new illuminati: 9/11: The New Kennedy Assassination

9/11: The New Kennedy Assassination

We hate to fan the fires of either conspiracists or those so-called skeptics who close their eyes and minds to the evidence before them. Nonetheless, major aspects of the world we’re experiencing need detailed examination.

Those who recall the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (and that of his brother Robert) will begin to understand that the truth behind the events of September 2001 will make no difference to the records of conventional 'history'. No matter what happened on the eleventh of September, the real culprits will almost certainly remain at large to pursue the ‘grand game’ of power over the life and death of their subject populations.

There is now no such thing as ‘proof’ of anything in the world; only evidence and the human ability to discern the truth can combine to provide clearer pictures of reality. That said, the ‘official’ version of events in the eastern United States on that date is a crock of excrement, as is obvious to anyone who has scrutinized it.

This report is by an explosives expert and is worth reading in full, as are the reports of explosive experts who anaylsed the first World Trade Tower bombing and the destruction of the Alfred P. Murrah building in the wake of the Waco tragedy, which culminated in a fire patently started by the ‘authorities’. But how many remember the details of Waco any more? How many (like me) remember seeing the first uncensored TV reports showing a government agency tank with a stopped-up gun push holes in the walls of the Waco compound and fire a flame thrower into the building?

- R.A.

Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?

By Steven E. Jones Department of Physics and Astronomy Brigham Young University Provo, UT 84602

ABSTRACT

In this paper, I call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges. I consider the official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11 Commission reports that fires plus impact damage alone caused complete collapses of all three buildings. And I present evidence for the controlled-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested by the available data, testable and falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded by the US government.

Introduction

We start with the fact that large quantities of molten metal were observed in basement areas under rubble piles of all three buildings: the Twin Towers and WTC7. A video clip provides eye-witness evidence regarding this metal at ground zero: http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/red_hot_ground_zero_low_quality.wmv . The photograph below by Frank Silecchia shows a chunk of the hot metal being removed from the North Tower rubble about eight weeks after 9-11. Notice the color of the lower portion of the extracted metal -- this tells us much about the temperature of the metal and provides important clues regarding its composition, as we shall see.

Next, as a basis for discussion, I invite you to consider the collapse of the 47-story WTC 7, which was never hit by a jet. Here is the building prior to and on September 11, 2001:

WTC 7: 47 - Story, steel-frame building.

WTC 7 on afternoon of 9-11-01. WTC 7 is the tall

sky-scraper in the background, right. Seen from WTC plaza area.

WTC 7 collapsed completely, onto its own footprint

Now that you have seen the still photographs, it is important to the discussion which follows for you to observe video clips of the collapse of this building, so go to:

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html Click on the three photos at the top of this web-site page in order to see the videos of the collapse of WTC 7. It helps to have sound.

Then consider a video close-up of the same building, SW corner, as this corner begins its steady drop to the ground:

http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/Flashes/squibs_along_southwest_corner.htm

What did you observe?

Symmetry: did the building collapse straight down (nearly symmetrically) – or did it topple over?

Speed: How fast did the southwest corner of the roof fall? (Students and I measure [6.5 +- 0.2] seconds; time it!)

Smoke/debris-jets: Did you observe puffs of smoke/debris coming out of the building? Please note for yourself the sequence and fast timing of observed puffs or “squibs.” Note that reference to web pages is used in this paper due largely to the importance of viewing motion picture clips, thus enhancing consideration of the laws of motion and physics generally. High-quality photographs showing details of the collapses of WTC 7 and the WTC Towers can be found in books (Hufschmid, 2002; Paul and Hoffman, 2004), magazines (Hoffman, 2005; Baker, 2005) and at http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/collapses.html .

On the basis of photographic and video evidence as well as related data and analyses, I provide thirteen reasons for rejecting the official hypothesis, according to which fire and impact damage caused the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC 7, in favor of the controlled-demolition hypothesis. The goal is to promote further scrutiny of the official government-sponsored reports as well as serious investigation of the controlled-demolition hypothesis. (No rebuttal of my argument can be complete, of course, unless it addresses all of these points.)…

SEE THE FULL ARTICLE @ http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

For further enlightening information enter a word or phrase into the search box @ New Illuminati or click on any label/tag at the bottom of the page @ http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

And see

The Her(m)etic Hermit - http://hermetic.blog.com

New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

New Illuminati on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-Illuminati/320674219559

The Prince of Centraxis – http://centraxis.blogspot.com

This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright (unless an individual item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work & author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original along with this notice. Feel free to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like what you see, please send a tiny donation or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

From the New Illuminati – http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com

new illuminati

Sunday, 2 April 2006

9/11: The New Kennedy Assassination

1 comment: