Alignment of Pyramids to Former North Poles
There
are many ancient temples and pyramids aligned to the current North Pole. Of the
228 selected structures 43 of them are exactly aligned to the current North Pole.
How coincidental is that?
© 2016 by Buildreps 
Alignment of Ancient Structures to Current
North Pole
Tiwanaku
is aligned to the current North Pole under an angle of 359.8 degrees. There's
much debate about Tiwanaku and who built it.
Why Temples and
Pyramids Are Aligned
There are
many ancient structures, like pyramids and temples, around the world
positioned in such a way that their footprint points precisely to the current
North pole.
The majority
of the temples and pyramids were built in the middle of nowhere.
Now what
would you do when you've all the space to position a pyramid?
Unless
you've no idea what you're doing, there's only one logical answer to that
question - you would align it to the geographical poles. Why?
When you
want to study and predict solar cycles, moon cycles, solar eclipses, equinoxes,
earth's motions (obliquity, precession, eccentricity of orbit), or any other
phenomenon in the sky, you must point your instrument to the only sure point -
the rotation axis of the earth. Which is the geographical North pole. If you
don't do that you will introduce another variable into the equations, which
makes them unsolvable.
But besides
this, it also appeared that many other structures of importance are aligned to
the geographical North pole without a clear reason. Pure symmetry between
sunrise and sunset might have been one of the reasons.
This article
is probably difficult for many readers. When you're able to work your way
through it, you might become aware how wrong our history is taught to us.
How Mathematics Proves Our History is Wrongly
Interpreted
What does it
mean when the majority of the pyramids and temples are not pointing to the current North Pole? How likely is it
then that they were pointed to former North Poles? This can be sorted out by
using the power of mathematics.
In this
series of articles I will prove that
the former North pole was on Greenland. The structures that are aligned to this
former pole are therefore older than assumed by archaeologists.
Why?
Because
these pyramids from all over the world were collectively pointing to another
location. What else can that be than another pole? And how long ago could that
have been? It won't be easy to argue against this conclusion. Some will try to
ridicule it, but it will be much harder to refute it. Unless you're able to prove that the mathematics
that is used here, combined with the approach, is wrong.
The claim is
extraordinary, the proof is extraordinary as well.
How Two Separate Bearings Can Intersect With
Each
other
Two
boats sailing a steady course will intersect at a certain point. We can
calculate this intersection point. The same principle counts for pyramid
alignments.
Belief is Strong
Belief is
strong. We believe that the history as it is taught to us is correct. Even when
mathematics proves it is wrong, we tend to keep believing that the history as
it is pounded in our brains is correct.
This is what
we might call conditioning.
A conditioned mind has troubles to interpret outcomes of mathematics that
deviates from our believes. No matter how solid the prove is, we tend to fall
back into our old believe of the trusty old thing. To get used to another idea
takes time.
At first
hand I intended to publish a book, for which people would have to pay money to
purchase it. But after some thinking I decided it would be better to give all
knowledge and data away for free, for
everyone available who has access to internet, including all the data. Some parts
of the data are available via Mediafire. You will find the links below. More
data links and research results will follow during the course of this series of
articles.
Advised to Read First Before Continuing
- Why
is Greenland Covered in Ice?
Greenland is covered in ice and no one knows why. Science has
explanations, but they are absurd and unscientific. The most rational
explanation is explored in this article which is part of a larger series.
- How
Old Are Pyramids Around the World?
Determining the age of a pyramid is not as easy as it seems. Stones cannot
be dated in any way to determine the age of the structure. The most common
way is to date artefacts found in pyramids.
How
Two Pyramids Pointing North Intersect
When
two pyramids are pointing North, we can be sure they belong to the same time
frame. We now know that this time frame is our current crustal position.
Borobudur
is probably the most accurate aligned temple in the world, aligned under an
angle 359.99 to the current North pole, which is an amazing achievement.
