"All the World's a Stage We Pass Through" R. Ayana

Showing posts with label rogue planet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rogue planet. Show all posts

Tuesday, 26 July 2011

Cosmic Catastrophe: Occluded History of our Solar System

Cosmic Catastrophe
Occluded History of our Solar System 

By Gerard Deva
   
 
“All cosmological theories assumed that the planets have evolved in their places for billions of years… Venus was formerly a comet and joined the family of planets within the memory of mankind… We claim that the Earth’s orbit changed more than once, and with it the length of the year; that the geographic position of the terrestrial axis and its astronomical direction changed repeatedly and that at a recent date the polar star was in the constellation of the Great Bear.”     
- Immanuel Velikovsky in Worlds in Collision, p.361    


Dr Immanuel Velikovsky was one of the twentieth century’s great scholars. He sought to solve a mystery and in the process generated enormous controversy in the fields of archaeology, astronomy, history, geology, theology and cosmology – among others. The extraordinary attack by many members of the scientific community on his work, their attempts to intimidate his publisher and suppress his evidence have made Velikovsky the Galileo of his time.   


The story starts in 1939. Dr Velikovsky, a practicing psychoanalyst who had studied with Freud, went to the US to research a book on three dominant figures of the ancient Mediterranean world – Moses, Oedipus and Akhnaton. When he was nearly complete a question arose about the timing of the Exodus of the Hebrews from Egypt. Although recorded in detail by the Hebrews, there was no equivalent record in Egyptian history. Why not?
  
  Under the conventional chronology of Egyptian history, the time period usually considered for the Exodus causes problems. For many other events in Hebrew history there appear to be no Egyptian counterparts either – but these two nations existed beside each other for centuries, according to the Hebrews.  Velikovsky’s answer to this lack of correlation was to suggest that the accepted chronology of ancient Egypt was out by five hundred years. He noted that our dating of Egyptian periods came from the dynastic records handed down by Aegyptus and Agrippa, and that the reins of the Pharaohs – used to date Egyptian history – had been strung together one after another to arrive at our modern conventional chronology.
 
 The key to the ‘missing’ half millennium was that there were many ‘co-regnal’ periods when the reins of monarchs overlapped or were indistinct. In Velikovsky’s revised chronology many events in Hebrew history were found to have their counterpart in the Egyptian record. He found papyri that described the events of Exodus, relating descriptions of the ‘plagues’ as they occurred in Egypt and the death of a pharaoh and his chariots in a watery vortex - and dated the fragments to the reign of Akhnaton - the ‘Heretical Pharaoh’ who ruled in times of utter chaos – and his father, Amenophis III.

  The new chronology was built from the archaeological evidence found in the ruins of ancient Egypt. From remaining papyrus and pottery, tomb paintings and monuments a new story emerged. Because the histories of Greece, Assyria, Babylon and Judea were all dated from the dynastic records of Egypt, Velikovsky’s work became highly controversial. In 1945 this was limited to a specialist field, but his next publication in 1950 aroused widespread controversy.   Worlds in Collision was Velikovsky’s explanation of the cause of this amnesia in our collective memory.   
The Comet Venus
   
 
The ancient civilization of Egypt was nearly destroyed in a cosmic catastrophe that endangered the entire planet, according to Velikovsky. Everywhere, huge resources were devoted to the study of the skies. It’s widely known that ancient civilizations in Asia, the Americas, Europe and the Middle East were highly advanced in astronomy. While we accept this as a common feature of our past, why were so many people interested in the study of the movements of the planets?
 
   Why is the alignment of astronomical instruments found in Babylon 2.5 degrees out from the present alignment of the Earth? Why did calendars constructed between the middle of the second millennium BCE and 800 BCE have 360 days and month of thirty days? Why do even earlier calendars have days, months and years of different lengths again?  Velikovsky’s answer was that the Earth and Mars had been involved in repeated near collisions with a gigantic cometary body since recorded history began.
 
 The events described in the Exodus and in Egyptian papyri are a vivid description of an age in chaos – plagues, turmoil and darkness, and the flight of the Hebrews from Egypt toward a ‘column of fire’ in Sinai.

