"All the World's a Stage We Pass Through" R. Ayana

Showing posts with label asteroid spaceship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label asteroid spaceship. Show all posts

Saturday, 28 April 2012

The Plan to Bring an Asteroid to Earth

The Plan to Bring an Asteroid to Earth
 



 video @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbFmzNV2WQk





Send a robot into space. Grab an asteroid. Bring it back to Earth orbit.

This may sound like a crazy plan, but it was discussed quite seriously last year by a group of scientists and engineers at the California Institute of Technology. The four-day workshop was dedicated to investigating the feasibility and requirements of capturing a near-Earth asteroid, bringing it closer to our planet and using it as a base for future manned spaceflight missions.

This is not something the scientists are imagining could be done some day off in the future. This is possible with the technology we have today and could be accomplished within a decade.

A robotic probe could anchor to an asteroid made mostly of nickel-iron with simple magnets or grab a rocky asteroid with a harpoon or specialized claws (see video) and then push the asteroid using solar-electric propulsion. For asteroids too big for a robot to handle, a large spacecraft could fly near the object to act as a gravity tractor that deflects the asteroid’s trajectory, sending it toward Earth.

“Once you get over the initial reaction — ‘You want to do what?!’ — it actually starts to seem like a reasonable idea,” said engineer John Brophy from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, who helped organize the workshop.

In fact, many of these ideas have been on the drawing board for years as part of NASA’s planetary defense program against large space-based objects that might threaten Earth. And there’s no shortage of potential targets. NASA estimates there are 19,500 asteroids at least 330 feet wide — large enough to detect with telescopes — within 28 million miles of Earth.

Though rearranging the heavens may seem an excessive undertaking, the mission has its merits. The Obama administration already plans to send astronauts to a near-Earth asteroid, a mission that would coop them up in a tiny capsule for three to six months, and involve all the risks of a long deep-space voyage. Instead, robots could shoulder some of that burden by bringing an asteroid close enough for astronauts to get there in just a month.

Parking an asteroid in a gravitationally neutral spot between the Earth and the sun, known as a Lagrange point, would provide a stationary base from which to launch missions further into space. There are several advantages to this. For one, launching materials from Earth requires a lot of power, fuel, and consequently money, to get out of our planet’s deep gravity well. Resources mined from an asteroid with very little gravitational pull could be easily shuttled around the solar system.

And many asteroids have a lot to offer. Some are full of metals such as iron, which can be used to build space-based habitats while others are up to one-quarter water, which would be either used for life-support or broken down into hydrogen and oxygen to make fuel. As well, asteroid regolith placed around a spaceship hull would shield it against radiation from deep space, allowing safer travel to other planets.

An asteroid could be an alternative to setting up camp on the moon, or complement a moon base with more resources for heading further out in the solar system, said engineer Louis Friedman, cofounder of the Planetary Society and another co-organizer of the Caltech workshop.

There’s also the potential for mining asteroid materials to bring back to Earth. Even a small asteroid contains roughly 30 times the amount of metals mined over all of human history, with an estimated worth of $70 trillion. And astronomers would have the chance to get a close-up look at one of the solar system’s earliest relics, generating important scientific data.

Though technically feasible, budging such a hefty target — with a mass in excess of a million tons — would not be easy.

“You’re moving the largest mother lode imaginable,” said former astronaut Rusty Schweickart, cofounder of the B612 Foundation, an organization dedicated to protecting Earth from asteroid strikes.

Most asteroids are irregular chunks of rock that spin chaotically along irregular axes. Engineers would need to be absolutely certain they could control such a potentially dangerous object. “It’s the opposite of planetary defense; if you do something wrong you have a Tunguska event,” said engineer Marco Tantardini from the Planetary Society, referring to the powerful 1908 explosion above a remote Russian region thought to have been caused by a meteoroid or comet. Of course, any asteroid brought back under the proposed plan would be too small to cause a repeat of such an event.


p45062



Still, these obstacles are like catnip to engineers, who love to go over every potential difficulty in order to solve it. Actually executing the asteroid retrieval plan would help demonstrate and greatly expand mankind’s space-based engineering capabilities, said Friedman. For instance, the mission would teach engineers how to capture an uncooperative target, which could be good practice for future planetary defense missions, he added.