Temples and Pyramids
Exactly Aligned to the Current North Pole
- Lintong +12 other structures in
China (pink line)
- Borobudur on Central Java (dark
blue line)
- Angkor Wat +12 other structures
in Cambodia (yellow line)
- Konark Sun Temple in India
(orange line)
- Sri Rangam temple +1 other
structure in India (red line)
- Harappa in Pakistan (green line)
- Bar'am +2 other structures in
Israel (white line)
- Giza in Egypt (green line)
- Tiwanaku in Bolivia (purple line)
- Naranjo in Quatemala +3 other
structures in Mexico (light blue line)
Total: 43 of 228 (including 3
additional ones in the database)
The question is: How likely is it that
43 of the random selected 228 ancient structures cross an area on the North Pole
within a certain radius?
Angkor
Wat is aligned within 0.2 degrees to the current North pole.
Don't Pick Just Some
Buildings
When you
want to prove a theory of this magnitude, it makes no sense to pick just some
structures. No, the structures you must pick must be monumental, big, ancient,
and perhaps religious of nature. Don't pick just some random buildings, like
the Notre Dame in Paris or some other cathedral somewhere.
But did you
know that the Vatican is almost
perfectly East-West aligned, and therefore to the current North pole? Whatever
the reason was, it seemed important enough to align it this way in the middle
of a crowded metropolis. The Vatican isn't on the list however. It's much too
young.
Picking just
some church in the middle of a town, proves nothing. The location of the sun
and stars didn't matter for them, let alone the North pole. The church had to
be fitted in the spatial possibilities of the city at that time.
The criteria
of the ancient sites:
- ancient
- square or rectangular,
- the larger the better (= of more
importance),
- preferably isolated (= not
influenced in alignment),
- alignment is measurable.
Seemingly
Criss-Cross Aligned
During the
research there were a few alignment clusters found. Alignment clusters
are a first indication of a possible former pole.
Some sites
in Mexico comprise a large collection of pyramids that are criss-cross aligned
as if they were just dumped down there.
But the
chance that a few structures on one
site cross other alignment cluster(s) is very, very small. It's
almost zero. But if that occurs, it means it was not accidental. It was
engineered.
These sites
can be interpreted as sites that were rebuild after a catastrophe - a crustal
shift. These structures can tell us an interesting story what might have
happened in the past.
Measuring
the alignment of a pyramid is never 100% accurate. You have to deal with a certain
error.
The Accuracy of
Measurement
We know
where the current geographical North Pole is.
So, we can
measure in Google Earth the angle under which structures were constructed in
relation to the geo pole. We can at least verify
the accuracy of our measurements.
Archaeologists
think they have verified things, but the fact is they're completely groping in
the dark, without even being aware of it.
The first
thing you need to know is how accurately a structure can be measured in Google
Earth.
Take for
example the Great pyramid of Giza. We know it is perfectly aligned to the geo
pole (within ±0.05°). So, we can verify our framework on this.
Experimental
measurements on different parts of Giza showed that the average accuracy of
measurement of Giza in Google Earth resulted in an error of ±0.20°. The
pyramids of Giza are relatively easy to measure; the satellite photos are sharp
and the bases of the pyramids are relatively clear.
Choosing the Error of Measurement
There are
structures that are harder to measure accurately, because the satellite footage is
blurry, or the angle under which the objects were photographed was not
vertically (the baseline is then the most safe area to measure).
For some of
these sites archaeological maps with a North arrow indicator were used as a
cross reference to verify the outcomes of the measurement in Google Earth.
Experiments
with measurements in Google Earth compared to maps of ancient sites showed a
standard deviation of:
- σ=68.2%: ±0.66° = ±0.7°
- 2σ=95.4%: ±1.33°= ±1.3°
- 3σ=99.7%: ±1.97°= ±2.0°
3σ (99.7%)
was accepted as reliable enough for the calculations: ±2.0°. This also includes the error of measurement.
Although Giza could be measured much more exact, only ±2.0° (total angle is
4.0°) was accepted as the standard accuracy for the whole project, and that
counted for Giza as well.
Accumulation
of errors can result in disasters.
Accumulation of
Errors
When we
intend to find former geographical poles, we have to be aware of a possible
accumulation of errors.
- When the pyramid builders
established the geo pole many thousands years ago, they made a little
error in their measurements. Even with our GPS systems today we have to
deal with a certain error of about ± 50 meters.
- When the pyramid builders
constructed their pyramids, they again made a small error between their
perception of true North and the actual alignment of the stones.