  The Earth was momentarily slowed down and its axis slightly altered as the comet passed by. Electrostatic forces caused discharges to arc between the Earth and the comet, turning the skies to fire and the forests to flame. The crust was rent, volcanoes erupted, earthquakes rocked and darkness enveloped the world – the time of Exodus.
 
 Seven hundred years later Isiah, Joel and Amos described another series of upheavals; the Sun appeared to stand still in the sky. Although slightly dislodged from its axis and orbit again, the Earth fared better this second time. These were, in fact, the last two acts of a cosmic drama; the earliest act of which we have records is called ‘The Deluge’.

  Velikovsky believed that the origin of the comet that was responsible for changes in the Earth’s orbit was the proto-star we know as Jupiter. This idea enraged the scientific community, but his theories about the natures of Jupiter and Venus have not yet been proven wrong. He said that because Venus was younger than the other planets, its surface temperature would be much hotter and its atmosphere denser than astronomers believed; these predictions were proven correct. 

    He predicted Venus would be found to have orbital anomalies in relation to other planets. Venus has since been found to rotate on its axis in reverse direction to the other planets, and its day is longer than its year. We now know that parts of the atmosphere of Venus rotate in four days (with winds of up to 400 kilometres per hour) while the planet itself rotates in 243 days. Both these rotations are retrograde.
 
 One of Velikovsky’s hypotheses for the slowing of the Earth’s rotation which made the Sun appear to stand still was that the planet was engulfed in the extended atmosphere of the comet Venus. Some of the diurnal rotation of the Earth was imparted to this dust cloud according to Velikovsky, which fits the eccentric characteristics of the Venusian atmosphere.

  The comet spiraled past the Earth in an ever-decreasing path around the Sun before taking up its present orbit as the planet Venus. He cites further evidence to show that the Earth interacted with Mars on a number of occasions when writing was better developed than during the times of the Venusian encounters, after Venus flipped Mars out of its orbit. Disturbances caused by the passages of Mars consisted of earthquakes and electrical discharges. Most of the ‘Mars events’ took place within a ninety year period.
      This may all sound far fetched, but Velikovsky’s evidence and the predictions he made from it have stood the test of nearly six decades of investigation. As in his previous work, Velikovsky amassed an impressive range of evidence to support his case.   
 
Mythic Keys

 
  
To support his interpretation of the Hebrew and Egyptian histories Velikovsky searched the records of the civilizations of the eighth and fifteenth centuries BCE. In his last book he described his many years of research as sitting at the feet of sages “to listen to those who lived close to the events of the past… I realized very soon that the ancient sages lived in a frightened state of mind”. What became quickly apparent was the similarity of the events these people had experienced, and the fear that global upheavals associated with planetary encounters had inspired.
 
 The legends of the past are folklore, but the similarity of motifs from five continents and the Pacific Ocean islands is striking; witches on brooms, the dragon and the scorpion, an animal with many heads and a winged body, a woman whose veils stream behind her – these images are universal cosmic myths recording the characteristic shapes possessed by comets.  Velikovsky tracks the motif of the Sun being trapped in its movement through the tales of the Polynesians, Hawaiians and North American Indians. Like Middle Eastern civilizations, they have the story of the Sun being snared and freed by a mouse. In the Hawaiian version Mauii caught and beat the Sun, which begged for mercy and promised to go more slowly ever after. At the same time new islands appeared.
 
 The Ute tribe of North America tell of a piece of the Sun setting fire to the world, which was broken off by a rabbit after the Sun rose, went down and rose again. Cultures on the other side of the globe speak of the Sun setting, rising and setting again, when the solar orb remained an extra hour in the sky during Joshua’s famous battle.

  The legend of the cosmic battle of the planetary gods is familiar to us all. In the Homeric epics the Greeks choose Athena/Venus for their protector, the Trojans Ares/Mars – and they fought their battles while the gods struggled in the skies above. A similar situation existed in ancient Mexico. The Toltecs worshipped Quetzal-couatl/Venus, but the later Aztecs revered Huitzilopachtil/Mars. The identity, conflict and features of the planetary gods are consistent across the ancient world. Similarly, many potentates across the world named the cometary newcomer after themselves.
 