And if the challenges for a large asteroid seem too daunting, researchers could always start with a smaller asteroid, perhaps six to 30 feet across. Gradually larger objects could be part of a campaign where engineers learn to deal with progressively greater complications.

Last year, Brophy helped conduct a study at JPL to look at the feasibility of bringing a 6.5-foot, 22,000-pound asteroid — of which there might conceivably be millions — to the International Space Station. This mission would help astronauts and engineers learn how to process asteroid materials and ores in space.

The JPL study suggested the asteroid could be captured robotically in something as simple as a large Kevlar bag and then flown to the space station or placed in a Lagrange point. Of course, such a small object might not have the same emotional impact as a larger destination. “NASA isn’t going to want to go to something that is smaller than our spaceships,” said engineer Dan Mazanek from NASA’s Langley Research Center.

No matter the size of the asteroid, these plans would require hefty investments. Even capturing a small asteroid would consume at least a billion dollars and anything larger would be a multi-billion-dollar endeavor. Convincing taxpayers to foot such a bill could be tricky.

Considering the resources available in any asteroid, private industry might be interested in getting involved. One possible mission would be to simply execute the first part of the plan — pushing the asteroid to near-Earth orbit — and then convene a commercial competition inviting anyone who wants to develop the capabilities to reach and mine the object.

Though the undertaking might be scientifically exciting, this wouldn’t be the primary motivation. An asteroid would provide great insight into the solar system’s formation, it’s not enough to justify the expense of bringing one to Earth. Any interesting science can be done much cheaper with an unmanned robotic spacecraft, said chemist Joseph A Nuth from NASA’s Goddard Spaceflight Center.

“Ultimately, we would be developing this target in order to help move out into the solar system,” Brophy said.

Though they did not reach a consensus on all the details, the group will reconvene in January to hammer out further specifications and potentially get the interest of NASA.

In the end, many agreed that bringing an asteroid back to Earth could create an interesting destination for repeated manned missions and that the undertaking would help build up experience for future jaunts into space.

Image: NASA/Denise Watt

From Wired @ http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/10/asteroid-moving/



How asteroid mining could turn billionaires into trillionaires (+video)

 

http://img.ibtimes.com/www/data/images/full/2012/04/25/266968.jpg


A cadre of Silicon Valley tycoons have announced plans to extract water and precious metals from near-Earth asteroids. Could that actually work?

By Irene KlotzReuters / April 25, 2012



·        
This computer-generated image provided by Planetary Resources, a group of high-tech tycoons that wants to mine nearby asteroids, shows a conceptual rendering of satellites prospecting a water-rich, near-Earth asteroid.
Planetary Resources/AP


Google Inc executives Larry Page and Eric Schmidt and filmmaker James Cameron are among those bankrolling a venture to survey and eventually extract precious metals and rare minerals from asteroids that orbit near Earth, the company said.
 
Planetary Resources, based in Bellevue, Washington, initially will focus on developing and selling extremely low-cost robotic spacecraft for surveying missions.
A demonstration mission in orbit around Earth is expected to be launched within two years, said company co-founders Peter Diamandis and Eric Anderson.

Planetary Resources' aim is to open deep-space exploration to private industry, much like the $10 million Ansari X Prize competition, which Diamandis created.

The prize, which galvanized the emerging commercial human spaceflight industry, was awarded in 2004 to Scaled Composites' SpaceShipOne for the first flights beyond Earth's atmosphere by a privately developed, manned spaceship. Commercial suborbital spaceflights are expected to begin next year.

Planetary Resources' first customers are likely to be science agencies, such as NASA, as well as private research institutes.

Within five to 10 years, however, the company expects to progress from selling observation platforms in orbit around Earth to prospecting services. It plans to tap some of the thousands of asteroids that pass relatively close to Earth and extract their raw materials.

Not all missions would return precious metals and minerals to Earth. In addition to mining for platinum and other precious metals, the company plans to tap asteroids' water to supply orbiting fuel depots, which could be used by NASA and others for robotic and human space missions.

