HPV Vaccines Toxic
Lead Developer of HPV Vaccines
Comes Clean to Warn Parents & Young Girls
Gardasil,
the vaccine that supposedly protects young girls from the human papillomavirus and the cervical
cancer which it can lead to, has come under intense scrutiny from medical
professionals around the world over the past few years.
Unfortunately, mainstream media outlets rarely if ever share information
related to this scrutiny, despite the many eye-opening revelations which have
made their way into the public domain.
This
is why I commonly write about the HPV vaccine and continue to push this
information; because it’s not really openly discussed, but should be.
One
of these revelations comes from Dr. Dianne Harper, one of a select few
specialists in OB/GYN (in the world) who helped design and carry out the Phase
II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies to get Gardasil approved.
There are only 50 HPV experts in the world, and Dr. Harper is one of them,
inarguably making her an expert on the subject.
Since
Harper’s involvement in getting Gardasil approved, she has condemned the
vaccine, stating that it is neither safe nor effective. She has mentioned
that the tested length of the efficacy of the vaccines in preventing HPV
infection is not long enough to prevent cervical cancer, which, as she states,
can take decades to develop. She has also stated that vaccination will not
decrease the number of cervical cancer cases, but a routine of regular pap
smears will.
Of all
the women who get an HPV infection, approximately 70 percent of those
will clear that infection all by themselves in the first year. You don’t
even have to detect it or treat it. Within two years, approximately 90 percent of those women will clear it all by themselves.
By three years, you will have 10 percent of that original group of women
left who still have an HPV infection, and 5 percent of this 10 percent will
have progressed into a pre-cancerous lesion. So, “now you have that small group of women who have pre-cancerous lesions
and now let’s look at that moving into invasive carcinoma. What we know then is
that amongst women with. . . [pre-cancerous] lesions. . . it takes five years
for about twenty percent of them to become invasive carcinomas. That’s a
pretty slow process. It takes about thirty years for forty percent of
them to become invasive cervical carcinomas.” (source)
This
begs the question, why do nine-year old girls need vaccinations for symptomless
venereal diseases that their immune systems kill anyway?
Harper
has told CBS
that these vaccines are essentially useless, explaining that “the benefit to public health is nothing, there is no reduction in
cervical cancers, they are just postponed, unless the protection lasts for at
least 15 years, and over 70% of all sexually active females of all ages are
vaccinated.”
She
also goes on to caution of their dangers:
Parents and
women must know that deaths occurred. Not all deaths that have been reported
were represented in Dr. Slade’s work, one-third of the death reports were
unavailable to the CDC, leaving the parents of the deceased teenagers in despair
that the CDC is ignoring the very rare but real occurrences that need not have
happened if parents were given information stating that there are real, but
small risks of death surrounding the administration of Gardasil.
“It is a
vaccine that’s been highly marketed, the benefits are over-hyped, and the
dangers are underestimated.” – Dr. Chris Shaw, Professor at the University
of British Columbia, in the department of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, and
Visual Sciences (Taken from the One More
Girl documentary)
“When one looks at the independent literature, so
studies which are not sponsored by the vaccine manufacturers, so with
relation to Gardasil there have been several reports documenting multiple
sclerosis and encephalitis, which is brain inflammation, in girls who have
received their Gardasil vaccine. So just because a study sponsored by the
manufacturers does not identify problems with the vaccine does not necessarily
mean that the vaccine is safe. In fact if one looks at the manufacturer
studies, they’re often not designed to detect serious adverse events. There was
a study done by a group of researchers sponsored by Glaxo Smith and Kline and
they were looking at Cervarix, which is another HPV vaccine, and the authors
acknowledged that none of the studies that they evaluated have been designed to
detect autoimmune diseases. So obviously, you’re not going to find what you’re
not looking for. And in spite of these obvious flaws, they concluded that there
is no evidence that Cervarix is associated with increased risk for autoimmune
diseases, and this is absurd because you haven’t looked for it, the study
has not been designed to detect autoimmune diseases.”
– Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD, Post-doctoral Fellow at the University of British Columbia, where she works in Neurosciences and the Department of Medicine (source)
Brand New Study Outlines Why Many Doctors Don’t Recommend HPV Shots
A
brand new study recently published in the journal Pediatrics has
found that many paediatricians don’t strongly recommend the HPV vaccine. For those of you
who are unaware, the HPV vaccine, also known as the Gardasil vaccine, is
designed to protect against four types of human papillomavirus, or HPV.
Although the HPV vaccine is banned in multiple countries, like Japan for
example, it has been approved for use in Canada and approximately 100 other countries.
