The Problem of Religion
Suns of God: Krishna, Buddha and
Christ Unveiled
by Acharya S/D.M. Murdock
"The
reproaching cry of heretic, infidel, atheist, etc., will be raised against the
author of these lectures, by every fiery intolerant bigot into whose hand they
may fall. But he alone is the true infidel who forsakes the laws of his nature,
and gives up his mind to a belief in fabulous and demoralizing legends, which
contradict all experience, and stand in opposition to the testimony of his own
sense and reason."
- Christian Mythology Unveiled, 1842
While the Western world begins its new millennium, little has changed in terms of religious understanding, and the world
in general continues to be divided largely along the lines of faith. The
proselytizers, proponents and propagandists of these various faiths persist in
fighting over bodies and souls, in an endless religious tug-of-war that has
ruined culture, wrecked minds and wreaked havoc. It also invades privacy and
stomps all over individual rights. Religion is motivated by fear and
insecurity: People want to believe, in God, Jesus, Krishna, Buddha—something,
anything, so as not to feel so alone, helpless and forgotten.
Life is a cruel,
sadistic torment in countless places around the globe. This fact should create
more questions than it does about whether or not there is any good god in
charge of everything and whether or not religion has any value in the first
place. Yet, in the face of tragedy, rationality and logic fail to win out over
powerlessness that desperately needs to believe in the Other, somewhere
"out there." What this insight reveals is that God is a popular
concept not because people have reasoned it through and proved it true, but
because humans are terrified of the opposite notion: If God is not, all is for
naught.
The concepts of God and religion have varied greatly over the millennia,
in the sense that they have been developed within cultural contexts, with odd
details and interpretations based chiefly on race, gender, language and
environment. Thus, goddess worship rather than god worship dominated in a
variety of places globally for thousands of years, and gods and goddesses often
have been of the same color and mentality, and speaking the same language, as
the culture in which they are developed. These variances have led to a
horrendous amount of suffering and terror, as fanatics of sundry religions,
sects, cults, etc., have believed themselves superior to all the rest, and have
attempted to force themselves upon everyone else. This aggressive behavior also
is out of insecurity, as beliefs are flimsy things, and it is imagined that the
more people who believe, the more these beliefs will be real. Not so, unless as
a phantasmagoria, a nightmare....
The Intolerance of Religion
In this day and age, when the world becomes smaller than ever before, there is an increasing need for investigation and education in
religion, as it is one of the most important and volatile of all human issues.
Save for the few enlightened periods and places, throughout history people of
faiths different from the ruling religion have been persecuted mercilessly.
Oddly enough, the Roman Empire, which was notorious for hardship and horror,
nevertheless exercised religious tolerance to an extreme degree; yet, cultures
with the pretense of being more civilized than Rome terrorize and kill those
who do not follow the prescribed path and preferred god. Thankfully, some
nations have achieved a standard of not persecuting and prosecuting members of
minority religions and non-religious freethinkers for "blasphemy" and
"heresy." However, in many countries freethinkers, secularists,
agnostics and atheists remain pariahs and outcastes, even though many of the
world's greatest thinkers have been of this inclination.
Among the countless atrocities committed in the name of God and religion
over the millennia looms large the practice of human sacrifice. This bloody and
common ritual allowed for marauding Christian armies to justify the cultural
destruction and genocide perpetrated in so many nations globally, including in
the Americas, as a prime example. In other words, in order to stop human
sacrifice, Christian armies sacrificed millions of humans. Moreover, the god of
the Old Testament was hardly a paragon of peace and love, and the list of
atrocities gleefully boasted about in the Bible is long indeed. As British
royal physician Dr. Thomas Inman states in Ancient Faiths and Modern:
"…Is there
any human king who ever promulgated a more bloody order than did Jehovah
Sabaoth, the God which, amongst the Hebrews, corresponded to the Mexican god of
war, when he commissioned Samuel to say to Saul (1 Sam. 15:3), 'Now go and
smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have; slay both man and woman,
infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass!' After such a destruction of
the Midianites as is narrated in Numb. 31, the fearful slaughter, effected by
Crusaders, of Jews, Turks, and heretics, is scarcely worth mentioning.