"We have a long view. We're not expecting this company to be an overnight financial home run. This is going to take time," Anderson said in an interview with Reuters.

The real payoff, which is decades away, will come from mining asteroids for platinum group metals and rare minerals.

"If you look back historically at what has caused humanity to make its largest investments in exploration and in transportation, it has been going after resources, whether it's the Europeans going after the spice routes or the American settlers looking toward the west for gold, oil, timber or land," Diamandis said.

"Those precious resources caused people to make huge investments in ships and railroads and pipelines. Looking to space, everything we hold of value on Earth - metals, minerals, energy, real estate, water - is in near-infinite quantities in space. The opportunity exists to create a company whose mission is to be able to go and basically identify and access some of those resources and ultimately figure out how to make them available where they are needed," he said.

Diamandis and Anderson declined to discuss how much money has been raised for their venture so far. In addition to Google billionaires Page and Schmidt and filmmaker Cameron, Planetary Resources investors include former Microsoft chief software architect Charles Simonyi, a two-time visitor to the International Space Station, Google founding director K. Ram Shriram and Ross Perot Jr.

Planetary Resources also declined to discuss specifics about how and when asteroid mining would begin. A 30-meter long (98-foot) asteroid can hold as much as $25 billion to $50 billion worth of platinum at today's prices, Diamandis said.

The company's first step is to develop technologies to cut the cost of deep-space robotic probes to one-tenth to one-hundredth the cost of current space missions, which run hundreds of millions of dollars, Diamandis said.

Among the targeted technologies is optical laser communications, which would eliminate the need for large radio antennas aboard spacecraft.

"We're taking new approaches at design," Diamandis said. "Part of the philosophy we're taking is building very low cost, very small spacecraft. You put up six or 10 or dozens and you get reliability."

Planetary Resources, which currently employs about 20 people, is overseen by former NASA Mars mission manager Chris Lewicki. It was founded about three years ago, but has been operating quietly behind the scenes until now.







 

 

Details around Asteroid Retrieval plans and what is in the Near Earth Asteroids

 

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/59831000/jpg/_59831437_s78_27139-1.jpg


Asteroid Return Feasibility Study (2010, 29 page presentation)

 


Self Imposed Rules

1. Launch by the end of this decade
2. Require only a single Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV)
3. Total round-­
trip flight time of ~5 years
4. Select an asteroid that has an unrestricted Earth return Planetary Protection categorization
5. Return asteroid to the ISS

Use 40 kilowatt Solar Electric Propulsion system (launch mass of 13.7 tons)
Return a 10 ton asteroid to low earth orbit
But if return to high earth orbit can return 50 times more. 508 tons.


• About 1000 one-kilometer-sized NEAs
• About 400,000 100-meter sized NEAs
• Periods generally 0.9 to 7 years
• Orbital inclinations generally 10-20o
• Eccentricities 0 to 0.9; mostly near 0.5
• About 30% will eventually hit Earth
• About 20% are easier to land on than the Moon



https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_kxl-RER4ubDs3XXNFNTLkG4fOc8NhR6upVgdr-cDIjj06cncWLsxahryNlvt0tS-LmV8JOpHx-bVDq4tBUBacaFm2HyDtN3qcDDcnyRWJI99sXFRC6h-3RzWNGWgrNnoVjiY3SLqRw8I/s1600/Peragus_Mining_Facility.jpg

Easy Access from low earth orbit

• Perihelion (or aphelion) close to 1 AU
• Small eccentricity
• Low inclination

These factors combined allow low outbound
ΔVs (from LEO to soft landing)

Easy Return to low earth orbit

• Perihelion (aphelion) close to 1 AU
• Small cross-range distance between orbits
• Favorable orbital phasing (different every time)
• Use of aerocapture at Earth

These factors allow low inbound
ΔVs (from asteroid surface to LEO).

Many NEAs have
ΔVin < 500 m s-1 (some as low as 60 m s-1, compared to 3000 m s-1 for Moon) Abundance of Useful Materials


http://www6.pcmag.com/media/images/342514-asteroid-mining.jpg?thumb=y
What are the most useful materials?