Researchers
used a national survey asking approximately 600 doctors to outline their
stance on the HPV vaccine. Conducted between October 2013 and January 2014, the
study found that a large percentage of paediatricians and family doctors —
nearly one third of those surveyed — are not strongly recommending the HPV
vaccine to parents and preteens, which is why, as illustrated by the study, HPV
vaccination rates continue to drop.
The
study mentioned that some doctors felt the need for a clearer understanding
of reasons to vaccinate preteens, particularly given the fact that most do not
become sexually active until later on in life, and that many parents would
object to them assuming otherwise.
Prior
to this, another study was published in the journal Cancer Epidemiolog in 2015. Written by Melissa
B. Gilkey, an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, the study was
designed to assess how physicians recommend the HPV vaccine. The authors were
surprised to find that “physicians so often
reported recommending HPV vaccination inconsistently, behind schedule, or
without urgency. Of the five communication practices we assessed, about half of
physicians reported two or more practices that likely discourage timely HPV
vaccination.” (source)
This
study found that 27 percent of physicians across the United States do not
strongly endorse HPV vaccination, and 39 percent reported that they do not give
the vaccinations on time as recommended. Approximately 59 percent of physicians
recommended it for adolescents.
Physicians
questioning vaccine safety seems to be a growing trend, and this is evident and
expressed in multiple publications. For example, a fairly recent study
published in the journal Human
Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics emphasized that “more research is needed to understand why some health professionals,
trained in medical sciences, still have doubts regarding the safety and
effectiveness of vaccination.” (source)
A
new study published in the journal EbioMedicine outlines
how more and more physicians, more specifically those in France, do not follow
the recommended vaccination schedule and have hesitancy with regards to
vaccination for a number of reasons, mainly due to a lack of trust
in pharmaceutical grade products, their perception of the utility and
risks of vaccines, and their comfort in explaining them to patients. (source)
American College of Pediatricians Links HPV Vaccine (Gardasil) To “Very Rare But Serious Condition.”
“It has
recently come to the attention of the College that one of the recommended
vaccines could possibly be associated
with the very rare but serious condition of premature ovarian failure (POF),
also known as premature menopause. There have been two case report series (3
cases each) published since 2013 in which post-menarcheal adolescent girls
developed laboratory documented POF within weeks to several years of receiving
Gardasil, a four-strain human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV4).”
The
press release goes on to state that adverse reactions are
not commonly caused by the vaccine, and that there has not been a noticeable
rise in POF cases in the last 9 years that the vaccine has been widely
used. This is not the first time a statement from a government medical agency
has contradicted the evidence of various scientists and
doctors around the world. Nevertheless, it’s great to see them at least
acknowledge these potentials, stating that there are “legitimate concerns that
should be addressed.” These concerns, according to them, are as follows:
- Long term ovarian function was not assessed in either the original rat safety studies, or in the human vaccine trial
- Most primary care physicians are probably unaware of a possible association between HPV4 and POF and may not consider reporting POF cases or prolonged missing menstrual periods to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
- Potential mechanisms of action have been postulated based on autoimmune associations with the aluminum adjuvant used and previously documented ovarian toxicity in rats from another component, polysorbate 80
- Since licensure of Gardasil in 2006, there have been about 213 VAERS reports involving amenorrhea, POF or premature menopause, 88 percent of which have been associated with Gardasil
“The
overwhelming majority (76%) of VAERS reports since 2006 with ovarian failure,
premature menopause, and/or amenorrhea are associated solely with Gardasil. . .
. A Vaccine Safety Datalink POF study is planned to address an association
between these vaccines and POF, but it may be years before results will be
determined. Plus, POF within a few years of vaccination could be the tip of the
iceberg since ovarian dysfunction manifested by months of amenorrhea may later
progress to POF.”
It’s
also worth mentioning that more than a dozen girls recently came forward in
Europe claiming that they are suffering from acute physical side effects from
the HPV vaccine. You can read more about that here.
Concordia Professor Criticizes HPV Vaccine After Winning A Federal Grant To Study It
Dr.
Genevieve Rail, Professor of Critical Studies of Health at Concordia University, recently received a
grant of $270,000 from the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR)
to study the Human Papillomavirus (HPV). She concluded that there is
absolutely no proof that the human papillomavirus directly causes cervical
cancer.
“I’m sort of
raising a red flag, out of respect for what I’ve found in my own study, and for
the despair of parents who had totally perfect 12-year-olds who are now in
their beds, too tired to go to school,” she said. “Yes, we’re going against the
grain, and we are going against those who are believed, i.e. doctors and nurses
and people in public health.” (source)
She
feels there are “serious concerns” about the vaccine, yet no research on how
young people “experience” the vaccine. (source)
You
can read more about this story here.