"…and surely,
when our Bible, which is treasured by so many as the only rule of faith amongst
us, details such horrible religious slaughters as are to be found in its pages,
and abounds with persecuting precepts, we had better not talk too much about
Mexican sacrifice. Was there any Aztec minister so brutal in his religious fury
as Samuel was (1 Sam. 15:33), who hewed Agag into pieces? The Mexican was
merciful to his victim; the Hebrew was like a modern Chinese executioner, who
kills the criminal by degrees….
"Surely the
Christians have too much sin amongst themselves to cast a stone at the inhabitants
of Mexico.
"We find a very strong offset to the horror of Aztec cruelty in the
very Bible, which we regard as the mainstay of our religious world. What, for
example, is the essential difference between a Mexican monarch sacrificing one
or ten thousand men taken in battle, and Moses commanding the extermination of
the inhabitants of Canaan, and only saving, out of Midian, thirty-two thousand
virgins, that they might minister to the lust of Hebrew followers? What, again,
are we to say of David's God, who would not turn away from his anger from Judah
until seven sons of the preceding king had been offered up as victims? And
lastly--thought still more awful! what must we say of the fundamental doctrines
of Christianity, that Jehovah Himself sacrificed His own Son by a cruel death;
and not only so, but that He had intercourse with an earthly woman, and had
thus a son by her, for the sole purpose of bringing about his murder?"
Furthermore, while there certainly was a tremendous amount of barbarity
perpetrated by Mexicans, the Spanish propagandists have been accused of
exaggerating the brutality in order to justify committing atrocities of their
own, at which they were well skilled, per their own chroniclers.
Does Martyrdom Make a Religion True?
In another specious argument it is claimed that a religion is determined
to be "superior" and "genuine" based
on "miracles" and the number of people who have been willing to die
for it. Concerning the "martyrdom" argument, often used by
Christians, Walter Cassels remarks:
"Every religion has had its martyrs, every error its devoted
victims. Does the marvellous endurance of the Hindu, whose limbs wither after
years of painful persistence in vows to his Deity, prove the truth of
Brahmanism? Or do the fanatical believers who cast themselves under the wheels
of the car of Jagganath establish the soundness of their creed? Do the Jews,
who for centuries bore the fiercest contumelies [insults] of the world, and were
persecuted, hunted and done to death by every conceivable torture for
persisting in their denial of the truth of the Incarnation, Resurrection and
Ascension, and in their rejection of Jesus Christ, do they thus furnish a
convincing argument for the truth of their belief and the falsity of
Christianity?… History is full of the records of men who have honestly believed
every kind of error and heresy, and have been steadfast to the death, through
persecution and torture, in their mistaken belief. There is nothing so
inflexible as superstitious fanaticism, and persecution, instead of
extinguishing it, has invariably been the most certain means of its
propagation. The sufferings of the Apostles, therefore, cannot prove anything
beyond their own belief, and the question what it was they really did believe
and suffered for is by no means as simple as it sounds."
Even in ancient times rational critics found the idea of martyrdom
appalling. As Porphyry, the Pagan writer of the third century, remarked,
"…it is not befitting the will of God--nor even the wishes of a good man—that
thousands should be tortured for their beliefs…"
Moreover, Muslims have regularly martyred themselves—would a Christian
then agree that Islam is the "truth faith?" Since millions of
so-called Pagans have been willing to die for their faith, by this
faulty martyrdom logic Paganism must be the "true faith!" In
the final analysis, martyrdom proves nothing, except the fervor of the
believer. Also, it should be kept in mind that, for many of us, those
"Pagan" people who were tortured, killed and had their property
stolen and cultures destroyed in the name of God, by whatever religious mania,
were our ancestors. When Christians, for example, rant about
"heathens" and "pagans," they are talking about our
ancestors and, in many cases, their own. This
"ancestor-hatred" is in exact opposition to practices found in many
places around the world, dating back thousands of years, and has led to a
tremendous amount of disrespect for ancient traditions, as well as for our own
family members....
The Past Destroyed
When it comes to religion, alternative perspectives are considered
highly suspect and are subject to intense scrutiny, held up to
impossible standards of proof, while the accepted paradigm is lightly handled
and can pass with little or no evidence at all. Those who step outside the box
are dunned with requests for credentials and bibliographies, while believers in
the mainstream ideology require no credentials except belief and seem not to
need to read much at all, including the very "sacred scriptures" they
defend. In any case, when one is doing investigative research, dating back
thousands of years, one must use a variety of sources, ancient and modern. If
one uses works too modern, the hue and cry is for "primary sources!"
If one uses material "too old," the criticism is that it is
"outdated." Hence, the scholar is put in a double bind, while the
critic is never satisfied. In such a picky environment, it is a wonder anything
important ever gets written or read.
The "outdated" argument becomes specious when it is understood
that the work of more "modern" authors is nonetheless based on those
who proceeded. To become a scholar one must study as much as is
possible; obviously, whatever one is studying must have come before. The
current studies are based on the past studies. No modern writer can
possibly be called a scholar if he or she has not studied the works of the
past; hence, he or she is using what detractors will call "outdated"
material. Since true scholarship is founded upon the studies of the centuries
and millennia past, it could all be deemed "outdated" by these
illogical and impossible standards. It should not be necessary to point out
this fact, but it often seems as if sense were not common at all, and every
little detail, every meaning between the lines, must be clearly spelled out or
else misrepresentation, misconstruing and misunderstanding will follow. In any
case, the date of a book is frequently irrelevant, as truth is timeless.
Moreover, the so-called outdated scholarship on the origins of religion
in general, and Christianity in particular, that arose in the past few
centuries is actually superior not only in depth but also in perspective
to what is often produced today. Furthermore, these various authorities
preserved information regarding literature and iconography since destroyed—and
there has been a great deal of destruction during the past three centuries,
including two World Wars. Indeed, the reconstruction of the ancient world and
its religion has been difficult to determine because of the passage of time and
the vast desolation of cultures worldwide. The eradication of evidence has been
so rampant and thorough that it is amazing anything can be said with any
certainty at all. However, enough does survive, in bits and pieces, that we can
gain a good idea of what was going on, at least in the past few thousand years.
When critics clamor for "primary sources," the din actually serves to
raise up the fact of this criminal and shameful cultural destruction, the
purpose of which frequently was to cover the tracks of conspirators gleefully
plagiarizing others' religions and falsely presenting their own as "divine
revelation." The "primary source" argument can be used in response
by asking, where are the primary sources that prove Christianity and the
existence of Jesus Christ? Where are the precious originals of the gospels,
written by the very hands of the apostles and other witnesses to Jesus's
alleged advent? The earliest New Testament manuscripts in existence can be
dated only to the third or fourth century. Not only are there no primary
sources proving Christian claims, but what texts we do possess have been
altered tens of thousands of times.
Ancient Cultural Commonality
One significant example of how
cultural destruction has prevented us from gaining ancient knowledge and obtaining "primary sources" can be found in Central
America, where the invading Spaniards were astonished to find a
religious/governing system nearly identical to both Judaism and Christianity.
This fact of similarity led crazed Christian authorities to destroy thousands
of Mexican codices containing much evidence that Christianity was not
"unique" or "original." Since this discovery, the subject
has been ignored, especially in the past century, during which time scholarship
on religion and mythology has taken a nosedive after a backlash by those vested
in the Christ myth.
Fortunately, despite the massive destruction enough remains to
reconstruct a picture of the pre-Christian Mexican life. In 1831, the eminent
Lord Kingsborough published a multi-volume series called Antiquities of
Mexico, in which he outlined the numerous correspondences between the
Christian religion and that of the pre-Columbian Central Americans. The Mexican
mythology included an omniscient, omnipresent god, who was, like the typical
monotheistic god, "invisible, incorporeal, a being of absolute perfection
and perfect purity," as Dr. Inman says. In the same manner as the
"polytheistic monotheism" of other cultures, including the
Judeo-Christian, this "one god" was divided into angels and devils.
Regarding the Mexican religion, Lewis Spence remarks:
"The various
classes of the priesthood were in the habit of addressing the several gods to
whom they ministered as 'omnipotent,' 'endless,' 'invisible,' 'the one god
complete in perfection and unity,' and 'the Maker and Moulder of All.'"
Concerning the Mesoamerican system, Inman states:
"This great
Mexican divinity was essentially the same as the Jehovah Tsebaoth of the
Hebrew Scriptures… His portrait is identical, apparently, with the commonly
received likeness of Jesus…."
Other similarities
between the Mexican and Christian religions including baptism and the
end-of-October festival of "All Souls" or "All Saints Day."