  Chinese chronicles record two suns doing battle in the sky and the disturbances of the other planets this caused. Mars was pursued by Venus, the Earth shook, glowing mountains collapsed, “the customs of the age are thrown into disorder… all living beings harass one another”. An old textbook of Hindu astronomy has a chapter on planetary conjunctions. A planet can be struck down or merely vanquished, and the victor in these encounters is usually the planet Venus. A juncture of the planets is called a yuga in Hindu astronomy; the ages of the world are also called yugas.
 
  An association of the planet Mars with the wolf is also common. In Babylon one of the seven names of Mars was ‘wolf’. An Egyptian god with the head of a wolf prowled the land and the Romans used the wolf – the legendary wet-nurse of Romulus and Remus, who are said to have founded Rome in 687 BCE - as the animal symbol for Mars. Slavic mythology has a god in the shape of the wolf, Vukadlak, who devoured the Sun and Moon. In the Icelandic epic the Edda, the god that darkens the Sun is the wolf Fenris, who battled the serpent Midgard in the heavens above. A Chinese astronomical chart quotes ancient sources in saying “once Venus ran into the Wolf Star”.    
 
Nature’s Evidence

 
 In Earth in Upheaval, Velikovsky excluded all references to ancient literature, tradition and folklore; “This I have done with intent, so that careless critics cannot decry the entire work as tales and legends. Stones and bones are the only witnesses.”  All over the coast of Alaska there are great heaps of smashed bones of extinct animals mingled with uprooted trees and the occasional flint spearhead. Four layers of volcanic ash can be found in these remains of splintered trees and dismembered bodies. In polar regions of Siberia and on the Arctic islands there are hills of broken wood piled hundreds of feet high, and beyond them hills of mammoth bones cemented together by frozen sand.
 
 On one island the bones of these animals were found with fossilised trees, leaves and cones. When the mammoth lived in Siberia there was abundant vegetation.  Spitsbergen is nearly 76 degrees north latitude; yet fossil flowers and corals and beds of coal thirty feet thick have been found there. Antarctica is known to have seams of coal at a latitude of 85 degrees. For this coal to have formed, the southern polar region must have had great forests in the past. How can relatively recent and sudden changes in the Earth’s climate and simultaneous widespread destruction of plant and animal species be explained?
 
  The violence of this destruction can be seen across Western Europe, where every major rock fissure is filled with the bones of animals, splintered and smashed into fragments. One 1,400 ft hill in France is capped by the remnants of mammoths, reindeer, horses and other animals. America has beds of fossil bones containing a hundred bones per square foot, deposited in sand. Some of these are over two hundred feet high. The hills of the Himalayas and Burma contain similar beds of bones. In China, among these fractured bones, the skeletons of seven humans were found. European, Melanesian and Eskimo types were lying together. Extinct and extant species of animals have been found mixed together in English deposits.     


Wreckords
 
         

The conventional theory of slow and uniform geological processes cannot explain these deposits – instead, they are evidence of major catastrophes, many of which have struck the planet during the time of modern humans’ existence. Velikovsky suggests a giant tidal wave engulfed the world that picked up and carried plants and animals over a great distance and smashed them intermingled into common graves.
 
 This and the transformation of the Earth’s climate are explained as consequences of the rapid change of the Earth’s axis brought about by a near-collision with another planet.    [The fact that the axis has tilted in relatively recent times is hardly in dispute – one must only glance at the distribution of ice sheets during the last glaciation to show that the poles must have titled about twenty degrees since the ice age principally ended about 13,000 years ago. Einstein wondered at the cause of a tilt of such magnitude, and conducted a protracted correspondence with Velikovsky and Charles Hapgood – who theorised that the crust regularly tilted around the mantle when the axial wobble became too pronounced – regarding their ideas about global catastrophe. Much of this debate has been somehow forgotten or misplaced in the new millennium, and Velikovsky’s ideas of smaller, more recent and repeated axial tilts have barely been considered – Ed.]
 