– Water (ice, -OH silicates, hydrated salts) for
• Propellants
• Life support
– Native ferrous metals (Fe, Ni) for structures
– Bulk regolith for radiation shielding
– Platinum-group metals (PGMs) for Earth
– Semiconductor nonmetals (Si, Ga, Ge, As,…) for Earth or Solar Power Satellites

Comparative abundances

– Water
• C, D, P chondrites have 1 to >20% H2O; extinct NEO comet cores may be 60% water ice
• Mature regolith SW hydrogen reaches maximum of about 100 ppm in ilmenite-rich mare basins (water equivalent 0.1% assuming perfect recovery)

– Metals
• To 99% in M asteroids; 5-30% in chondrites
• Lunar regolith contains 0.1 to 0.5 % asteroidal metals


Simple Processing Schemes

“Simple and Efficient” means:
– Low energy consumption per kg of product
– Processes require little or no consumables
– Few mechanical parts
– Modular design for ease of repair
– Highly autonomous operation
– On-board AI/expert systems for process control
– Self-diagnosis and self-repair capabilities
– Maximal use of low-grade (solar thermal) energy
– Regenerative heat capture wherever possible

Examples of Processing Schemes

• Ice extraction by melting and sublimation of native ice using solar or nuclear power
• Water extraction from –OH silicates or hydrated salts by solar or nuclear heating
• Electrolysis of water and liquefaction of H/O
• Ferrous metal volatilization, separation, purification, and deposition by the gaseous Mond process
– Feo(s) +5CO < -- > Fe(CO)5(g)
– Nio(s) + 4CO < -- > Ni(CO)4(g)


Magnitude of what is in Near Earth Asteroids


• Total NEA mass about 4x10^18 g
• About 1x1018 g ferrous metals
• About 1x1018 g water
• Earth-surface market value of NEA metals
– Fe iron $300/Mg x 10^12 Mg = $300 T
– Ni $28000/Mg x 7x10^10 Mg = $2000 T
– Co $33000/Mg x 1.5x10^10 Mg = $500 T
– PGMs $40/g x 5 x 10^7 Mg = $2000 T




Highly useful material for use in space


• Structural metals for SPS, bases, etc.
– High-purity iron from Mond process
• 99.9999% Fe: strength and corrosion resistance of stainless steel
– High-precision chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of Ni in molds
• Custom CVD of Fe/Ni alloys
• Bulk radiation shielding
– Regolith, metals, water (best)

• LEO
– Propellants for GTO/GEO/HEEO/Moon/Mars
– Radiation shielding

• GEO
– Structural metals for Solar Power Satellites
– Station-keeping propellants
– Photovoltaics for SPS

• Direct use of water as propellant
– Solar Thermal Propulsion-- STP (“Steam rocket”)
– Nuclear Thermal Propulsion– NTP
• Electrolysis of water to H/O
– H2 STP
– H2 NTP
– H2/O2 chemical propulsion

One Asteroid Amun has over 30 times all the metal mined in human history

• 3554 Amun: smallest known M-type NEA
• Amun is 2000 meter in diameter
• Contains about 30x the total amount of metals mined over human history
• Contains 3x10^16 g of iron
• Contains over 10^12 g of PGMs with Earth surface market value of about $70 Trillion



Near Earth Asteroids as traveling hotels


• Typical NEAs have perihelia near Earth and aphelia in the heart of the asteroid belt
• NEA regolith provides radiation shielding
• Asteroid materials provide propellants
• Earth-Mars transfer orbits possible
• Traveling hotels/gas stations/factories… colonies?

• Typical NEAs have perihelia near Earth
and aphelia in the heart of the asteroid belt
• NEA regolith provides radiation shielding
• Asteroid materials provide propellants
• Earth-Mars transfer orbits possible
• Traveling hotels/gas stations/factories…
colonies?