Merck’s Former Doctor Predicts Gardasil To Become The Greatest Medical Scandal of All Time
Dr. Bernard
Dalbergue is a former pharmaceutical industry physician with Gardasil
manufacturer Merck
who has started to raise his voice against the HPV vaccine, and
against the pharmaceutical industry as a whole. He joins a long list of
experts from within the industry who have slammed the rampant manipulation and
control of clinical research done by the pharmaceutical industry.
This
quote is taken from an interview that happened in April of 2014, from an issue
of the French magazine Principes
de Santé (Health Principles):
The full
extent of the Gardasil scandal needs to be assessed: everyone knew when this
vaccine was released on the American market that it would prove to be
worthless. Diane Harper, a major opinion leader in the United States, was
one of the first to blow the whistle, pointing out the fraud and scam of it
all.I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all
time because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this
vaccine, technical and scientific feat that it may be, has absolutely no effect
on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy
lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the
manufacturers. Gardasil is useless and costs a fortune! In addition,
decision-makers at all levels are aware of it! Cases of Guillain-Barré
syndrome, paralysis of the lower limbs, vaccine-induced MS and vaccine-induced
encephalitis can be found, whatever the vaccine. (source)
Dr.
Dalbergue has also recently released a book titled Omerta dans les labos pharmaceutiques: Confessions d’un
medicine which goes into more detail about corruption in
the medical/pharmaceutical industry. He also recently made an appearance on a
popular radio show in France which you can watch here.
Althought it’s in French, it’s nice to put a face to the name so that you can
see he is real.
Gardasil Contains More Than Double The Amount Of Aluminum Than It Previously Had
Gardasil,
like several other vaccines, contains aluminum. Health authorities will
tell you that using aluminum as an adjuvant in vaccines is completely
safe, but what they won’t tell you is that there are no safety assessments
(toxicity studies) for vaccine ingredients. This can be quite eye-opening for
those who were not already aware of this, especially considering the fact that
aluminum has been being added to vaccines for approximately 90 years.
Yet the Food and Drug Administration, or any other government agency for
that matter, has not conducted or included appropriate toxicity studies/testing
proving the safety of aluminum. Why is this? One reason could be
that vaccines have traditionally (over the years) been viewed as non-toxic
substances, therefore not warranting such research. (source)
“I have a document from 2002
from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)… discussing the assessment of
vaccine ingredients… and testing specifically in animal models. Back then,
the FDA stated that the routine toxicity studies in animals with vaccine
ingredients have not been conducted because it was assumed that these
ingredients are safe. When I read that I was kind of pulling my hairs out
[thinking] ‘So, this is your indisputable evidence of safety?’ These documents never made it to mainstream media.
It’s just a lie perpetuated over and over again; that we’ve been using these
things for over nine decades and it’s been proven safe. No, it’s
been assumed safe.”
– Dr. Lucija
Tomljenovic (source)
Even
if we look at the FDA’s current website/guidelines, this is not a
secret. The statement above was made in response to their 2002
guidelines, which is a fairly recent document. More than 10 years later,
however, despite all of the studies demonstrating clear cause for concern, not
much has changed.
“Until
recently, few licensed vaccines have been tested for developmental toxicity in
animals prior to their use in humans.” (source)
Studies
also continue to emerge every single year stressing the need to actually test
vaccine ingredients for safety. You’d think this would be a no-brainer,
wouldn’t you?
Here
is a study published in 2015 that stresses how important it is for us to
further examine the inclusion of mercury and aluminum in vaccines, arguing
that “the safety levels of these substances have never
been determined, either for animals or for adult humans—much less for fetuses,
newborns, infants, and children.” (source)
A
growing number of studies have linked the use of aluminum adjuvants to serious
autoimmune outcomes in humans. (source)(source)(source)(source)
Below
is an excerpt from a paper that was published in 2015 in the journal Frontiers In Neurology which emphasizes
various concerns about aluminum in vaccines:
The
conceptual link between long-term persistence of alum particles within
macrophages at the site of previous immunization, and the occurrence of adverse
systemic events, in particular neurological ones, has long remained an unsolved
question. Aluminum has long been identified as a neurotoxic metal, affecting
memory, cognition and psychomotor control, altering neurotransmission and
synaptic activity, damaging the blood–brain barrier (BBB), exerting pro-oxidant
effects, activating microglia and neuroinflammation, depressing the cerebral
glucose metabolism and mitochondrial functions, interfering with
transcriptional activity, and promoting beta-amyloid and neurofilament
aggregation (56).