- When we measure the pyramid many
thousands years later, the position of the pyramid might have changed a
little bit, due to geological processes, especially when earth crust
displacements appear to be real.
- When we measure the pyramid many
thousands years later, we again make small errors in our measurements.
It is
possible that all these errors cancel eachother out and nicely result in some
perfection, but it is most likely that we'll find an erratic pattern of
'noise'. This noise is the build-up of the above mentioned errors.
We have to
deal with this in a clever way.
Probability That Giza Was Meant to Point
North
The chance
that one of the pyramids of Giza coincidentally points Northward
is 1 to 22.5 (90÷4.0).
The chance that all three of them are coincidental aligned
to the North pole is almost ZERO. To be exact: 0,0088% (0.04443 ×
100%). So, Giza altogether
was no coincidence.
The claim
that all three were meant to be aligned to the North pole is 99.9912% sure.
The purpose,
like with the alignment of the Vatican, is something totally different, and is
open to any
speculation, which might differ from structure to structure.
Did you know
that the White House is also exactly aligned to the North pole? That also is
done on purpose, although the reason why it is done might be unclear to us. But
that shouldn't hinder any research to the phenomenon itself.
When it
comes to structures of power, it seems as if the North pole is almost
inescapable. Structures of greater importance seem to be aligned to the pole.
When they're not pointed to the North pole, they were more or less subjected to
their immediate surroundings, and that makes them of lesser importance.
When
alignments are measured under a large angle, the error will remain small.
Measuring
objects that are alignment under a small angle result in a larger error.
How to Define the
Chances on Intentional Alignments
Most
pyramids have four sides.
Since we don't know for sure the purpose of a pyramid, we cannot discriminate
one side over another. So, the angle in which it can be uniquely arranged is
90° (360°÷4).
With the
average accuracy of ±2.0° in which we could measure the structures, there are
within the angle of 90° 22.5 discriminating steps, which makes a chance of 4%
in the defined framework that a pyramid is accidentally pointing to the North
pole.
But there's
no 90° of freedom. The claim is that the pole shifted from 50°N to 90°N, which
is an angle of 40° (see drawing). Within this angle there's 10% (4.0°÷40°×100%)
chance that a measured structure is accidentally pointing North.
There are
228 measured structures in the database, from which 196 are within the angle of
40° (50°N to 90°N). Hence there's a 'standard' chance that 19.6 of the
structures (196×10%) are pointing North. So, when we find 20 structures
clustering within an area of 4 degrees, even if this is Greenland, we cannot
derive a special status from that.
Of the
randomly selected structures, there were 43 ancient structures pointing to the
current geo North pole. The chance for this event is very small, to be more
precise: 0.000042%[1]. We now
have to make a twist. The probability that the current North pole is correctly
defined at its current location is 99.99996 sure%.
When another
cluster of this magnitude shows up it is surely one of the former North poles,
with a certainty of almost 100%. Let's have a look.
[1]:
n=196; x=43; p=0.1
How
large is the chance that more 50% of all the alignments are running over
Greenland, which is just 25% of a quarter hemisphere? When we're trying to find
another pole, is Greenland our best bet.
Finding the Other
Poles
You can find
former North poles by following the alignment patterns of ancient structures, and then calculate
the probability that it actually is a former North Pole location. Just follow
the patterns of pyramid alignments that are not pointing to the current North
pole.
But since we
only know the current North pole for sure, and we are not sure where to look,
it is best to go from coarse to fine. If there are hints that the former North
pole was on Greenland, the first thing that could be done is looking for the
amount of alignment that intersect Greenland as a whole.
The amount
of intersections on Greenland is 112 of the total 196. The probability for this
clustering to occur coincidental is immensely small: 2.9×10-21 %[2]. We can be 100% certain that the former North
pole was somewhere on Greenland. Or better, Greenland was once on the North
pole.
We don't
know yet where to look on Greenland, but that can be done by following a simple
logic. Going from course to fine is the best approach.
How? We have
to connect pyramids somehow by using a kind of 'independent intermediator' -
the reference line.
[2]:
n=196; x=112; p=0.25
Creating an Intersection Line Over Greenland
When
we draw a vertical line towards the South pole at a longitude of 45 degrees, we
can examine how many alignments intersect that line. The peaks in the graph
show the most likely locations of the former poles.
