Corporations Masquerading as
Government (Part II)
Which
“Government” Can We Trust?
By Scott Bartle
It appears that Corporations are masquerading as government in countries around
the world – for profit and not for the purpose of governance. We know the role
of true government is to act as trustees for the people… to provide services to
the community, to represent its interests. But do those claiming government
status today truly act as our trustees? Does real government still exist? What the FUQ is
going on in government today????
Let’s go right back to the beginning… before there was
Government.
Natural Trust
When each of us is born, our parents take on the role of Executor of a
trust. They appoint Trustees like nannies, school teachers, dentists etc.
to return benefits to you as the Beneficiary. Your parents may make the
determinations about your care, but they do so on your behalf until we reach
maturity.
When we become of age (whatever age that is) we take on
the role of Executor, and continue to appoint Trustees to return benefits
to us as Beneficiaries. This is a global human phenomenon; even the most
isolated tribes in the deepest jungles appear to behave in the same way.
Let’s call this a Natural Trust.
How Does This Relate To Government?
In the same way we appoint nannies and dentists, we also appoint
Government as a Trustee. They perform an administrative service and return
benefits to us as Beneficiaries. We enjoy the benefits of roads, schools,
public health services etc… or at least that’s how it should work. Most
people, I believe, would be comfortable appointing Government as a Trustee
– provided Government functions according to this Natural Trust, and more
importantly that Government actually serves the people.
But what if somewhere, something went wrong?
What if the Government, appointed as Trustee, started serving
another master? What if the actions of Government were benefiting others – like shareholders? Would you trust them enough to appoint them
your Trustee?
Inconsistencies in the Representation of “Government”
Let’s first look to the United States. The original
Constitution reads “The Constitution for the United States”. As of 1871, a
Constitution was substituted and reads “The CONSTITUTION of the UNITED
STATES of AMERICA”.
So which is it? Which one is legitimate? How many
constitutions are there?
A similar scenario appears to be taking place in
Australia. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) tells
us that Government is named “Government of the Commonwealth”.… yet
occupying the country’s capital is the “Australian Government”.
Further inconsistency manifests in the name of the
Parliament holding office in Australia. The Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act 1900 (UK) defines Parliament as ”The Parliament” or “The
Parliament of the Commonwealth”. This is in direct contrast to the entity
called “Parliament of Australia” which is
currently occupying the country’s capital.
Surely the Constitutions in both America and Australia
aren’t so weak that legal entity names can so easily be substituted? It
doesn’t take a constitutional lawyer to tell you there are strict
rules for altering constitutions; that’s why we have referenda. But
does anyone remember the referenda that enabled these changes to be made?
And is it just the name that’s different..?
Frequently Unanswered Questions.
When such questions are put to “Government”, answers are scarce –
if not completely absent. In a recent
case study involving the importation of a 1959 Chevrolet Corvette
into Australia, “Australian Customs & Border Protection Service” were
challenged to provide evidence they were in fact a legitimate Department
of the de jure Government of the Commonwealth of Australia. After twelve
months of questioning at all levels of Government, no answers have been
forthcoming. ”Ministers”, “Judges”, “Commissioners”, “Departments”,
“Governors”, and even the Prime Minister - all remain silent.
So who are they? Are they really Government? So far,
no “Government” official has been willing to attempt an explanation; to
demonstrate their legitimacy as representatives of true government.
But is a government’s refusal to provide evidence of its
legitimacy really good enough? Is that what you expect of
a Government that is supposed to act as your trustee? What happened
to accountability in
Government? Should 12 months without answers be taken AS the answer…??
Accountability in Government… in the Words of JFK
So what happened to accountability in government? Surely questions
related to the lawful validity of Government are not simply vexatious?
Rather, isn’t a “Government” official who declines scrutiny into the lawful
validity of their office claiming to be above the law?
In 1961 US President John F Kennedy made a speech to the American
Newspaper Publishers Association that everyone in Government – and
those who believe Government do not have to answer to the people
- should listen to.
He stated: “Government at all levels must meet its
obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information, outside
the narrowest limits of national security…. We intend to accept full
responsibility for our errors, and we expect you to point them out when we
miss them” said Kennedy. Those are powerful words.