In addition, alum particles impact the immune system through their adjuvant
effect and by many other means. They adsorb vaccine antigens on their surface,
which protect them from proteolysis thus forming a persistently immunogenic
pseudo-pathogen (57).
Alum particles may also bind undesirable residual products inherent to vaccine
production procedures, as shown for HPV DNA sequences (58)
or yeast proteins (59)
that may be potentially hazardous (60).
Finally, alum particles can directly induce allergy (61,
62)
as other metals (63) Concerns
about long-term biopersistence of alum largely depend on the ability of alum
particles to reach and exert toxicity in remote organs. This ability has been
suggested by several studies.
Here is another paper, published in 2013 in the
journal Immunome Research, which
provides further evidence of the dangers associated
with aluminum in vaccines.
A study published in the journal Current Medical Chemistry in 2011 does the
same:
Aluminum is
an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine
adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants,
medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still
remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and
pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum
in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research,
however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce
serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant
form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and
associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread
adverse health consequences.
Another one published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry shared
the following conclusions:
We
show that Al-adjuvanted vaccines may be a significant etiological factor in the
rising prevalence of ASD. We also show that children from countries with
the highest ASD prevalence appear to have a much higher exposure to Al from
vaccines, particularly at 2 months of age. . . . According to the FDA,
vaccines represent a special category of drugs as they are generally given to
healthy individuals [15]. Further according to the FDA, ‘this places
significant emphasis on their [vaccine] safety’ [15]. While the FDA does set an
upper limit for Al in vaccines at no more than 850 μg/dose [89], it is important
to note that this amount was selected empirically from data showing that Al in
such amounts enhanced the antigenicity of the vaccine, rather than from
existing safety data or from the basis of toxicological considerations
[89]. . . . Nonetheless, given that the scientific evidence appears to indicate
that vaccine safety is not as firmly established as often believed, it would
seem ill advised to exclude pediatric vaccinations as a possible cause of
adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, including those associated with
autism.
The
list regarding the concerns about aluminum goes on and on. Below is a video
from Dr. Christopher Shaw, a professor at the University of British Columbia in
the department of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, and Visual Sciences.
Again,
a growing number of studies have clearly demonstrated aluminum adjuvants in
vaccines could be a factor in the development of serious autoimmune outcomes in
humans. (source)(source)(source)(source)
Moreover,
we know, from the work of Richard
Flarend, that aluminum is commonly absorbed into the body — into areas it
shouldn’t be — and has been found in various urine samples from multiple
studies examining this topic… and that’s not just for aluminum in vaccines.
“We
increasingly have this compound that was not part of any biochemical process on
Earth, that can now only go and do havoc, which is exactly what it does. It
causes all kinds of unusual biochemical reactions.” – Dr. Chris Shaw, a
neuroscientist and professor at the University of British Columbia
Here
is a great video by Dr. Christopher Exley, Professor of Bioinorganic Chemistry
at Keele University and Honorary Professor at UHI Millennium Institute. He is
known as one of the world’s leading experts on aluminum toxicity.
From Collective
Evolution @ http://www.collective-evolution.com/2016/04/12/lead-developer-of-hpv-vaccines-comes-clean-to-warn-parents-young-girls/
For more information about toxic vaccines see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/vaccination
For more information about Gardasil see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/gardasil
Scroll down through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
Scroll down through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
Do you like this
not for profit site?
It takes hours of work every day by
a genuinely incapacitated invalid to maintain, write, edit, research,
illustrate and publish this website from a tiny cabin in a remote forest.
Now that most viewers see these posts
on mobile devices, sites like this receive an ever diminishing amount of
revenue from advertising… less than a pittance.
Like what you see? Please give anything
you can -
Contribute any amount and receive at
least one New Illuminati eBook!
(You can use a card
securely if you don’t use Paypal)
Please click below -
Spare Bitcoin
change?
Videos - https://youtu.be/FfTo35UrFPA
For further enlightening
information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @
the top left of http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
And see
New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati
New Illuminati Youtube Channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/playlists
New Illuminati’s OWN Youtube Videos
-
New Illuminati on Google+ @ For
New Illuminati posts - https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RamAyana0/posts
New Illuminati on Twitter @ www.twitter.com/new_illuminati
New Illuminations –Art(icles) by
R. Ayana @ http://newilluminations.blogspot.com
The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com
DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide
a live link to your original material on your site (and links via social
networking services) - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps
spread your info further!
This site
is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT (unless an
individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright
holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged - if you
give attribution to the work & author and include all links in the original
(along with this or a similar notice).
Feel free
to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you
never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember
attribution!
If you
like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large)
or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…
Live long
and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible worlds…
From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