    The geological record tells a similar compelling story to that which paleontologists have unearthed. At 1,400 ft (over 400 metres) altitude in the Andes there are high water surf marks lined with undecayed seashells. There are many ruins surrounded by terraces for cultivation on the now high and dry western side of the Andes. On the east side, cultivated terraces continue far past the permanent snowline. Before the last lava sheet spread over Columbia human settlements were there, the remnants of which have been found. That the Andes Mountains were raised in fairly recent times by unimaginable forces is one conclusion.
 
  The ocean floor around the globe also bears witness to flows of lava and volcanic ash which covered a violently shifting bedrock while tidal waves battered the continents. There were once large areas of dry land and relatively recently formed beaches lie preserved in many places where the Atlantic Ocean now lies.
 
 The bottom of the seas show that the Earth has been showered with meteorites on a very large scale, leaving clay deposits rich in nickel, radium and iron.  When the Earth’s axis was shifted by the interaction of the Earth’s and the other planets’ magnetic fields, magnetic eddy currents formed in the atmosphere. These generated great heat and melted rocks on the surface. As this rock cooled, it reformed with a different magnetic polarity to surrounding strata. All over the world, similar local rock formations are found with their magnetic polarities reversed. For this to be the case the Earth’s magnetic field must have been reversed when these rocks were formed. Also, rocks with this inverted polarity are far more strongly magnetised than the Earth’s magnetic field alone can account for.
 
  Why was volcanic activity so common in the recent past? How was the sea floor raised and lowered around the world? As the Earth’s axis shifted in earlier times, the inertia of air and water caused hurricanes and tidal waves; the stress on the planet caused vulcanism and an outpouring of magma, sending up clouds of volcanic ash that threw a cloak of darkness over a sunless world.    


{As the Earth is not perfectly round but an oblate spheroid with an equatorial bulge, when the planet tilts on its axis areas which move off the raised area of the bulge will sink in relation to the sea level, and areas that tilt onto or nearer the equator will usually rise – up to two miles or more. Thus a continent can easily sink in the span of a single night, leaving only the mountaintops of Cuba and a few smaller islands as evidence of its former existence - and Lake Titicaca is full of salt water and contains species that have elsewhere become extinct since the ice age; its bed and the entire surrounds have been abruptly tilted, it’s surrounded by extensive ruins and the vast irrigated areas of an advanced civilization - and the irrigated areas and the lake itself are located above the point where rain ceases to fall; the lake has had no inflow for around 13,000 years - Ed}
 
  The heat generated by these forces evaporated seas. In some places torrential downpours formed great streams running through recently opened fissures in the Earth’s crust which suddenly eroded the landscape. Elsewhere, snow fell and covered the land with continental ice sheets. At the poles, permanent snow cover grew as the land cooled.  Climatic changes, ice cover, mountain building and the reverse magnetic orientation of contiguous strata of rocks are explained by Velikovsky’s theory of cosmic catastrophe. However, the accepted view of the Earth’s geological history is known as uniformitarianism; where the gradual workings of natural forces have produced the world as we know it. Needless to say, Velikovsky aroused as great a controversy in geology as he had previously in archaeology and astronomy. The defenders of uniformitarianism disliked Velikovsky’s ideas at least as much as their fellow scientists had.       
 
Velikovsky Attacked  


       
 
Publication of Worlds in Collision caused a violent reaction; astronomers everywhere denounced and decried the book. They threatened to blacklist Macmillan, the publisher, which was forced to withdraw the book from circulation. Under pressure, Macmillan transferred publication rights to Doubleday - who did not have a textbook department - and burned the unsold copies.  In reviews in reputable journals and public statements, academics and scientists even criticized some of Velikovsky’s works before anyone had read the manuscripts.
 
 Vehement conferences were held to show that Velikovsky’s theories were wrong.  Dr Immanuel Velikovsky died on November Seventeenth,1979 at the age of eighty-four. As more is learned about our solar system, some scientists have realized that his theories might conflict with accepted ideas, but not actually conflict with the facts.     
 
Rising From Amnesia          

Velikovsky theorized that humanity suffered a collective amnesia on the subject of catastrophes. As a reaction to the repeated near-destruction of human civilization, a deep scar has been left in the human psyche. Although the solar system has been settled for 2,700 years, he notes a seven hundred year cycle in the human collective consciousness. Christianity in the first century CE and Islam in the seventh were both founded in apocalyptic visions of the transformation of the world by fire. The fourteenth century was the time of the Black Death and the Hundred Years War, which reduced the population of Western Europe by two-thirds.  
 