The Mexican fast for 40 days as a tribute to the god was essentially the same
as the fasting of Jesus "forty days upon a mountain." Also, like
Jesus and Lucifer, the Mexican god Quetzalcoatl was the "morning
star." Furthermore, the Mexicans revered the cross, upon which their god
was nailed. Likewise, the Madonna and Child were adored, and many Mexican
sayings find their equivalents in the Judeo-Christian bible. Moreover, the
Mexican priesthood was startlingly similar to that of Catholicism, with
"fathers" who acted as confessors listening to penitents' sin and who
prescribed prayers, penance and fasting. Like that of Catholicism, the Mexican
priesthood exacted tithes in order to support itself, and priests and nuns
constituted the populace's teachers. Other commonalities between the
Judeo-Christian and Mexican religions, concerning in specific human sacrifice,
so notoriously found in Mesoamerica, but not widely perceived as existing
within Judeo-Christianity, are outlined thus by Inman:
"The
necessity of sacrifice, as atonement for sin, forms an essential, though
bloody, part of both the Hebrew and the Christian faiths, and history has long
taught us that the slaughter of a man, woman, or child, formed, in the
estimation of the Ancient Greeks, and other nations, one of the most acceptable
of the forms of homage paid by a human being to the Creator. This idea is at
the very basis of the Christian theology…. In Hebrews 10:12, we find this
doctrine very distinctly enunciated, in the words, 'this man, after he had
offered one sacrifice of sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God'…
Again, in Heb. 9:26, 'once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away
sin by the sacrifice of himself;' and in Heb. 10:10, 'we are sanctified through
the offering of the body of Jesus Christ;' and in 9:28, 'Christ once offered to
bear the sins of many.'"
The human sacrifice ritual in Mexico was very similar to that of the
biblical Jews and that which is recorded in the gospel story. This fact is
sadly ironic considering the excuse used for centuries for destroying these
cultures in the first place: to wit because they practiced human sacrifice. In
reality, the destruction was motivated in large part because of the
correspondences between the Mexican and Catholic cultures, as well as the quest
for booty.
Pre-Christian Christianity in Asia
As distressing to the Catholic Church as was the discovery of their
mythos and ritual in Mexico was finding it in Asia, from
the Near to Far East. In the 19th century, Catholic missionary Abbé
Huc traveled to Asia, where he encountered rites and rituals startlingly
similar to those of Catholicism. In his book Christianity in China, Tartary,
and Thibet, Huc makes the following surprising statements:
"The Gospel
of the Christian religion, when preached successively to all the nations of the
earth, excited no astonishment, for it had been everywhere prophesied, and was
universally expected. A Divine Incarnation, the birth of a Man-God, was the
common faith of humanity--the great dogma that under forms, more or less
mysterious, appears in the oldest modes of worship, and may be traced in the
most ancient religions. The Messiah, the Redeemer, promised to fallen man in
the terrestrial Paradise, had been announced uninterruptedly from age to age;
and the nation specially chosen to be the depository of this promise had spread
hope abroad among men for centuries before its fulfillment; such was, under
Providence, the result of the great revolutions which agitated the Jews, and
dispersed them over all Asia and the world at large."
Abbé Huc is thus admitting that the basic gospel story was found
"everywhere," ages ago, in the "most ancient religions."
Fortunately, Huc was honest enough to acknowledge the profound correspondences
between Christianity and this pre-Christian worship he discovered, which proved
the unoriginality of Christianity. In order to explain these similarities,
which were profound and not casual, Huc asserts that "agitated Jews"
spread the fables, and he then puts forth the claim made repeatedly by
apologists over the ages, i.e., that these tales were prophecy fulfilled in
Christ:
"When the
Christ appeared, it was not only in Judea, among the Hebrews, that he was
looked for; he was expected also at Rome, among the Goths and Scandinavians, in
India, in China, in High Asia especially, where almost all religious systems
are founded on the dogma of a Divine Incarnation. Long before the coming of the
Messiah, a reconciliation of man with a Saviour, a King of righteousness and
peace, had been announced throughout the world. This expectation is often
mentioned in the Puranas, the mythological books of India."
This paragraph is extremely revealing; yet, what is not disclosed is
that in "High Asia," this Divine Incarnation had already arrived,
several times in fact, as the many Buddhas and incarnations of Indian gods,
such as Krishna. Moreover, a Christian missionary pronouncing the sacred
scriptures of another culture "mythological books," while evidently
maintaining his own to be the "historical Word of God," represents
propaganda and the puerile game of "my god is bigger and better than yours."
Concerning the resemblances between Buddhism and Christianity, Huc says:
"Those who have studied the system of Buddhism in Upper Asia, have
been often struck with the analogy, in many points, between its doctrines,
moral precepts, and liturgy, and those of Christian Churches. Unbelievers have
exulted at these resemblances, and have inferred immediately that Christianity
was copied from the religious systems of India and China."
Again, basic biblical stories and doctrines were found widespread in
these vast and isolated regions, established long prior to the arrival of
Christian missionaries. The missionary Huc, being a pious man no doubt
terrified of what would and eventually did happen to him—excommunication—could
not admit to Christian plagiarism, and thus sought to establish the opposite
reason for why "Christianity" or the basic astrotheological religion
was to be found in Asian countries, before missionaries had arrived there.
Hence, he claimed that the "descendants of Noah," having spread out
from Judea centuries before the Christian era, were accountable for the
correspondences....
The Bible As History—Not!
The reality is that the basic gospel tale and numerous other major
biblical stories are found in a variety of cultures, before the
Christian and Jewish eras. The reason for this scenario is not because the same
"history" played out over and over again in various ages and places,
like some bizarre and bloody film loop, but because these stories are myths
that reflect natural, recurrent phenomena that are perceivable worldwide.
Modern science and scholarship, based on numerous archaeological discoveries,
biblical criticism and comparative mythology, have shown that the Bible is in
large part myth.
Included in the most recent developments is the work of Israeli
archaeologists Ze'ev Herzog and Israel Finkelstein, the latter being the
director of the Institute of Archaeology at Tel Aviv University and the
co-author with Neil Asher Silberman of The Bible Unearthed. Also holding
down the fort of biblical criticism formerly occupied by the German and English
is the Danish school, including Thomas Thompson, author of The Mythic Past:
Biblical Archaeology and the Myth of Israel. This fact of biblical
non-historicity has been known for centuries, however, and was particularly
revealed in the 19th century. One of these 19th-century
scholars was Dr. Inman, who wrote:
"We have
demonstrated, as far as such a matter is capable of demonstration, that the Old
Testament, which has descended to us from the Jews, is not the mine of truth
which it has been supposed by so many to be: that not only it is not a
revelation given by God to man, but that it is founded upon ideas of the
Almighty which are contradicted by the whole of animate and inanimate nature.
We showed that its composition was wholly of human origin, and that its authors
had a very mean and degrading notion of the Lord of Heaven and Earth. We
proved, what indeed [Bishop] Colenso [1814-1883] and a host of German critics
have demonstrated in another fashion, that its historical portions are not to
be depended upon; that its stories are of no more real value than so many fairy
tales or national legends; that its myths can now be readily traced to Grecian,
Babylonian, and Persian sources; that its miracles are as apocryphal as those
told of Vishnu and Siva; and its prophecies absolutely worthless. We proved,
moreover, that the remote antiquity of its authorship has been greatly
exaggerated; that the stories of the creation, of the flood, of Abraham, of
Jacob, of the descent into, and the exodus from, Egypt, of the career of Moses
and the Jews in the desert, of Joshua and his soldiers, of the judges and their
clients, are all apocryphal, and were fabricated at a late period of Jewish
history…; that the so-called Mosaic laws were not known until long after the
time of David…
We showed that the
Jewish conception of the Almighty, and of His heavenly host, did not materially
differ from the Greek idea of Jupiter and his inferior deities… We called
attention to the apparently utter ignorance of the Jews that certain laws of
nature existed, and of their consequent belief that defeat, disease, famine,
slaughter, pestilence, and the like, were direct punishments of ceremonial or
other guilt; while victory, wealth, virility, and old age were special and decided
proofs of Divine favour. We showed that the Jews were, in general, an abject
but very boastful race, and their spiritual guides—the so-called prophets—were
constantly promising, but always vainly, a striking manifestation of the
Almighty's power in favour of the Hebrews…that histories were fabricated to
give colour to these statements… we showed, moreover, that the race was
imitative and readily adopted the religious ideas and practices of those who
conquered them…. In fine, we showed that the Hebrews could not sustain the
claim they made to be the especial people of God, and that their writings are
of no more value, as records of absolute truth, or of Divine revelation, than
the books of the Greeks, Persians, Egyptians, Hindoos, Chinese or the more modern
Mahometans."