From Next Big Future @ http://nextbigfuture.com/2012/04/details-around-asteroid-retrieval-plans.html
  






video @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fYYPN0BdBw


Help This Unique Site Survive
Donate any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati eBook!
Just click in the jar - 









For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the search box @  New Illuminati or click on any label/tag at the bottom of the pagehttp://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com


And see




 New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati

New Illuminati Youtube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/feed



The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com






This material is published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…


From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

Tuesday, 12 April 2011

Astrophysicist: Giant Spaceships are Orbiting Mars

Astrophysicist: Giant Spaceships are Orbiting Mars
Phobos is a spaceship, says famous scientist


Astrophysicist Dr. Iosif Samuilovich Shklovsky calculated the orbital motion of Martian satellite Phobos and came to the jaw-dropping conclusion that the moon is artificial, hollow, and basically a titanic spaceship. The scientist is world renowned for penning the classic science book, "Intelligent Life in the Universe" with famous Cornell University professor, the late Carl Sagan of PBS and Voyager space probe fame…

Dr. Iosif Samuilovich Shklovsky

Fear and Horror

Mars' two moons, Phobos and Deimos, translate
into "fear" and "horror." As Mars is named after the god of war, the names seem appropriate. Both satellites were discovered in 1877 by U.S. astronomer Asaph Hall who never guessed they were artificial.

Both moons are extremely odd, especially the tumbling moon of fear: Phobos. Shklovsky puzzled over them.


Phobos and Deimos.

Deeply troubling facts

Two facts deeply troubled Shklovsky.

First, both moons are too small. No other planet in the solar system has moons as tiny as the Martian moons. They're unique.

Second, their origin bothered him. Were they captured asteroids as others assumed? No, they could not be! Their orbital plane was all wrong. And they're too close to Mars. Much too close. Even more amazing--Phobos changes its speed from time to time.

Impossible, yet true!

Phobos is shaped like interstellar spaceship

Russian astronomer Dr. Cherman Struve spent months calculating the Martian moons' orbits with extreme accuracy early in the 20th Century. Yet, Shklovsky astutely noted, as the years progressed into decades the mystery moon's orbital velocity and position no longer matched its mathematically predicted position.

After lengthy study of the tidal, gravitic, and magnetic forces, Shklovsky came to the inescapable conclusion that no natural causes could account for the origins of the two odd moons or their bizarre behavior, particularly that exhibited by Phobos.

The orbit of that fantastic moon was so peculiar, so bizarre, that Phobos had to be a gigantic spaceship.

Every other possible cause was carefully considered and resignedly rejected. Either alternate explanations had no supporting proof or the math was wildly off.

So, Phobos had to be accelerating as it lost altitude, yet could the outer fringes of the thin Martian atmosphere be affecting it? Was the atmosphere actually causing a braking action like the deteriorating orbit of a slowing Earth satellite?


A hollowed out Martian moon

Phobos is a hollow, empty tin can

During an interview about the peculiarities surrounding Phobos, Shklovsky said, "In order to make this braking action so significant, and taking into account the extremely rarefied Martian atmosphere at this altitude, Phobos should have very small mass, that is, very low average density, approximately one thousand times smaller than the density of water."

A density that low, less than an Earth cloud, would have dispersed Phobos eons ago. That could not be the solution.
  
"But can a continuous solid have such low density, probably smaller than that of air?  Of course not!  There's only one way in which the requirements of coherence, constancy of shape of Phobos, and its extremely small average density can be reconciled. We must assume that Phobos is a hollow, empty body, resembling an empty tin can."

A tin can indeed! Like a spaceship is a tin can in the cosmos. For all intents and purposes, the Apollo Lunar Excursion Module was a tin can exceedingly smaller than Phobos, of course.


Computer modeling of weird 'moons'
  
"Well, can a natural celestial body be hollow?  Never!  Therefore, Phobos must have an artificial origin and be an artificial Martian satellite.  The peculiar properties of Deimos, though less pronounced than those of Phobos, also point toward an artificial origin."

Alien spaceships the size of small moons orbiting Mars? That makes the so-called "Face on Mars" look ridiculously feeble by comparison!