So if this is the case, does real government simply
shut up when its validity is challenged? Or does it attempt to address the
concerns of those it is supposed to serve, especially as public pressure
to do so continues to mount? And if they don’t serve us…. who ARE they
serving?? What would happen if the “Government” started to act as the Executor
of a trust – dictating rules, codes and statutes to you? What happens
if “Government” started demanding that benefits be returned to them..?
How could this happen..?
Corporate “Government” Trust
Let’s consider for a minute the scenario of a Corporate Government
Trust, in which the “government” plays the role of Executor. Would a
“government” acting as Executor take questions from it’s Trustee? Would
the “Government” create a legal entity to which you act as Trustee? Perhaps
upon the registration of your birth? Do governments address you … or a LEGAL
ENTITY? More importantly, does the silence of government on these questions provide
the “fullest possible information” that President Kennedy spoke about??
What can we do about this..?
The first action appears to be to determine the capacity in which
“Government” acts. Who are they actually serving..? This question is
critical. But I don’t expect this information to be any more forthcoming of
government than the answer of their legitimacy. So in the meantime, there are
other things we can do in our interactions with Corporate Government.
- Some offer to accept the role of Trustee to their Corporate Government on the condition that they be paid an annual fee to be the Trustee… say $1,000,000 p.a.
- Others provide terms and conditions to their Corporate Government, which set out fees and charges applicable for acts of the pretence to real government.
Either of these two approaches would collapse if those
claiming government status were able to demonstrate their legitimacy. But
these actions have been shown to stop Corporate Government agencies in their
tracks. Does this sound like the actions of a Trustee of the people? Or an
Executor and Beneficiary of a corrupted system?
More importantly, how many challenges to the lawful
validity of government have been met with the proof demanded by its
people?
So what the FUQ do we do next?
- In dealings with any government representative, ask them ONE SIMPLE QUESTION: Can you please demonstrate that today’s government (the one you represent) is the same one as established at the inception of this country? It is the onus of any person or entity claiming government status to prove they act on behalf of legitimate government. Until they can demonstrate this, don’t deal with them.
- Sign the petition to ask Her Majesty, The Queen for the truth about the “Australian Government”; something all levels of the “Australian Government” have been unwilling or unable to provide.
- Share this article. The Corporate Government phenomenon is not limited just to the United States, the UK, or Australia. Increasingly, Governments around the world are behaving as Executors and Beneficiaries, not as Trustees of their people. We all have a right to know… which “Government” can we trust?
About the Author:
Scott spent 12 years working aboard luxury mega yachts for
some of the richest and fussiest people on the planet. His travels took him
throughout the Mediterranean, Caribbean with voyages through the Indian and
Pacific Oceans and islands. Encountering Customs and Immigration formalities
was commonplace as Captain. More recently Scott has worked in mining
relying on his degree in project management.
With a keen eye for detail Scott has observed inconsistencies in
“Government” and contributes this article from his findings.
Visit Scott’s website for more information - truth-now.net
From Wake Up World @ http://wakeup-world.com/2012/12/17/corporations-masquerading-as-government-part-ii-which-government-can-we-trust/
For more information about the unreality of modern laws see http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/common%20law
- See ‘Older Posts’ at the end of each section
You Can Help This Unique Independent
Site Survive
Donate any amount and receive at least one New Illuminati
eBook!
Just click in the jar -
Video @ http://youtu.be/lVsMUpPgdT0
For further
enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the random synchronistic search
box @ http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
And see
New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
New Illuminati on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/the.new.illuminati
New Illuminati Youtube
Channel - http://www.youtube.com/user/newilluminati/feed
The Her(m)etic Hermit -
http://hermetic.blog.com
The Prince of Centraxis - http://centraxis.blogspot.com
(Be Aware! This link leads
to implicate & xplicit concepts & images!)
This
site is published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an
individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work
& author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original
along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or
software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay
glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please
send a small but heartfelt donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading
this far…
Live
long and prosper!
From the
New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Add your perspective to the conscious collective