As we can see, over a century ago what is just being exposed to the
public was already known, in detail, and was accurately summarized, even
without the benefit of modern archaeological discoveries. Concerning biblical
imposture, Inman further remarks:
"…according
to what is known as Mosaic law, it was a crime punishable by a lingering death
to gather sticks on a Sabbath day (Num. 15:32-36); but it was no crime to kill
all the males and women of a whole nation, and retain the maidens for private
prostitution and for the use of the priest (Num. 31: 17, 18, 40, 41). In such a
nation it was no crime to commit forgery—and of all the bearers of false
witness, none exceeded in ancient times the Jewish writers in the Bible—but in
mercantile England, the former has been at one time punished with death, and
the latter by ignominious penalties."
The sentiments expressed by Inman and so many others during the 19th
century came on the heels of the higher biblical criticism that so handily
exposed the mythical nature of biblical texts. Indeed, the cacophony concerning
the Bible, a book that had been violently compelled upon Europeans for
centuries, was loud and nearly universal at that time. It is clear is that
these critics, who included freethinkers, Christians and Jews alike, upon
discovering that they had been duped, understandably became angry. Instead of
junking the old, cruel, bogus and bigoted system, and creating a new and
improved ethic, however, the vested interests regrouped and fired back, with
the result that critics were stifled and the scholarship subsequent to WWII did
not approach that of the previous two centuries. The ridicule, by those who
believed the ridiculous, and the economic pressure, by those who held the purse
strings, won out. It is also apparent that the educational system was
deliberately dumbed down.
Before the reader enters into a brave new world, she or he is asked to
inquire of her or himself: Do you truly want to continue to have religious
"enemies?" Do you really wish to think of your friends, family
members and neighbors, who may not believe as you do, as being
"lost," "infidel" or "evil," and to live in
suspicion and fear of them? Or feeling superior to them? Would it not be more
pleasant and refreshing to know that, behind mythological and fantastical
accretions, your beliefs and morals are essentially the same as those of your
so-called adversaries? That most of us are human beings trying to manage and
make sense of the world the best we can? That we are, in fact, one family
sharing one home? In reality, the study of the origin of religion demonstrates
that, despite the obvious divisiveness of modern religions, many cultures worldwide
share a common heritage, one more fascinating and wondrous than has been
perceived or depicted over the past few millennia. It is to this engrossing and
shared inheritance that we shall now turn, with a mind to understanding our
past and progressing in our future.
Excerpted from:
For more, please see Suns of God: Krishna, Buddha and Christ
Unveiled.
From Truth Be Known @
http://www.truthbeknown.com/introduction.htm
For more information about the regional lies known as
religions see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/religion
- Scroll down
through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
Do you LIKE this uniquely informative site?
A genuinely incapacitated invalid maintains, writes, edits,
researches, illustrates, moderates and publishes this website from a tiny cabin
in a remote forest.
Now that most people use ad blockers and view these posts
on phones and other mobile devices, sites like this earn an ever shrinking
pittance from advertising sponsorship.
This site needs your help.
Like what you see? Please give
anything you can -
Contribute any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!
(You can use a card securely if you don’t use Paypal)
Please click below -
And it costs nothing
to share this post on Social Media!
Dare to care and
share - YOU are our only advertisement!
Xtra Image by R. Ayana - https://www.flickr.com/photos/67194724@N03/26255437712/sizes/k/
For further enlightening
information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search box @
the top left of http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
And see
New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati
New Illuminati Youtube Channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/playlists
New Illuminati’s OWN Youtube Videos
-
New Illuminati on Google+ @ For
New Illuminati posts - https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RamAyana0/posts
New Illuminati on Twitter @ www.twitter.com/new_illuminati
New Illuminations –Art(icles) by
R. Ayana @ http://newilluminations.blogspot.com
The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com
DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide
a live link to your original material on your site (and links via social
networking services) - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps
spread your info further!
This site
is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT (unless an
individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright
holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged - if you
give attribution to the work & author and include all links in the original
(along with this or a similar notice).
Feel free
to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you
never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember
attribution!
If you
like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large)
or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…
Live long
and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible worlds…
From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
