpe, gravity, whatever) into a form that we can use, i.e, mechanical, electric, etc..

This is what many so-called perpetual motion and free energy machines do and which many of us at KeelyNet are trying to replicate for practical use worldwide. With regard to point #2 under the 2nd law, the claim states there is ALWAYS a net INCREASE in entropy which drags the system down into chaos and causes it to eventually stop, meaning entropy is irreversible, there CAN BE NO restorative, rejuvenating force. Under currently undefined conditions, it should be possible to adjust the performance characteristics of a system so the operation involves the least possible resistance as well as taking advantage of the introduction (and conversion to other forms) of outside energy (per 'law' #1) in the form of gravity, aether/zpe, etc..

To my view, it appears everything keys into a wave or motion where one half of that wave or motion is positive, under 'pressure' and adds power, the other side is negative, has 'vacuum' and extracts power. If the energy is already separated from the natural state of equilibrium, then most of our work is DONE. Why? Because it is the natural RECOMBINING of these polarities back to a state of equilibrium that will provide the 'work' we can use to carry out practical applications. In the case of gravity, it already has a gradient so is immensely available for tapping under the right configuration.

In the case of aether/zpe, which pops into and out of existence, we need to learn to detect its appearance and capture it. This might be possible to capture as the original unknown force that separates the vacuum in the first place as well as the collapse of the wave back to its state of equilibrium. When you think about an expansion wave versus a collapsing wave, there might be properties quite opposite each other and which deal with the claims of a 'cold current' where sparking wires produce frost and circuits tapping this form of energy produce cold in the local area. However, that is beyond the scope of this paper. With aether/zpe, it is a matter of rectification of the energy as it appears and begins to collapse. This can be tapped to produce mechanical or electrical forces, where the separated, polarized energies can be guided into a single form of either pure positive or pure negative. This is dealt with in my paper on rectifying chaos.

Conversion vs Creation

Now for the crux of all this verbiage, the contention that free energy enthusiasts claim to create something from nothing. That is an error. We are trying to CONVERT gravity and other ambient forces into mechanical and/or electrical energy that can do work. Its not such a brain stretcher. In fact, WE DEPEND ON CONVERSION from one form of energy to another in our everyday lives, for some examples, we;

1) convert the motion of a magnetic field past a copper coil into electrical current
2) convert wind energy to electrical energy or mechanical force
3) convert water energy to electrical energy or mechanical force
4) convert geothermal energy to electrical energy or mechanical force
5) convert gasoline and other combustibles to explosive force or to heat or to light
6) nature converts sunlight and heat into life itself with the right mix of nutrients

None of these produce 'something from nothing', it is the CONVERSION of something to something ELSE. From one form of energy to another form of energy. Is it so hard to comprehend the CONVERSION of gravity, aether/zpe or other gradients into other useful forces??? One bugaboo we face is proving the existence of aether/zpe in a practical, reproducible and simple experiment that anyone can do and which will undeniably show the presence of aether/zpe. That does not apply to gravity which one day we will learn to tap when we discover how to overbalance a wheel as Johannes Bessler did or when we learn to reduce the intensity of gravity under one half of a wheel so it will be continually over-balanced and 'fall into itself'. There is no question gravity is a force and we do in fact tap it through the flow of water over a dam to produce mechanical power converted to electrical current in hydroelectric installations.

The overbalancing principle used by Bessler and probably others is the key to the whole thing. It is important to bear in mind that with an influx of energy from space such as gravity, there must be a gradient as it increases with proximity to the earth. Where there is a gradient there is a difference of potential. When there is a difference of potential, you have the natural flow of the two potentials trying to rejoin to re-establish equilibrium. In this case it is the attraction of gravity towards the earth. It is the force exerted by nature in 'her' attempt at regaining equilibrium that we must learn to tap. Since there is a natural overbalance due to the gradient, ...if we can lower the resistance of the recovery side of the circuit or design ...to a level less than the additional energy imparted from the pressurized side of the gradient, ...then we achieve first unity, then overunity.

We have the Casimir effect to show the pressure of aether/zpe to the tune of 10 tons per square meter, a tremendous amount of energy that forces the dielectric plates together. This should be capable of 'conversion' to produce work as practical applications. Lambertsons WIN cell, at least the samples I saw, use a rubbery insulator looking something like silicone caulk so that the plates slap together from the pressurized high side of the wave, then when the vacuum release side of the wave comes into play, the rubber pushes the plates apart to 'recock' or 'reload' it for the next pressure wave that again collapses it.