Velikovsky’s fear was that in the Twenty-First Century this trauma would be reenacted by humanity, who are now in possession of the means of our own destruction. 

An examination of the facts may help the recall of our racial memory, the suppression of which could be the cause of great violence in our history.   
  

The Books of Dr Immanuel Velikovsky    

Worlds in Collision – 1950    Ages in Chaos – 1952   

Earth in Upheaval – 1955   

Oedipus and Akhnaton – 1960   

Peoples of the Sea – 1977   

Ramses II and His Time – 1978   

Mankind in Amnesia - 1982

 By Gerard Deva     

  

Editor's Note: I first published this article in NEXUS New Times Magazine (Vol. 1) No 7, 1988; it’s been slightly edited for the new millennium. Since Dr Velikovsky’s time our discoveries in the solar system have tended to confirm his theories rather than refute them - including many observations of evidence of relatively recent catastrophes in the tortured terrains of Mars and Venus, the obvious catastrophic damage to many of the solar system’s myriad moons, the discovery of numerous hitherto unsuspected dwarf planets and last century’s paradigm-altering collision of the String of Pearls comets with the planet Jupiter.
Many ‘cometary’ bodies have been shown to have ‘planetary’-scale masses and many scientific assumptions regarding the stability and formation of the solar system have been proven incorrect. Recent carbon dates assigned to many sites and artefacts also conform with Velikovsky’s theories and many of the challenges he has made to conventional theories have remained unanswered - except by his theory.
   Readers familiar with the works of Zechariah Sitchin will note the parallels between his translations of Sumerian cosmological records and the hypotheses of Velikovsky. Hapgood’s The Path of the Pole is also an excellent read, and Worlds in Collision is an excellent place to start for anyone who intends to read Velikovsky’s extraordinarily erudite, detailed and fully footnoted works. His detractors should read his evidence before criticising it – but although many of these books were once found everywhere, most are now out of print and only available second hand. Is anyone out there dedicated enough to scan heaps of pages - and proofread and correct the resultant OCR text? The web awaits…   

- R.A.

 

For more see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/Velikovsky


For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the search box @  New Illuminati or click on any label/tag at the bottom of the page @  http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

And see

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com





This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright (unless an individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

Tuesday, 31 May 2011

'Exciting' find: Possible planets without orbits

'Exciting' find: Possible planets without orbits

This artist's conception provided by NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory-Caltech shows a newly discovered type of planet that wanders freely or follows very loose orbits. Astronomers have the mysterious denizens of the Milky Way are apparently as common as the stars. One expert called the discovery a huge surprise. (AP Photo/NASA JPL-Caltech)
This artist's conception provided by NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory-Caltech shows a newly discovered type of planet that wanders freely or follows very loose orbits. Astronomers have the mysterious denizens of the Milky Way are apparently as common as the stars. One expert called the discovery a huge surprise. (AP Photo/NASA JPL-Caltech)

Are these planets without orbits?

Astronomers have found 10 potential planets as massive as Jupiter wandering through a slice of the Milky Way galaxy, following either very wide orbits or no orbit at all. And scientists think they are more common than the stars.

These mysterious bodies, apparently gaseous balls like the largest planets in our solar system, might help scientists understand how planets form.

“They’re finding evidence for a lot of pretty big planets,” said Alan Boss of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, who wasn’t involved in the research.

If they orbit stars, their sheer number suggests every star in the galaxy has one or two of them, “which is astounding” because that’s five or 10 times the number of stars scientists had thought harbored such gas-giant planets, he said.

And if instead they are wandering free, that “would be really stunning” because it’s hard to explain how they formed, he said.

If that’s the case, it would give a boost to some theories that say planets can be thrown out of orbit during formation, said Lisa Kaltenegger of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, another outside expert.

Other scientists have reported free-wandering objects in star-forming regions of the cosmos, but the newfound objects appear to be different, said one author of the new study, physicist David Bennett of the University of Notre Dame.