Why Not Connecting
Pyramids Directly
It happens
too often, especially on the internet, that people claim to have found a
connection between ancient objects by drawing some lines between them. In most
cases that means absolutely nothing, and we cannot draw any conclusions from
it.
With 228
pyramids we can have (228-1)2 possible connections. That might be
about 51,500 intersection points. That would be an immense scatterplot with
tons of useless noise in it. What conclusions could we draw from that? And why
wouldn't we organize the research logically at first hand?
We can find
an intersection point between two of the most enigmatic pyramids on the planet,
Teotihuacan and Giza. They intersect near Kongsfjord that lies in Northern
Norway. We won't find anything useful at that location.
This
intersection point has not any significance whatsoever. We can connect
absolutely different time frames to eachother, but we cannot draw any conclusion from it. We
cannot just connect some pyramids onto eachother, without using a well thought
out reference.
The
reference will lead us to groups of pyramids that we can safely connect to each
other, which leads to a definitive location of a former pole.
Most Sure Former Pole Locations
The
current North pole is easy to find. It is the highest peak in the graph. This
graph shows three other peaks. There are three former Geo poles found. A fourth
pole is also found, but that required a mathematical trick
Probability
can be calculated with the binomial formula.
How Probability is
Determined
On the
reference line we found 38 intersections between latitude 71 and 74. The standard
probability is 20 intersections. We can calculate the likelihood that such a
large cluster forms coincidental by using the binomial formula.
- n = number of trials = 196
- p = probability of success = 0.1
- x = number of successes = 38
P(x) =
3.9×10-5 ≡ 0.03%.
The
probability that a cluster of this magnitude forms coincidental is 0.03%.
Conversely we can say it is artificial constructed. It was clearly pointing to
one location, and therefore most likely a former North pole, since there was no
relation between the randomly distributed pyramids around the globe.
The same
situation was emulated by using Monte Carlo simulations, which gave the same
results. We can be sure this formula expresses this situation correctly.
Intersection Clusters = Proximity of Former
North Poles
Latitude
|
Intersections with 45 Lon Line
|
Probability
|
72.5°N
|
38
|
99.97%
|
76.4°N
|
31
|
99.70%
|
65.0°N
|
22
|
92.30%
|
Intersection Clusters on
Greenland
A group of
pyramids that are apparently aligned to Greenland form a colossal intersection cluster
between latitude 71° and 74°. The weighed average of this cluster is at 72.5°N,
45°W.
A second
cluster was found between latitude 75° and 78°. The weighed average of this
cluster is at 76.4°N, 45°W.
A third
cluster was found between latitude 63° and 66°. The weighed average of this
cluster is at 65.0°N, 45°W.
Greenland
went in a few steps over the North pole. It is possible to correlate the magnitude of the steps
with the temperature proxies, δD or δ018, respectively found in ice cores of
Vostok and Dome-C (Antarctica). The similarities are clear. From this we can
directly derive the time frames of the crustal shifts which are clearly related
to the Milankovitch cycles.
In a series
of next articles I will show you in an increasing detail what happened in our
distant past.
© 2016 by
Buildreps
First
published: February 21, 2016
- Database
of Intersections Pyramids
The database contains the used data of 228 pyramids and temples spread
over the world. The data contains the intersection coordinates with the
45W Longitude line. The data also contains some specific info about the
buildings.
- Scroll down
through ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
Hope you like this
not for profit site -
It takes hours of work every day by
a genuinely incapacitated invalid to maintain, write, edit, research,
illustrate and publish this website from a tiny cabin in a remote forest
Like what we do? Please give anything
you can -
Contribute any amount and receive at
least one New Illuminati eBook!
(You can use a card
securely if you don’t use Paypal)
Please click below -
Spare Bitcoin
change?
And see
New Illuminati’s OWN Youtube Videos
-
DISGRUNTLED SITE ADMINS PLEASE NOTE –
We provide
a live link to your original material on your site (and links via social
networking services) - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps
spread your info further!
This site
is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT (unless an
individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright
holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged - if you
give attribution to the work & author and include all links in the original
(along with this or a similar notice).
Feel free
to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you
never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember
attribution!
If you
like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large)
or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…
Live long
and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible worlds…