The machines that will present a problem requiring very long term monitoring and measurement are those like Bedinis and the Gray motor which use very little electrical energy to get a large mechanical force, thus extending the life of the battery far longer than is normal. John Bedini says he has machines in his basement that have been running for years on a single battery...he says Bearden visited once and accidentally bumped into a battery which had been running a machine for years, the battery fell apart and was dried out inside, but the machine kept running....ask him, he'll tell you that himself.

The bottom line is the device must produce sufficient energy to recharge the driving circuit, otherwise over a very long period of time it will run down as it proves out to be an extended pendulum effect where a clockspring, once wound will eventually run down unless it can somehow rewind itself, something that every branch of physics says cannot happen due to the 1st and 2nd laws. In Bedinis' case, as I understand it, the battery is recharged in a negentropic, negative resistance effect peculiar to his machines. Research done by Prigogine and others in the fields of chaos theory, criticality, dissipative structures and self-organizing fields are shedding light on how such processes work which will I think become key design components when the first reproducible self-running free energy circuit is publicly released and duplicated worldwide.

One final comment, some think simple experiments are wasted time, effort, money and resources. They take the approach that 'its all been done before' and so is well understood, therefore don't bother doing experiments, don't tinker, don't try anything that hasn't been proven. Another frequent comment is what good are 'anomalies', tiny effects that have no possible use. What good is running a magnet past a wire because it only produces a tiny current? Has that not been scaled up with bigger magnets and more coils to produce massive electrical power? What good is burning a few drops of gasoline or oil only useful for lighting? Has that kind of thinking not been disproven by exploding the expanded gas or oil in a closed cylinder to transport our nation?

There are of course, many more obvious 'anomalies' which have changed the world by perceptive people willing to experiment, share and expand on what has been found. Many of our most useful processes resulted from these simple, useless anomalies. For that reason, KeelyNet has always urged people to experiment wherever possible, even repeating supposedly 'known' experiments with the possibility you might experience something no one else noticed, or you might build your own version of a 'known' experiment that could well produce an interesting anomaly which could be scaled up for the next big discovery. If nothing else, you are building up your equipment, skills and understanding that will help you with future projects and experiments. So before you write an email criticizing 'free energy' seekers, you might also write the providers and users of windpower, solar power, hydroelectric, geothermal and anyone who drives a car, mows a lawn or runs a magnet past a coil to produce electrical current, since they are producing energy from nothing and need to be corrected with your 'laws'.

Post a Useful comment Rectifying Chaos to www.keelynet.com

Your (Mostly) Dead Predecessors

"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." (Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895)

"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." (Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943)

"There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in their home." (Ken Olsen, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977)

"The telephone has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us." (Western Union internal memo, 1876)

"Airplanes are interesting toys but of no military value." (Marshal Ferdinand Foch, French commander of Allied forces during the closing months of World War I, 1918)

"The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?" (David Sarnoff's associates, in response to his urgings for investment in radio in the 1920's)

"Professor Goddard does not know the relation between action and reaction and the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react. He seems to lack the basic knowledge ladled out daily in high schools." (New York Times editorial about Robert Goddard's revolutionary rocket work, 1921)

"Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?" (Harry M. Warner, Warner Brothers, 1927) "Everything that can be invented has been invented." (Charles H. Duell, commissioner, US Office of Patents, 1899)

"The [flying] machine will eventually be fast; they will be used in sport, but they are not to be thought of as commercial carriers." --Octave Chanute, aviation pioneer, 1904.

"The ordinary 'horseless carriage' is at present a luxury for the wealthy; and although its price will probably fall in the future, it will never come into as common use as the bicycle." --The Literary Digest, 1889.

"[It] is, of course, altogether valueless.... Ours has been the first, and will doubtless be the last, party of whites to visit this profitless locality." --Lt. Joseph D. Ives, Corps of Topographical Engineers, 1861, on the Grand Canyon.

"Landing and moving around on the moon offer so many serious problems for human beings that it may take science another 200 years to lick them." --Science Digest, August, 1948.

"X rays are a hoax." "Aircraft flight is impossible." "Radio has no future." --Physicist and mathematician Lord Kelvin (1824-1907)

"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." --Thomas Watson, Chairman, IBM, 1943.

"The bomb will never go off, and I speak as an expert in explosives." --Adm. William Leahy, U.S. Atomic Energy Project, 1945.

"Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons." --Popular Mechanics, 1949. "We don't like their sound, and guitar music is on the way out." --Decca Recording Co., in rejecting the Beatles, 1962.