Bennett and colleagues from Japan, New Zealand and elsewhere report the finding in today’s issue of the journal Nature. They didn’t observe the objects directly. Instead, they used the fact that massive objects bend the light of distant stars with their gravity, just as a lens does. So they looked extensively for such “microlensing” events.

They found 10, each caused by one of the newfound objects. They calculated each object has about the mass of Jupiter, and estimated how common such objects are. They also found no sign of a star near these bodies, at least not within 10 times the distance from Earth to the sun. (For comparison, within our solar system that would basically rule out an orbit closer than Saturn’s.)

So the newfound objects either orbit a star more distant than that, or they don’t orbit a star at all, the researchers concluded. They drew on other data to determine most of the objects don’t orbit a star.

Scientists believe planets are formed when disks of dust that orbit stars form clumps, so that these clumps — the planets — remain in orbit. Maybe the newfound objects started out that way, but then got tossed out of orbit or into distant orbits by the gravitational tugs of larger planets, the researchers suggest.

The work suggests that such a tossing-out process is quite common, Bennett said.

Boss said maybe the bodies formed around a pair of stars instead, one of which supplied the gravitational tug. But even that would take some explaining to produce an object without an orbit, he said. Or maybe they somehow formed outside of any orbit. So the theoretical challenge in explaining the existence of such bodies is “exciting,” he said.

Boss said he suspects most of these are in a distant orbit, and that maybe they even formed at that great distance rather than being tossed outward from a closer orbit.
Kaltenegger also said the new results can’t rule out the possibility that these possible planets are in orbit, and that they might only have the mass of Saturn, about a third of Jupiter’s.

But if they aren’t orbiting a star, she noted, they don’t fit the official definition of a planet — at least not the definition applied to objects in our own solar system.

All in all, Boss said, the new work is “pretty exciting in telling what is out there in the night sky. .¤.¤. Lots of theories will grow in this environment.”





For further enlightenment enter a word or phrase into the search box @  New Illuminati:

@  http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com (or click on any tag at the bottom of the page for direct references)

or @ http://newilluminati.blog-city.com  (this one only works with Firefox)

And see

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com





This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright (unless an individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com


Monday, 17 November 2008

The Comet Venus

The Comet Venus
Hidden Histories of our Unstable Solar System

During the centuries when Venus was a comet, it had a tail. What could give Venus the appearance of a star throwing out smoke?


The Vedas said that the star Venus looks like fire with smoke. The star had a tail, dark in the daytime and luminous at night. This luminous tail, which Venus had in earlier centuries, is mentioned in the Talmud: `Fire' was hanging down from the planet Venus. Described by the Chaldeans the planet Venus `was said to have a beard. "Beard" is used in modern astronomy in the description of comets.

The Mexicans called a comet `a star that smoked. What was the illusion of the ancient Toltecs and Mayas? What was the phenomenon and what was its cause? A train, large enough to be visible from the earth and giving the impression of smoke and fire, hung from the planet Venus. Venus, with its glowing train, was a very brilliant body; therefore not strange that the Chaldeans described it as a `bright torch of heaven. Illuminates like the sun,' and compared with the light of the rising Sun.

At present, the light of Venus is less than one millionth of the light of the sun. `A stupendous prodigy in the sky,' the Chaldeans called it. The Hebrews similarly described the planet: `The brilliant light of Venus blazes from one end of the cosmos to the other end. The Chinese astronomical text refers to the past when `Venus was visible in full daylight and, while moving across the sky, rivaled the sun in brightness.

Venus (Ishtar) `who is clothed with fire and bears aloft a crown of awful splendour.' The Egyptians described Venus (Sekhmet) : `A circling star which scatters its fame in fire . . . a flame of fire in her tempest.' They also called it by the name of Twntemocque, or `the mane.' The Arabs called Ishtar (Venus) by the name Zebbaj or `one with hair,' as did the Babylonians .

`Sometimes there are hairs attached to the planets,' wrote Pliny. Hair or coma is a characteristic of comets, and in fact `comet' is derived from the Greek word for `hair.' The Peruvian name 'Chaska' (wavy-haired). is still the name for Venus, though at present the Morning Star is definitely a planet and has no tail attached to it.