  Strange monolith on surface of Phobos

Yet, no less than the United States Naval Observatory weighed in on the Russian astrophysicist's amazing revelation, stating: Dr. Shklovsky quite correctly calculated that if the acceleration of Phobos is true, the Martian moon must be hollow, since it cannot have the weight of a natural body and behave in the prescribed manner.

Thus, even that august American institution conceded that mysterious alien ships might be orbiting Mars.. .the objects' strange origins and ultimate purposes completely unknown.

Speculations over what the giant artificial spaceships might be have ranged from massive Martian space observatories, to half-completed generational interstellar spaceships, or even gargantuan planet-killing space bombs left over from an interplanetary war waged millions of years ago.

If they are world-destroying bombs, hopefully they're duds...


Iosif Shklovsky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Iosif Samuilovich Shklovsky (Ио́сиф Самуи́лович Шкло́вский; sometimes transliterated Josif, Josif, Shklovskii, Shklovskij) (Hlukhiv, Russian Empire, July 1, 1916 – Moscow, March 3, 1985) was a Soviet astronomer and astrophysicist. He is remembered for work in theoretical astrophysics and other topics.
He won the Lenin Prize in 1960 and the Bruce Medal in 1972. Asteroid 2849 Shklovskij is named in his honor. He was a Corresponding Member of Soviet Academy of Sciences beginning in 1966.

 

Biography


Shklovsky was born in Hlukhiv, a city in the Ukrainian part of the Russian Empire. After graduating from the seven-year secondary school, he worked as a foreman on building Baikal Amur Mainline. In 1933 Shklovsky entered the Physico-Mathematical Faculty of the Moscow State University.
There he studied until 1938, when he took a Postgraduate Course at the Astrophysics Department of the Sternberg State Astronomical Institute and remained working in the Institute until the end of his life.
He specialized in theoretical astrophysics and radio astronomy, as well as the Sun's corona, supernovae, and cosmic rays and their origins. He showed, in 1946, that the radio-wave radiation from the Sun emanates from the ionized layers of its corona, and he developed a mathematical method for discriminating between thermal and nonthermal radio waves in the Milky Way. He is noted especially for his suggestion that the radiation from the Crab Nebula is due to synchrotron radiation, in which unusually energetic electrons twist through magnetic fields at speeds close to that of light. Shklovsky proposed that cosmic rays from supernova explosions within 300 light years of the sun could have been responsible for some of the mass extinctions of life on earth.
In 1959 Shklovsky examined the orbital motion of Mars's inner satellite Phobos. He concluded that its orbit was decaying, and noted that if this decay was attributed to friction with the Martian atmosphere, then the satellite must have an exceptionally low density. In this context he voiced a suggestion that Phobos might be hollow, and possibly of artificial origin. This interpretation has since been refuted by more detailed study, but the apparent suggestion of extraterrestrial involvement caught the public imagination, though there is some disagreement as to how seriously Shklovsky intended the idea to be taken. However, Shklovsky and Carl Sagan[1] argued for serious consideration of "paleocontact" with extraterrestrials in the early historical era, and for examination of myths and religious lore for evidence of such contact.
In 1967, before the discovery of pulsars, Shklovsky examined the X-ray and optical observations of Scorpius X-1 and correctly concluded that the radiation comes from an accreting neutron star.[2]
His memoir, Five Billion Vodka Bottles to the Moon: Tales of a Soviet Scientist, was published posthumously in 1991 by W.W. Norton & Co.

 

Bibliography


  • I.S. Shklovsky: Cosmic Radio Waves, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1960
  • I.S. Shklovsky: Вселенная, жизнь, разум (English: Universe, Life, Intelligence), Moscow, USSR Academy of Sciences Publisher, 1962
    • Revised and extended English translation of this book, coauthored with Carl Sagan, was first published in 1966, under the name Intelligent Life in the Universe, one of the latest reissues was published in 1998 by Emerson-Adams Press (ISBN 1-892803-02-X)
  • I.S. Shklovsky: Physics of the Solar Corona, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1965
  • I.S. Shklovskii, Supernovae, New York: Wiley, 1968
  • I.S. Shklovsky: Stars: Their Birth, Life, Death,San Francisco, 1978, ISBN 0-7167-0024-7
  • I.S. Shklovsky: Five Billion Vodka Bottles to the Moon: Tales of a Soviet Scientist, W.W. Norton & Company, 1991.