The coma of Venus changed its form with the position of the planet. When the planet Venus approaches the earth now, it is only partly illuminated, a portion of the disc being in shadow; it has phases like the moon. At this time, being closer to the earth, it is most brilliant. When Venus had a coma, the horns of its crescent must have been extended by the illuminated portions of the coma. It had two long appendages and looked like a bull's head.

Rabbinical authorities say that `the devotion of Israel to this worship of the bull is in part explained by the circumstance that, while passing through the Red Sea, they beheld the celestial Throne, and most distinctly of the four creatures about the Throne, they saw the ox.

The Egyptians similarly, pictured the planet and worshipped it in the effigy of a bull. The cult of a bull sprang up also in Mycenaean Greece. A' golden cow head with a star on its brow was found in Mycenae, on the Greek mainland. The people of far away Samoa, primitive tribes that depend on oral tradition as they have no art of writing, repeat to this day: `The planet Venus became wild and horns grew out of her head.''

The long horns of Venus could have been seen without the aid of a telescopic lens. These horns were illuminated portions of the coma of Venus, which stretched towards the earth. These horns could also have extended towards the sun as Venus approached the solar orb, since comets were repeatedly observed with projections in the direction of the sun, while the tails of the comets are regularly directed away from the sun. When Venus approached close to one of the planets, its horns grew longer: this is the phenomenon the astrologers of Babylon observed and described when Venus neared Mars.


Velikovsky’s Venus
 
Immanuel Velikovsky reasoned out much of the historical reality which has been so effectively occluded from our collective memory.

The mechanisms by which Humankind remain in amnesia are manifold; witness the so-called skepticism of those confronted with undeniable data concerning. They denounce everything Velikovsky postulated, ranging from the known and verifiable consistent cooling of Venus - we've been able to observe the planet's upper atmospheric temperatures cooling for a century – and its ‘plastic crust’, to the irrefutable double-dating of historical events.

Even when carbon dating of organic objects and artefacts has 'proven' them to be totally out of synch with the conformist models, outdated and false histories are still taught in schools. Most of these outworn viewpoints were first formulated more than a century ago, when little actual data had been collated and men's minds were projecting their expectations and dogmas, rather than creating scientific theories based on observations. Nonetheless, physical data and testimonial evidence that conflicts with theory is still regularly thrown out or ignored as aberrant or contaminated. This has continued for decades.

Ridiculous as it seems to our 'modern' minds, the planet Venus has only occupied its current orbit for around three millennia. The new planet – ‘Venus’ means ‘she arrives’ in Latin, after all - was not ejected from Jupiter (as postulated by Velikovsky), but passed through the fringe of its outer atmosphere in a cosmic near-miss; this is one of the only semi-errors that Velikovsky made in his interpretation of all the evidence available more than half a century ago. Venus' origins are quite unique, but its near-collisions with other planets and the end result of its wandering passage through the solar system – its current orbit - is identical under either scenario.

There are many reasons for the suppression of the truth underlying the responses to Velikovsky's various works; not the least has been the ingrained dogmas of various religions. Many belief systems have ironically and often unwittingly passed on seminal truths to the new millennium through the fossilised records of ancient observations they have maintained, often disguised as religious visions or portents of the gods.
 
It's important to recall that the ancients viewed the planets as gods - and the ancient Hebrews, Chinese and Chaldeans were no different in this respect, and all bear near-identical testimonies of the events that shook the world within their sacred texts, as do many other tribes and nations. Many would prefer that we all believe in an anthropomorphic old man in the clouds, than recognise Jah or Venus for what they were - and are.

So-called open minded skeptics would do well to reanalyze the data that purports to show that Einstein's theories are correct, including the now discredited Michaelson-Morley experiment and the observations of bodies passing close to the sun; it's interesting to note that atomic clocks and the world satellite networks are NOT synchronised using relativity theory, but Newtonian physics.


- by R. Ayana




For more information on the hidden history of our solar system see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/Velikovsky




Videos - http://youtu.be/U18gMJXNyX8
http://youtu.be/ZjEC1vOIuxY


For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the search box @  New Illuminati or click on any label/tag at the bottom of the pagehttp://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

And see

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com





This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright (unless an individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com