References

1.                        ^ Shklovski, I.S and Carl Sagan. Intelligent Life in the Universe. San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1966.
2.                        ^ Shklovsky, I.S. (April 1967), "On the Nature of the Source of X-Ray Emission of SCO XR-1", Astrophys. J. 148 (1): L1–L4, doi:10.1086/180001




For further enlightenment enter a word or phrase into the search box @  New Illuminati:

or http://newilluminati.blog-city.com  (this one only works with Firefox)

And see

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com




This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright (unless an individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

Sunday, 26 June 2005

Moon Mine: Owning Space

Moon Mine: Owning Space

http://www.cosmographica.com/gallery/portfolio2007/content/bin/images/large/106_Asteroid_Mining.jpg

Until elemental construction methods are introduced, mining outside the ecosphere is certainly preferable to damaging the Earth. It’s technically simple and economically more than competitive.

 

Overt terrestrial technology has been capable of mining Luna since the 1970s, using magnetic accelerators to overcome the Moon's relatively weaker gravitational field and loft materials that are easily available on or near the surface into orbit, where processing takes place. Low gravity metallurgy makes many unexpected things possible as well.

 

All this is required for establishing any real foothold in space with any real economy. The products available would be useful not only in space, however, and can be literally dropped – carefully – from Earth orbit to splash down in a predetermined area. Once up and running the efficiencies would virtually close down many Earthly mines, rendering them unnecessary.

 

Naturally, this could be very dangerous if left in the hands of individuals, individual governments or even purely mechanical systems, particularly considering the unevolved series of multifarious political systems on Earth.


Mining asteroids is only slightly more difficult; a captured body such as Phobos or Deimos (the recently arrived and all-too-temporary moonlets of Ares/Mars) would be simple to mine and would result in an engineered habitat, if the work was carefully planned.

Dinosaur killers could be diverted and put to good use in a best-case scenario.

All pollution from mining - and ultimately from heavy industrial manufacturing as well - can be moved entirely out of Earth's biosphere.

Of course, there are some who might object... But mining the moon and asteroids is a viable way of saving planet Earth's ecosystem/s – and of allowing those who want to leave this paradise planet to do so.

The first thing that's required to make this viable is an end to war and the 'economy' which drives it; otherwise the same magnetic acceleration technology which can fling material economically into Earth orbit from Luna will be used to bombard the globe and human terror will expand to fill the place of peaceable exploration.

            Now that the US has announced its intention to be the sole power of significance in space it’s timely to consider the OTHER uses of ‘defence’ technology - like orbital lasers, particle beams and nuke platforms orbiting the globe; offensive weapons that can terrorise the entire world, burning armies or cities from above, that are certainly already in orbit.

Note that the three quarters of all space shuttle missions were actually carrying secret military payloads all the years they were in operation.  Less than one quarter of the shuttle missions is required to complete the entire International Space Station.

 Remember who profits from all of this? Remember 9/11? It was a terrible catastrophe, though small to the point of insignificance compared with what's happened to the US since.

I'm not surprised that innocent readers cannot believe that a modern western 'government' would be responsible for this; if the education system really taught history then fewer would forget its lessons.

The terms 'plausible deniability', 'collateral damage', credible threat' and 'treating us like mushrooms' have all evolved for very good reasons. Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. What, after all, can you make of the likes of Cheney, Rumsfeld and Bush? Are you aware of their histories?

And, of course, the 'media' leads the public down carefully chosen garden paths. Ever hear of Citizen Kane? This is all BUSINESS as usual - trade is war by other means to these all too human Mammon worshipers. Money is an illusion - a very dangerous one which appeals to the insecure every bit as much as the word ‘mummy’.

Let’s live in space in better ways and for better reasons.

http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/08/moon_mining.jpg


-         R. Ayana







For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the search box @  New Illuminati or click on any label/tag at the bottom of the pagehttp://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

And see

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com





This material is published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com